540 Chemie und zugeordnete Wissenschaften
Refine
Year of publication
- 2015 (1)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (1)
Institute
Ribosomes are the central cellular assembly lines for protein synthesis. To cope with the translational needs, a proliferating mammalian cell can produce up to 7500-ribosomes per minute. However, under growth limiting conditions, such as nutrient depletion, ribosome synthesis is rapidly shut down exemplifying the importance of a tight coordination between ribosome supply and cellular energy status. In addition to the quantitative regulation, a strict quality control of ribosome synthesis is equally important, because alterations in the composition or function of ribosomes can lead to a variety of pathologies. To cope with these challenges a highly regulated, multi-step pathway of ribosome biogenesis has evolved. In mammals this pathway generates the mature 80S ribosomes that comprise the large 60S and the small 40S subunits. Together they contain around 80 ribosomal proteins and the 28S, 18S, 5.8S and 5S rRNAs. The 28S, 5.8S and 5S rRNAs are assembled into the large subunit, while the 18S rRNA is part of the small subunit. The pathway of ribosome biogenesis is a multi-step cellular process, where specific stages occur in distinct subcellular compartments. Transcription of the 47S rRNA, which is the precursor for the 28S, 18S and 5.8S species, occurs in the nucleolus. Modification of distinct bases and early processing of this precursor also take place in the nucleolus. Subsequently, the 40S and 60S pre-ribosomes take separate maturation routes through the nucleoplasm before their export and final assembly in the cytoplasm. The various stages of preribosomal maturation require the constant and sequential action of a large number of non-ribosomal proteins, known as trans-acting factors. These factors coordinate the delicate remodeling of the pre-ribosomal intermediates and thereby ensure proper progression of the maturation process. The remodeling events largely depend on the dynamics of post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation or SUMOylation. This requires that the enzymes controlling these modifications are properly targeted to their sites of activity as they fulfill their functions within specific compartments. Here we studied the regulatory principles that govern the subcellular partitioning of the SUMO-specific isopeptidase SENP3 and its associated factor PELP1. Previous work from our laboratory has delineated the importance of the SUMO system for proper ribosome biogenesis in mammalian cells. In particular, we have shown that SENP3 is critically involved in 28S rRNA formation, which is a key step for pre-60S subunit maturation. A critical involvement of SENP3 at this stage of the maturation process is in agreement with the observed enrichment of SENP3 in the nucleolus, since 28S rRNA processing is considered to occur in the nucleolus. Our subsequent work identified the nucleolar scaffold protein NPM1 and the ribosomal trans-acting factor PELP1 as bona fide substrates of SENP3. For both proteins we could demonstrate modification by SUMO2/3 and define SENP3 as the demodifying enzyme. Depletion of SENP3 enhanced the conjugation of SUMO to both proteins and concomitantly reduced conversion of the 32S pre-rRNA to the mature 28S rRNA. PELP1 is part of a larger protein complex consisting of the core components PELP1, TEX10 and WDR18. We could show that the balanced SUMOylation/deSUMOylation of PELP1 controls the nucleolar/nucleoplasmic distribution of this complex. Enhanced SUMOylation, which is observed in the absence of SENP3, triggers the nucleolar release of the complex suggesting that SENP3-mediated deSUMOylation controls the dynamics of nucleolar trans-acting factors. Based on these findings we first wanted to understand, in which cellular compartment(s) SENP3 exerts its function on 28S maturation. Next, we wanted to tackle the question how the subcellular distribution of SENP3 is controlled. Finally
we addressed the question how the SUMOylation of PELP1 determines the subnuclear distribution of the PELP1 complex. This work initially revealed that the nucleolar localization of SENP3 is crucial for proper 28S rRNA formation and 60S ribosome maturation. Importantly, we could demonstrate that the nucleolar compartmentalization of SENP3 depends on its direct physical interaction with NPM1. Further, we could show that the amino-terminal region of SENP3 is necessary for its binding to NPM1 and nucleolar recruitment. Strikingly, this interaction requires the phosphorylation of SENP3, which is brought about by the mTOR kinase. By in-vitro kinase assays and mass-spectrometric approaches we identified five serine/threonine residues within the amino-terminal region of SENP3 that are targeted by mTOR (S/T 25, 26, 141, 142, 143). We could further demonstrate by mutagenesis that these sites in SENP3 are in fact critical for the phospho-dependent binding of SENP3 to NPM1 and its nucleolar recruitment.
Consistent with these data, we found that chemical inhibitors of the mTOR kinase trigger the nucleolar release of SENP3 and impair its interaction with NPM1. Strikingly, this goes along with severe 28S rRNA maturation defects demonstrating the physiological importance of mTOR signaling in the regulation SENP3 function and rRNA processing. By specifically depleting components of the either mTORC1 or mTORC2, we could attribute the observed effects to signaling by mTORC1 rather than mTORC2. In an attempt to find the negative regulators of SENP3 phosphorylation, we identified PP1-γ as the candidate phosphatase in this pathway. We found a strong physical interaction of SENP3 with PP1-γ and observed a loss of SENP3 nucleolar localization upon ectopic expression of PP1-γ. Thus we could define mTOR/PP1-γ mediated phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of SENP3 as an important
mechanism in the control of ribosome maturation. Given that mTOR activity is controlled by nutrient availability, SENP3 functions as a sensor that couples ribosome synthesis with nutrient availability. The second part of this work delineated the role of SUMOylated PELP1 in nucleoplasmic partitioning of the SENP3-PELP1 complex. It was revealed that the AAA-ATPase MDN1 binds preferentially to SUMO modified PELP1 and likely segregates SUMOylated PELP1 from nucleolar pre-60S particles. We initially found that the PELP1 complex associates with MDN1, a factor known to be involved in the 28S rRNA maturation. Notably, depletion of MDN1 led to an enhanced accumulation of the PELP1 complex in the nucleolus and a strong association of PELP1 with pre-60S particles, suggesting that MDN1 is required for the release of this complex from the pre-ribosomes. Intriguingly, the interaction of PELP1 with MDN1 requires SUMO2/3 and SUMOylated PELP1 shows enhanced binding to MDN1 when compared to unmodified PELP1. Taken together this work provides new insights in the control of the SENP3-PELP1 complex dynamics. We could define several layers for the coordinated spatial regulation of SENP3 and the PELP1 complex. This work therefore underscores the crucial importance of dynamic post-translational modifications for the control of ribosome maturation.