Working paper series / Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften : Finance & Accounting
Refine
Year of publication
- 2006 (5) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (5) (remove)
Language
- German (5) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (5)
Keywords
- Deutschland (2)
- Aktie (1)
- Ausland (1)
- Bankkredit (1)
- Börsenhandel (1)
- Corporate Governance (1)
- Geschichte 1870-2005 (1)
- Kreditmarkt (1)
- Rentenreform (1)
- Russland (1)
- Stabilität (1)
- Stakeholder (1)
- Unternehmen (1)
- Wertpapier (1)
- collateralized loan obligations (1)
- credit risk transfer (1)
- securitization (1)
Institute
171
This paper provides new insights into the nature of loan securitization. We analyze the use of collateralized loan obligation (CLO) transactions by European banks from 1997 to 2004 andtry to identify the influence that various firm-specific and macroeconomic factors may have on an institution's securitization decision. We find that not only regulatory capital arbitrage under Basel I has been driving the market. Rather, our results suggest that loan securitization is an appropriate funding tool for banks with high risk and low liquidity. It may also have been used by commercial banks to indirectly access investment-bank activities and the associated gains.
172
Wir untersuchen, in welchem Ausmaß die Aktien deutscher Unternehmen im Zeitverlauf an ausländischen Börsen gehandelt werden. Es zeigt sich – nach anfänglich bedeutsamer Handelsaktivität im Ausland – ein ausgeprägter Rückfluss-Effekt nach Deutschland. Zweitnotierungen an ausländischen Börsen dienen der Verbreiterung der Aktionärsbasis und somit der Senkung der Kapitalkosten und letztendlich der Steigerung des Unternehmenswertes. Dazu ist ein ausreichendes Handelsvolumen an der ausländischen Börse unabdinglich. Daran gemessen sind die Auslandsnotierungen deutscher Unternehmen nicht erfolgreich. Dies ist jedoch nicht im gleichen Ausmaß für alle Unternehmen der Fall. Kleinere, wachsende Unternehmen und Unternehmen mit höherem Anteil des Auslandsumsatzes am Gesamtumsatz werden relativ stärker im Ausland gehandelt.
167
Rentenreform in Russland : heutiger Stand und Entwicklungsperspektiven im internationalen Vergleich
(2006)
Das Rentensystem ist ein wichtiges Element jeder modernen Volkswirtschaft. Heutzutage werden Rentenreformen sowohl in den Industriestaaten als auch in den Transformationsländern diskutiert und praktisch umgesetzt. Jedoch sind die Ursachen bzw. Ziele der Rentenreformen in einzelnen Regionen zu unterscheiden. Während der demographische Wandel in den Industriestaaten zur Notwendigkeit der Erhöhung der Einnahmen bzw. Kürzung der Ausgaben der Rentensysteme geführt hat, kämpfen die Transformationsländer mit den Folgen des sozialistischen Systems der Alterssicherung und den Problemen des Transformationsprozesses. Vor diesem Hintergrund diskutiert diese Arbeit die Notwendigkeit sowie die ersten Schritte der Umsetzung der Rentenreform in Russland, setzt diese in Relation zu den Reformschritten in Lateinamerika und Osteuropa und analysiert die Perspektiven zukünftiger Reformen in Russland.
162
Stakeholderorientierung, Systemhaftigkeit und Stabilität der Corporate Governance in Deutschland
(2006)
Since the time of Germany’s belated industrialisation, corporate governance in Germany has been stakeholder oriented in the dual sense of attaching importance to the interests of stakeholders who are not at the same time shareholders, and of providing certain opportunities for these stakeholders to influence corporate decisions. Corporate governance is also systemic. It is a system of elements that are complementary to each other, and also consistent. In other word, it is composed of elements for which it is important that they fit together well, and in the German case these elements did fit together well until quite recently. Corporate governance as a system is itself an element of the German bank-based financial system at large and possibly even of the entire German business and economic system. Stakeholder orientation of governance is consistent with the general structure this system, and even represents one of its central elements. In retrospect, German corporate governance has also proved to be surprisingly stable. Its fundamental traits date back to the turn from the 19th to the 20th century. There are strong reasons to assume that the systemic features, that is, its complementarity and consistency, have greatly contributed to its past stability. Since about ten years now, there are growing tendencies to question the viability and stability of the German corporate governance system and even the financial system as a whole. One of the central topics in the new debate concerns the stakeholder orientation of the system, which some observers and critics consider as the main weakness of the “German model” under the increasing pressures of globalisation and European integration. As far as their development over time is concerned, systems of complementarity elements exhibit certain peculiarities: (1) They do not adjust easily to changing circumstances. (2) Changes concerning important individual elements, such as the stakeholder orientation of governance, tend to jeopardize the viability and the stability of the entire system. (3) While they appear to be stable, systems shaped by complementary may simply be rigid and tend to break under strong external pressure. “Breaking” means that a system undergoes a fundamental transformation. It seems plausible to assume that the German financial system is already in the middle of such a transformation. It is yet another consequence of its systemic character that this transformation is not likely to be a smooth and gradual process and that it will not lead to a “mixed model” but rather to the adoption of a capital market-based financial system as it prevails in the Anglo-Saxon countries. In such a system, corporate governance cannot be geared to catering to the interests of stakeholders, and an active role for them would not even make any economic sense.