Refine
Year of publication
- 2011 (24) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (24) (remove)
Language
- German (24) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (24)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (24) (remove)
Keywords
- Literaturwissenschaft (3)
- Interdisziplinarität (2)
- Judenvernichtung (2)
- Methodologie (2)
- Philologie (2)
- Technische Unterlage (2)
- Antike (1)
- Ben Jelloun, Tahar / L' enfant de sable (1)
- Benda, Oscar (1)
- Biedermeier (1)
- Cavell, Stanley (1)
- Chamisso, Adelbert von / Reise um die Welt in den Jahren 1815-1818 (1)
- Einfühlungsästhetik (1)
- Erkenntnistheorie (1)
- Ermatinger, Emil (1)
- Erzählen (1)
- Erzähltheorie (1)
- Farbe (1)
- Geschichtsschreibung (1)
- Geschlecht (1)
- Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von (1)
- Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von / Mächtiges Überraschen (1)
- Greiffenhagen, Manfred (1)
- Grenzsituation <Motiv> (1)
- Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich (1)
- Intermedialität (1)
- Kift, Roy / Camp Comedy (1)
- Kongress (1)
- Konkrete Poesie (1)
- Kulturwissenschaften (1)
- Körper <Motiv> (1)
- Körpersprache <Motiv> (1)
- Literaturtheorie (1)
- Maghrebinische Literatur (1)
- Mann, Frido / Terezín (1)
- Maschinelle Übersetzung (1)
- Maync, Harry (1)
- Medizinische Ausbildung (1)
- Morphologie <Linguistik> (1)
- München <2011> (1)
- Petersen, Julius (Philologe) (1)
- Poetologische Lyrik (1)
- Raum (1)
- Reiseliteratur (1)
- Skeptizismus (1)
- Sprachtheorie (1)
- Standardisierung (1)
- Strauß, Leo (1)
- Theresienstadt / Konzentrationslager (1)
- Ullmann, Viktor / Der Kaiser von Atlantis (1)
- Universalgrammatik (1)
- Videointerview (1)
- Vischer, Robert (1)
Institute
Vom 17. bis 19. Februar 2011 luden Jens Eder, Joseph Imorde und Maike Sarah Reinerth für die Filmwissenschaft / Mediendramaturgie der Universität Mainz und die Kunstgeschichte der Universität Siegen Forscher und Forscherinnen unterschiedlicher Disziplinen zu einem Workshop mit dem Thema "Medium Menschenbild" ein. Förderer waren der Forschungsschwerpunkt "Medienkonvergenz" der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz und das Labor Neue Kunst Siegen. Ziel der Tagung war, das grundsätzliche Verhältnis von Medialität und Menschenbild zu analysieren, die Spezifik medial vermittelter Menschenbilder im interdisziplinären Austausch zu diskutieren sowie auf die in ihnen implizit enthaltenen konzeptuellen Vorstellungen hinzuweisen. ...
Schließlich untersuchte die Kunsthistorikerin HELEN BARR (Frankfurt am Main) den "neuen Menschen" in Werbeanzeigen illustrierter Zeitschriften der 1920er-Jahre. Das breite Spektrum der Werbung für Pflegeprodukte und Genussmittel suggeriere Orientierungshilfe in der urbanisierten Welt und propagiere ideale Menschenbilder der Moderne. ...
Es ist eine alte Debatte. Auf der einen Seite steht die althergebrachte Maxime, alles, was wert ist, gesagt zu werden, müsse in jeder Sprache gesagt werden können - umso mehr dann, wenn es sich um die Wissenschaft handelt, die den Anspruch erhebt, universelle Wahrheiten zu erfassen. Demgegenüber steht ein immer wieder anzutreffender Gedanke, dessen wohl inspirierteste Formulierung von Wilhelm von Humboldt stammt, nämlich, dass die Verschiedenheit der Sprachen nicht nur eine von „Schällen und Zeichen“, sondern eine der „Weltansichten selbst“ sei. Thema dieses Vortrags ist die Frage, wo die Wahrheit zwischen diesen scheinbaren Gegensätzen liegt.
Es war eine in jeder Hinsicht außergewöhnliche Tagung, die Ende Oktober 2010 in Marbach stattfand. 20 renommierte Historiker/innen kamen zusammen, um an ihren akademischen Lehrer und Mentor Wolfgang J. Mommsen zu erinnern. Jeder sollte, so die Vorgabe der beiden Organisatoren Christoph Cornelißen und Gerhard Hirschfeld, aus seinem Forschungsfeld berichten und den Einfluss Mommsens auf diesen Themengebieten einschätzen und beschreiben. Der entsprechende Tagungsband mit den Beiträge konnte bereits auf der Konferenz vorgestellt werden. Zugegen war auch die Familie Mommsen und ebenso der Zwillingsbruder Hans Mommsen. ...
Based on the metaphor of “liminality” in literary studies, this paper examines two different approaches to the literary genre of travelogues, using the example of Adelbert von Chamisso‟s Voyage Around the World (1836). One approach, with the help of autobiographical research, sheds light on the author-specific key motifs of “omnipotent time” and the process of aging. In the second approach, the focus shifts to the relationship between literature and natural science, i.e. to Chamisso‟s transitional position in the context of the historicization and dynamization of the sciences and humanities in the 19th century. Rather than thinking of “philology” and “cultural studies” as opposing methods, this article thus suggests a more in-tercessory position for the purpose of a fruitful study of travel literature.
