439 Andere germanische Sprachen
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of Periodical (8)
- Part of a Book (6)
- Article (4)
- Contribution to a Periodical (3)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Periodical (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (24)
Keywords
- Deutsch (2)
- Isländisch (2)
- Niederländisch (2)
- Phraseologie (2)
- Schwedisch (2)
- Sprache (2)
- Syntax (2)
- Afrikaans (1)
- Aspekt (1)
- Construction grammar (1)
- Contrastive linguistics (1)
- Englisch (1)
- Ethnolekt (1)
- Experiment (1)
- Flexion / Morphologie <Linguistik> (1)
- Fragment (1)
- German (1)
- Germanic languages (1)
- Ghetto Slang (1)
- Grammatical doubts (1)
- Grammatical gaps (1)
- Grenzüberschreitung (1)
- Jugendsprache (1)
- Kaaps (1)
- Kasus (1)
- Kindersprache (1)
- Kollektivum (1)
- Konstruktionsgrammatik (1)
- Kontrastive Phonologie (1)
- Language (1)
- Language change (1)
- Language decay (1)
- Language enrichment (1)
- Lautwandel (1)
- Lübisches Recht (1)
- Mittelniederländisch (1)
- Morphologie (1)
- Multi-ethnolect (1)
- Mundart (1)
- Mundart Afrikaans <Kapstadt, Region> (1)
- Niederdeutsch (1)
- Niederdeutsche Schriftsprache (1)
- Overabundance (1)
- Phraseologisms (1)
- Retroflex (1)
- Ripuarisch (1)
- Romanian (1)
- Rule conflicts (1)
- Rumänisch (1)
- Semantik (1)
- Skandinavische Sprachen (1)
- Slang (1)
- Sprachliches Experiment (1)
- Sprachverfall (1)
- Swedish (1)
- Translation (1)
- Trantraal, Nathan (1)
- Umlaut (1)
- Untranslatability (1)
- Verb (1)
- Weltliteratur (1)
- Wismar (1)
- Wismarer Fragment (1)
- Worldliterature (1)
- Wortbildung (1)
- Youth Language (1)
- conceptual metaphors (1)
- death/dying (1)
- idiom (1)
- literal respective phraseological reading (1)
- literal translation (1)
- phraseology (1)
- world-play (1)
- Übersetzung (1)
Institute
- Neuere Philologien (13)
- Präsidium (3)
Von A bis Å. (Fast) alles über die Frankfurter Skandinavistik. Ausgabe 8 ; Sommeremester 2024
(2024)
Von A bis Å. (Fast) alles über die Frankfurter Skandinavistik. Ausgabe 7 ; Wintersemester 2023/24
(2023)
Von A bis Å. (Fast) alles über die Frankfurter Skandinavistik. Ausgabe 6 ; Sommersemester 2023
(2023)
Von A bis Å. (Fast) alles über die Frankfurter Skandinavistik. Ausgabe 5 ; Wintersemester 2022/23
(2022)
Von A bis Å. (Fast) alles über die Frankfurter Skandinavistik. Ausgabe 4 ; Sommersemester 2022
(2022)
Von A bis Å. (Fast) alles über die Frankfurter Skandinavistik. Ausgabe 3 ; Wintersemester 2021
(2021)
Von A bis Å. (Fast) alles über die Frankfurter Skandinavistik. Ausgabe 2 ; Sommersemester 2021
(2021)
Von A bis Å. (Fast) alles über die Frankfurter Skandinavistik. Ausgabe 1 ; Wintersemester 2020/21
(2020)
Unquestionably (or: undoubtedly), every competent speaker has already come to doubt with respect to the question of which form is correct or appropriate and should be used (in the standard language) when faced with two or more almost identical competing variants of words, word forms or sentence and phrase structure (e.g. German "Pizzas/Pizzen/Pizze" 'pizzas', Dutch "de drie mooiste/mooiste drie stranden" 'the three most beautiful/most beautiful three beaches', Swedish "större än jag/mig" 'taller than I/me'). Such linguistic uncertainties or "cases of doubt" (cf. i.a. Klein 2003, 2009, 2018; Müller & Szczepaniak 2017; Schmitt, Szczepaniak & Vieregge 2019; Stark 2019 as well as the useful collections of data of Duden vol. 9, Taaladvies.net, Språkriktighetsboken etc.) systematically occur also in native speakers and they do not necessarily coincide with the difficulties of second language learners. In present-day German, most grammatical uncertainties occur in the domains of inflection (nominal plural formation, genitive singular allomorphy of strong masc./neut. nouns, inflectional variation of weak masc. nouns, strong/weak adjectival inflection and comparison forms, strong/weak verb forms, perfect auxiliary selection) and word-formation (linking elements in compounds, separability of complex verbs). As for syntax, there are often doubts in