Institute
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2021 (25) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (25)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- nein (25)
Schlagworte
- Klassifikation (2)
- Oqaluttuaq (2)
- Sprache (2)
- Sprachstörung (2)
- Sprechen (2)
- Sprechstörung (2)
- classification (2)
- comics and memory (2)
- cultural memory of Greenland (2)
- forensic aesthetics (2)
Institut
- Neuere Philologien (25)
- Medizin (2)
- Biowissenschaften (1)
Von A bis Å. (Fast) alles über die Frankfurter Skandinavistik. Ausgabe 3 ; Wintersemester 2021
(2021)
Von A bis Å. (Fast) alles über die Frankfurter Skandinavistik. Ausgabe 2 ; Sommersemester 2021
(2021)
This dissertation investigates several aspects of nominal modification in Ògè, an understudied language of Benue-congo spoken in Àkókó Northwest in Nigeria. The study focuses on two areas of nominal modification namely, Nominal Attributive Modifiers (NAMs) and the strategies of number marking.
The discussion and analysis of NAMs in the language reveal that Ògè belongs to the group of languages which lacks adjectives as a lexical category. NAMs are nominal and they
are derived from an existing lexical category namely, verbs. Predicative modifiers and NAMs have forms that are similar to the long and short forms (LF & SF) of adjectives in languages in which adjectives form an open class, for example, Russian, SerBoCroatian (BCS) and German.
Based on the Minimalist program, the dissertation reveals that unlike Russian, BCS, and German in which the discrepancies between the two forms of adjectives are related to definiteness (as in the case of BCS) and Agree, the discrepancies in the two forms of modifiers in Ògè are related to the fact that Ògè lacks adjectives and resorts into the nominalization of stative verbs in order to derive attributive forms. Using the analyses of adjuncts according to Truswell (2004) and Zeijlstra (2020), the dissertation proposes that NAMs are adjuncts in a modification structure while they are heads in possessive and genitive constructions. In addition, I propose that NAMs are attributive-only modifiers which modify the NP rather than
the DP.
The dissertation also investigates the strategies of number marking in Ògè. Unlike languages in which number marking is obligatory in the nominal domain (Hebrew, German, English),
nouns in Ògè are not always marked for number. This means that nouns in Ògè have general number. The general number nature of nouns in Ògè is like that of the nouns in modifying plural marking languages namely, Halkomelem, Korean, Yucatec Maya and Yorùbá. However, I argue that unlike the modifying plural marking languages in which the Number Phrase (NumP) is not projected, NumP is projected in the nominal spine of Ògè, claiming that NumP bears an
interpretable number feature which values the uninterpretable number feature in D. Argument in support of this comes from the interpretation of the noun in the presence of òtúro (an element which translates to the plural definite interpretation of the noun). I analyze òtúro as a plural determiner which occupies the D-head in the syntax of Ògè. The dissertation argues following Alexiadou (2019) that the locus of the occurrence of the marker of plurality in the nominal spine does not depend on its interpretation as a plural morpheme, rather, the locus of the occurrence of the element that is sensitive to the plural interpretation of the noun depends on other parameters which are definiteness, specificity and animacy.
