25th IVR World Congress: Law, Science and Technology Frankfurt am Main 15–20 August 2011 ; Paper Series
25th IVR World Congress Law and technology
Frankfurt am Main
15–20 August 2011
Paper Series
Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (114)
Has Fulltext
- yes (114)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (114)
Keywords
- Democracy (9)
- Law (6)
- human rights (6)
- law (6)
- democracy (5)
- Internet (4)
- Human Rights (3)
- Verfassung (3)
- educational freedom (3)
- homeschooling (3)
- jurisprudence (3)
- responsibility (3)
- Adjudication (2)
- Brazilian Legal System (2)
- Dworkin (2)
- E-democracy (2)
- Giorgio Agamben (2)
- Hans Kelsen (2)
- ICTs (2)
- Justice (2)
- Laizismus (2)
- Legal Theory (2)
- Michel Foucault (2)
- Moral (2)
- Philosophy (2)
- Recht (2)
- Recognition (2)
- Religionsfreiheit (2)
- Security (2)
- Social Justice (2)
- State (2)
- Values (2)
- autonomy (2)
- bioethics (2)
- climate change (2)
- coercion (2)
- compulsory education (2)
- ethics (2)
- hermeneutics (2)
- home education (2)
- information (2)
- justice (2)
- justification (2)
- legal theory (2)
- methodology (2)
- parental autonomy (2)
- persecution (2)
- public sphere (2)
- religious freedom (2)
- risk (2)
- technocracy (2)
- "Critical Race Theory” (1)
- ADR (1)
- Abnormal Use (1)
- Absolute Level (1)
- Agamben (1)
- Albania (1)
- Alexy (1)
- American legal paradigm (1)
- Analytical model (1)
- Anerkennung (1)
- Animal Welfare Act (1)
- Archaeological Method (1)
- Archaeology of Knowledge (1)
- Architecture (1)
- Aristotle (1)
- Axel Honneth (1)
- Bare Life (1)
- Bias (1)
- Bioethics (1)
- Biopolitics (1)
- Biopower (1)
- Brasilien (1)
- Brazil (1)
- Brazilian Federal Supreme Court (1)
- Brazilian Judiciary (1)
- Brazilian Law courses (1)
- Brazilian legal system (1)
- CO2 emission (1)
- Capitalism (1)
- Certainty in Law (1)
- China (1)
- Civil Society (1)
- Cloud Computing (1)
- Coaching Systems (1)
- Code as Law (1)
- Code-based regulation (1)
- Common Morality (1)
- Concept of person (1)
- Conflict (1)
- Confucianism legal system (1)
- Constitutional Court (1)
- Consummations of Legislation (1)
- Courts of Law (1)
- Critical Legal Studies (1)
- Critical Theory (1)
- Data Protection Directive (1)
- David Hilbert (1)
- Defect (1)
- Democracy, the Internet, Net, Disintermediation, Election (1)
- Democratic State of Law (1)
- Demokratie (1)
- Der Muselmann (1)
- Digital Democracy (1)
- Directed Duties (1)
- Disciplines (1)
- Discourse theory of law (1)
- Discretion (1)
- Disintermediation (1)
- Ductility in Law (1)
- E-Democracy (1)
- E-Government (1)
- E-Participation (1)
- E-Voting (1)
- ECHR (1)
- EEA law (1)
- EEA legal order (1)
- EFTA Court (1)
- Education for citizenship (1)
- Efficiency (1)
- Eike v. Savigny (1)
- Election (1)
- Electronic Democracy (1)
- Empirical model (1)
- Encapsulation (1)
- Encryption Technology (1)
- Enlightenment (1)
- Environment (1)
- Epistemic Values (1)
- Equality (1)
- Ethical (1)
- Ethical Use (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Ethics and law (1)
- European Court (1)
- European Court of Human Rights (1)
- European law (1)
- Experimental Animals (1)
- Fair Play (1)
- Fairness (1)
- Foucault (1)
- Fractal scaling (1)
- Free Riders (1)
- Freedom (1)
- Fusion (1)
- Führer principal (1)
- Genetic Engineering (1)
- Genetically Modified Organism (1)
- Gerichtete Pflichten (1)
