SAFE policy letter
https://safe-frankfurt.de/policy-center/policy-publications.html
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (63)
Language
- English (63) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (63)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (63)
Keywords
- financial stability (7)
- coronavirus (4)
- regulation (4)
- systemic risk (3)
- Banking Union (2)
- ECB (2)
- Greece (2)
- Monetary Policy (2)
- Monetary Union (2)
- Solvency II (2)
- banking supervision (2)
- central banks (2)
- financial crisis (2)
- insurance (2)
- monetary policy (2)
- regulatory arbitrage (2)
- structural reforms (2)
- Asset Quality Review (1)
- BRRD (1)
- BVerfG (1)
- Bankenunion (1)
- Banks (1)
- Bitcoin (1)
- CBDC (1)
- CMU (1)
- Capital Markets Union (1)
- Central Bank (1)
- Central Banks (1)
- Central Counterparties (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Coco bonds (1)
- Commerzbank (1)
- Commodities (1)
- Conditionality (1)
- Coronavirus (1)
- Covid-19-Crisis (1)
- Cyprus (1)
- Deutsche Bank (1)
- Digital (1)
- ECJ (1)
- EGC (1)
- EIOPA (1)
- EMIR (1)
- ESMA (1)
- Energy Embargo (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Equity fund (1)
- Euro (1)
- Europe (1)
- European Central Bank (1)
- European Central Bankor (1)
- European Insurance Union (1)
- European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (1)
- European Supervisory Architecture (1)
- European Supervisory Authorities (1)
- Eurosystem (1)
- Financial Assistance (1)
- Financial Regulation and Banking (1)
- Financial Stability (1)
- Financial stability (1)
- Fiscal Compact (1)
- Fiscal Union (1)
- Fiskalunion (1)
- Fusion (1)
- German banks (1)
- German financial system (1)
- German retirement system (1)
- Greek economic crisis (1)
- High-Level-Forum (1)
- IT innovations (1)
- Insurance (1)
- Insurance Supervision (1)
- Interim Report (1)
- Invasion (1)
- Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg (1)
- Lender of Last Resort (1)
- Libra (1)
- Life insurance companies (1)
- Merger (1)
- Money Market Funds (1)
- NCAs (1)
- OMT (1)
- Open Banking Platform Germany (1)
- Outright Monetary Transactions (1)
- Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (1)
- Pension system (1)
- Policy measures in the EU (1)
- Political Union (1)
- Politische Union (1)
- Public Finance (1)
- Quantitative Easing (1)
- Risk sharing (1)
- Russia (1)
- Russian Economy (1)
- Russian Sanction (1)
- SRM (1)
- SSM (1)
- SWIFT (1)
- Sanctions (1)
- Single Supervisy Mechanism (1)
- Social Security solvency (1)
- Target 2 (1)
- UK (1)
- USA (1)
- Ukraine (1)
- Wirecard (1)
- Währungsunion (1)
- bail-in (1)
- bailout (1)
- bank resolution regimes (1)
- banking (1)
- banking regulation (1)
- banking resolution (1)
- banking supervision, (1)
- banks (1)
- blockchain (1)
- capital liquidations (1)
- capture (1)
- catastrophe bond (1)
- collective action (1)
- comprehensive assessment (1)
- corona bonds (1)
- corona crisis (1)
- corporate governance (1)
- crisis (1)
- cryptocurrencies (1)
- cryptocurrency (1)
- currency board (1)
- debt restructuring (1)
- debt sustainability (1)
- digitalization (1)
- distributed ledger technology (1)
- economic and monetary union (1)
- economic reforms (1)
- emergency liquidity assistance (ELA) (1)
- emergency loans (1)
- euro area (1)
- eurozone (1)
- financial innovation (1)
- financial innovations (1)
- financial institutions (1)
- financial market data (1)
- financial markets regulation (1)
- financial reporting quality (1)
- financial resilience (1)
- financial services (1)
- financial supervision (1)
- fiscal crisis (1)
- forward guidance (1)
- government debt (1)
- greek crisis (1)
- household liquidity (1)
- household savings (1)
- incentives for investment (1)
- investment decisions (1)
- leasing (1)
- life-cycle models (1)
- macroprudential franework (1)
- market discipline (1)
- market supervision (1)
- micro data transparency (1)
- nachrangiges Fremdkapital (1)
- pandemic insurance (1)
- payment system (1)
- peer to peer payment systems (1)
- pensions (1)
- policy measures in the EU (1)
- productivity (1)
- public debt (1)
- public private partnership (1)
- public-private relations (1)
- restatements (1)
- risk premia (1)
- risk sharing (1)
- risk-taking (1)
- securities markets (1)
- social impact bonds (1)
- social relations (1)
- social security claiming (1)
- spillover effects (1)
- statistical risk measurement (1)
- statistics (1)
- strategies (1)
- supervisory arbitrage (1)
- systemic risk analysis (1)
- taxation (1)
- too big to fail (1)
- total loss absorbing capacity (TLAC) (1)
- troika (1)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (63) (remove)
85
The European Commission is trying to reboot the CMU project: The High-Level Forum on Capital Markets Union – a group of 28 selected experts from industry, academia and civil society – is expected to submit policy recommendations by the end of May 2020 which will feed into the Commission’s new CMU agenda. This contribution is largely based on a letter to the High-Level Forum that gives feedback on the Interim Report published in February. There, we introduce a comprehensive approach to distinguish, from a functional finance perspective, between the ‘game changers’ and what is nice to have. We highlight the importance of common and consistent supervisory practices across Member States and recommend building up a European Securities and Exchange Commission (E-SEC) according to the American model.