Nature's non-material contributions to people are difficult to quantify and one aspect in particular, nature's contributions to communication (NCC), has so far been neglected. Recent advances in automated language processing tools enable us to quantify diversity patterns underlying the distribution of plant and animal taxon labels in creative literature, which we term BiL (biodiversity in literature). We assume BiL to provide a proxy for people's openness to nature's non-material contributions enhancing our understanding of NCC. We assembled a comprehensive list of 240,000 English biological taxon labels. We pre-processed and searched a subcorpus of digitised literature on Project Gutenberg for these labels. We quantified changes in biodiversity indices commonly used in ecological studies for 16,000 books, encompassing 4,000 authors, as proxies for BiL between 1705 and 1969. We observed hump-shape patterns for taxon label richness, abundance and Shannon diversity indicating a peak of BiL in the middle of the 19th century. This is also true for the ratio of biological to general lexical richness. The variation in label use between different sections within books, quantified as β-diversity, declined until the 1830s and recovered little, indicating a less specialised use of taxon labels over time. This pattern corroborates our hypothesis that before the onset of industrialisation BiL may have increased, reflecting several concomitant influences such as the general broadening of literary content, improved education and possibly an intensified awareness of the starting loss of biodiversity during the period of romanticism. Given that these positive trends continued and that we do not find support for alternative processes reducing BiL, such as language streamlining, we suggest that this pronounced trend reversal and subsequent decline of BiL over more than 100 years may be the consequence of humans’ increasing alienation from nature owing to major societal changes in the wake of industrialisation. We conclude that our computational approach of analysing literary communication using biodiversity indices has a high potential for understanding aspects of non-material contributions of biodiversity to people. Our approach can be applied to other corpora and would benefit from additional metadata on taxa, works and authors.
James Joyce's Ulysses is treated as one of the most influential, paradigmatic texts of high modernism. Novels like Thomas Pynchon’s 1973 Gravity’s Rainbow and David Foster Wallace’s 1996 Infinite Jest, which equally raise claims to being the paradigms of their respective time, are perpetually compared to and measured against Joyce’s epic novel. However, novels like Ulysses, Gravity’s Rainbow and Infinite Jest are usually either grouped together due to their length, complexity and importance, to examine direct allusions in the texts or analyse a rather general “style” or to conversely stress the novels’ singularity and autonomy. I argue that not only can Joyce’s Ulysses, Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow and Wallace’s Infinite Jest be meaningfully put in relation to one another but that their singularity and paradigmatic status in 20th century literature should be understood through the relationality of a Ulyssean Tradition. Novels like Gravity’s Rainbow and Infinite Jest can be fruitfully read in a Ulyssean Tradition. Their singular, paradigmatic aesthetic projects emerge from a reciprocal dialogue with Ulysses in their self-inscription into a Ulyssean Tradition. The intertextual connection of this Ulyssean Tradition is integrally constitutive of the autonomy through which these novels claim the status of singular representations of their respective human condition and thus epic paradigms of a new way of writing the world. By positioning themselves in the literary field alongside Ulysses as the received paradigm of modernism, Wallace in Infinite Jest and Pynchon in Gravity’s Rainbow legitimize their own, independent project and their own claims to paradigmaticness. The Ulyssean Tradition thereby becomes not only a way of writing,a nd this study not merely a study of literary influence, but also a way of reading that can generate new, independent readings through the relationality of a Ulyssean Tradition
This thesis investigates the structure of research articles in the field of Computational Linguistics with the goal of establishing that a set of distinctive linguistic features is associated with each section type. The empirical results of the study are derived from the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of research articles from the ACL Anthology Corpus. More than 20,000 articles were analyzed for the purpose of retrieving the target section types and extracting the predefined set of linguistic features from them. Approximately 1,100 articles were found to contain all of the following five section types: abstract, introduction, related work, discussion, and conclusion. These were chosen for the purpose of comparing the frequency of occurrence of the linguistic features across the section types. Making use of frameworks for Natural Language Processing, the Stanford CoreNLP Module, and the Python library SpaCy, as well as scripts created by the author, the frequency scores of the features were retrieved and analyzed with state-of-the-art statistical techniques.
The results show that each section type possesses an individual profile of linguistic features which are associated with it more or less strongly. These section-feature associations are shown to be derivable from the hypothesized purpose of each section type.
Overall, the findings reported in this thesis provide insights into the writing strategies that authors employ so that the overall goal of the research paper is achieved.
The results of the thesis can find implementation in new state-of-the-art applications that assist academic writing and its evaluation in a way that provides the user with a more sophisticated, empirically based feedback on the relationship between linguistic mechanisms and text type. In addition, the potential of the identification of text-type specific linguistic characteristics (a text-feature mapping) can contribute to the development of more robust language-based models for disinformation detection.