- Germany (1)
- Gewissenszwang (1)
- Governmentality (1)
- Greek Tragedy (1)
- Green Movement (1)
- Günther (1)
- Habermas (1)
- Hannah Arendt (1)
- Hart (1)
- Hegel (1)
- Hermeneutic model (1)
- Hermeneutik (1)
- Hilary Putnam (1)
- Historical Memory (1)
- History (1)
- Homo Sacer (1)
- Human and machine (1)
- ICT (1)
- IT Audit (1)
- IVR (1)
- Icelandic courts (1)
- Immanuel Kant (1)
- Indeterminacy (1)
- Individualismus (1)
- Information Age (1)
- Information Ethics (1)
- Information Filtering (1)
- Information Systems Design (1)
- Information Technology (1)
- Information and Communication Technologies (1)
- Information system (1)
- Input Reasons (1)
- Institutional fact (1)
- Instructional Design (1)
- Interessenabwägung (1)
- Interest Theory of Rights (1)
- Interpretation (1)
- Interpretativism (1)
- Interpretive Concepts (1)
- Interrationalität (1)
- Intersubjectivity (1)
- Iranian Politics (1)
- Japanese annexation (1)
- Jeffrey Alexander (1)
- Jeremy Bentham (1)
- Jews (1)
- Journalism (1)
- Judicial Modernization (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Judiciary Reform (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Jürgen Rödig (1)
- Kant (1)
- Kantian-Lockean tradition (1)
- Karl Popper (1)
- Karl William Kapp (1)
- Kyoto Protocol (1)
- Laizität (1)
- Lautsi vs Italy case (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law as an Applied Social Science (1)
- Law communication (1)
- Law epistemology (1)
- Legal Judgment (1)
- Legal Positivism (1)
- Legal Post-Positivism (1)
- Legal Problem Solving (1)
- Legal Sociology (1)
- Legal act (1)
- Legal computing (1)
- Legal informatics (1)
- Legal modelling, Legal computing, Fractal scaling (1)
- Legal status (1)
- Legal visualization (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Levinas (1)
- Luhmann (1)
- MacCormick (1)
- Mankind (1)
- Marx (1)
- Mediation (1)
- Mending wall (1)
- Methodological aspects in the law research (1)
- Miscegenation (1)
- Modern Constitutionalism (1)
- Modern reason (1)
- Monographs of Law students (1)
- Moral Responsibility (1)
- Multisensory law (1)
- Mythos and Logos (1)
- National Identity (1)
- Nationale Identität (1)
- Natural Law (1)
- Nature (1)
- Nazism (1)
- Net (1)
- Non-violence (1)
- Normal Use (1)
- Normative Principles (1)
- ODR (1)
- Open Texture (1)
- PIA process (1)
- PIA taxonomy (1)
- Participation (1)
- Participatory Budgeting (1)
- Participatory Democracy (1)
- People (1)
- People’s sovereignty (1)
- Philosophy of History (1)
- Phronesis (1)
- Policies (1)
- Political Information (1)
- Political Obligation (1)
- Political Philosophy (1)
- Political Theory (1)
- Political action (1)
- Population (1)
- Post-Communist countries (1)
- Posthumanism (1)
- Power (1)
- Pragmatic Realism (1)
- Praktische Vernunft (1)
- Premodern Trial (1)
- Principlism (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Production and communication pattern (1)
- Public Administration (1)
- Public Sphere (1)
- Public freedoms (1)
- Public spaces (1)
- RFID applications (1)
- Race Relations in Brazil (1)
- Rassenbeziehungen in Brasilien (1)
- Rassenmischlung (1)
- Rechtsauslegung (1)
- Rechtsphilosophie (1)
- Relative Level (1)
- Robert Frost (1)
- Ronald Dworkin (1)
- Rule by Law (1)
- Rule of Law (1)
- Scientificity (1)
- Sekularität (1)
- Selbstbestimmung des Patienten (1)
- Signatura Rerum (1)
- Sittlichkeit (1)
- Social Contract (1)
