Linguistik-Klassifikation
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (229)
- Article (66)
- Working Paper (47)
- Preprint (25)
- Conference Proceeding (22)
- Report (7)
- Book (5)
- Review (3)
- magisterthesis (1)
Language
- English (308)
- German (77)
- Croatian (7)
- Portuguese (7)
- French (4)
- mis (1)
- Multiple languages (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (405)
Keywords
- Syntax (116)
- Deutsch (63)
- Thema-Rhema-Gliederung (37)
- Wortstellung (32)
- Englisch (30)
- Generative Transformationsgrammatik (30)
- Relativsatz (29)
- Intonation <Linguistik> (28)
- Semantik (26)
- Bantusprachen (22)
- Prädikat (21)
- Formale Semantik (17)
- Prosodie (16)
- Optimalitätstheorie (15)
- Chinesisch (14)
- Topikalisierung (14)
- Informationsstruktur (13)
- Interrogativsatz (13)
- Phonologie (13)
- Sinotibetische Sprachen (13)
- Referenzidentität (12)
- Russisch (12)
- Spracherwerb (12)
- Lexikologie (11)
- Linguistik (11)
- Pronomen (11)
- Adjunkt <Linguistik> (10)
- Morphosyntax (10)
- Valenz <Linguistik> (10)
- Kasus (9)
- Kontrastive Linguistik (9)
- Nungisch (9)
- Pragmatik (9)
- Tagalog (9)
- Tibetobirmanische Sprachen (9)
- Topik (9)
- Adverb (8)
- Anapher <Syntax> (8)
- Kontrastive Syntax (8)
- Oberflächenstruktur <Linguistik> (8)
- Tiefenstruktur (8)
- Extraposition (7)
- Nominalphrase (7)
- Referenz <Linguistik> (7)
- Thematische Relation (7)
- Chewa-Sprache (6)
- Genus verbi (6)
- Grammatische Kategorie (6)
- Kindersprache (6)
- Kongress (6)
- Morphologie (6)
- Nebensatz (6)
- Negation (6)
- Satz (6)
- Sprachstatistik (6)
- Sprachtypologie (6)
- Sprachverstehen (6)
- Transitivität (6)
- Aspekt <Linguistik> (5)
- Bulgarisch (5)
- Griechisch (5)
- Italienisch (5)
- Japanisch (5)
- Klitisierung (5)
- Lokativ (5)
- Malagassi-Sprache (5)
- Morphonologie (5)
- Skopus (5)
- Spezifität (5)
- Verb (5)
- Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft (5)
- syntax (5)
- Adjektiv (4)
- Aufsatzsammlung (4)
- Ergativ (4)
- Französisch (4)
- Funktionale Kategorie (4)
- Generative Grammatik (4)
- Gradpartikel (4)
- Kontrastive Grammatik (4)
- Modalverb (4)
- Niederländisch (4)
- Personalpronomen (4)
- Prädikation (4)
- Qiang-Sprache (4)
- Quantor (4)
- Satzglied (4)
- Satztyp (4)
- Spaltsatz (4)
- Türkisch (4)
- Ungarisch (4)
- Adverbiale (3)
- Afrikanische Sprachen (3)
- Austronesische Sprachen (3)
- Bahasa Indonesia (3)
- Baskisch (3)
- Bindungstheorie <Linguistik> (3)
- Definitheit (3)
- Demonstrativpronomen (3)
- Ergänzung <Linguistik> (3)
- Ergänzungsfragesatz (3)
- Grammatische Relation (3)
- Hypotaxe (3)
- Infinitkonstruktion (3)
- Koreanisch (3)
- Kroatisch (3)
- Mboshi-Sprache (3)
- Neugriechisch (3)
- Nominalisierung (3)
- Objekt (3)
- Parenthese (3)
- Passiv (3)
- Phrasenstruktur (3)
- Plural (3)
- Portugiesisch (3)
- Referenzsemantik (3)
- Satzanalyse (3)
- Satzsemantik (3)
- Scrambling (3)
- Swahili (3)
