790 Freizeitgestaltung, darstellende Künste, Sport
Refine
Document Type
- Article (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (5)
Keywords
- ACL rupture (1)
- Athletes (1)
- COINS (1)
- Injury (1)
- Integrated multimodal training (1)
- Jumping (1)
- Laufökonomie (1)
- Neurocognition (1)
- Running Economy (1)
- central nervous system modifications (1)
Institute
This study investigated the effects of a daily plyometric hopping intervention on running economy (RE) in amateur runners. In a randomized, controlled trial, thirty-four amateur runners (29 ± 7 years, 27 males) were allocated to a control or a hopping exercise group. During the six-week study, the exercise group performed 5 min of double-legged hopping exercise daily. To progressively increase loading, the number of hopping bouts (10 s each) was steadily increased while break duration between sets was decreased. Pre- and post-intervention, RE, peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were measured during 4-min stages at three running speeds (10, 12, and 14 km/h). ANCOVAs with baseline values and potential cofounders as cofactors were performed to identify differences between groups. ANCOVA revealed an effect of hopping on RE at 12 km/h (df = 1; F = 4.35; p < 0.05; η2 = 0.072) and 14 km/h (df = 1; F = 6.72; p < 0.05; η2 = 0.098), but not at 10 km/h (p > 0.05). Exercise did not affect VO2peak (p > 0.05), but increased RER at 12 km/h (df = 1; F = 4.26; p < 0.05; η2 = 0.059) and 14 km/h (df = 1; F = 36.73; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.520). No difference in RER was observed at 10 km/h (p > 0.05). Daily hopping exercise is effective in improving RE at high running speeds in amateurs and thus can be considered a feasible complementary training program.
Clinical trial registration German Register of Clinical Trials (DRKS00017373).
Failed jump landings represent a key mechanism of musculoskeletal trauma. It has been speculated that cognitive dual-task loading during the flight phase may moderate the injury risk. This study aimed to explore whether increased visual distraction can compromise landing biomechanics. Twenty-one healthy, physically active participants (15 females, 25.8 ± 0.4 years) completed a series of 30 counter-movement jumps (CMJ) onto a capacitive pressure platform. In addition to safely landing on one leg, they were required to memorize either one, two or three jersey numbers shown during the flight phase (randomly selected and equally balanced over all jumps). Outcomes included the number of recall errors as well as landing errors and three variables of landing kinetics (time to stabilization/TTS, peak ground reaction force/pGRF, length of the centre of pressure trace/COPT). Differences between the conditions were calculated using the Friedman test and the post hoc Bonferroni-Holm corrected Wilcoxon test. Regardless of the condition, landing errors remained unchanged (p = .46). In contrast, increased visual distraction resulted in a higher number of recall errors (chi² = 13.3, p = .001). Higher cognitive loading, furthermore, appeared to negatively impact mediolateral COPT (p < .05). Time to stabilization (p = .84) and pGRF (p = .78) were unaffected. A simple visual distraction in a controlled experimental setting is sufficient to adversely affect landing stability and task-related short-term memory during CMJ. The ability to precisely perceive the environment during movement under time constraints may, hence, represent a new injury risk factor and should be investigated in a prospective trial.
Background: We aimed to investigate the potential effects of a 4-week motor–cognitive dual-task training on cognitive and motor function as well as exercise motivation in young, healthy, and active adults.
Methods: A total of 26 participants (age 25 ± 2 years; 10 women) were randomly allocated to either the intervention group or a control group. The intervention group performed a motor–cognitive training (3×/week), while the participants of the control group received no intervention. Before and after the intervention period of 4 weeks, all participants underwent cognitive (d2-test, Trail Making Test) and motor (lower-body choice reaction test and time to stabilization test) assessments. Following each of the 12 workouts, self-reported assessments (rating of perceived exertion, enjoyment and pleasant anticipation of the next training session) were done. Analyses of covariances and 95% confidence intervals plotting for between group and time effects were performed.
Results: Data from 24 participants were analysed. No pre- to post-intervention improvement nor a between-group difference regarding motor outcomes (choice-reaction: F = 0.5; time to stabilization test: F = 0.7; p > 0.05) occurred. No significant training-induced changes were found in the cognitive tests (D2: F = 0.02; Trail Making Test A: F = 0.24; Trail Making Test B: F = 0.002; p > 0.05). Both enjoyment and anticipation of the next workout were rated as high.