- Social Movements (1)
- Social Philosophy (1)
- Social networks (1)
- Social utopias (1)
- Sozialphilosophie (1)
- Standard (1)
- Status Theory of Rights (1)
- Statustheorie von Rechten (1)
- Sweden (1)
- Swedish Labour Court (1)
- Technology (1)
- Technology Assessment (1)
- The Brazilian Private-Constitutional School of Thought (1)
- Theoretical models of Law Science (1)
- Theories of Rights (1)
- Theory of Chaos (1)
- Theory of Law (1)
- Thomas Aquinas (1)
- Tolerance (1)
- Toleranz (1)
- Transitional Justice (1)
- Transparency (1)
- Trust (1)
- Turkish Legislation of GMO (1)
- Turkish sociological positivism (1)
- Twitter (1)
- Umweltrecht (1)
- United Nations (1)
- Unverfügbarkeit des Lebens (1)
- Vagueness in Law (1)
- Validity of Law (1)
- Validity of Legal Norms (1)
- Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit (1)
- Verfassungsinterpretation (1)
- Verfassungswandlung (1)
- Walter Benjamin (1)
- War on Terror (1)
- Wissenschaftlicher Diskurs (1)
- Word Congress (1)
- Zulässigkeit des einseitigen Behandlungsabbruchs (1)
- ability to pay (1)
- accident prevention technologies (1)
- aesthetics (1)
- akrasia (1)
- anthropology (1)
- art criticism (1)
- authenticity (1)
- autopoiesis (1)
- axiom (1)
- axiom of choice (1)
- axiomatic method (1)
- bioethics subject (1)
- biopolitics (1)
- biopower (1)
- brain-drain problem (1)
- capitalism (1)
- censure (1)
- choice (1)
- citizen participation (1)
- civil sphere (1)
- code substitutes (1)
- codification (1)
- cognitive liberty (1)
- communicative aesthetic rationality (1)
- complementarity (1)
- complexity (1)
- concept acquisition (1)
- constitutionalism (1)
- constitutive convention (1)
- construction (1)
- contractarianism (1)
- conventionalism (1)
- coordination convention (1)
- cost to move (1)
- cultural difference (1)
- cyborg (1)
- decision theory (1)
- deconstruction (1)
- democracy and technology (1)
- descriptivism (1)
- determinism (1)
- diagnostics (1)
- dialectics (1)
- diffuse legal structure (1)
- dignity (1)
- discounting (1)
- discrimination (1)
- distribution of income (1)
- e-participation (1)
- efficiency (1)
- emancipation (1)
- emerging countries (1)
- equal concern (1)
- equal sacrifices (1)
- equality (1)
- ethic (1)
- ethical conflict (1)
- ethical standards (1)
- evaluation (1)
- expected utility (1)
- experience (1)
- exponential progression (1)
- fascination (1)
- free will (1)
- functioning (1)
- fundamental rights (1)
- gender (1)
- global environment (1)
- global redistribution (1)
- global warming (1)
- globalisation (1)
- health (1)
- health law (1)
- homo sacer (1)
- identity and being (1)
- immaturity (1)
- incommensurability (1)
- indeterminism (1)
- individual ethics (1)
- inequality (1)
- institutional construction (1)
- intergenerational justice (1)
- international law (1)
- internet (1)
- interpretation of legal rules (1)
- interpretivism (1)
- judicial activism (1)
- judicial review (1)
- judicial understanding (1)
- law-making (1)
- legal authority (1)
- legal culture (1)
- legal epistemology (1)
- legal norm (1)
- legal norms (1)
- legal pluralism (1)
- legal rationality (1)
- legal standards (1)
- legal theories (1)
- liberal legalism (1)
- liberalism (1)
- limits to growth (1)
- living will (1)
- mathematics (1)
- methodological proposal (1)
- modernism (1)
- modernity (1)
- moral dispositions (1)
- morphological freedom (1)