The Greenlandic oral story-telling tradition, Oqaluttuaq, meaning “history,” “legend,” and “narrative,” is recognized as an important entry point into Arctic collective memory. The graphic artist Nuka K. Godtfredsen and his literary and scientific collaborators have used the term as the title of graphic narratives published from 2009 to 2018, and focused on four moments or ‘snippets’ from Greenland’s history (from the periods of Saqqaq, late Dorset, Norse settlement, and European colonization). Adopting a fragmentary and episodic approach to historical narrativization, the texts frame the modern European presence in Greenland as one of multiple migrations to and settlements in the Artic, rather than its central axis. We argue that, in consequence, the Oqaluttuaq narratives not only “provincialize” the tradition of hyperborean colonial memories, but also provide a postcolonial mnemonic construction of Greenland as a place of multiple histories, plural peoples, and heterogenous temporalities. As such, the books also narrativize loss and disappearance—of people, cultures, and environments-as a distinctive melancholic strand in Greenlandic history. Informed by approaches in the field of cultural memory and in the study memorial objects, Marks’ haptic visuality and Keenan and Weizman’s forensic aesthetics, we analyze the graphic narratives of Oqaluttuaq in regard to their aesthetic dimensions, as well as investigate the role of material objects and artifacts, which work as narrative “props” for multiple stories of encounter and survival in the Arctic.
The Greenlandic oral story-telling tradition, Oqaluttuaq, meaning “history,” “legend,” and “narrative,” is recognized as an important entry point into Arctic collective memory. The graphic artist Nuka K. Godtfredsen and his literary and scientific collaborators have used the term as the title of graphic narratives published from 2009 to 2018, and focused on four moments or ‘snippets’ from Greenland’s history (from the periods of Saqqaq, late Dorset, Norse settlement, and European colonization). Adopting a fragmentary and episodic approach to historical narrativization, the texts frame the modern European presence in Greenland as one of multiple migrations to and settlements in the Artic, rather than its central axis. We argue that, in consequence, the Oqaluttuaq narratives not only “provincialize” the tradition of hyperborean colonial memories, but also provide a postcolonial mnemonic construction of Greenland as a place of multiple histories, plural peoples, and heterogenous temporalities. As such, the books also narrativize loss and disappearance—of people, cultures, and environments—as a distinctive melancholic strand in Greenlandic history. Informed by approaches in the field of cultural memory and in the study memorial objects, Marks’ haptic visuality and Keenan and Weizman’s forensic aesthetics, we analyze the graphic narratives of Oqaluttuaq in regard to their aesthetic dimensions, as well as investigate the role of material objects and artifacts, which work as narrative “props” for multiple stories of encounter and survival in the Arctic.
This introductory paper provides an overview of the main phenomena investigated in this Special Issue, such as the relation between the encoding of indefinites and the presence of genitive and definite markers, the relation between partitivity and indefiniteness and the distribution of these phenomena in minority, or “micro”, varieties – such as Italian dialects, Galloromance varieties, North and South Saami – compared to the distribution of the same phenomena in majority, or “macro”, varieties – such as French, Italian, Spanish, Brazilian Portuguese, Estonian, Finnish, Czech and Serbian. The second part of the paper, then, provides an overview of the content of each original paper collected in the special issue.
The standard view of the form-meaning interfaces, as embraced by the great majority of contemporary grammatical frameworks, consists in the assumption that meaning can be associated with grammatical form in a one-to-one correspondence. Under this view, composition is quite straightforward, involving concatenation of form, paired with functional application in meaning. In this book, we discuss linguistic phenomena across several grammatical sub-modules (morphology, syntax, semantics) that apparently pose a problem to the standard view, mapping out the potential for deviation from the ideal of one-to-one correspondences, and develop formal accounts of the range of phenomena. We argue that a constraint-based perspective is particularly apt to accommodate deviations from one-to-many correspondences, as it allows us to impose constraints on full structures (such as a complete word or the interpretation of a full sentence) instead of deriving such structures step by step.
