Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (12) (remove)
Document Type
- Report (12) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (12) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (12) (remove)
Keywords
- AfD (1)
- Blasphemy Law (1)
- Bridge International (1)
- Bundeswehr (1)
- Chemnitz (1)
- China (1)
- European Union (1)
- Germany (1)
- Global South (1)
- ICANN (1)
Institute
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (12) (remove)
Bridge International is a for-profit chain of private (pre-)primary schools employing technology to allegedly provide “high-quality, affordable education” in the Global South. Like many other actors, Bridge (cl)aims to bridge the global digital divide and to use information and communication technologies to realize development (“ICT4D”), in particular in sub-Saharan Africa. But are such projects really allowing the region to “catch up” with the rest of the world and strengthen its weak global standing? Not necessarily. Many projects’ implementation mirrors existing global power inequalities and may even reinforce them.1 Moreover, the technologies employed themselves augment these imbalances. The present contribution illustrates this, using Bridge as a case study.
Die am Wochenende beschlossene Verfassungsänderung gibt Chinas Präsident Xi Jinping die Möglichkeit auf Lebenszeit im Amt zu bleiben. Das wird als Zeichen des wachsenden Autoritarismus und Xis zunehmender Macht gewertet. Doch ein genauerer Blick lässt zweifeln: Die Entscheidung ist eher Ausdruck von Zukunftssorgen und Selbstzweifeln der Regierenden in Peking.