connection with case choice (pseudo-partitive constructions, prepositional case government) and agreement (especially due to coordination or appositional structures). This contribution aims to present a contrastive approach to morphological and syntactic uncertainties in contemporary Germanic languages (mostly German, Dutch, and Swedish) in order to obtain a broader and more fine-grained typology of grammatical instabilities and their causes. As will be discussed, most doubts of competent speakers - a problem also for general linguistic theory - can be attributed to processes of language change in progress, to language or variety contact, to gaps and rule conflicts in the grammar of every language or to psycholinguistic conditions of language processing. Our main concerns will be the issues of which (kinds of) common or different critical areas there are within Germanic (and, on the other hand, in which areas there are no doubts), which of the established (cross-linguistically valid) explanatory approaches apply to which phenomena and, ultimately, the question whether the new data reveals further lines of explanation for the empirically observable (standard) variation.
A typical characteristic of Central German dialects, especially of the Ripuarian dialect, is that it has collective nouns with ge- + -ze (cf. gesteinze) besides those with ge- + -e (cf. gesteine) corresponding to Dutch gesteente and gestene. A relationship between ge- + -ze and ge- + -te has been assumed for a long time. A corpus-based comparison is given in order to explain the genesis of these different formation types (ge- + -e, ge- + -ze, ge- + -te) and their relations. It seems likely that earlier Dutch formations influenced their Ripuarian counterparts. Rarely, the circumfix ge- + -te also occurs in Ripuarian texts and may be autochthone. One main result is that the suffic -ze in Ripuarian restores the collective formation in the circumfix ge- + -e when it was destroyed by the e-apokope. This is a rare instance where an element of word formation is replaced by another one in order to neutralize the isolation effect of sound change.
By focusing human factors by the phraseological nomination, it becomes possible to expose obvious cases as reflections of everyday collective observations, experiences and evaluations considering a certain behavior or action. The subject of this investigation is differently molded phraseological units that permit to be listed under the hypernym ‘THE END OF LIFE BY HUMAN BEINGS’. The execution follows up the role of the linguistic image by the constitution of a slice of reality and gives representative examples of the metaphorization of the concept ‚DECEASE‘ in German, Romanian and Swedish. Productive source domains for the conceptualization of this notion will be considered; this due to the insight that conceptual spheres give keys to thought models, values and ideals anchored in the language.
This article discusses one of many possible strategies that translators use in rendering an idiom from a L1 to a L2, i.e. the verbatim or the literal translation. The points of view according to this strategy differ very much among the researchers: some treat them as semantic false friends. Based on the replies to a questionnaire that was handed out to 10 Romanian native speakers, one could state that the context in which the literal translation of a source-idiom is situated plays an important role for the understanding of the text. Beyond that, the translation of an idiom cannot be judged only by virtue of the denotative meaning – the pragmatic function of the translation as a whole is just as important. The questionnaire was compiled of literal translations of Swedish idioms into Romanian (from different translations of different novels). The article further discusses some of the text examples from this questionnaire and describes some of the phenomena related to idioms which hinder the so-called idiom-understanding and which probably led to misinterpretation and a failed literal translation.
