Tuexenia : Mitteilungen der Floristisch-Soziologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft, Band 37 (2017)
Refine
Year of publication
- 2017 (2)
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- grazing (2) (remove)
Understanding plant-plant interactions is essential in planning and implementing effective grassland management strategies. Positive and negative interactions generally co-occur in plant communities and the net effect of these interactions may depend on the disturbance regime, including grazing. Shrubs can act as biotic refuges by physically protecting neighbouring plants from herbivores. As a result, we would expect that in pastures the diversity and flowering success of plants is higher in the close vicinity of shrubs compared to the open vegetation. Nevertheless, we can also assume a competitive trade-off cost for plants that grow together with shrubs. In this study, we assessed the small-scale effects of dwarf shrubs (30–40 cm in diameter) on species density and flowering success. Specifically, we considered three types of microsites: (i) shrub interior, (ii) edge of shrub, and (iii) open pasture (more than 2 meters away from the shrub). We surveyed these three types of microsites using 10 × 10 cm sized plots both in grazed and ungrazed meadow steppe, in central Hungary. The highest species density was found at the edge of shrubs, both in grazed and ungrazed vegetation. Meanwhile, species density did not differ significantly between shrub interiors and the open pasture. However, in grazed vegetation, species flowering success was significantly higher in shrub interiors and edges than in the open pasture; no significant trend was observed for this measure in ungrazed vegetation. In contrast to previous studies, we did not detect a competitive effect of small-sized shrubs on plants in ungrazed vegetation. Our results indicate that small-sized shrubs protect other plants from herbivores and that the edge effect plays an important role for the maintenance of small-scale species diversity in pastures. Overall, our results underline the beneficial effect of biotic refuges in pastures and we suggest that retaining a sparse population of small-sized native shrubs is advantageous from a conservation point of view.
The vast majority of European grasslands strongly depend on the regular removal of aboveground biomass by agricultural land use, mostly grazing or mowing or a combination of both. These specific management schemes have strong influence on plant diversity and vegetation composition, depending on their particular characteristics and their intensity. For example, the presence or absence of fertilization will favour some species over others, changing plant communities accordingly. Additionally, the farmer’s choice of a specific management scheme will also depend on the abiotic site conditions. This leads to a complex set of associated factors potentially affecting the structure and diversity of grasslands.
In this study, we compiled a unique dataset of 169 differently managed grasslands (in total 202 plots), which were sampled in five regions across Germany. For each plot, we documented management characteristics, measured plant diversity and functional group composition, recorded endangered species according to red lists, and calculated Ellenberg indicator values. We assessed patterns in vegetation composition and diversity in relation to the particular management scheme, which was categorized as meadow, meadow with autumn or winter grazing (with mowing as predominant management), mown pasture (where mowing and grazing are used at roughly equal intensity), seasonal pasture (with grazing as predominant management) and year-round pasture.
Our study showed that grasslands of different management schemes significantly differed in diversity, structure and functional composition. However, it also became obvious that vegetation composition was not strictly distinguished by management alone. Local and regional characteristics such as soil conditions, size of the grassland species pool or land-use history, often played a more prominent role than land use alone. Assumingly, the interplay of those local and regional characteristics with the proportion of grazing and mowing at a particular site inhibit clear differences among our predefined management schemes. Nevertheless, species richness was the lowest in year-round pastures, moderate in meadows and highest in seasonal pastures. In contrast, year-round pastures harboured the highest mean numbers of endangered species. The dependency of a certain management scheme on site-specific environmental factors such as soil fertility, further complicated the clear separation of management effects from those of the environmental background. In summary, modern grassland management strongly shaped grassland vegetation, but today’s combination of different management practices complicated the assessment of specific land-use effects on plant diversity. Thus, neither mowing nor grazing turned out to be “the one and only” management for nature conservation. Although our results challenge long-term prognoses for future vegetation development under modern grassland management, we clearly showed that low-intensity management and the absence of fertilization promoted plant diversity, with higher values in pastures compared to meadows and mown pastures.