- Syntaktische Kongruenz (3)
- Tempus (3)
- Albanisch (2)
- Artikel (2)
- Artikulation (2)
- Aspiration <Linguistik> (2)
- Aufforderungssatz (2)
- Ausrufesatz (2)
- Basaa-Sprache (2)
- Bestimmter Artikel (2)
- Consecutio temporum (2)
- Diachronie (2)
- Dialektologie (2)
- Diskontinuität (2)
- Diskursanalyse (2)
- Diskursrepräsentationstheorie (2)
- Distribution <Linguistik> (2)
- Drung (2)
- Experiment (2)
- Feldlinguistik (2)
- Frage (2)
- Freier Relativsatz (2)
- Ganda-Sprache (2)
- Gegenwartssprache (2)
- Genitiv (2)
- German (2)
- Grammatik (2)
- Grammatikalisation (2)
- Grammatiktheorie (2)
- Hebräisch (2)
- Herausstellung (2)
- Indefinitpronomen (2)
- Instrumental (2)
- Inuktitut (2)
- Isländisch (2)
- Junktur (2)
- Kajkavisch (2)
- Kanuri-Sprache (2)
- Konditionalsatz (2)
- Konjunktion (2)
- Konstruktionsgrammatik (2)
- Kontrastive Phonologie (2)
- Kontrolle <Linguistik> (2)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (2)
- Makonde-Sprache (2)
- Methodologie (2)
- Modalität (2)
- Morphem (2)
- Nama-Sprache (2)
- Parataxe (2)
- Partikel (2)
- Partizipialkonstruktion (2)
- Personenname (2)
- Philippinen-Austronesisch (2)
- Phrasenstrukturgrammatik (2)
- Polarität (2)
- Portugiesisch / Brasilien (2)
- Pro-Form (2)
- Prädikativsatz (2)
- Präposition (2)
- Reflexivität <Linguistik> (2)
- Restriktiver Relativsatz (2)
- Salish-Sprache (2)
- Satzakzent (2)
- Satzteil (2)
- Sotho (2)
- Spanisch (2)
- Sprachgeschichte (2)
- Sprachverarbeitung <Psycholinguistik> (2)
- Spurtheorie (2)
- Subjekt (2)
- Temporalsatz (2)
- Thai (2)
- Tharaka (2)
- Tschechisch (2)
- Umgangssprache (2)
- Unbestimmtheit (2)
- Valenz (2)
- Wortbildung (2)
- Yoruba-Sprache (2)
- Zulu-Sprache (2)
- also (2)
- case (2)
- dass (2)
- Ableitung <Linguistik> (1)
- Adversativsatz (1)
- Affix (1)
- Akan-Sprache (1)
- Algorithmus (1)
- Allomorph (1)
- Althochdeutsch (1)
- Altkroatisch (1)
- Ambiguität (1)
- Amerikanisches Englisch (1)
- Analyse syntaxique déductive (1)
- Argument <Linguistik> (1)
- Aschanti-Sprache (1)
- Aspekt (1)
- Asymmetrie (1)
- Attribut (1)
- Attributives Partizip (1)
- Auslassung (1)
- Bambara (1)
- Bantoid (1)
- Baushi (1)
- Belebtheit <Grammatik> (1)
- Belhare (1)
- Bemba-Sprache (1)
- Berlin <2001> (1)
- Chinese (1)
- Chomsky (1)
- Dativus ethicus (1)
- Demokratische Republik Kongo (1)
- Deskriptivität (1)
- Determination <Linguistik> (1)
- Determinativ (1)
- Deutsch als Fremdsprache (1)
- Dialog (1)
- Disambiguierung (1)
- Dutch (1)
- Eindeutigkeit (1)
- Ellipse <Linguistik> (1)
- Emphase (1)
- Engel, Ulrich (1)
- Entscheidungsfrage (1)
- Epenthese (1)
- Erkenntnistheorie (1)
- Ethnolinguistik (1)
- Etikett <Linguistik> (1)
- Evidenz (1)
- Existentialsatz (1)
- Fachsprache (1)
- Faktiv (1)
- Feld <Linguistik> (1)
- Finite Verbform (1)
- Finnisch (1)
- Fipa (1)
- Fragebogen (1)
- Fremdsprachenlernen (1)
- Frühneuhochdeutsch (1)
- Fugenelement (1)