Die Überlieferung des Lübischen Rechts nimmt für den Ostseeraum eine zentrale Stellung ein. In über 100 Städten hatte dieses Recht Geltung. Bereits in den 1260er Jahren entstanden erste deutschsprachige Handschriften und im Jahr 1294 veranlasste der Lübecker Kanzler Albrecht von Bardewik eine Neuordnung des Rechts im sog. Bardewikschen Codex. Heute liegt das Lübische Recht in rund 30 mittelalterlichen Codices sowie einer Reihe von Fragmenten vor. [...] Bei der Katalogisierung der abgelösten mittelalterlichen Makulatur im Archiv der Hansestadt Wismar tauchte sozusagen in allerletzter Sekunde, als das Manuskript des Kataloges bereits abgeschlossen war, ein niederdeutsches Fragment auf, das sich inhaltlich sehr schnell als Lübisches Recht entpuppte.
What are called 'natural languages' are artificial, often politically instituted and regulated, phenomena; a more accurate picture of speech practices around the globe is of a multidimensional continuum. This essay asks what the implications of this understanding of language are for translation, and focuses on the variety of Afrikaans known as Kaaps, which has traditionally been treated as a dialect rather than a language in its own right. An analysis of a poem in Kaaps by Nathan Trantraal reveals the challenges such a use of language constitutes for translation. A revised understanding of translation is proposed, relying less on the notion of transfer of meaning from one language to another and more on an active engagement with the experience of the reader.
In meinem Beitrag möchte ich einerseits die Hauptfunktionen von Multiethnolekten hervorheben, wie etwa Identitätsmarkierung, Gruppenzugehörigkeit, Sozialstatus und Protest, und andererseits möchte ich das Gebrauchsmuster solcher ethnisch geprägten Varietäten als spontane Ausdrucksweisen sozialer Lebenswelten darstellen. Meine Schlussfolgerung ist, dass Vielsprachigkeit heutzutage nicht als Bedrohung oder als Problem betrachtet werden sollte, sondern vielmehr als Bereicherung alltäglicher Interaktionen, als Gelegenheit für die Entfaltung des Menschen und als eine Chance für den Erfolg des interkulturellen Dialogs.
Alle germanischen Sprachen haben in den nachchristlichen Jahrhunderten eine phonologische Umlautphase durchlaufen, allerdings mit je unterschiedlichen Resultaten. Dieser Umgang mit den Umlautprodukten wurde bisher nie vergleichend in den Blick genommen; vielmehr bekommt man in jeder Einzelphilologie den Eindruck, als habe die Umlautentwicklung nur so und nicht anders verlaufen können. Erst die historisch-kontrastive Perspektive erweist, dass sich drei Pfade systematisieren lassen: Der Umlaut wird konserviert (Isländisch), er wird eliminiert (Englisch, Niederländisch) – Schwedisch nimmt hier eine Zwischenposition ein –, oder er wird funktionalisiert (grammatikalisiert) und damit morphologisch ausgedehnt (Deutsch, Luxemburgisch).
Im Folgenden werden diese drei Wege nicht nur beschrieben, sondern auch begründet. Der konsequente Sprachwandelvergleich ermöglicht dabei das Verständnis von Zusammenhängen und erlaubt es, aus den Einzelphilologien abgeleitete Annahmen zu revidieren.
Case and event structure
(2001)
I argue in this paper for a novel analysis of case in Icelandic, with implications for case theory in general. I argue that structural case is the manifestation on the noun phrase of features which are semantically interpretable only on verbal projections; thus, Icelandic case does not encode features of noun phrase interpretation, but it is not uninterpretable either; case is properly seen as reflecting (interpretable) tense and aspect features. Accusative case in Icelandic is available when the two subevents introduced in a transitive verb phrase are identified with each other, and dative case is available when the two parts are distinct (thus Icelandic case manifests aktionsart or inner aspect, in partial contrast to Finnish). This analysis bears directly on the theory of feature checking in the Minimalist Program; specifically, it paves the way for a restrictive theory of feature checking in which no features are strictly uninterpretable: all formal features come in interpretable-uninterpretable pairs, and feature checking is the matching of such pairs, driven by legibility conditions at Spell-Out.
