Journal für Medienlinguistik : jfml = Journal for media linguistics
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (35) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (35)
Keywords
- conversation analysis (4)
- Extremismus (2)
- Framing (2)
- Konzeptualisierung (2)
- Linguistik (2)
- Mobile Telekommunikation (2)
- WhatsApp (2)
- co-presence (2)
- corpus linguistics (2)
- social media (2)
- öffentlich-medialer Diskurs (2)
- (Digital) language criticism (1)
- (re-)openings (1)
- Aneignungsforschung (1)
- Anonymität (1)
- Asterisk (1)
- Beiläufiges Schreiben (1)
- Benutzernamen (1)
- Bewegtbildwissenschaft (1)
- Bildtheorie (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Computervermittelte Kommunikation (1)
- Datenschutz (1)
- Designtheorie (1)
- Designwissenschaft, (1)
- Digitalisierung (1)
- Dokumentationen (1)
- Empraxis, Kommunikationsform (1)
- Erzählstrategie (1)
- Face-to-Face-Interaktion (1)
- Facework (1)
- Fernsehforschung (1)
- Gleichheitszeichen (1)
- IRC-Chat (1)
- Infotainment (1)
- Infrastruktur (1)
- Internet Relay Chat (IRC) (1)
- Journalistische Textproduktion (1)
- Konversationsanalyse (1)
- Korpuslinguistik (1)
- Let’s Play (1)
- Medialität (1)
- Medienbegriff (1)
- Medienintegration (1)
- Medienlinguistik (1)
- Mensch-Maschine-Dialog (1)
- Methodologie (1)
- Minuszeichen (1)
- Mobile Medien (1)
- Multimodalität (1)
- Nicknamen (1)
- Onomastik (1)
- Plattform (1)
- Pluszeichen (1)
- Politolinguistik (1)
- Populismus (1)
- Praxistheorie (1)
- Presidential Debate (1)
- Privatheit (1)
- Progressionsanalyse (1)
- Reparatur (1)
- Reparaturinitiierung (1)
- Rhetorik (1)
- Smart Speaker (1)
- Smartphones (1)
- Soziale Medien (1)
- Technik (1)
- Textdesign (1)
- Transdisziplinäre Forschung (1)
- Twitter (1)
- VR-games (1)
- Verfahren der Zeichenprozessierung (1)
- Wikipedia (1)
- Zero- und Mini-Texte (1)
- accounts (1)
- announcements (1)
- asterisk (1)
- avatars (1)
- communication form (1)
- community (1)
- computer game (1)
- computer-mediated communication (CMC) (1)
- computervermittelte Kommunikation (1)
- conversation (1)
- conversation analyses (1)
- counterspeech (1)
- definition of media (1)
- democracy-threatening discourses (1)
- digital activism (1)
- embodiment (1)
- empraxis (1)
- encounter (1)
- equal sign (1)
- face-work (1)
- fifth estate (1)
- gathering (1)
- group chats (1)
- handles (1)
- hashtags (1)
- hate speech (1)
- informal language learning (1)
- institutioneller Diskurs (1)
- light verb constructions (1)
- linguistic landscape (1)
- linguistic repertoires (1)
- medial shaping (1)
- mediale Durchformung (1)
- mediality (1)
- mediational repertoire (1)
- mediatisierte Alltagsgespräche (1)
- methodology (1)
- minus sign (1)
- multimodal analysis (1)
- multimodal interaction (1)
- multimodal narratives (1)
- multimodality, text design (1)
- mundane technology use (1)
- non-players (1)
- onomastics (1)
- ordinary conversation (1)
- pandemic (1)
- participation (1)
- participation framework (1)
- plus sign (1)
- political communication in television (1)
- politische Kommunikation im Fernsehen (1)
- polymedia (1)
- positioning (1)
- presidential debate (1)
- procedures of sign processing (1)
- protest (1)
- publicness (1)
- refugees (1)
- relationships (1)
- repair (1)
- repair initiation (1)
- screen-based interaction (1)
- self-naming (1)
- shared gameplay (1)
- single player games (1)
- smartphone-based language practices (1)
- smartphones (1)
- social media narratives (1)
- spectating (1)
- storytelling (1)
- technique (1)
- tele-presence (1)
- text linguistics (1)
- transgressiv (1)
- transgressive (1)
- transition (1)
- usernames (1)
- valency (1)
- videogames (1)
- virtual embodiment (1)
- virtual worlds (1)
- ways of spectating (1)
- zero and mini texts (1)
- Öffentlichkeit (1)
Institute
The aim of this paper is to present the results of an empirical analysis of the use of non-alphabetic graphic signs (e.g. asterisks, slashes, plus signs etc.) in the context of repairs in Russian and German informal electronic communication. The data for the analysis were taken from the “Mobile Communication Database MoCoDa” (http://mocoda.spracheinteraktion.de/), which contains Russian and German private electronic communication via SMS, WhatsApp and other short message services, and the “Dortmunder Chat-Korpus” (http://www.chatkorpus.tu-dortmund.de/korpora.html). This paper describes the functions of various graphic resources in the context of repairs in both data collections and compares the occurrences of these functions in current Russian and German computer-mediated communication. It concludes that particular signs in both data sets share the same subset of functions, but they differ in terms of how frequently these resources occur in each form of communication.
All linguistics should be media linguistics, but it is not. This thesis is presented by using linguistic landscapes as an example. LL research does not belong to the traditional core of either mainstream linguistics or media linguistics. This is why not everything within power has been done yet to make full use of their thematic, conceptual and methodological possibilities. Visible signs in public space, however, are an everyday phenomenon. You have to pull out all the stops to research them extensively. The distinction between linguistics and media linguistics turns out to be counterproductive. But this does not only apply to the case of linguistic landscapes. It also stands for any comprehensive investigation of language and language use. (Exceptions may be very narrow questions for specific purposes.) The above thoughts are supported by a database of the project „Metropolenzeichen“ with more than 25.000 systematically collected, geocoded and tagged photographs.