370 Bildung und Erziehung
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2020 (7) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (7)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- nein (7)
Schlagworte
- PISA (2)
- ICT Engagement (1)
- anxiety disorder (1)
- attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (1)
- complex problem-solving (1)
- conduct disorder (1)
- depression (1)
- exploration (1)
- log data (1)
- questionnaire (1)
Institut
- Psychologie (7) (entfernen)
Das Projekt »Digi_Gap – Digitale Lücken in der Lehrkräftebildung schließen« wird von 2020 bis 2023 vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung im Rahmen der Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung (QLB) gefördert (Fördersumme: 1 678 023 Euro) und umfasst fünf Teilprojekte mit 19 WissenschaftlerInnen aus neun Fachbereichen an der Goethe-Universität. Geleitet wird das Projekt von Prof. Dr. Holger Horz (wissenschaftliche Gesamtprojektleitung) und Dr. Claudia Burger (operative Leitung). An der Goethe-Universität ebenfalls durch die QLB gefördert wird »The Next Level«, das Nachfolgeprojekt von »Level« (»Lehrerbildung vernetzt entwickeln)«, mit dem Digi_Gap inhaltlich und strukturell eng verbunden ist. Das Leitungs- und Koordinationsteam (Leitung: Holger Horz & Claudia Burger; Koordination: Johannes Appel und Annika Kreft) von Digi_Gap hat sich den Fragen des UniReport auch zum aktuellen Thema »Homeschooling« gestellt.
This study examined age‐related differences in the effectiveness of two generative learning strategies (GLSs). Twenty‐five children aged 9–11 and 25 university students aged 17–29 performed a facts learning task in which they had to generate either a prediction or an example before seeing the correct result. We found a significant Age × Learning Strategy interaction, with children remembering more facts after generating predictions rather than examples, whereas both strategies were similarly effective in adults. Pupillary data indicated that predictions stimulated surprise, whereas the effectiveness of example‐based learning correlated with children’s analogical reasoning abilities. These findings suggest that there are different cognitive prerequisites for different GLSs, which results in varying degrees of strategy effectiveness by age.
In this explorative study, we investigate how sequences of behaviour are related to success or failure in complex problem‐solving (CPS). To this end, we analysed log data from two different tasks of the problem‐solving assessment of the Programme for International Student Assessment 2012 study (n = 30,098 students). We first coded every interaction of students as (initial or repeated) exploration, (initial or repeated) goal‐directed behaviour, or resetting the task. We then split the data according to task successes and failures. We used full‐path sequence analysis to identify groups of students with similar behavioural patterns in the respective tasks. Double‐checking and minimalistic behaviour was associated with success in CPS, while guessing and exploring task‐irrelevant content was associated with failure. Our findings held for both tasks investigated, from two different CPS measurement frameworks. We thus gained detailed insight into the behavioural processes that are related to success and failure in CPS.
A question of striking the right balance : how do digital media influence how we think and act?
(2020)
What influence do digital technologies have on human perception, thinking and action? Do computer games harm the development of young brains? And is there really such a thing as »digital dementia«, an increasing forgetfulness caused by the use of modern technologies? For some of these questions, answers are available that are empirically corroborated.
Auf das richtige Maß kommt es an : wie beeinflussen digitale Medien unser Denken und Handeln?
(2020)
Welchen Einfluss haben digitale Technologien auf das menschliche Wahrnehmen, Denken und Handeln? Schaden Computerspiele der Entwicklung junger Gehirne? Und gibt es tatsächlich so etwas wie eine »digitale Demenz«, eine durch die Nutzung moderner Technologien bedingte wachsende Vergesslichkeit? Auf einige dieser Fragen gibt es bereits Antworten, die empirisch belegt sind.
Children with reading and/or spelling disorders have increased rates of behavioral and emotional problems and combinations of these. Some studies also find increased rates of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), conduct disorder, anxiety disorder, and depression. However, the comorbidities of, e.g., arithmetic disorders with ADHD, anxiety disorder, and depression have been addressed only rarely. The current study explored the probability of children with specific learning disorders (SLD) in reading, spelling, and/or arithmetic to also have anxiety disorder, depression, ADHD, and/or conduct disorder. The sample consisted of 3,014 German children from grades 3 and 4 (mean age 9;9 years) who completed tests assessing reading, spelling as well as arithmetic achievement and intelligence via a web-based application. Psychopathology was assessed using questionnaires filled in by the parents. In children with a SLD we found high rates of anxiety disorder (21%), depression (28%), ADHD (28%), and conduct disorder (22%). Children with SLD in multiple learning domains had a higher risk for psychopathology and had a broader spectrum of psychopathology than children with an isolated SLD. The results highlight the importance of screening for and diagnosing psychiatric comorbidities in children with SLD.
As a relevant cognitive-motivational aspect of ICT literacy, a new construct ICT Engagement is theoretically based on self-determination theory and involves the factors ICT interest, Perceived ICT competence, Perceived autonomy related to ICT use, and ICT as a topic in social interaction. In this manuscript, we present different sources of validity supporting the construct interpretation of test scores in the ICT Engagement scale, which was used in PISA 2015. Specifically, we investigated the internal structure by dimensional analyses and investigated the relation of ICT Engagement aspects to other variables. The analyses are based on public data from PISA 2015 main study from Switzerland (n = 5860) and Germany (n = 6504). First, we could confirm the four-dimensional structure of ICT Engagement for the Swiss sample using a structural equation modelling approach. Second, ICT Engagement scales explained the highest amount of variance in ICT Use for Entertainment, followed by Practical use. Third, we found significantly lower values for girls in all ICT Engagement scales except ICT Interest. Fourth, we found a small negative correlation between the scores in the subscale “ICT as a topic in social interaction” and reading performance in PISA 2015. We could replicate most results for the German sample. Overall, the obtained results support the construct interpretation of the four ICT Engagement subscales.