57
Given rising life expectations around the world, it seems that old-age pension benefits will need to be cut and pension contributions boosted in many nations. Yet our research on old-age system reforms does not require raising mandatory retirement ages or contributions. Instead, we offer ways to enhance incentives for people to work longer and delay retirement. There are good reasons to incentivize older people to work longer and delay retirement. These include rising longevity, the shrinking workforce, and emerging evidence indicating that working longer can be associated with better mental and physical health for many people. Nevertheless, old age Social Security systems in many nations find that people tend to claim benefits early, usually leading to reduced benefits.In the United States, for instance, a majority of Americans claim their Social Security benefits at the earlier feasible age, namely 62, even though their monthly benefits would be 75% higher if they waited until age 70. To test whether this is the result of people underweighting the economic value of higher lifetime benefit streams, we examine whether people would claim later and work longer if they were rewarded with a lump sum instead of a higher lifetime benefit stream for deferring. Two arguments have been offered to explain early claiming. One is that workers claim early to avoid potentially “forfeiting” their deferred benefits should they die too soon (Brown et al., 2016). A second explanation is that many people underweight the economic value of lifetime benefit streams (Brown et al., 2017). This latter rationale motivates the present study.
50
The paper discusses an additional reform proposal for enhancing Social Security solvency which reframes the existing debate in a different light. In our research, we focus on incentives to prolong working years and to delay benefits claiming as a way of sustaining Social Security. Specifically, we analyze how the offer of a budget-neutral, actuarially fair lump sum payment - instead of the current delayed retirement credit – would encourage people to delay claiming their OASI benefits and work longer. The results of our research will be useful for policymakers, namely in (1) measuring who would delay claiming benefits if offered a lump sum instead of higher annuity payments, (2) examining how long they would wait, and (3) how much longer, if at all, they would continue working in the interim.
6
What happened in Cyprus
(2013)
This policy letter sheds light on the economic and political backround in Cyprus and provides an analyses of the factors which lead to an intensification of the crisis there. It discusses the severe consequences of the errors made in the recent establishment of an adjustment program for Cyprus by the Europroup for European economic management as a whole.
103
A safe core mandate
(2023)
Central banks have vastly expanded their footprint on capital markets. At a time of extraordinary pressure by many sides, a simple benchmark for the scale and scope of their core mandate of price and financial stability may be useful.
We make a case for a narrow mandate to maintain and safeguard the border between safe and quasi safe assets. This ex-ante definition minimizes ambiguity and discourages risk creation and limit panic runs, primarily by separating market demand for reliable liquidity from risk-intolerant, price-insensitive demand for a safe store of value. The central bank may be occasionally forced to intervene beyond the safe core but should not be bound by any such ex-ante mandate, unless directed to specific goals set by legislation with explicit fiscal support.
We review distinct features of liquidity and safety demand, seeking a definition of the safety border, and discuss LOLR support for borderline safe assets such as MMF or uninsured deposits.