Most of the papers in this volume are formulated in a particular constraint-based grammar framework, Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. The contributions investigate how the lexical and constructional aspects of this theory can be combined to provide an answer to this question across different linguistic sub-theories.
There are two main approaches to change of state verbs. One adopts an approach in terms of a total change (becomeP, for base predicate P), i.e., a change from not being in the extension of the base predicate to being in it. The other adopts an approach in terms of a relative change (becomemore P, for base predicate P), i.e., a change for a theme in which it increases in the extent to which it holds the property denoted by the base predicate. Different languages have been analyzed using one or the other approach. I argue that both proposals are actually appropriate for analyzing related but not (completely) overlapping phenomena in the domain of derived change of state verbs in the very same language. This proposal is based on the discussion of change of state verbs in Southern Aymara that are derived with the suffixes -pta and -ra. I show that verbs with -pta convey the meaning of total change and that verbs with -ra convey the meaning of relative change. I further discuss how expressions with -pta and -ra interact: expressions with -ra implicate that the theme does not change from not being in the extension of the base to being in it. I propose an account in terms of scalar implicatures in which -pta and -ra are lexical alternatives, thus extending the domain of linguistic phenomena for which the computation of scalar implicatures is relevant.
The project investigates how economic paradigm shifts that occur at the beginning of the 1970s (primarily the abandonment of the gold standard and the endlessly increasing pool of capital awaiting investment that succeeded it) led to the emergence of a unique building type: the high-altitude observation deck. Part investment vehicle, part iteration of an ongoing fascination with the view from above, the project presents the observation deck as the point where three distinct paradigms intersect: observation, speculation and spectacle. Tracing the emergence of the observation deck through a series of case studies (Top of the World atop the World Trade Center (NYC), One World Observatory (NYC), The Tulip (London) the project enriches its interdisciplinary approach with archival research and fieldwork. Re-telling the complicated collaboration between architect Warren Platner and graphic designer Milton Glaser at the end of the 1960s, the project lays out how the observation deck is conceived at a time when the perceived “crisis” of New York results in a rapidly accelerating neoliberalization of urban space. An avatar of this emerging ideology the observation deck is heavily invested in making the city visually comprehensible. Incorporating a sort of neoliberalist geometry, the deck transforms the city into a product to be consumed instead of a reality to live in and thus paves the way for other ventures of what has been called the “experience economy.” Thus, it signals the ongoing shift away from an architecture that possesses any use value, towards one that, as Barthes put it with regards to Eiffel Tower, is centered only on viewing and being viewed. A speculative machine, the observation deck renders the city into a product.
Fragestellung und Ziele
Die vorliegende Dissertation untersucht, auf welche Weisen der Roman Lodore von Mary Shelley die Erziehung von Mädchen inhaltlich und stilistisch gestaltet. Daran anknüpfend erforscht die Arbeit, welche Implikationen die Art der Darstellung für die Interpretation des gesamten Romans birgt. Die Analyse der Inszenierung der Mädchenerziehung dient somit als Basis und Fokuspunkt, durch welchen sich die weitere Erforschung der Sprache und Mechanismen des Romans sowie von Shelleys schriftstellerischer Handwerkskunst entwickelt.
Die Zielsetzung ist darauf ausgerichtet, zur Wiederentdeckung von Lodore beizutragen und eine holistische Neubewertung der Autorin Mary Shelley sowie ihres Spätwerks anzuregen. In Abgrenzung zum Gros der wissenschaftlichen Abhandlungen zu Mary Shelleys Spätwerk konzentriert sich die vorliegende Arbeit auf den Text als solchen in seiner Gestalt, seinem Inhalt und seinen Aussagen. Shelleys Biographie und ihre weiteren Veröffentlichungen wie etwa Frankenstein werden derweil bewusst ausgeblendet. Untersucht werden somit ausschließlich der Roman Lodore und das darin manifestierte Handwerk der Autorin, nicht jedoch ihr restliches Werk, ihre Person oder ihr Lebensumfeld.