This paper reports results from a series of experiments that investigated whether semantic and/or syntactic complexity influences young Dutch children’s production of past tense forms. The constructions used in the three experiments were (i) simple sentences (the Simple Sentence Experiment), (ii) complex sentences with CP complements (the Complement Clause Experiment) and (iii) complex sentences with relative clauses (the Relative Clause Experiment). The stimuli involved both atelic and telic predicates. The goal of this paper is to address the following questions.
Q1. Does semantic complexity regarding temporal anchoring influence the types of errors that children make in the experiments? For example, do children make certain types of errors when a past tense has to be anchored to the Utterance Time (UT), as compared to when it has to be anchored to the matrix topic time (TT)?
Q2. Do different syntactic positions influence children’s performance on past-tense production? Do children perform better in the Simple Sentence Experiment compared to complex sentences involving two finite clauses (the Complement Clause Experiment and the Relative Clause Experiment)? In complex sentence trials, do children perform differently when the CPs are complements vs. when the CPs are adjunct clauses? (Lebeaux 1990, 2000)
Q3. Do Dutch children make more errors with certain types of predicate (such as atelic predicates)? Alternatively, do children produce a certain type of error with a certain type of predicates (such as producing a perfect aspect with punctual predicates)? Bronckart and Sinclair (1973), for example, found that until the age of 6, French children showed a tendency to use passé composé with perfective events and simple present with imperfective events; we will investigate whether or not the equivalent of this is observed in Dutch.
Nicht nur literarische Werke und Figuren, Schriftsteller und Festschriftempfänger – auch Verben können zu Grenzgängern werden. Während das Grenzgängertum in der ersten Gruppe meist äußeren Umständen wie z.B. Migration geschuldet ist, gibt es bei Verben eigentlich keinen Grund, zu Grenzgängern zu werden. Dennoch kommt es immer wieder zu solchen Phänomenen. Dies impliziert, dass es überhaupt Grenzen gibt, die die Verben in bestimmte Rubriken verweisen; dies sind üblicherweise die sog. Flexionsklassen, etwa in Gestalt der starken und schwachen Klasse. Dieser Beitrag befasst sich mit Grenzen im Verbalbereich, illustriert anhand einiger skandinavischer Verben. In einem weiteren Schritt sollen auch Grenzziehungen, Grenzveränderungen und Grenzauflösungen beleuchtet werden. Dabei stellt sich die Frage, wie unverbrüchlich Grenzen sind, und insbesondere, warum es überhaupt Flexionsklassen gibt und warum sie sich oft so hartnäckig erhalten. Solche Fragen wurden bisher viel zu selten gestellt. Schließlich werden temporäre und dauerhafte Grenzüberschreitungen von Verben beleuchtet. Dabei verharren bestimmte Verben über Jahrhunderte hinweg als Grenzgänger zwischen wohletablierten Klassen. Speziell solche Phänomene verlangen eine Begründung, denn Grenzen, so steht zu vermuten, sollten dazu dienen, eine gewisse Ordnung zu garantieren.
A common topic in recent literature on phonology is the question of whether phonological processes and segments are licensed by prosodic position or by perceptual cues. The former is the traditional view, as represented by e.g. Lombardi (1995) and Beckman (1998), and holds that segments occur in specific prosodic positions such as the coda. In a licensing by cue approach, as represented by Steriade (1995, 1999), on the other hand, segments are assumed to occur in those positions only where their perceptual cues are prominent, independent of the prosodic position. In positions where the cues are not salient, neutralization occurs.