- Funktionsverb (1)
- Funktionsverbgefüge (1)
- Galloitalienisch (1)
- Gapping (1)
- Gefühl (1)
- Gefühlsausdruck (1)
- Generische Aussage (1)
- Genus (1)
- Germanistik (1)
- Grammatikalität (1)
- Grammatiklehrbuch (1)
- Hausa (1)
- Haya (1)
- Herero-Sprache (1)
- Hildebrandslied (1)
- Historische Morphologie (1)
- Homonymie (1)
- Imperfektiv (1)
- Inchoativ (1)
- Indonesische Sprachen (1)
- Infix (1)
- Inkorporation <Linguistik> (1)
- Inversion <Grammatik> (1)
- Je suis Charlie (1)
- Jiddisch (1)
- Kamerun (1)
- Kasusgrammatik (1)
- Kausalsatz (1)
- Kausativ (1)
- Khoisan (1)
- Klassifikator <Linguistik> (1)
- Kognitive Entwicklung (1)
- Komitativ (1)
- Komoren (1)
- Komposition <Wortbildung> (1)
- Konfiguration <Linguistik> (1)
- Kongo-Sprache (1)
- Kongressbericht (1)
- Konsekutivsatz (1)
- Kontrastive Semantik (1)
- Konzessivsatz (1)
- Kopula (1)
- Kopulasatz (1)
- Koverb (1)
- Lerntheorie (1)
- Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar (1)
- Lexikographie (1)
- Logische Form <Linguistik> (1)
- Logische Partikel (1)
- Lokale Präposition (1)
- Makua-Sprache (1)
- Malawi (1)
- Mittelenglisch (1)
- Modalität <Linguistik> (1)
- Modalpartikel (1)
- Modus (1)
- Morphologie <Linguistik> (1)
- Move-alpha (1)
- Mundart Westfälisch <Ruhrgebiet> (1)
- Mura-Sprache (1)
- Mögliche Welt (1)
- Mündlichkeit (1)
- Nachfeld (1)
- Negationspartikel (1)
- Nicht-restriktiver Relativsatz (1)
- Niger-Kongo-Sprachen (1)
- Nilosaharanische Sprachen (1)
- Nilotische Sprachen (1)
- Niue-Sprache (1)
- Noam (1)
- Nomen (1)
- Notwendigkeit (1)
- Numerale (1)
- Numerus (1)
- Objektsatz (1)
- Opaker Kontext (1)
- Oslo <1999> (1)
- Paiwan (1)
- Palauisch (1)
- Palaung (1)
- Parametrisierung (1)
- Parasitic gap (1)
- Partitiv (1)
- Partizip (1)
- Partizip Perfekt (1)
- Perfekt (1)
- Perfektiv (1)
- Phonetik (1)
- Phrasenkompositum (1)
- Phrasenmarker (1)
- Pirahã (1)
- Podravina (1)
- Possessivität (1)
- Possessivkonstruktion (1)
- Potsdam <2002> (1)
- Proto-Indo-European (1)
- Proto-Tibetobirmanisch (1)
- Präfix (1)
- Präfixverb (1)
- Präsupposition (1)
- Quantifizierung <Linguistik> (1)
- Raising (1)
- Range Concatenation Grammar (1)
- Rechtssprache (1)
- Reduktion <Linguistik> (1)
- Reduplikation (1)
- Referenzwechsel (1)
- Reflexivpronomen (1)
- Reflexivsatz (1)
- Relativpronomen (1)
- Relevanz <Linguistik> (1)
- Resultativ (1)
- Rezension (1)
- Reziprozität (1)
- Reziprozität <Linguistik> (1)
- Rumänisch (1)
- Saharanische Sprachen (1)
- Samoanisch (1)
- Satzadverb (1)
- Satzgliednegation (1)
- Satznegation (1)
- Schriftlichkeit (1)
- Schriftsprache (1)
- Schwedisch (1)
- Senufo (1)
- Serbian (1)
- Serbisch (1)
- Serialverb-Konstruktion (1)
- Situativangabe (1)
- Situativergänzung (1)
- Skandinavische Sprachen (1)
- Slawische Sprachen (1)
- Sprachproduktion (1)
- Sprachtheorie (1)
- Sprachverarbeitung (1)
- Sprachwahrnehmung (1)
- Sprachwandel (1)
- Stadtname (1)
