Refine
Document Type
- Article (5)
- Working Paper (3)
- Part of a Book (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (9)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (9) (remove)
Keywords
- Biodiversity (1)
- Conservation biology (1)
- Environmental impact (1)
- Global risk (1)
- Lebensmittelhandel (1)
- Müllvermeidung (1)
- Plastik (1)
- Problem structuring (1)
- Risk assessment (1)
- Social ecology (1)
Plastic products leach chemicals that induce in vitro toxicity under realistic use conditions
(2021)
Plastic products contain complex mixtures of extractable chemicals that can be toxic. However, humans and wildlife will only be exposed to plastic chemicals that are released under realistic conditions. Thus, we investigated the toxicological and chemical profiles leaching into water from 24 everyday plastic products covering eight polymer types. We performed migration experiments over 10 days at 40 °C and analyzed the migrates using four in vitro bioassays and nontarget high-resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTOF-MSE). All migrates induced baseline toxicity, 22 an oxidative stress response, 13 antiandrogenicity, and one estrogenicity. Overall, between 17 and 8681 relevant chemical features were present in the migrates. In other words, between 1 and 88% of the plastic chemicals associated with one product were migrating. Further, we tentatively identified ∼8% of all detected features implying that most plastic chemicals remain unknown. While low-density polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, and polyurethane induced most toxicological endpoints, a generalization for other materials is not possible. Our results demonstrate that plastic products readily leach many more chemicals than previously known, some of which are toxic in vitro. This highlights that humans are exposed to many more plastic chemicals than currently considered in public health science and policies.
Plastikmüll ist ein zentrales Umweltproblem des 21. Jahrhunderts. Ein Großteil dieses Mülls stammt aus lediglich kurzzeitig genutzten Einwegverpackungen. Lebensmittelhersteller und Lebensmittelhandel stehen vor der Herausforderung, eine nachhaltige Gestaltung, Nutzung und Reduktion von Kunststoffverpackungen voranzutreiben. Drei Überlegungen sind hier zentral. Erstens muss der Einsatz von kurzlebigen Einwegverpackungen möglichst vermieden und reduziert werden. Zweitens müssen in den Bereichen, in denen Vermeidung nicht möglich oder ökologisch sinnvoll ist, Materialien nach Nachhaltigkeitskriterien (Ökobilanzen, toxikologische Tests) ausgewählt und Verpackungen dementsprechend gestaltet werden. Drittens müssen Unternehmen Ressourcen für betriebliche Innovation bereitstellen und Veränderungsprozesse möglichst transparent und partizipativ gestalten. Neben technischen Innovationen sollten soziale Innovationen und organisatorische Anpassungen im Mittelpunkt stehen. Dieser Policy Brief bietet eine wissenschaftlich fundierte Grundlage insbesondere für Unternehmen und Verbände in der Lebensmittelversorgung, aber auch für politische Entscheidungsträger*innen sowie Mitarbeitende in
Behörden, die sich diesen Erfordernissen stellen und damit als Pioniere der Nachhaltigkeit zu einer Lösung des Plastikmüllproblems beitragen wollen.
Highlights
• PUR, PVC and PLA microplastics affect life-history parameters of Daphnia magna.
• Natural kaolin particles are less toxic than microplastics.
• Microplastic toxicity is material-specific, e.g. PVC is most toxic on reproduction.
• In case of PVC, plastic chemicals are the main driver of microplastic toxicity.
• PLA bioplastics are similarly toxic as conventional plastics.
Abstract
Given the ubiquitous presence of microplastics in aquatic environments, an evaluation of their toxicity is essential. Microplastics are a heterogeneous set of materials that differ not only in particle properties, like size and shape, but also in chemical composition, including polymers, additives and side products. Thus far, it remains unknown whether the plastic chemicals or the particle itself are the driving factor for microplastic toxicity. To address this question, we exposed Daphnia magna for 21 days to irregular polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyurethane (PUR) and polylactic acid (PLA) microplastics as well as to natural kaolin particles in high concentrations (10, 50, 100, 500 mg/L, ≤ 59 μm) and different exposure scenarios, including microplastics and microplastics without extractable chemicals as well as the extracted and migrating chemicals alone. All three microplastic types negatively affected the life-history of D. magna. However, this toxicity depended on the endpoint and the material. While PVC had the largest effect on reproduction, PLA reduced survival most effectively. The latter indicates that bio-based and biodegradable plastics can be as toxic as their conventional counterparts. The natural particle kaolin was less toxic than microplastics when comparing numerical concentrations. Importantly, the contribution of plastic chemicals to the toxicity was also plastic type-specific. While we can attribute effects of PVC to the chemicals used in the material, effects of PUR and PLA plastics were induced by the mere particle. Our study demonstrates that plastic chemicals can drive microplastic toxicity. This highlights the importance of considering the individual chemical composition of plastics when assessing their environmental risks. Our results suggest that less studied polymer types, like PVC and PUR, as well as bioplastics are of particular toxicological relevance and should get a higher priority in ecotoxicological studies.