- mutmaßliche Einwilligung (1)
- nano-particles (1)
- nanotechnology (1)
- national laws (1)
- negligence (1)
- new media (1)
- normativity of law (1)
- open borders (1)
- order out of chaos (1)
- paradigm (1)
- parental rights (1)
- passive Sterbehilfe (1)
- personal morality (1)
- philosophy of Law (1)
- phrónesis (1)
- point of view (1)
- political membership (1)
- political morality (1)
- political public sphere (1)
- positivist paradigm (1)
- postmodern thought (1)
- postmodernity (1)
- precautionary measures (1)
- privacy-by-design (1)
- proportional sacrifices (1)
- public discourse (1)
- public hearings (1)
- publicity of law (1)
- race (1)
- recruitment of professionals (1)
- religious authority (1)
- respect and protection of rights (1)
- rightness of natural reason (1)
- risk assessment (1)
- risk design (1)
- risks (1)
- robot (1)
- rule of law (1)
- rule of reconition (1)
- self-closure (1)
- self-regulation (1)
- self-respect (1)
- separation of powers (1)
- social costs (1)
- social damages (1)
- solidarity (1)
- speech acts (1)
- stakeholder theory (1)
- strict liability (1)
- structure of the norms (1)
- student rights (1)
- substantiation (1)
- supreme courts (1)
- system theory (1)
- tax justice (1)
- technological change (1)
- technology (1)
- technology assessment (1)
- technology policy (1)
- the Club of Rome (1)
- the rule of law (1)
- theoretical reflection (1)
- theory of justice (1)
- theory of rationalization (1)
- transhuman (1)
- truancy (1)
- two-aspect model of legal norm (1)
- uncertainty (1)
- validity (1)
- value incommensurability (1)
- value pluralism (1)
- virtue (1)
- weak-willed actions (1)
- welfare state (1)
- world law (1)
- “ethnic origins” (1)
Institute
- Rechtswissenschaft (110)
- Physik (1)
014
Making use of United Nations (U.N.) materials and documents, Anja Matwijkiw and Bronik Matwijkiw argue that the organization – in 2004 – converted to a stakeholder jurisprudence for human rights. However, references to “stakeholders” may both be made in the context of narrow stakeholder theory and broad stakeholder theory. Since the U.N. does not specify its commitment by naming the theory it credits for its conversion, the authors of the article embark on a comparative analysis, so as to be able to try the two frameworks for fit. The hypothesis is that it is the philosophy and methodology of broad stakeholder theory that best matches the norms and strategies of the U.N. While this is the case, certain challenges nevertheless present themselves. As a consequence of these, the U.N. has to – as a minimum – take things under renewed consideration.
013
The improvement of accident prevention technology in many fields of social life has spurred new challenges to the doctrinal tools of fault and strict based civil liability in the law of torts. Amid these challenges lies the identification of the proper scope of the respective criteria of liability in a changing factual environment, their suitability as doctrinal tools, as well as their actual application to concrete cases given the amount of information which would be needed to render adequate judgments. Precedents and old laws should be assessed with caution, taking into account the tacit cost-benefit analysis embedded in them, for they may or may not serve the interests of welfare maximization in an environment with constantly renewed accident prevention technology.
