Universitätspublikationen
Refine
Year of publication
- 2015 (1742) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (606)
- Doctoral Thesis (187)
- Working Paper (169)
- Contribution to a Periodical (164)
- Book (159)
- Report (157)
- Part of Periodical (124)
- Review (70)
- Preprint (55)
- Conference Proceeding (22)
- Part of a Book (6)
- Master's Thesis (5)
- Periodical (5)
- Bachelor Thesis (4)
- Magister's Thesis (4)
- magisterthesis (4)
- Habilitation (1)
Language
- English (866)
- German (835)
- Spanish (14)
- Italian (11)
- Portuguese (11)
- French (3)
- Multiple languages (1)
- Russian (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (1742)
Keywords
- Islamischer Staat (34)
- IS (25)
- Terrorismus (23)
- Deutschland (16)
- Dschihadismus (13)
- Syrien (12)
- Terror (11)
- Irak (10)
- Islamismus (10)
- Salafismus (10)
Institute
- Präsidium (336)
- Medizin (252)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (230)
- Physik (185)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (149)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (116)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (115)
- Biowissenschaften (99)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS) (97)
- Informatik (96)
Wissenschaftler und Praktiker diskutierten auf der Jahreskonferenz des Leibniz-Instituts Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung über die Rolle nicht-staatlicher Akteure in der Weltpolitik. Im Fokus stand die Frage, ob die Einbindung von so unterschiedlichen Akteuren wie Rebellengruppen, Unternehmen und NGOs der Gestaltung einer friedlichen Ordnung zu- oder abträglich sei.
In the last few years, Myanmar has undergone a severe and unexpected change. The military-led country has been starting to open up its borders and economy, enhance citizens’ rights and, allegedly, democratize. While the EU and US were quick to celebrate the changes and lift sanctions in return, a number of questions remain: Will the changes be sustainable? Does the opening-up indicate a movement towards democracy? What were the reasons for the military to relinquish some of its power – and has it actually done so in the first place?
Objectives: We aimed to investigate the contemporary usage rate and habits of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) in German urological departments.
Methods: We designed a 26-item questionnaire that was sent to all urological departments in Germany. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the usage rate of the SSC. Secondary aims were to compare perioperative characteristics of users vs. non-users of the SSC and to assess circumstances of the SSC application.
Results: A total of 213 of 234 (91 %) urological departments were users of the SSC, and 21 (9 %) were non-users. SSC users had more often a standard protocol, took less time and had fewer people involved for checking perioperative patient data compared to non-users. Financial budgeting for the SSC existed in 55 (24 %) departments and for patient safety in 73 (32 %) departments.
Conclusions: The usage rate of the SSC in urological departments in Germany is high despite restricted financial budgeting. Users of the SSC profit by saving time and manpower for checking perioperative patient data.