Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung (DIPF)
Refine
Year of publication
- 2020 (15) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (13)
- Book (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (15)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (15)
Keywords
- PISA (2)
- Behavior (1)
- Bilingualität (1)
- Child abuse (1)
- Depression (1)
- Global positioning system (1)
- Higher education (1)
- ICT Engagement (1)
- Identität (1)
- Learner goals (1)
- Learning analytics dashboard (1)
- Mental health and psychiatry (1)
- Peer Learning (1)
- Post-traumatic stress disorder (1)
- Psychological and psychosocial issues (1)
- Quality of life (1)
- Schule (1)
- Schüler (1)
- Self-regulated learning (1)
- Sense-making (1)
- Sprache (1)
- Spracherwerb (1)
- Sprachkompetenz (1)
- Student-facing learning analytics (1)
- age differences (1)
- anxiety disorder (1)
- assessment of/for learning (1)
- attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (1)
- autobiographical reasoning (1)
- automatic scoring (1)
- cognition (1)
- complex problem-solving (1)
- conduct disorder (1)
- depression (1)
- dimension reduction (1)
- economics (1)
- education (1)
- emotionality (1)
- epistemic network analysis (1)
- ergodic subspace analysis (1)
- ergodicity (1)
- exploration (1)
- eye-tracking (1)
- graph understanding (1)
- higher education (1)
- imageability (1)
- imagery (1)
- item design (1)
- kognitive Kompetenz (1)
- log data (1)
- meaning made (1)
- meaning making (1)
- narrative identity (1)
- process data (1)
- questionnaire (1)
- sequence analysis (1)
- specific learning disorder (1)
- technology-based assessment (1)
- test design (1)
- valence (1)
- validity (1)
Institute
A question of striking the right balance : how do digital media influence how we think and act?
(2020)
What influence do digital technologies have on human perception, thinking and action? Do computer games harm the development of young brains? And is there really such a thing as »digital dementia«, an increasing forgetfulness caused by the use of modern technologies? For some of these questions, answers are available that are empirically corroborated.
Auf das richtige Maß kommt es an : wie beeinflussen digitale Medien unser Denken und Handeln?
(2020)
Welchen Einfluss haben digitale Technologien auf das menschliche Wahrnehmen, Denken und Handeln? Schaden Computerspiele der Entwicklung junger Gehirne? Und gibt es tatsächlich so etwas wie eine »digitale Demenz«, eine durch die Nutzung moderner Technologien bedingte wachsende Vergesslichkeit? Auf einige dieser Fragen gibt es bereits Antworten, die empirisch belegt sind.
Die vorliegende Studie versucht einen Beitrag zur Erforschung von Implementationsmöglichkeiten des bilingualen Sprachvermögens von Schüler*innen mit Migrationshintergrund für den Regelschulkontext zu leisten, indem ein bilinguales Interaktionsangebot beim Peer-Learning für türkisch-deutschsprachig aufwachsende Schüler*innen der dritten und vierten Klasse in einem quasi-experimentellen Setting unter Verwendung von Mixed Methods untersucht wird.
This study examined age‐related differences in the effectiveness of two generative learning strategies (GLSs). Twenty‐five children aged 9–11 and 25 university students aged 17–29 performed a facts learning task in which they had to generate either a prediction or an example before seeing the correct result. We found a significant Age × Learning Strategy interaction, with children remembering more facts after generating predictions rather than examples, whereas both strategies were similarly effective in adults. Pupillary data indicated that predictions stimulated surprise, whereas the effectiveness of example‐based learning correlated with children’s analogical reasoning abilities. These findings suggest that there are different cognitive prerequisites for different GLSs, which results in varying degrees of strategy effectiveness by age.
Children with reading and/or spelling disorders have increased rates of behavioral and emotional problems and combinations of these. Some studies also find increased rates of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), conduct disorder, anxiety disorder, and depression. However, the comorbidities of, e.g., arithmetic disorders with ADHD, anxiety disorder, and depression have been addressed only rarely. The current study explored the probability of children with specific learning disorders (SLD) in reading, spelling, and/or arithmetic to also have anxiety disorder, depression, ADHD, and/or conduct disorder. The sample consisted of 3,014 German children from grades 3 and 4 (mean age 9;9 years) who completed tests assessing reading, spelling as well as arithmetic achievement and intelligence via a web-based application. Psychopathology was assessed using questionnaires filled in by the parents. In children with a SLD we found high rates of anxiety disorder (21%), depression (28%), ADHD (28%), and conduct disorder (22%). Children with SLD in multiple learning domains had a higher risk for psychopathology and had a broader spectrum of psychopathology than children with an isolated SLD. The results highlight the importance of screening for and diagnosing psychiatric comorbidities in children with SLD.