012
As is well known, the 2nd Spanish Republic (1931-1936) was toppled by a military uprising which, after a cruel Civil War, set up an autocratic regime led by General Franco which lasted until his natural death in 1975. According to the contemporary theory of the legal system, a legal order exists on the sole condition that it is efficient in general terms and this was the case for both the Republic and the Dictatorship. In turn, the validity of the legal norms of all legal orders is based on its respective rules of recognition. Thus, neither the existence of the legal order nor the validity of its respective legal norms depends on moral considerations. In this paper, we call this affirmation into question on the base of the fact that the compensatory methods adopted from the Transition to Democracy show an evident concern to repair the damage of taking away a person’s basic rights (life, health, freedom, expression, association etc) although the Spanish Constitution, with its catalogue of fundamental rights was not in force at that time. But these measures would not have much sense if, as Raz says, there was no shared content which is common to all legal systems. Like Nino, we claim that one must discriminate between a democratic legal order and an autocratic one to establish the level of validity of its respective legal norms. Thus it can be assigned a presumption of justice to democratic norms. Finally, we state that the criteria to weigh up the justice or injustice of legal norms, as that of legal orders, takes root in the level of respect they show towards human rights.
011
Introduction: aims and points of departure. 1. The problem of the knowledge of law: whether previous general rules may support a casuistic decision. 2. The problem of legal ethics: whether there are autonomous rights, which do not depend on positive law. 3. The ways of modern dogmatics to deal with these problems. 4. The question remains the same.
010
From chaos to chaos theory, from the primordial perception of the world as disorderly to the scientific research of disorder a long distance has been covered. This path implies openness of mind and scientific boldness which connect mythological perceptions of the world with philosophical and scientific interpretations of phenomena throughout the world in a quite distinctive way resting on the creation of a model and application of computing. Owing to this, for the first time instead of asking What awaits us in the future? we can ask What can be done in the future? and get a reliable scientific answer to the question.
009
In reconsideration of the composition and operation of European law, it is the description of its underlying mentality that may cast best light on the query whether European law is the extension of domestic laws or a sui generis product. As to its action, European law is destructive upon the survival of traditions of legal positivism, for it recalls post modern clichés rather. Like a solar system with planets, it is two-centred from the beginning, commissioning both implementation and judicial check to member states. As part of global post modernism, a) European law stems from artificial reality construction freed from particular historical experience and, indeed, anything given hic et nunc. By its operation, b) it dynamises large structures and sets in motion that what is chaos itself. It is owing to reconstructive human intent solely that any outcome can at all be seen as fitting to some ideal of order, albeit neither operation nor daily management strives for implementing any systemicity. This is the way in which the European law becomes adequate reflection of the underlying (macro) economic basis, which it is to serve as superstructure. Accordingly, c) the entire construct is operated (as integrated into one well-working unit) within the framework of an artificially animated dynamism. With its “order out of chaos” philosophy it assures member states’ standing involvement and competition, achieving a flexibly self-adapting (and unprecedentedly high degree of) conformity.
008
Die Hauptthese dieses Papers geht von dem Konzept der normativen Verfassung der Nachkriegzeit aus und setzt sich kritisch mit dem Konzept des 19. Jahrhunderts „Verfassungswandlung“ auseinander. Das Konzept des Verfassungswandels ist mit der Verfassungsdemokratie inkompatibel. Statt von einem Verfassungswandel zu sprechen, sollte man die Entwicklung des Sinns der Normen in der Zeit als dynamische Interpretation bezeichnen.
007
There is an increasing interest in incorporating significant citizen participation into the law-making process by developing the use of the internet in the public sphere. However, no well-accepted e-participation model has prevailed. This article points out that, to be successful, we need critical reflection of legal theory and we also need further institutional construction based on the theoretical reflection.
Contemporary dominant legal theories demonstrate too strong an internal legal point of view to empower the informal, social normative development on the internet. Regardless of whether we see the law as a body of rules or principles, the social aspect is always part of people’s background and attracts little attention. In this article, it is advocated that the procedural legal paradigm advanced by Jürgen Habermas represents an important breakthrough in this regard.
Further, Habermas’s co-originality thesis reveals a neglected internal relationship between public autonomy and private autonomy. I believe the co-originality theory provides the essential basis on which a connecting infrastructure between the legal and the social could be developed. In terms of the development of the internet to include the public sphere, co-originality can also help us direct the emphasis on the formation of public opinion away from the national legislative level towards the local level; that is, the network of governance.1
This article is divided into two sections. The focus of Part One is to reconstruct the co-originality thesis (section 2, 3). This paper uses the application of discourse in the adjudication theory of Habermas as an example. It argues that Habermas would be more coherent, in terms of his insistence on real communication in his discourse theory, if he allowed his judges to initiate improved interaction with the society. This change is essential if the internal connection between public autonomy and private autonomy in the sense of court adjudication is to be truly enabled.