- Standardsprache (1)
- Stativ <Grammatik> (1)
- Stochastik (1)
- Strukturelle Grammatik (1)
- Strukturelle Phonologie (1)
- Suffixbildung (1)
- Suppire (1)
- Suppire-Sprache (1)
- Taiwan-Austronesisch (1)
- Teilsatz (1)
- Temporaladverb (1)
- Terminologielehre (1)
- Text (1)
- Textkohärenz (1)
- Textverstehen (1)
- Theory of mind (1)
- Tibetobirmanische Sprachen ; Nungisch (1)
- Tongaisch (1)
- Tonologie (1)
- Transitives Verb (1)
- Tschechische Republik (1)
- Tswana (1)
- Tukangbesi (1)
- Tumbuka-Sprache (1)
- Tundalus <Prosa> (1)
- Universalgrammatik (1)
- Valenzgrammatik (1)
- Venetisch (1)
- Verbalphrase (1)
- Vergleichspartikel (1)
- Verwaltung, Fachsprache (1)
- Vietnamese (1)
- Vokal (1)
- Vokalharmonie (1)
- Wissenschaftsgeschichte (1)
- Wortart (1)
- Xhosa (1)
- Zentralkhoisan-Sprachen (1)
- Zulu (1)
- acceptability (1)
- agree (1)
- anticausatives (1)
- argument dislocation (1)
- background particles (1)
- causatives (1)
- clefts (1)
- complementation (1)
- cyclicity (1)
- deductive parsing (1)
- doch (1)
- epp (1)
- ergativity (1)
- estar (1)
- features (1)
- fieldwork (1)
- focus particles (1)
- free-choice (1)
- gradience grammar (1)
- grammaires à concaténation d’intervalles (1)
- grammaticality (1)
- hierarchies (1)
- long wh-movement (1)
- passives (1)
- person splits (1)
- phi-features (1)
- phonology (1)
- pirahã (1)
- pp modification (1)
- question formation (1)
- range concatenation grammar (1)
- root classes (1)
- ser (1)
- stress patterns (1)
- subject inversion (1)
- syntactic decomposition (1)
- temporal gradation (1)
- temporal limitation (1)
- tone (1)
- tones (1)
- word order variation (1)
- Übersetzung (1)
- Čapek, Karel (1)
Institute
The paper proposes structural constraints for different adjunct classes in German and English. Approaches in which syntax has only the task to provide adjunct positions and in which principles of scope are supposed to explain the distribution of adjuncts are rejected as incomplete. The syntactic requirements are not as rigid as other approaches require, such that there is just one possible position for a given adjunct. Rather the syntactic constraints may be fulfilled in different positions.
With the rise of minimalism, many concepts related to the geometrical relations of phrase structure held fast to in earlier approaches have been reconsidered. This article deals with distinguishing (relational and technical) properties of specifiers and adjuncts in a Bare Phrase Structure framework (X'-Theory). I extend specific aspects of X-structure relevant to the discussion of specifiers vs. adjuncts. I argue that unique specifiers can be derived from the system and that adjunction, possibly multiple, results from Direct Merge only. The final product is a series of relationships in line with recent thoughts and minimalist premises, but formally more similar to earlier conceptions of the X'-schema.
