Universitätspublikationen
Refine
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- Thomism (2) (remove)
Matías De Paz and the introduction of thomism in the Asuntos De Indias: a conceptual revolution
(2018)
Most of the writings dedicated to assessing the contribution of the Spanish Second Scholasticism to the controversial issue of infidels’ dominion began their analyses with the well-known Francisco de Vitoria’s Relectiones (1532). This article offers a reconstruction of the history of the theological and juridical debates on this key issue on the Iberian Peninsula since the late 13th century. Special attention is paid to friar Matías de Paz, who was asked to offer his advice on the early patterns of rule and domination imposed on the Native Americans at the Junta de Burgos (1512), introduced to the discussions about asuntos de Indias the Thomist conceptual framework later employed by Vitoria, Soto, Suárez and many other prominent members of the so-called School of Salamanca. The article shows that it was, in fact, De Paz who first considered the Amerindians infidels affected by an "invincible ignorance", and he tried to curb some of the many abuses committed against them by applying the distinctions between different types of dominium and principatus.
Francisco Suárez (1548-1617) and Rodrigo Arriaga (1592-1667) on the state of innocence and community
(2014)
Recent scholarship on late-scholastic thought has stressed a Jesuit discontinuity from Thomism. While Aquinas’ Aristotelian thesis located the political sphere in the state of innocence, Jesuit thought on community formation is said to have referred to ‘fallen’ and ‘pure’ nature. In this piece, I trace one particular narrative: In the hypothetical, lasting state of innocence (if original sin had not occurred), Aquinas identified the political community, but not the institution of the sacraments. Two celebrated Jesuit scholastics, Francisco Suárez and Rodrigo Arriaga, challenged the latter claim and defended the naturalness of spiritual alongside temporal power. This effectively allowed them to connect ‘nature’ to ‘utility’ and ‘necessity’ without tying their claims to the supernatural teleology. To them, the state of innocence remained relevant for politics, albeit in a way that challenged the Thomist account.