In order to demonstrate such improved co-original relationships, the empowering character of the state-made law is instrumental in initiating the mobilization of legal intermediaries, both individual and institutional. A mutually enhanced relationship is thus formed; between the formal, official organization and its governance counterpart aided by its associated ‘local’ public sphere. Referring to Susan Sturm, the Harris v Forklift Systems Inc. (1930) decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the field of sexual harassment is used as an example.
Using only one institutional example to illustrate how the co-originality thesis can be improved is not sufficient to rebuild the thesis but this is as much as can be achieved in this article.
In Part Two, the paper examines, still at the institutional level, how Sturm develops an overlooked sense of impartiality, especially in the derivation of social norms; i.e. multi-partiality instead of neutral detachment (section 4). These two ideas should be combined as the criterion for impartiality to evaluate the legitimacy of the joint decision-making processes of both the formal official organization and ‘local’ public sphere.
Sturm’s emphasis on the deployment of intermediaries, both institutional and individual, can also enlighten the discourse theory. Intermediaries are essential for connecting the disassociated social networks, especially when a breakdown of communication occurs due to a lack of data, information, knowledge, or disparity of value orientation, all of which can affect social networks. If intermediaries are used, further communication will not be blocked as a result of the lack of critical data, information, knowledge or misunderstandings due to disparity of value orientation or other causes.
The institutional impact of the newly constructed co-originality thesis is also discussed in Part Two. Landwehr’s work on institutional design and assessment for deliberative interaction is first discussed. This article concludes with an indication of how the ‘local’ public sphere, through e-rulemaking or online dispute resolution, for example, can be constructed in light of the discussion of this article.
006
Principles can be directly expressed by law or may be found in jurisprudence, philosophy or literature. Often the principles are contradictory, as in the case of transparency and the taboo of state information disclosure. At the individual level, transparency and taboo, the sense and purpose of privacy may compliment each other. Moreover the rise of cyberspace has blurred the distinction between privacy and public. The taboo is widening. The development of the internet and of the social networks can alter the once apparently stable legal situation, bringing a new dynamic into play in both state and individual spheres. In the context of the internet it is as though the secret workings of the state are projected on its "walls and facades", reminding us of Plato's "Myth of the Cave". As Plato described, disillusionment and reflexive defensiveness can follow.
005
In the intersection between law, science and technology lies the debate on the overcoming of the boundaries of the biological structure of the human being and its implications on the idea of human rights, on the concept of person and on the conception of equality – being the latter a fundamental tenet of a democracy.
Posthumanism assumes a biological inadequacy of the human body regarding the quantity, complexity and quality of information which it can muster. The same occurs with the needs of accuracy, speed or strength demanded by the contemporary environment. Under such perspective, the body is considered to be an inefficient structure, with a short lifespan, easy to break and hard to fix.
The body, always seen as the locus for the definition of human, emerges as the object of a commodification process that seeks to exonerate men from their burden - by declination towards a virtual existence, totally free and rational - or to enhance them with bionic devices or drugs.
This issue has already been the subject of attention by many scholars like Savulescu, Rodotà, Broston, Fukuyama and even Habermas.
Therefore, the aim of this paper is to seek, by criticism and revision of the positions on the foreseen problems of this process, an adequate theoretical approach on issues like the concept of person and its connection with the idea of human rights in order to promote the fundamental statement that all men are equal without disregard to the values of diversity and personal identity.
