100 Philosophie und Psychologie
Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (50)
- 2015 (39)
- 2016 (39)
- 2017 (38)
- 2018 (33)
- 2012 (31)
- 2013 (30)
- 2014 (28)
- 2020 (27)
- 2005 (26)
- 2010 (25)
- 2009 (21)
- 2008 (18)
- 2011 (16)
- 2003 (15)
- 2007 (11)
- 2004 (10)
- 1999 (9)
- 1997 (7)
- 1998 (7)
- 2002 (7)
- 2021 (7)
- 2006 (6)
- 1994 (5)
- 1914 (4)
- 1996 (4)
- 2000 (4)
- 2001 (4)
- 1924 (3)
- 1926 (3)
- 1992 (3)
- 1993 (3)
- 1995 (3)
- 1919 (2)
- 1984 (2)
- 2024 (2)
- 1908 (1)
- 1913 (1)
- 1917 (1)
- 1918 (1)
- 1920 (1)
- 1927 (1)
- 1929 (1)
- 1930 (1)
- 1933 (1)
- 1934 (1)
- 1965 (1)
- 1987 (1)
- 1988 (1)
- 1989 (1)
Document Type
- Article (421)
- Review (50)
- Doctoral Thesis (35)
- Working Paper (14)
- Book (9)
- Contribution to a Periodical (9)
- magisterthesis (9)
- Part of a Book (4)
- Magister's Thesis (3)
- Master's Thesis (1)
Language
Has Fulltext
- yes (557)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (557)
Keywords
- Adorno (53)
- Critical Theory (31)
- Reconhecimento (27)
- Axel Honneth (25)
- Frankfurt School (25)
- Recognition (25)
- Teoria Crítica (18)
- Theodor W. Adorno (18)
- Critical theory (17)
- Escola de Frankfurt (17)
Institute
- Philosophie (557) (remove)
Hegels Nützlichkeit
(2021)
The aim of this paper is to take a fresh look at a discussion about the distinct existences argument that took place between David Armstrong and Frank Jackson more than 50 years ago. I will try to show that Armstrong’s argument can be successfully defended against Jackson’s objections (albeit at the price of certain concessions concerning Armstrong’s view on the meaning of psychological terms as well as his conception of universals). Focusing on two counterexamples that Jackson put forward against Hume’s principle (which is central to Armstrong’s argument), I will argue that they are either compatible with Hume’s principle, or imply a false claim. I will also look at several other considerations that go against Hume’s principle, such as, for example, Kripke’s origin essentialism and counterexamples from aposteriori necessity.
I will argue for a novel variant of the knowledge norm for practical reasoning. In Sect. 2, I will look at current variations of a knowledge norm for practical reasoning and I will provide reasons to doubt these proposals. In Sects. 3 and 4, I develop my own proposal according to which knowledge is the norm of apt practical reasoning. Section 5 considers objections. Finally, Sect. 6 concerns the normativity of my proposed knowledge norm and its significance.
In Krisenzeiten suchen Menschen nach einem Zeichen der Hoffnung. Hoffnung steht auch im Zentrum der Forschung von Claudia Blöser. Ein Gespräch mit der Philosophin über die Beziehung zwischen Hoffnung, Wissen und Angst und darüber, warum das Konzept der radikalen Hoffnung in einer Krisensituation hilfreich sein kann.
Die Magisterarbeit in ein Beitrag zur Weiterentwicklung neuzeitlicher Subjekt- und Emanzipationstheorien. Im ersten Schritt werden die Grundkonzepte aus Baruch de Spinozas Ethik dargestellt und ihre Rolle fuer die Ideologietheorie Louis Althussers analysiert. Auf Grundlage dieser Analyse werden Grenzen der Subjekt- und Ideologietheorie Altussers aufgezeigt und der Versuch unternommen sie unter Zugriff auf spinozistische Begigriffe zu ueberwinden. Eine zentrale Rolle spielt hierbei die Perspektive auf den Menschen als körperliches, emotionales und begehrendes Wesen.