Methodik
Da Lodore das Thema Mädchenerziehung nicht explizit thematisiert, entwickelt und erprobt die vorliegende Abhandlung eine Methodik, die es ermöglicht, einen Text auf Aspekte hin zu erforschen, welche er nur peripher zu tangieren scheint. Um jene für den Untersuchungsschwerpunkt relevanten Details identifizieren zu können, die in den Text beiläufig, untergründig oder selbstverständlich verwoben sind und die Erziehung von Mädchen charakterisieren, stützt sich die Arbeit auf eine diskursanalytische und kulturwissenschaftliche Betrachtung dessen, was der Begriff „Mädchenerziehung“ im Kontext des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts umfasst.
Fundament dieser Sensibilisierung für die zeitgenössische, historische Perspektive auf die Erziehung von Mädchen sind, erstens, Abhandlungen der historischen Bildungsforschung zu Mädchenerziehung im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert in Europa und speziell in England. Zweitens werden aktuelle, wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen über den historischen Diskurs von Erziehungstheoretikern /-theoretikerinnen über Mädchenerziehung dazu genutzt, ein grundlegendes Verständnis aus moderner Perspektive auf die damaligen Denkmuster und Fragestellungen zu gewinnen. Drittens wird die Sensibilisierung für die zeitgenössischen Überlegungen und Ausdrucksweisen zum Thema Mädchenerziehung abgerundet durch das eigenständige Studium originaler Publikationen von Erziehungstheoretikern /-theoretikerinnen. Feinabgestimmt auf die Problemfelder und die historischen, erziehungsphilosophischen Grundpositionen untersucht die Arbeit in intensivem close reading die Darstellung der Mädchenerziehung und deren resultierenden Einfluss auf das Leben und Verhalten der weiblichen Figuren in Lodore.
Ergebnisse
Die Abhandlung erkennt unter der zunächst konventionell und unanstößig anmutenden Textoberfläche einen systematisch konstruierten, konsistenten Subtext. Die Dissertation charakterisiert die wiederkehrenden Techniken und sprachlichen Muster, mit denen der Subtext implementiert ist. Dadurch macht sie nachvollziehbar, inwiefern die emotionale Reaktion des Lesers auf den Roman im Sinne von Unverständnis, Irritation oder Amüsement nicht zufällig auftritt, sondern durch Mary Shelleys schriftstellerisches Handwerk bewusst provoziert wird.
Im Subtext verborgen identifiziert die Dissertation, erstens, eine Einladung zur kritischen Betrachtung systemkonformer Wertvorstellungen zum Leben von Frauen in der Familie und in der Gesellschaft. Dabei demonstriert die Interpretation, wie der Roman traditionelle und literarische Idealisierungen von „Weiblichkeit“ entzaubert, während er gleichzeitig alternative, geschlechtsneutrale Lebensentwürfe für Frauen anerkennend präsentiert.
Zweitens beobachtet die Arbeit im Subtext vielfältige Hinweise auf Missstände im Lebensalltag von Frauen und weist nach, dass der Roman insbesondere Momente der geschlechtsdiskriminierenden Vorverurteilung durchgängig inszeniert. Diese Problematisierung versteht die Dissertation als eine Aufforderung an den Leser / die Leserin, den eigenen Leseprozess des Romans in Bezug auf Informationsdistribution, Disposition und Verteilung der Sympathien selbstkritisch zu reflektieren.