004
Der zweifache Urteilsspruch des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte im Fall “Lautsi gegen Italien” hat sich zum Paradigma der Schwierigkeiten entwickelt, welche Europa bei der adäquaten Ansiedlung der Religion im öffentlichen Bereich erfährt. Die Lösung kann sich ändern, wenn, anstatt dem politischen Problem (wann ist die Ausübung von Macht erlaubt) einzuräumen, die Möglichkeit einer praktischen Vernunft und ihre Verträglichkeit mit dem religiösen Glauben zum Ausgangspunkt gemacht wird. Diese würde zweifelsfrei zu einer politischen Fragestellung zu einer Präsenz der Religion im öffentlichen Bereich einladen, die auf eine positive Laizität mehr Rücksicht nimmt, dabei den Laizismus ablehnt, der darauf drängt, die Rationalität zur Macht auch einen nicht kognitivistischen Code zu reduzieren.
003
Technologies carry politics since they embed values. It is therefore surprising that mainstream political and legal theory have taken the issue so lightly. Compared to what has been going on over the past few decades in the other branches of practical thought, namely ethics, economics and the law, political theory lags behind. Yet the current emphasis on Internet politics that polarizes the apologists holding the web to overcome the one-to-many architecture of opinion-building in traditional representative democracy, and the critics that warn cyber-optimism entails authoritarian technocracy has acted as a wake up call. This paper sets the problem – “What is it about ICTs, as opposed to previous technical devices, that impact on politics and determine uncertainty about democratic matters?” – into the broad context of practical philosophy, by offering a conceptual map of clusters of micro-problems and concrete examples relating to “e-democracy”. The point is to highlight when and why the hyphen of e-democracy has a conjunctive or a disjunctive function, in respect to stocktaking from past experiences and settled democratic theories. My claim is that there is considerable scope to analyse how and why online politics fails or succeeds. The field needs both further empirical and theoretical work.
002
When judges are authorised to invalidate legal acts for being unconstitutional, the competence of the legislator is directly concerned. The question raises, if thus judges do not usurp legislative power. In the traditional doctrine of the separation of powers the parliament is the first power, based on its direct democratic legitimacy. Yet cancelling legal acts completely or partially does evoke more irritations in the public that could be expected. The people seem to have more confidence to the assumed impartiality of the judges than to the results of the parliamentary work which seems to be dominated by the struggles of the parties. The necessity of judicial review mainly is based on the consideration that individual rights even in an authentic democratic system may be violated by a legal act of the parliament. In this case constitutional courts have the very task to defend individual rights, principles of liberty and authentic equality. Therefore it is justified to speak of the “jurisdiction of liberty”, as the Italian constitutional expert Cappelletti has said. But also without such legitimacy in many countries the Courts intervene in the field of the legislator. The courts themselves discuss the limits of judicial interventions, emphasising themselves, that they have to respect the legislative decisions principally, but do not abide always by their own proclaimed principles. In Spanish recent publications it is spoken of the principle “in dubio pro legislatore”, (in case of doubt in favour the legislator), reminding of “in dubio pro reo”, in order to treat the legislative power not worse than the defendant in a criminal process..
001
Human rights and climate policy – toward a new concept of freedom, protection rights, and balancing
(2012)
Neither the scope of “protection obligations” which are based on fundamental rights nor the theory of constitutional balancing nor the issue of “absolute” minimum standards (fundamental rights nuclei, “Grundrechtskerne”), which have to be preserved in the balancing of fundamental rights, can be considered satisfactorily resolved–in spite of intensive, long-standing debates. On closer analysis, the common case law definitions turn out to be not always consistent. This is generally true and with respect to environmental fundamental rights at the national, European, and international level. Regarding the theory of balancing, for the purpose of a clear balance of powers the usual principle of proportionality also proves specifiable. This allows a new analysis, whether fundamental rights have absolute cores. This question is does not only apply to human dignity and the German Aviation Security Act, but even if environmental policy accepts death, e.g. regarding climate change. Overall, it turns out that an interpretation of fundamental rights which is more multipolar and considers the conditions for freedom more heavily–as well as the freedom of future generations and of people in other parts of the world–develops a greater commitment to climate protection.