Refine
Year of publication
- 2006 (20) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (11)
- Article (5)
- Review (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Language
- German (13)
- English (5)
- Polish (1)
- Portuguese (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (20)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (20) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutschland (20) (remove)
In einem modernen Staat finden immer wieder Gedenkveranstaltungen unterschiedlichster Art statt. Man will sich schöner und weniger schöner, beglückender und traumatischer Ereignisse erinnern, um daraus sich selbst und der Welt ein Wir- Gefühl und ein Selbstbild zu präsentieren. In diesem Sinn wurden am 8. Mai 1985 und am 8. Mai 2005 Gedenkveranstaltungen im Plenarsaal des Deutschen Bundestages abgehalten; Hauptredner waren die jeweiligen Bundespräsidenten, 1985 Richard von Weizsäcker, 2005 Horst Köhler. Beide Reden - sie werden Gegenstand der nachfolgenden Analysen und Interpretationen sein - sind heute im Internet leicht abrufbar: Die Rede von Weizsäckers habe ich von der Homepage der Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, die Rede Köhlers vom Internetauftritt des Bundespräsidialamtes bezogen. Die beiden Texte, die mir in dieser Form zugänglich wurden, werde ich nun beschreiben.
Demographic change in industrialized nations has been a matter of common interest for some time. The financial implications of an ageing society are also increasingly discussed, particularly with regard to pension systems. The impact of this development on public finances is, however, only gradually being realized and the constitutional framework of public finances in Germany and the European Union just falls short of ignoring it entirely. This paper is a preliminary assessment of the burden of an ageing society under the fiscal law, specifically in respect of prospective entitlements to the public pension system. The first part analyses the provisions of the German constitution on finances (Finanzverfassungsrecht) to identify what rules, if any, exist addressing such (potential) expenditures, which lie in the immediate or very distant future. The second part of the paper analyses the fiscal requirements under European Union law. In the third and final part a few comments on the proposed national pact on stability and the recent moves to amend the German Federal Constitution are presented.
Stakeholderorientierung, Systemhaftigkeit und Stabilität der Corporate Governance in Deutschland
(2006)
Since the time of Germany’s belated industrialisation, corporate governance in Germany has been stakeholder oriented in the dual sense of attaching importance to the interests of stakeholders who are not at the same time shareholders, and of providing certain opportunities for these stakeholders to influence corporate decisions. Corporate governance is also systemic. It is a system of elements that are complementary to each other, and also consistent. In other word, it is composed of elements for which it is important that they fit together well, and in the German case these elements did fit together well until quite recently. Corporate governance as a system is itself an element of the German bank-based financial system at large and possibly even of the entire German business and economic system. Stakeholder orientation of governance is consistent with the general structure this system, and even represents one of its central elements. In retrospect, German corporate governance has also proved to be surprisingly stable. Its fundamental traits date back to the turn from the 19th to the 20th century. There are strong reasons to assume that the systemic features, that is, its complementarity and consistency, have greatly contributed to its past stability. Since about ten years now, there are growing tendencies to question the viability and stability of the German corporate governance system and even the financial system as a whole. One of the central topics in the new debate concerns the stakeholder orientation of the system, which some observers and critics consider as the main weakness of the “German model” under the increasing pressures of globalisation and European integration. As far as their development over time is concerned, systems of complementarity elements exhibit certain peculiarities: (1) They do not adjust easily to changing circumstances. (2) Changes concerning important individual elements, such as the stakeholder orientation of governance, tend to jeopardize the viability and the stability of the entire system. (3) While they appear to be stable, systems shaped by complementary may simply be rigid and tend to break under strong external pressure. “Breaking” means that a system undergoes a fundamental transformation. It seems plausible to assume that the German financial system is already in the middle of such a transformation. It is yet another consequence of its systemic character that this transformation is not likely to be a smooth and gradual process and that it will not lead to a “mixed model” but rather to the adoption of a capital market-based financial system as it prevails in the Anglo-Saxon countries. In such a system, corporate governance cannot be geared to catering to the interests of stakeholders, and an active role for them would not even make any economic sense.
Im Folgenden sollen die von Pierre Bourgeade verfassten Theaterwerke 'Deutsches Requiem' und 'Berlin, 9 novembre' analysiert werden, welche beispielhaft für die Tendenz stehen, in der französischen Gegenwartsliteratur herkömmliche Wahrnehmungs- und Darstellungsmuster Deutschlands und der Deutschen einer konstruktiven Revision zu unterziehen. Zuvor jedoch soll ein Überblick über zentrale Verfahren im Umgang mit Fremdstereotypen die Voraussetzung schaffen für die anschließende Bewertung der Darstellung Deutschlands und der Deutschen bei Pierre Bourgeade.
We study a set of German open-end mutual funds for a time period during which this industry emerged from its infancy. In those years, the distribution channel for mutual funds was dominated by the brick-and-mortar retail networks of the large universal banks. Using monthly observations from 12/1986 through 12/1998, we investigate if cross-sectional return differences across mutual funds affect their market shares. Although such a causal relation has been established in highly competitive markets, such as the United States, the rigid distribution system in place in Germany at the time may have caused retail performance and investment performance to uncouple. In fact, although we observe stark differences in investment performance across mutual funds (and over time), we find no evidence that cross-sectional performance differences affect the market shares of these funds. Klassifikation: G 23