I address conceptual, empirical and theoretical arguments against multiple specifiers and related issues next, that is beyond the predictions immediately following from the tripartitional view of clause structure proposed in Grohmann (2000). After laying out my motivations to critically consider the issue, I present a set of data that casts serious doubt over the justifications offered to replace Agr with v as the accusative casemarker. Having conceptual and empirical back-up, I then tackle the theoretical validity of specifiers, and ways to distinguish unique specifiers from (multiple) adjuncts. I introduce a version of Bare Phrase Structure that does so, yet keeps the spirit of defining structural identification over relational rather than categorial properties.
Focus theories distinguish different types of focus according to the pragmatic conditions or communicative point on the one side and different scopes of focus on the other side. The assertion in term focus constructions (Dik 1989), called by others argument focus constructions or identificational sentences (Lambrecht 1994), has the purpose of establishing a relation between an argument and an open proposition. Kar, a north-eastern Senufo language of Burkina Faso, which has the basic word order S-Aux-O-V-other, has at its disposal different strategies to mark argument focus, among them fronting of the focused item. In many West African languages the displacement of the focused argument involves other devices, such as the use of special verb forms. In Kar fronting of a focused argument requires the use of special pronouns in the out-of-focus part of the sentence, called background subject pronouns. They are used in other backgrounded contexts, too, for example in relative clauses, adverbial clauses and constituent questions. Their inconsistent use is attributed to a particular sociolinguistic situation in which the data has been collected. The use of the same focus strategies for completive and contrastive focus suggests that Kar does not distinguish pragmatic conditions on the level of sentence grammar.
Many analyses of existential sentences have focused attention on determining which of its elements constitutes the logical subject and predicate, and this has proven to be a not uncontroversial topic of research. Some, from both syntactic and semantic points of view, have argued that there is a subject (cf. Williams 1994) others that it is a predicate (cf. Moro 1997). Similarly, some have argued that the associate NP is a logical subject, others that it is apredicate (Higginbotham 1987).
One logical possibility that has not (to my knowledge) been pursued in the linguistics literature is that these statements are not of the form subject-predicate, a possibility that has been taken up in the philosophical literature by P.F. Strawson (1959). He claims that there are such statements and that their form is simpler than that of subject-predicate statements because it does not, and cannot, involve an expression that makes reference to an individual. Not involving reference to an individual, these sentences are therefore are made true by different means than a subject-predicate statement whose truth, in the simplest cases, depends on the denotation of the subject being a member of the denotation of the predicate. Of interest from the point of view of the present discussion is his claim that existential statements are examples of this kind of statement, which he calls a feature-placing statement. The truth of a statement of the form feature-placer requires that something with the set of features denoted by the associate NP exist at the location or coordinates expressed by the placer. In an existential sentence we can take the associate NP as the feature-denoting expression and the coda-XP as the placer.
The goal of this paper is to investigate cases of apparent noun-incorporation in Malagasy, a western Austronesian language spoken in Madagascar. Looking at examples [...], one may ask whether or not Malagasy has nounincorporation. [...] The organization of this paper is as follows: I begin with a general discussion of the distribution of nominals in Malagasy - with and without determiners. In section 3 I turn to […] two constructions […] and compare and contrast them. Section 4 details the analyses of the two constructions and I conclude the paper in section 5.
In this work, I provide an analysis of adjectival depictive constructions which accounts for most of their fundamental properties. First, I focus on the restrictions having to do with the integration of the depictive and the verbal predicate: they are based on aspectual compatibility between the two predicates, which, in turn, will depend on the ability, on the part of the depictive, to make reference to some (sub)event in the event structure of the verbal predicate. Facts not captured by previous approaches in the literature will be straightforwardly accounted for, among them the possibility to have I-L depictive constructions, and the impossibility to combine a depictive with some non-stative verbal predicates. Second, it will be shown that the informational import of the depictive in the sentence can be equivalent to that of the verbal predicate: both can be the primary lexical basis of predication. This is reflected in the sentence in various ways, having to do with aspectual modifiers, and in the properties of the sentential subject. In this connection, we will reconsider the notion of subject, arguing that no subject-predicate relation takes place in the lexical domain of sentences, and hence that the argument the depictive is oriented to, the common argument, cannot be a subject of the depictive. Finally, a minimalist analysis is proposed for the syntax of the construction, in terms of direct syntactic merge of predicative constituents and sidewards (q-to-q) movement for the common argument, from the lexical domain of the depictive to the lexical domain of the verb. As to morphosyntactic properties, a syntactic Double Agree relation is assumed to hold between T/v, as probes, on the one hand, and the common argument and depictive, as simultaneous goals, on the other, which would allow for the deletion of Case features on both goals. The assumed presence of Structural Case on the adjectival depictive will be responsible for the well-known restriction on the orientation of depictives to the sentential subject or object.
