ZASPiL 60 = Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22, Vol. 1
Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (29)
Language
- English (29)
Has Fulltext
- yes (29)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (29)
Keywords
- focus (3)
- presupposition projection (2)
- presuppositions (2)
- pronoun (2)
- quantification (2)
- quantifiers (2)
- scalar implicature (2)
- subjectivity (2)
- tense (2)
- uniqueness (2)
- Epistemic Containment Principle (ECP) (1)
- Korean (1)
- MaxElide (1)
- Q-adverbs (1)
- Question Under Discussion (QUD) (1)
- Thai (1)
- Tiwa (1)
- accessibility (1)
- acquisition (1)
- adjectival antonyms (1)
- adjectives (1)
- agreement mismatch (1)
- alternative questions (1)
- alternative semantics (1)
- appositives (1)
- aspect (1)
- assertion (1)
- assertions (1)
- at-issue content (1)
- binding (1)
- choice functions (1)
- classifiers (1)
- coercions (1)
- coherence relations (1)
- common ground (1)
- comparative constructions (1)
- conditionals (1)
- conventional implicatures (1)
- conversational implicatures (1)
- cornering (1)
- counterfactuals (1)
- de dicto (1)
- decomposition, (1)
- definiteness (1)
- deixis (1)
- deontic modals (1)
- depiction verbs (1)
- determiners (1)
- discourse (1)
- discourse coherence (1)
- discourse particles (1)
- distributional semantics (1)
- domain restriction (1)
- donkey sentences (1)
- double access (1)
- ellipsis (1)
- embedded implicature (1)
- entailment (1)
- epistemic 'modals' (1)
- epistemic indefinites (1)
- epistemic modals (1)
- event semantics (1)
- events (1)
- evidentiality (1)
- exhaustivity (1)
- experimental pragmatics (1)
- experimental semantics (1)
- experiments (1)
- familiarity (1)
- firsthand experience (1)
- frame semantics (1)
- free choice (1)
- function words (1)
- future (1)
- game–theoretic pragmatics (1)
- generic quantifier (1)
- gestures (1)
- habitual (1)
- habituals (1)
- hierarchy (1)
- higher-order quantification (1)
- imperfective (1)
- implicated presupposition (1)
- implicature (1)
- imposters (1)
- individual variation (1)
- inferencing task (1)
- information structure (1)
- intensional quantifiers (1)
- intensional transitives (1)
- knowledge (1)
- language acquisition (1)
- lexical semantics (1)
- linear order (1)
- local context (1)
- logical form (1)
- manner implicature (1)
- maximality (1)
- mention-some (1)
- miners puzzle (1)
- modal flavor (1)
- modification (1)
- monotonicity (1)
- natural language metaphysics (1)
- negation (1)
- negative strengthening (1)
- negative-islands (1)
- non-intersective adjectives (1)
- not-at-issue content (1)
- number construction (1)
- parsing (1)
- partitives (1)
- person agreement (1)
- personal reference (1)
- perspective (1)
- pragmatic inference (1)
- predicates of personal taste (1)
- probability (1)
- progressive (1)
- prominence (1)
- pronouns (1)
- psycholinguistics (1)
- quantifier processing (1)
- reaction time (1)
- reasoning errors (1)
- reconstruction (1)
- relational adjectives (1)
- relative clauses (1)
- resumptive pronouns (1)
- salience (1)
- scalar diversity (1)
- scalar implicatures (1)
- scalar inferences (1)
- scope (1)
- secondary focus (1)
- similarity (1)
- simplification (1)
- speech reports (1)
- speeded verification (1)
- syllogisms (1)
- type composition logic (1)
- type-shifting (1)
- unalternative semantics (1)
- visusal representations (1)
- wide scope indefinites (1)
Sentences containing subjective predicates - e.g., "The movie was awesome"” - are intuitively anchored to a particular perspective; this makes them different from sentences describing objective facts - e.g., "The movie was set in 1995".
While authors have long debated on whether this intuition tracks a lexical distinction between subjective and factual predicates, much remains to be explored on whether, and how, the difference between these two assertions is reflected at the illocutionary level. Relying on evidence from two experiments, we show that assertions containing subjective predicates display different discourse behavior from objective assertions. We take these findings to support the idea that SAs should be assigned a special illocutionary profile, unveiling a genuine empirical difference between subjective and factual speech.