A safe core formulation is close to the historical focus on regulated entities, collateralized lending and attention to the public debt market, but its specific framing offers some context on controversial issues such as the extent of LOLR responsibilities. It also justifies a persistently large scale for central bank liabilities (Greenwood, Hansom and Stein 2016), as safety demand is related to financial wealth rather than GDP. Finally, it is consistent with an active central bank role in supporting liquidity in government debt markets trading and clearing (Duffie 2020, 2021).
76
Facebook’s proposal to create a global digital currency, Libra, has generated a wide discussion about its potential benefits and drawbacks. This note contributes to this discussion and, first, characterizes similarities and dissimilarities of Libra’s building blocks with existing institutions. Second, the note discusses open questions about Libra which arise from this characterization and, third, potential future developments and their policy implications. A central issue is that Libra raises considerable questions about its role in and impact on the international monetary and financial system that should be addressed before policymakers and regulators give Libra the green light.
43
In this statement the European Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee (ESFRC) is advocating a conditional relief of Greek’s government debt based on Greece meeting certain targets for structural economic reforms in areas such as its labor market and pensions sector.The authors argue that the position of the European institutions that debt relief for Greece cannot be part of an agreement is based on the illusion that Greece will be able to service its sovereign debt and reduce its debt overhang after implementing a set of fiscal and structural reforms. However, the Greek economy would need to grow at an unrealistig level to achieve debt sustainability soley on the basis of reforms.The authors therefore view a substantial debt relief as inevitable and argue that three questions must be resolved urgently, in order to structure debt relief adequately: First, which groups must accept losses associated with debt relief. Second, how much debt relief should be offered. Third, under what conditions should relief be offered.
75
In early July 2019, Christian Sewing, the CEO of Deutsche Bank, proclaimed a fundamental shift of the bank’s strategy after finally obtaining the approval of the Supervisory Board, which the management seems to have requested for quite some time. The essential point of the reorientation is a deep cut into the bank’s investment banking activities. At the same time, those parts of the bank’s activity portfolio that had been the mainstay of Deutsche Bank’s business 20 to 25 years ago, in particular lending to large and mid-sized German and European corporate clients, shall be strengthened in spite of a simultaneous reduction of the bank’s staff by 18,000 FTEs over the next three years.
The bank’s CEO, who has only been in office since about one year, was reported to have called this shift of strategy a “return to the roots of Deutsche Bank” at the press conference at which it was announced, without, however, making it clear to which roots he was referring: those of some 40 years ago, when Deutsche Bank was essentially a Germany-focused commercial bank, or even those from the late 19th century, when the bank had been founded with the mission to become an international bank with a strong capital market-orientation. In any event, the press was impressed and keeps repeating these words, that deserve to be taken seriously and irrespective of their vagueness may be justified. If it were successfully implemented, this change of strategy would indeed be fundamental and imply undoing what Deutsche Bank’s former management teams had aspired to do in the last 20 or 25 years.
The newly announced strategy shift raises two questions. Can it be successful, and what does it mean for the bank itself and its shareholders, for its staff and for its clients? And what does it imply for the German financial system? This note focuses on the latter question. What makes it interesting is the fact that the last fundamental change of Deutsche Bank’s strategy of two decades ago, which aimed at transforming Deutsche Bank from a Germany-centered commercial bank into a leading international investment bank, had a profound – and in my view clearly negative - effect on the entire German financial system.
56
The Judgement of the EGC in the Case T-122/15 – Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg - Förderbank v European Central Bank is the first statement of the European judiciary on the sub-stantive law of the Banking Union. Beyond its specific holding, the decision is of great importance, because it hints at the methodological approach the EGC will take in interpreting prudential banking regulation in the appeals against supervisory measures that fall in its jurisdiction under TFEU, arts. 256(1) subpara 1 and 263(4). Specifically, the case pertained to the scope of direct ECB oversight of significant banks in the euro area and the reassignment of this competence to national competent authorities (NCAs) in individual circumstances (Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) Regulation, art. 6(4) subpara 2; SSM Framework Regulation, arts. 70, 71).
64
Digitalization expands the possibility for corporations to reduce taxes, mainly, but not exclusively, by allowing improved planning where profits can be shifted. Against this background, the European Commission and several countries emphatically demand and design new tax instruments. However, a selective turning away from internationally accepted principles of international taxation will bring up more questions than solutions. While there are good reasons to think about a fundamental regime switch in international corporate taxation, there are also good arguments for not turning to ad hoc measures that selectively target the relatively small market of Google and Facebook and raise only negligible tax revenues.