Discussion: The neuro-motor training appears to have no significant effects on motor and cognitive function in healthy, young and physically active adults. This might be explained in part by the participants’ very high motor and cognitive abilities, the comparably low training intensity or the programme duration. The high degree of exercise enjoyment, however, may qualify the training as a facilitator to initiate and maintain regular physical activity. The moderate to vigorous intensity levels further point towards potential health-enhancing cardiorespiratory effects.
Introduction Current: evidence suggests that the loss of mechanoreceptors after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears might be compensated by increased cortical motor planning. This occupation of cerebral resources may limit the potential to quickly adapt movements to unforeseen external stimuli in the athletic environment. To date, studies investigating such neural alterations during movement focused on simple, anticipated tasks with low ecological validity. This trial, therefore, aims to investigate the cortical and biomechanical processes associated with more sport-related and injury-related movements in ACL-reconstructed individuals.
Methods and analysis: ACL-reconstructed participants and uninjured controls will perform repetitive countermovement jumps with single leg landings. Two different conditions are to be completed: anticipated (n=35) versus unanticipated (n=35) successful landings. Under the anticipated condition, participants receive the visual information depicting the requested landing leg prior to the jump. In the unanticipated condition, this information will be provided only about 400 msec prior to landing. Neural correlates of motor planning will be measured using electroencephalography. In detail, movement-related cortical potentials, frequency spectral power and functional connectivity will be assessed. Biomechanical landing quality will be captured via a capacitive force plate. Calculated parameters encompass time to stabilisation, vertical peak ground reaction force, and centre of pressure path length. Potential systematic differences between ACL-reconstructed individuals and controls will be identified in dependence of jumping condition (anticipated/ unanticipated, injured/uninjured leg and controls) by using interference statistics. Potential associations between the cortical and biomechanical measures will be calculated by means of correlation analysis. In case of statistical significance (α<0.05.) further confounders (cofactors) will be considered.
Ethics and dissemination: The independent Ethics Committee of the University of Frankfurt (Faculty of Psychology and Sports Sciences) approved the study. Publications in peer-reviewed journals are planned. The findings will be presented at scientific conferences.
Trial status: At the time of submission of this manuscript, recruitment is ongoing.
Trial registration number: NCT03336060; Pre-results.
Die Laufökonomie erfasst den Wirkungsgrad der kardiometabolischen Energiebereitstellung eines Menschen für die bipedale Fortbewegung. Ob diese, im Leistungssport häufig angewandte, Größe auch bei Amateursportlern ein leistungsbeeinflussender Faktor ist, wurde bislang noch nicht systematisch untersucht. Speziell die großen Leistungsunterschiede bei Amateursportlern und die Vielzahl an Erfassungs- und Auswertungsmethoden stellen für die interindividuelle Vergleichbarkeit in diesem Kollektiv bislang noch ungelöste Probleme dar.
Die vorliegende Untersuchung verfolgt drei Ziele: 1) Die Überprüfung der Eignung standardisierter stufenförmiger Belastungsprotokolle zur Laufökonomieermittlung; 2) Die Analyse des Einflusses der relativen Beanspruchungsintensität auf die Laufökonomie; und 3) Den Nachweis der Bedeutung der Laufökonomie für die Laufleistung von Amateursportlern unterschiedlicher Leistungsfähigkeit. Zu diesem Zweck wurden zwei unabhängige Studien im Querschnittdesign entworfen. Das erste Experiment überprüfte die Eignung spiroergometrischer Kenngrößen aus stufenförmigen Belastungstests zur Bestimmung der Laufökonomie und deren Einflüsse auf die Laufleistung bei Amateursportlern. Die zweite dieser Arbeit zugrundeliegende Studie diente zur Identifikation des optimalen Beanspruchungsniveaus zur zuverlässigen Bestimmung von Parametern der Laufökonomie bei Amateursportlern.
Die vorliegenden Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass stufenförmige Belastungsprotokolle zur Laufökonomieermittlung an definierten Beanspruchungspunkten geeignet sind. Sie bestätigen den Einfluss der Laufökonomie auf die Laufleistung bei Amateursportlern unabhängig von der maximalen Sauerstoffaufnahme. Die Auswertung als Sauerstoff- (ml/kg/m) und/oder Kalorienumsetzung (kcal/kg/km) pro zurückgelegte Strecke an standardisierten submaximalen Referenzpunkten erscheint im Amateurbereich empfehlenswert. Speziell für Amateursportler können diese Größen nicht nur als leistungslimitierender Faktor interpretiert sondern auch zur Quantifizierung des bewegungsbezogenen Energieverbrauchs und des damit assoziierten Gesundheitsnutzen körperlicher Aktivität herangezogen werden.