In this paper I put forward and justify a syntactic configuration that I call Complex Small Clause-structure. I show that this single syntactic structure can explain both the semantic value and the syntactic behavior of a range of constructions that up to now have been explored separately and, hence, proposed divergent analyses among them.
Even if we can generate a logical form, principles of use may limit the ways in which we can use it. In this paper, I motivate one such principle of use, and explore its effects. Much of the discussion involves kinds of sentences that have received attention in the literature on "individual-level predicates".
This paper employs empirical methods to examine verbs such as seem, for which the traditional raising to subject analysis relates pairs of sentences which differ by taking an infinitival or sentential complement. A corpus-driven investigation of the verbs seem and appear demonstrates that information structure and evidentiality both play a determinate role in the choice between infinitival or sentential complementation. The second half of the paper builds upon the corpus results and examines the implications for the standard claims concerning these constructions. First, pairs of sentences related by the subject-to-subject raising analysis of verbs are often viewed as equivalent. New evidence from indefinite generic subjects shows that whether an indefinite generic subject occurs in the infinitival or sentential complement construction leads to truth-conditional differences. Further implications are explored for the claim that subjects of the infinitival variant may take narrow-scope: once various confounds are controlled for, the subject of the infinitival construction is shown to most naturally take wide-scope.
This paper focuses on different subtypes of constructions involving temporally bounded quantification, e.g. sequences like David visited Rome three times followed by temporal phrases as different as (i) last year, which defines a time interval; (ii) in less that two months, which defines an amount of time; and (iii) per month, which refers to a time unit. As for the first two types of temporal phrases, data will be presented which shows that they have specific linguistic properties in these quantifying contexts, and do not behave exactly as the locating or duration adverbials they are superficially identical with. The third type of phrases will receive special attention. Structures with frequency adverbials like n times per month will be analysed compositionally, separating the quantified component n times from the temporally binding phrase per month (whose role is comparable to that of adverbials (i) and (ii) in the relevant constructions). The data presented is mainly from Portuguese, although the issues at stake – the linguistic properties of temporally bounded quantification – are obviously relevant to parallel constructions in other languages.
This paper looks at sentences with "quantificational indefinites," discussed by Diesing (1992) and others. I propose that these sentences generate sets of alternatives of the form {p, not p and it's possible that p}, which restrict the quantification by an extension of familiar focus principles. For example, in the sentence "I usually read a book about slugs" (on the relevant reading), "usually" quantifies over pairs <x,t> such that x is a book about slugs, t is a time interval, and one alternative is true from the set {I read x at t, I can but do not read x at t}. In addition to accounting for a well-known contrast between creation and non-creation verbs, this also explains a second contrast that Diesing’s analysis cannot account for.
Russian and Spanish each have two variants of the predicational copular sentence. In Russian, the variation concerns the case of the predicate phrase, which can be nominative or instrumental, while in Spanish, the variation involves the choice of the copular verb, either ser or estar. It is shown that the choice of the particular variant of copular sentence in both languages depends on the speaker’s perspective, i.e., on whether or not the predication is linked to a specific topic situation.
