440 Romanische Sprachen; Französisch
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of Periodical (22)
- Article (14)
- Part of a Book (5)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- magisterthesis (1)
- Periodical (1)
- Report (1)
- Review (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (47)
Keywords
- Deutsch (3)
- Romanistik (3)
- Europa (2)
- Französisch (2)
- Hagen <2001> (2)
- Kind (2)
- Kongress (2)
- Mehrsprachigkeit (2)
- Semantik (2)
- Spracherwerb (2)
Institute
Nominalization in French can be done by means of conversion, which is characterized by the identity between the base and the derived lexeme. Since both noun→verb and verb→noun conversions exist, this property raises directionality issues, and sometimes leads to contradictory analyses of the same examples. The paper presents two approaches of conversion: derivational and non-derivational ones. Then it discusses various criteria used in derivational approaches to determine the direction of conversion: diachronic ones, such as dates of first attestation or etymology; and synchronic ones, such as semantic relations, noun gender or verb inflection. All criteria are evaluated on a corpus of 3,241 French noun~verb pairs. It is shown that none of them enables to identify the direction of conversion in French. Finally, the consequences for the theory of morphology are discussed.
French suffixations in -age, -ion and -ment are considered roughly equivalent, yet some differences have been pointed out regarding the semantics of the resulting nominalizations. In this study, we confirm the existence of a semantic distinction between them on the basis of a large scale distributional analysis. We show that the distinction is partially determined by the degree of technicality of the denoted action: -age nominals tend to be more technical than -ion ones. We examine this hypothesis through the statistical modeling of technicality. To this end, we propose a linguistic definition of technicality, which we implement using empirical, quantitative criteria estimated in corpora and lexical resources. We show to what extent the differences with respect to these criteria adequately approximate technicality. Our study indicates that this definition of technicality, while amendable, provides new perspectives for the characterization of action nouns.