Analyses of scope reconstruction typically fall into two competing approaches: 'semantic reconstruction', which derives non-surface scope using semantic mechanisms, and 'syntactic reconstruction', which derives it by positing additional syntactic representations at the level of Logical Form. Grosu and Krifka (2007) proposed a semantic-reconstruction analysis for relative clauses like the gifted mathematician that Dan claims he is, in which the relative head NP can be interpreted in the scope of a lower intensional quantifier. Their analysis relies on type-shifting the relative head into a predicate of functions. We develop an alternative analysis for such relative clauses that replaces type-shifting with syntactic reconstruction. The competing analyses diverge in their predictions regarding scope possibilities in head-external relative clauses. We use Hebrew resumptive pronouns, which disambiguate a relative clause in favor of the head-external structure, to show that the prediction of syntactic reconstruction is correct. This result suggests that certain type-shifting operations are not made available by Universal Grammar.
According to Ogihara (1995), the usage of the embedded present in a speech report such as John said that Mary is in the room is restricted by the cause of John’s belief (the state that made John think that Mary is in the room): the present tense can be used only if this cause still holds at the time that John said that Mary is in the room is uttered.
This paper presents experimental evidence demonstrating that this is only one of the factors that licenses a felicitous usage of the embedded present tense. In particular, we show that the cause of belief still holding is not a necessary condition, and identify two additional, sufficient (but not necessary) factors: in cases of false belief, who is aware of the falsity of the belief and duration of the reported state. While these factors are independent, they collectively support the idea that the present tense encodes ‘current relevance’, even in embedded contexts (e.g. Costa 1972; McGilvray 1974). This gives rise to the question of how we can derive ‘current relevance’ and, in particular, whether previous analyses of the embedded present tense are adequately equipped to do so.
This paper presents a new account of the generalization that focused elements cannot be elided, framed within Unalternative Semantics, a framework that does away with syntactic F-marking. We propose the mirror image of the generalization: what is elided cannot introduce alternatives. We implement this as a focus restriction in UAS and then go on to show how to account for MAXELIDE effects using the same technique, without making reference to any transderivational constraints.
The semantics of adjectives related to nominals denoting societal roles, such as presidential (from president), have remained understudied. We examine the semantics of what we call role-denoting relational adjectives, providing a formal analysis using the notion of a frame, a unified representation for lexical knowledge, world knowledge, and context. The frames we propose are based on a constructivist philosophical understanding of social roles, leading us to posit a multi-tiered ontology of events and individuals. Using frames and our ontology, we provide a general semantics for role-denoting relational adjectives and roles
Discourses in the historical (or narrative) use of the simple present in English prohibit backshifting, though they allow forward sequencing. Unlike both reference time theories and discourse coherence theories of these temporal inferences, we propose that backshifting has a different source from narrative progression. In particular, we argue that backshifting arises through anaphora to a salient event in the preceding discourse.
The goal of this paper is to evaluate two approaches to quantification in event semantics, namely the analysis of quantificational DPs in terms of generalized quantifiers and the analysis proposed in Schein (1993) according to which quantifiers over individuals contain an existential quantifier over sub-events in their scope. Both analyses capture the fact that the event quantifier always takes scope under quantifiers over individuals (the Event Type Principle in Landman (2000)), but the sub-events analysis has also been argued to be able to account for some further data, namely for adverbs qualifying ‘ensemble’ events and for mixed cumulative/ distributive readings. This paper shows that the sub-events analysis also provides a better account of the Event Type Principle if a broader range of data is considered, including cases with non-existential quantifiers over events: unlike the generalized quantifiers analysis, it can successfully account for the interpretation of indefinites in bare habituals and sentences that contain overt adverbs of quantification.
Korean is a generalized classifier language where classifiers are required for numerals to combine with nominals. This paper presents a number construction where the classifier is absent and the numeral appears prenominally. This construction, which I call the classifier-less number construction (Cl-less NC), results in a definite or a partitive reading where the referent must be familiar: ‘the two women’ or ‘two of the women’. In order to account for this, I argue that Korean postnominal number constructions are ambiguous between a plain number construction and a partitive construction. After motivating and proposing an analysis for the partitive structure, I argue that Cl-less NC is derived from the partitive construction, explaining its distributional restriction and the interpretation.
Counter to the often assumed division of labour between content and function words, we argue that both types of words have lexical content in addition to their logical content. We propose that the difference between the two types of words is a difference in degree. We conducted a preliminary study of quantificational determiners with methods from Distributional Semantics, a computational approach to natural language semantics. Our findings have implications both for distributional and formal semantics. For distributional semantics, they indicate a possible avenue that can be used to tap into the meaning of function words. For formal semantics, they bring into light the context-sensitive, lexical aspects of function words that can be recovered from the data even when these aspects are not overtly marked. Such pervasive context-sensitivity has profound implications for how we think about meaning in natural language.