300 Sozialwissenschaften
Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (203) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (82)
- Contribution to a Periodical (42)
- Part of a Book (33)
- Part of Periodical (17)
- Doctoral Thesis (10)
- Working Paper (7)
- Book (5)
- Review (5)
- Bachelor Thesis (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
Language
- German (111)
- English (60)
- Portuguese (15)
- Spanish (8)
- Ukrainian (4)
- Italian (2)
- mis (1)
- Multiple languages (1)
- Turkish (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (203)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (203)
Keywords
- Critical Theory (6)
- Frankfurt School (6)
- Adorno (5)
- critical theory (5)
- Escola de Frankfurt (4)
- Estudios organizacionales (4)
- Begriff (3)
- Digitalisierung (3)
- Escuela de Frankfurt (3)
- Estudos organizacionais (3)
Institute
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (73)
- Präsidium (51)
- Philosophie (47)
- Institut für Sozialforschung (IFS) (42)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (10)
- Institut für sozial-ökologische Forschung (ISOE) (9)
- Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaften (9)
- Cornelia Goethe Centrum für Frauenstudien und die Erforschung der Geschlechterverhältnisse (CGC) (8)
- Geographie (4)
- Geowissenschaften / Geographie (3)
ISOE-Newsletter 04/2019
(2019)
Alltagsprodukte aus Plastik: Chemikalienmix aus schädlichen und unbekannten Substanzen +++ Kooperationen zwischen Kommunen sichern Lebensqualität im ländlichen Raum +++ IAA im gesellschaftlichen Wandel: Wenn die Verkehrswende der Leitmesse die Show stiehlt +++ „Wasserwende“ gegen Versorgungsengpässe +++ Zielgruppengerechte Ansprache für energieeffizientes und sicheres Wohnen im Alter +++ Wasser in Plastik – Plastik im Wasser. Warum es schwierig ist, die Ökobilanz von PET-Flaschen zu erstellen +++ Lehrveranstaltungen im Wintersemester 2019/20 +++ ISOE unterstützt „Globale Aktionswoche gegen die Klimakrise“ +++ Aus dem ISOE +++ Termine +++ Publikationen
ISOE-Newsletter 05/2019
(2019)
Zukunft gestalten im Anthropozän: Gestaltungsprinzipien für eine kritische Nachhaltigkeitsforschung +++ Institutsbericht 2019 des ISOE erschienen +++ 30 Jahre ISOE: Aufbruch in die Gegenwart. Die sozial-ökologische Zukunft heute gestalten +++ Das ISOE auf Instagram +++ Forschungsergebnisse aus der Schweiz zu nachhaltigem Mobilitätsverhalten +++ Klimaanpassung in den Städten: Was Infrastrukturen dazu beitragen können +++ Kipppunkte in Ökosystemen: Maßnahmen zum Erhalt der Savannen im südlichen Afrika +++ Termine +++ Publikationen
This article analyzes and criticizes the temporal orientation of Catherine Lu’s theory of colonial redress in Justice and Reconciliation in World Politics. Lu argues that colonial historic injustice can, with few exceptions, justify special reparative measures only if these past injustices still contribute to structural injustice in contemporary social relations. Focusing on Indigenous peoples, I argue that the structural injustice approach can and should incorporate further backward looking elements. First, I examine how Lu’s account has backward-looking elements not present in other structural injustice accounts. Second, I suggest how the structural injustice approach could include additional backward-looking features. I presuppose here, with Lu, that all agents connected to an unjust social structure have a forwardlooking political responsibility to reform this structure, regardless of their relation (or lack thereof) to victims or perpetrators of historic injustice. However, I suggest that agents with connections to historic injustice can occupy a social position that makes them differently situated than other agents within that same structure, leading to differences in how these agents should discharge their forward-looking responsibility and differentiated liability for failure to do so. Third, I argue that Lu obscures the importance of rectifying material dispossession. Reparations, pace Lu, can be justified beyond a minimum threshold of disadvantage. Theorists of settler colonialism and Indigenous scholars show how the dispossession of Indigenous land can be seen as a structure that has not yet ended. I conclude by arguing that rectification can be a precondition for genuine reconciliation.