Die Antike bildet einen zentralen Bezugspunkt für Identitätskonstruktionen in den europäischen Kulturen. Das Wissen davon, was Antike ist, ist jedoch keineswegs statisch: "Die Antike" formiert sich historisch stets im Wechselspiel mit dem Selbstverständnis der rezipierenden Kulturen. Diese bipolare Konstruktion griff die interdisziplinäre Tagung "Das Geschlecht der Antike" auf, die Anna Heinze (Berlin) und Friederike Krippner (Berlin) im Juni an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin veranstalteten. Sie verfolgte einerseits die Frage, welche Rolle die Kategorie "Geschlecht" bei verschiedenen Epochenentwürfen der Antike spielt, und richtete den Blick andererseits darauf, was die Referenz auf die Antike bei der Konstruktion von Geschlechterverhältnissen in nachantiken Gesellschaften leistet.
In works of Maghrebi authors like Tahar Ben Jelloun (Morocco), the body is the central medium that generates and constitutes the narration. The authors stand in the tradition of oral folk literature, which increasingly has been displaced by French written literature. Hence there is a tendency in postcolonial Maghrebi texts to reintegrate the performative act of narrating via the body into the literary structures of the novels. This becomes manifest in poly-phonic and poly-perspectival narrative experiments in which, with recourse to the halqa (the typical oral narrative situation), a re-territorialization (Deleuze/Guattari) of the body is performed.
In this context the body in literature plays a central role on the level of the metadiegesis: it is presented as the medium of narration. Using as an example Tahar Ben Jellouns novel L’enfant de sable (1985), the aim of this essay is to show how halqa elements and narrative influences from The Arabian Nights structure the text, which becomes a hybrid between medium and embodiment (Fischer-Lichte) by simulating eventfulness.
On the level of the diegesis, the body plays likewise a decisive role as subject of the storyline, becoming the most important medium for the expression of emotions, thoughts or attitudes. Body language is deliberately utilized by the authors to discuss ways of dealing with traditions, the negotiation of social relations and the (de-)construction of identity. Social order, power structures, hierarchies, existing values and norms are communicated and constituted via body language.
Is there something like a 'scientific' approach to the reading or interpretation of literary texts as is suggested by the German term 'Literaturwissenschaft'? This essay argues that genuinely scientific criteria such as the intersubjective verifiability of a given reading do not apply to the reading of literary texts. The reason is that such texts enable a quasi infinite range of different readings the preconceptions of which are contingent upon the individual readers, their previous experiences, literary as well as non-literary, and their expectations. — What, then, are the tasks of a scholarly reading of literary texts? Firstly, the theoretical reflection upon the status of such texts in comparison to pragmatic texts; secondly, the attempt at reconstructing their historical context (in terms of discursive history), and thirdly, a reading with regard to present-day problems. The 'quality' of a scholarly reading of a literary text would thus be dependent not on its 'objectivity', but rather on its capacity to produce resonances amongst other present-day readers, scholarly and non-scholarly.
Innovation oder Wiederkehr? : Das Methodenspektrum im Kurzzeitgedächtnis der Literaturwissenschaft
(2011)
In recent years, a pronounced methodological self-reflexiveness has been established as a standard in studying language and literature. Methodological pluralism and a specific methodological adaptation to the objects of study are a characteristic feature of present-day literary and cultural studies. In keeping with this tendency, introductory textbooks on literary studies often provide an overview of the broad discussion and spectrum of methods and their seemingly boundless possible applications and the options for combining them. But this is not the first time that the boundaries of our discipline have undergone dissolution. Beginning with early examples of accounts of methodological variety and methodological reflection (Oscar Benda, Harry Maync, Emil Ermatinger, Julius Petersen), the present article discusses the ways in which an awareness of a surprisingly long tradition of discussions concerning methodological competence affects the present self-conception and identity of philology.
In response to the question "What is the nature of a philological practice that seeks to establish a spatial relationship between text and reader?" this essay compares the philologist Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht's contemporary account of aesthetic experience with the school of Empathy Aesthetics in the late nineteenth century with respect to the manner each emphasizes the spatial qualities of that relationship. Although employing different conceptual repertoires, both assert that the desire of an aesthetic recipient to be in the spatial vicinity of the object and experience the presence of the object with and upon his own body motivates an aesthetic experience, including the work of the philologist. Gumbrecht and the empathy aesthetician Robert Vischer characterize the desire to stand in a spatial relationship to the aesthetic object as the desire to be subsumed thereby, a characterization which entails the negation of the original philological standpoint.
The essay raises the question of what it actually means to work with concepts of intermediality in literary studies. It uses as an example a Ph.D project which compares story-telling in literary texts and videographed testimonies by Shoah survivors. It soon becomes clear that that a strictly "intermedial" approach does not fully serve the purpose. Instead, one should try to maintain a literary studies perspective even on other forms of media. To illustrate this, the essay presents an analysis of videographed testimonies using categories taken from literary narratology. It thereby shows the problems as well as the merits of such an approach, at the limits of the discipline.