Drittens entdeckt die Abhandlung im Subtext des Romans, dass Lodore unterschiedliche Ansätze der Mädchenerziehung in Bezug auf die Ausbildung von „Weiblichkeit“ polyperspektivisch erkundet. Die Untersuchung zeigt auf, dass der Roman drei verschiedene Modelle der Mädchenerziehung einander gegenüberstellt, die sich ideologisch mitunter diametral gegenüberstehen. Die Analyse beschreibt, inwiefern sich die drei Modelle mit den gleichen Herausforderungen innerhalb der Mädchenerziehung beschäftigen. Hierbei wird ausgeführt, auf welche Weise der Roman die unterschiedlichen Lösungsansätze auslotet, die von den drei Modellen auf diese konkreten Problemstellungen angeboten werden und sie abwägend, jedoch ohne kategorische Abwertung nebeneinander positioniert. Die Arbeit resümiert, dass der Roman einerseits die Bedeutung, Ausbildung und Konsequenz von „Weiblichkeit“ durch Erziehung, und andererseits das Leben, die Ziele und das Verhalten einer Frau innerhalb der Gesellschaft als Resultat solcher Erziehung kritisch prüft. Im Zuge dessen veranschaulicht die Dissertation, welche Aussagen und Suggestionen der Subtext dabei in Bezug auf die Themenkomplexe „Weiblichkeit“ und „Erziehung“ transportiert.
...
Modeling misretrieval and feature substitution in agreement attraction: a computational evaluation
(2021)
We present computational modeling results based on a self-paced reading study investigating number attraction effects in Eastern Armenian. We implement three novel computational models of agreement attraction in a Bayesian framework and compare their predictive fit to the data using k-fold cross-validation. We find that our data are better accounted for by an encoding-based model of agreement attraction, compared to a retrieval-based model. A novel methodological contribution of our study is the use of comprehension questions with open-ended responses, so that both misinterpretation of the number feature of the subject phrase and misassignment of the thematic subject role of the verb can be investigated at the same time. We find evidence for both types of misinterpretation in our study, sometimes in the same trial. However, the specific error patterns in our data are not fully consistent with any previously proposed model.
Die vorliegende Studie widmet sich der Problematik von individueller Mehrsprachigkeit und Mehrschriftigkeit innerhalb kollaborativer Schreibinteraktionen. Individuelle
Mehrsprachigkeit/Mehrschriftigkeit wird mittels der Konzepte der sprachlichen Repertoires und Register beleuchtet. Als kollaborative Schreibinteraktion wird ein Face-to-Face-Format definiert, bei dem zwei oder mehrere, am selben Ort befindliche Personen, ein Dokument basierend auf gemeinsamen Ideen anfertigen und hierüber ein Gespräch führen. Von Interesse ist die Forschungsfrage, wie mehrsprachige Studierende der Romanistik an der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt a.M. ihre schriftsprachlichen Ressourcen beim gemeinsamen Formulieren eines akademischen Texts in einer romanischen Zielsprache (Französisch oder Spanisch) einsetzen.
Zur Beantwortung der Fragestellung dient ein qualitatives methodenplurales Forschungsdesign, bei dem theoretisch-methodische Forschungsansätze aus Soziolinguistik, Ethnographie und Aktionsforschung zusammenfließen. Die Datenerhebung erfolgte in einem ethnographisch gerahmten Aktionsforschungsseminar, in dem mehrsprachige Studierende über ihre sprachlichen Repertoires schriftlich reflektieren und zum akademischen Schreiben interaktiv in Gruppen zusammenkommen. Das hierbei entstandene Datenmaterial, die Reflexionstexte einerseits sowie die Audio- und Bildschirmaufnahmen der Schreibinteraktionen andererseits, wurde inhalts- und gesprächsanalytisch ausgewertet. Darüber werden Konzepte aus Mehrsprachigkeits- und Textproduktionsforschung miteinbezogen, um einen ganzheitlichen Blick auf Dynamiken beim kollaborativen Formulieren zu gewinnen.