The diagnosis that we are living in a world risk society formulated by Ulrich Beck 20 years ago (Beck, Kölner Z Soziol Sozialpsychol 36:119–147, 1996) has lost nothing of its power, especially against the background of the Anthropocene debate. “Global risks” have been identified which are caused by human activities, technology, and modernization processes. Microplastics are a by-product of exactly these modernization processes, being distributed globally by physical processes like ocean currents, and causing effects far from their place of origin. In recent years, the topic has gained great prominence, as microplastics have been discovered nearly everywhere in the environment, raising questions about the impacts on food for human consumption. But are microplastics really a new phenomenon or rather a symptom of an old problem? And exactly what risks are involved? It seems that the phenomenon has accelerated political action—the USA has passed the Microbead-Free Waters Act 2015—and industries have pledged to fade out the use of microbeads in their cosmetic products. At first sight, is it a success for environmentalists and the protection of our planet?
This chapter deals with these questions by adopting a social-ecological perspective, discussing microplastics as a global risk. Taking four main characteristics of global risks, we develop four arguments to discuss (a) the everyday production of risk by societies, (b) scientific risk evaluation of microplastics, (c) social responses, and (d) problems of risk management. To illustrate these four issues, we draw on different aspects of the current scientific and public debate. In doing so, we contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the social-ecological implications of microplastics.
Innovative Wasserinfrastrukturen, wie sie etwa mit den Neuartigen Sanitärsystemen entwickelt worden sind, versprechen Effizienzgewinne. Ihre Anwendung bedeutet nicht nur, den Einsatz neuer Techniken, sondern auch, dass sich die im konventionellen System erprobten Arbeitsteilungen zwischen verschiedenen Akteuren verändern. Ebenso können sich Beweggründe und Motivationen der beteiligten Akteure wandeln. Die Innovations- und Umsetzungsschritte werden dabei komplexer. Die Konstellationen der verschiedenen (heterogenen) Akteure und ihre Zusammenarbeit haben dabei hohe Relevanz für die Umsetzung innovativer Infrastrukturkonzepte.
Das vorliegende Diskussionspapier zeigt – aufbauend auf Ergebnisse aus zwei BMBFForschungsvorhaben – welcher Koordinationsbedarf bei einer Umsetzung auf der Quartiersebene zu erwarten ist. Zudem werden Hinweise gegeben, wie sich die Koordination zwischen den beteiligten Akteuren optimieren lässt.
Vorarbeiten zu einer sozial-ökologischen RisDie Nanotechnologie gilt als eine der Schlüsseltechnologien der Zukunft: Die Verringerung der Teilchengröße in den nanoskaligen Bereich führt zu neuartigen physikalischen und chemischen Stoffeigenschaften, welche Innovationspotenzial in vielfältigen Anwendungsfeldern versprechen. Besonders in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten hat die Nanotechnologie wirtschaftlich an Bedeutung gewonnen, da immer mehr nanotechnologische Entwicklungen kommerziell umgesetzt werden. Aufgrund des breiten Anwendungsspektrums und der Vielzahl unterschiedlicher Materialien ist bisher weder eine transparente Darstellung der tatsächlichen wirtschaftlichen Bedeutung noch eine adäquate Bewertung potenzieller Gesundheits- und Umweltrisiken, die aus den neuartigen nanospezifischen Eigenschaften hervorgehen könnten, möglich.
Das Papier gibt einen aktuellen Überblick über den Stand des Wissens zum Thema Nanotechnologie, wobei besonderer Fokus auf den Bereich Risiko, Toxikologie und Ökotoxikologie sowie Risikowahrnehmung und -kommunikation gelegt wird. Die Ergebnisse der Literaturstudie sollen künftig dazu dienen, zu prüfen, welchen Beitrag ein sozial-ökologischer Forschungsansatz zur nachhaltigen Entwicklung und Nutzung der Nanotechnologie leisten kann.
The antibacterial properties of nanosilver have led to a versatile application spectrum including medical purposes and personal care products. However, the increasing use of nanosilver has raised concerns about its environmental impacts. Long-term exposure studies with aquatic invertebrates are essential to assess possible adverse effects on aquatic ecosystems. In the present study, acute (48 h), chronic (21 d) and long-term effects of nanosilver (primary size 15 nm) on five successive generations of three Daphnia species (D. magna, D. pulex, and D. galeata) were investigated. Acute EC50 values of nanosilver were 121 µg Ag L−1 for D. magna being the least sensitive species and 8.95 and 13.9 µg Ag L−1 for D. pulex and D. galeata, respectively. Chronic exposure provided EC10 values of 0.92 µg Ag L−1 for D. magna showing the most sensitive chronic reaction and 2.25 and 3.45 µg Ag L−1 for D. pulex and D. galeata, respectively. Comparative exposure to AgNO3 revealed a generally higher toxicity of the soluble form of silver. The multi-generation experiments resulted in effects on the population level for all tested species. Exposure of D. magna indicated an increased toxicity of nanosilver in the fifth generation of animals exposed to 10 µg Ag L−1. Neonates from pre-exposed parental daphnids did not completely recover when transferred into clean water. Exposure of D. pulex and D. galeata revealed not only increasing toxicity in some generations, but also greater tolerance to nanosilver. This study contributes to the assessment of the risk potential of nanosilver on aquatic ecosystems. It shows that effects of nanosilver vary within one genus and change with exposure duration. Therefore, long-term studies considering different aquatic species are needed to better understand the possible effects of nanosilver on aquatic ecosystems.