Learning to solve graph tasks is one of the key prerequisites of acquiring domain-specific knowledge in most study domains. Analyses of graph understanding often use eye-tracking and focus on analyzing how much time students spend gazing at particular areas of a graph—Areas of Interest (AOIs). To gain a deeper insight into students’ task-solving process, we argue that the gaze shifts between students’ fixations on different AOIs (so-termed transitions) also need to be included in holistic analyses of graph understanding that consider the importance of transitions for the task-solving process. Thus, we introduced Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) as a novel approach to analyze eye-tracking data of 23 university students who solved eight multiple-choice graph tasks in physics and economics. ENA is a method for quantifying, visualizing, and interpreting network data allowing a weighted analysis of the gaze patterns of both correct and incorrect graph task solvers considering the interrelations between fixations and transitions. After an analysis of the differences in the number of fixations and the number of single transitions between correct and incorrect solvers, we conducted an ENA for each task. We demonstrate that an isolated analysis of fixations and transitions provides only a limited insight into graph solving behavior. In contrast, ENA identifies differences between the gaze patterns of students who solved the graph tasks correctly and incorrectly across the multiple graph tasks. For instance, incorrect solvers shifted their gaze from the graph to the x-axis and from the question to the graph comparatively more often than correct solvers. The results indicate that incorrect solvers often have problems transferring textual information into graphical information and rely more on partly irrelevant parts of a graph. Finally, we discuss how the findings can be used to design experimental studies and for innovative instructional procedures in higher education
Ergodic subspace analysis
(2020)
Properties of psychological variables at the mean or variance level can differ between persons and within persons across multiple time points. For example, cross-sectional findings between persons of different ages do not necessarily reflect the development of a single person over time. Recently, there has been an increased interest in the difference between covariance structures, expressed by covariance matrices, that evolve between persons and within a single person over multiple time points. If these structures are identical at the population level, the structure is called ergodic. However, recent data confirms that ergodicity is not generally given, particularly not for cognitive variables. For example, the <i>g</i> factor that is dominant for cognitive abilities between persons seems to explain far less variance when concentrating on a single person’s data. However, other subdimensions of cognitive abilities seem to appear both between and within persons; that is, there seems to be a lower-dimensional subspace of cognitive abilities in which cognitive abilities are in fact ergodic. In this article, we present ergodic subspace analysis (ESA), a mathematical method to identify, for a given set of variables, which subspace is most important within persons, which is most important between person, and which is ergodic. Similar to the common spatial patterns method, the ESA method first whitens a joint distribution from both the between and the within variance structure and then performs a principle component analysis (PCA) on the between distribution, which then automatically acts as an inverse PCA on the within distribution. The difference of the eigenvalues allows a separation of the rotated dimensions into the three subspaces corresponding to within, between, and ergodic substructures. We apply the method to simulated data and to data from the COGITO study to exemplify its usage.
In this explorative study, we investigate how sequences of behaviour are related to success or failure in complex problem‐solving (CPS). To this end, we analysed log data from two different tasks of the problem‐solving assessment of the Programme for International Student Assessment 2012 study (n = 30,098 students). We first coded every interaction of students as (initial or repeated) exploration, (initial or repeated) goal‐directed behaviour, or resetting the task. We then split the data according to task successes and failures. We used full‐path sequence analysis to identify groups of students with similar behavioural patterns in the respective tasks. Double‐checking and minimalistic behaviour was associated with success in CPS, while guessing and exploring task‐irrelevant content was associated with failure. Our findings held for both tasks investigated, from two different CPS measurement frameworks. We thus gained detailed insight into the behavioural processes that are related to success and failure in CPS.
Highlights
• Transparency of design, reference frames and support for action were found to support students' sense-making of LA dashboards.
• The higher the overall SRL score, the more relevant the three factors were perceived by learners.
• Learner goals affect how relevant students find reference frames.
• The SRL effect on the perceived relevance of transparency depends on learner goals.
Abstract
Unequal stakeholder engagement is a common pitfall of adoption approaches of learning analytics in higher education leading to lower buy-in and flawed tools that fail to meet the needs of their target groups. With each design decision, we make assumptions on how learners will make sense of the visualisations, but we know very little about how students make sense of dashboard and which aspects influence their sense-making. We investigated how learner goals and self-regulated learning (SRL) skills influence dashboard sense-making following a mixed-methods research methodology: a qualitative pre-study followed-up with an extensive quantitative study with 247 university students. We uncovered three latent variables for sense-making: transparency of design, reference frames and support for action. SRL skills are predictors for how relevant students find these constructs. Learner goals have a significant effect only on the perceived relevance of reference frames. Knowing which factors influence students' sense-making will lead to more inclusive and flexible designs that will cater to the needs of both novice and expert learners.