There is an elegant account, proposed by Beaver and Condoravdi (2003), that assumes that the temporal connectives before and after are converses (i.e., they are analyzed by means of a unified lexical schema), and that explains away their different logical and veridical behavior appealing to other factors. There is an elegant explanation that connects the licensing of Polarity Items to informational strengthening requirements: Polarity Items are viewed as existentials that lead to a widening of the domain of quantification, and they are predicted to be legitimate only when this widening leads to a stronger statement (roughly, in downward monotone contexts). My plan is to connect these two approaches – by proposing an amendment in the definition Beaver and Condoravdi presented for before and after that is meant to account also for their Polarity Items licensing behavior.
This paper examines how questions, both Wh-questions and yes-no questions, are phrased in Chimwiini, a Bantu language spoken in southern Somalia. Questions do not require any special phrasing principles, but Wh-questions do provide much evidence in support of the principle Align-Foc R, which requires that focused or emphasized words/constituents be located at the end of a phonological phrase. Question words and enclitics are always focused and thus appear at the end of a phrase. Although questions do not require any new phrasing principles, they do display complex accentual (tonal) behavior. This paper attempts to provide an account of these accentual phenomena.
This paper presents a preliminary survey of the positions and prosodies associated with Wh-questions in two Bantu languages spoken in Malawi. The paper shows that the two languages are similar in requiring focused subjects to be clefted. Both also require 'which' questions and 'because of what' questions to be clefted or fronted. However, for other non-subjects Tumbuka rather uniformly imposes an IAV (immediately after the verb) requirement, while Chewa does not. In both languages, we found a strong tendency for there to be a prosodic phrase break following the Wh-word. In Tumbuka, this break follows from the general phrasing algorithm of the language, while in Chewa, I propose that the break can be best understood as following from the inherent prominence of Wh-words.
This paper sketches the morphosyntactic and prosodic properties of questions in Fipa, discussing three varieties: Milanzi, Nkansi and Kwa. The general word order and morphological patterns relevant to question structures are outlined and different types of wh-question constructions are described and tentatively linked to the prosodic features of Fipa questions.
The purpose of this paper is to show how WH questions interact with the complex tonal phenomena which we summarized and illustrated in Hyman & Katamba (2010). As will be seen, WH questions have interesting syntactic and tonal properties of their own, including a WH-specific intonation. The paper is structured as follows: After an introduction in §1, we successively discuss non-subject WH questions (§2), subject WH questions (§3), and clefted WH questions (§4). We then briefly present a tense which is specifically limited to WH questions (§5), and conclude with a brief summary in §6.
This questionnaire is intended as an aid to eliciting different question types, including yes/no questions, alternative questions, and wh-questions on a range of constituents. We have taken care to include examples that allow one to test for common Bantu phenomena, such as a subject/non-subject asymmetry in wh-questions and an obligatory immediately after the verb (IAV) position for questioning verb complements. The questionnaire is intended as a guide, only, as every language will have its own set of possibilities and complications. At the end of the questionnaire is a checklist. While we had Bantu languages in mind in devising the questionnaire, we hope it will also be useful to linguists with an interest question constructions in other languages.
This article aims to recast the properties of topic-prominent languages and their differences from subject-prominent languages as documented in the functionalist literature into the framework of the Principle-and-Parameter approach. It provides a configurational definition of the topic construction called Topic Phrase (TP), with the topic marker as its head. The availablity of TP enables topic prominent languages to develop various topic structures with properties such as morphological marking; cross-categorial realization of topics and comments; and mutiple application of topicalization. The article elaborates the notion of topic prominence. A topic prominent language is characterized as one that tends to activate the TP and to make full use of the configuration. Typically, it has a larger number and variety of highly grammaticalized topic markers in the Lexicon and permits a variety of syntactic categories to occur in the specifier position and the complement position of TP.
This paper tests three current theories of the phonology-syntax interface – Truckenbrodt (1995), Pak (2008) and Cheng & Downing (2007, 2009) – on the prosody of relative clauses in Chewa. Relative clauses, especially restrictive relative clauses, provide an ideal data set for comparing these theories, as they each make distinct predictions about the optimal phrasing. We show that the asymmetrical phase-edge based approach developed to account for similar Zulu prosodic phrasing by Cheng & Downing also best accounts for the Chewa data.