Structural alienation: Lu's structural approach to reconciliation from within a relational framework
(2019)
In Justice and Reconciliation in World Politics Catherine Lu argues that structural reconciliation, rather than interactional reconciliation, ought to be the primary normative goal for political reconciliation efforts. I suggest that we might have good reason to want to retain relational approaches – such as that of Linda Radzik – as the primary focus of reconciliatory efforts, but that Lu’s approach is invaluable for identifying the parties who ought to bear responsibility for those efforts in cases of structural injustice. First, I outline Lu’s analysis of reconciliation, where she argues for the normative priority of structural approaches within the global political sphere, and propose that it will be useful to identify whether or not a relational account could instead identify underlying structural injustices. Second, I examine one particular relational account of reconciliation (based on Radzik’s account of atonement) and argue that this type of account brings to light underlying structural injustices of the kind Lu is concerned with. Finally, I identify an issue for relational accounts in identifying relevant responsible parties for reconciliation before returning to Lu’s structural account to address this gap.
African visionaries
(2019)
In over forty portraits, African writers present extraordinary people from their continent: portraits of the women and men whom they admire, people who have changed and enriched life in Africa. The portraits include inventor, founders of universities, resistance fighters, musicians, environmental activists or writers. African Visionaries is a multi-faceted book, seen through African eyes, on the most impactful people of Africa. Some of the writers contributing to the collection are: Helon Habila, Virginia Phiri, Ellen Banda-Aaku, Véronique Tadjo, Tendai Huchu, Solomon Tsehaye, Patrice Nganang and Sami Tchak.
This paper discusses two possible difficulties with Catherine Lu’s powerful analysis of the moral response to our shared history of colonial evil; both of these difficulties stem from the rightful place of shame in that moral response. The first difficulty focuses on efficacy: existing states may be better motivated by shame at the past than by a shared duty to bring about a just future. The second focuses on equity: it is, at the very least, possible that shame over past misdeeds ought to be brought into the conversation about present duties, in a manner more robust than Lu’s analysis allows.
This paper addresses the phenomenon of climate-induced displacement. I argue that there is scope for an account of asylum as compensation owed to those displaced by the impacts of climate change which needs only to appeal to minimal normative commitments about the requirements of global justice. I demonstrate the possibility of such an approach through an examination of the work of David Miller. Miller is taken as an exemplar of a broadly ‘international libertarian’ approach to global justice, and his work is a useful vehicle for this project because he has an established view about both responsibility for climate change and about the state’s right to exclude would-be immigrants. In the course of the argument, I set out the relevant aspects of Miller’s views, reconstruct an account of responsibility for the harms faced by climate migrants which is consistent with Miller’s views, and demonstrate why such an account yields an obligation to provide asylum as a form of compensation to ‘climate migrants.’
La sfida del nominalismo alla realtà degli universali (sia in filosofia che in teologia) è stata un motore del pensiero moderno. Tradotta in termini estetici, ha favorito la resistenza alle generiche convenzioni e ha contribuito a minare le nozioni essenzialiste della forma estetica. Theodor W. Adorno ebbe una risposta tipicamente dialettica al nominalismo, plaudendo alla sua sovversione delle reificazioni categoriche, ma allarmato dal suo livellamento indiscriminato della distinzione tra concetto e oggetto, che poteva anche cancellare la distinzione tra opere d'arte e oggetti di uso quotidiano. In termini musicali, ha apprezzato l'enfasi nominalista sui singoli lavori rispetto alle generiche categorie formali e ha elogiato la rivoluzione atonale di Arnold Schoenberg. Ma era anche consapevole del fatto che, portato all'estremo, il nominalismo poteva condurre al dominio soggettivo di una natura considerata priva di proprie caratteristiche essenziali. Nella sua tardiva riflessione sulla musique informelle, ammirò una musica che evitava sia le categorie reificate che il dominio soggettivo dell'apparente contingenza del mondo materiale, una musica che esprimeva un nominalismo che avrebbe potuto essere meglio chiamato "magico" piuttosto che "convenzionale".
Christian Reuter ist Universitätsprofessor für Wissenschaft und Technik für Frieden und Sicherheit (PEASEC) am Fachbereich Informatik mit Zweitmitgliedschaft im Fachbereich Gesellschafts- und Geschichtswissenschaften der Technischen Universität Darmstadt. Er beschäftigt sich insbesondere mit interaktiven und kollaborativen Technologien im Kontext der Sicherheits-, Krisen- und Friedensforschung und hat mehr als 160 wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen im Bereich Informatik, Wirtschaftsinformatik, Mensch- Computer-Interaktion (HCI), Computerunterstützte Gruppenarbeit (CSCW), Krisen-, Sicherheits- und Friedensforschung und Soziale Medien publiziert.