Die Studie bietet zahlreiche Anknüpfungspunkte für zukünftige Forschung über Mehrschriftigkeit. Aus theoretischer Sicht ist es relevant, wie strukturelle Mehrschriftigkeit im Format der kollaborativen Schreibinteraktion konzeptualisiert werden kann. Methodisch betrachtet besteht die Notwendigkeit zur Weiterentwicklung des methodenpluralen Forschungsdesigns, um sowohl Daten zu Prozessen und Produkten als auch zu beteiligten Individuen zu triangulieren. In dieser Hinsicht spielt das Verhältnis von Ethnographie und Gesprächsanalyse eine gewichtige Rolle. Aus didaktischer Sicht ist es schließlich bedeutsam, wie die Aneignung zielsprachlicher Kompetenz beim akademischen Schreiben mit einer Integration mehrsprachiger Ressourcen einhergehen kann.
Viele der rezenten Studien zur Ästhetik des Monströsen nehmen auf Michel Foucaults Vorlesungsreihe Les anormaux Bezug, in der er u. a. der diskursiven Transformation des Monsters von einem somatischen hin zu einem moralischen Abweichungsphänomen nachgeht. Dass Foucaults Ausführungen mitunter nur unzureichend differenziert sind, soll der vorliegende Beitrag nachweisen. Auch wenn die Literatur in Les anormaux eine untergeordnete Rolle spielt, eher als peripheres Beleg- oder Anschauungsmaterial dient denn als Gegenstand einer eigenen Untersuchung, ist gerade sie es, die Foucaults genealogische Analyse der notwendigen Komplexitätssteigerung zuführen und ihre Leerstellen ausfüllen kann. Zu diesem Zweck werden exemplarisch Ovids Lykaon-Mythos aus dem ersten Buch der Metamorphosen sowie Mary Shelleys Roman Frankenstein, or, The Modern Prometheus herangezogen. Neben der gebotenen Korrektur von Les anormaux vermögen beide Texte Foucaults Befund von der diskursiven Produktivität des Monströsen zu bestätigen und anzureichern: Sowohl Ovid als auch Shelley dokumentieren eine Wertschätzung und Wertschöpfung des Monströsen und stehen damit quer zu konventionellen Narrativen, die das Monster als etwas rein Destruktives und Dämonisches oder als das radikal Andere des Menschen in Szene setzen, ohne auf die kulturellen Profite und anthropologischen Einsichten zu reflektieren, die sich aus jenem gewinnen lassen.
This contribution focuses on indefinite arguments in object position. We address this topic from the point of view of the crosslinguistic variation within the Romance continuum, especially looking at Northern Italian Dialects (NIDs). The target is to describe the distribution of the different possible realizations of this kind of arguments in this area by means of an in-depth analysis of the data coming from the ASIt database and from three new fieldwork sessions. We show that the microvariation attested in this area reflects and refines the “macro” variation attested among the major Romance languages. The fine-grained picture that can be drawn from a closer look to a set of minimally varying languages helps crosslinguistic comparison and, consequently, the modeling of more precise analyses.
This paper intends to provide some speculative remarks on how consistency and continuity in language use practices within and across contexts inform heritage language acquisition outcomes. We intend “consistency” as maintenance of similar patterns of home language use over the years. “Continuity” refers to the possibility for heritage language speakers to be exposed to formal education in the heritage language. By means of a questionnaire study, we analyze to what extent Italian heritage families in Germany are consistent in their use of the heritage language with their children. Furthermore, by analyzing the educational offer related to Italian as a heritage language across different areas in Germany, we reflect on children’s opportunities to experience continuity between home and school language practices. Finally, we interpret the results of previous studies on Italian heritage language acquisition through the lens of consistency and continuity of language experience. In particular, we show that under the appropriate language experience conditions (involving consistency and continuity), heritage speakers may be successful even in the acquisition of linguistic phenomena that have been shown to be acquired late in first language acquisition.