Linguistik-Klassifikation
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (22) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (22)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (22)
Keywords
- Nungisch (4)
- Tibetobirmanische Sprachen (4)
- Philippinen-Austronesisch (2)
- Tagalog (2)
- Adjektiv (1)
- Adverbiale (1)
- Albanisch (1)
- Deutsch (1)
- Drung (1)
- Dutch (1)
- Englisch (1)
- Generative Transformationsgrammatik (1)
- German (1)
- Griechisch (1)
- Hebräisch (1)
- Inuktitut (1)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (1)
- Methodologie (1)
- Niederländisch (1)
- Oberflächenstruktur <Linguistik> (1)
- Parenthese (1)
- Serbian (1)
- Serbisch (1)
- Skandinavische Sprachen (1)
- Spurtheorie (1)
- Syntax (1)
- Tibetobirmanische Sprachen ; Nungisch (1)
- Tiefenstruktur (1)
A pragmatic explanation of the stage level/individual level contrast in combination with locatives
(2004)
One important difference between stage level predicates (SLPs) and individual level predicates (ILPs) is their behavior with respect to locative modifiers. It is commonly assumed that SLPs but not ILPs combine with locatives. The present study argues against a semantic account for this behavior (as advanced by e.g. Kratzer 1995, Chierchia 1995) and proposes a genuinely pragmatic explanation of the observed stage level/individual level contrast instead. The proposal is spelled out using Blutners (1998, 2000) optimality theoretic version of the Gricean maxims. Building on the observation that the respective locatives are not event-related but frame-setting modifiers, the preference for main predicates that express temporary properties is explained as a side-effect of “synchronizing” the main predicate with the locative frame in the course of finding an optimal interpretation. By emphasizing the division of labor between grammar and pragmatics, the proposed solution takes a considerable load off of semantics.
The paper is structured as follows. Section 2.1 introduces the basic classes of adjectives that constitute the factual core of the paper. Section 2.2 summarizes in greater detail the X° and the XP movement approaches to word order variation within the DP. Section 3 briefly discusses problems for both approaches. Sections 4.1, 5.1, and 5.2 draw from Alexiadou (2001) and contain a discussion of Greek DS and its relevance for a re-analysis of the word order variation in the Romance DP. Section 4.2 introduces refinements to Alexiadou & Wilder (1998) and Alexiadou (2001). Section 5.3. discusses certain issues that arise from the analysis of postnominal adjectives in Romance as involving raising of XPs. Section 6 discusses phenomena found in other languages, which at first sight seem similar to DS. However, I show that double definiteness in e.g. Hebrew, Scandinavian or other Balkan languages constitutes a different type of phenomenon from Greek DS, thus making a distinction between determiners that introduce CPs (Greek) and those that are merely morphological/agreement markers (Hebrew, Scandinavian, Albanian).