Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (59)
Has Fulltext
- yes (59)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (59)
Keywords
- Immunological methods (5)
- Immunologische Methoden (5)
- Postural control (5)
- Diagnostics (4)
- Diagnostik (4)
- Kinematic analysis (4)
- MSD (4)
- dentist (4)
- prevalence (4)
- Healthy adults (3)
- Medical research (3)
- Musculoskeletal diseases (3)
- Musculoskeletal disorder (3)
- Musculoskeletal system (3)
- Upper body posture (3)
- dental profession (3)
- ergonomics (3)
- inertial motion capture (3)
- musculoskeletal disorders (3)
- CUELA (2)
- Cuela (2)
- Dentist (2)
- Knees (2)
- Occupational health (2)
- Posture analysis (2)
- Standard value (2)
- Tumor marker (2)
- Tumormarker (2)
- dental assistant (2)
- dental assistants (2)
- dental education (2)
- dentists (2)
- kinematic analysis (2)
- musculoskeletal (2)
- pain (2)
- questionnaire (2)
- ACE-Bestimmung (1)
- Access (1)
- Acute injuries (1)
- Adrenocorticotropic hormone (1)
- Adrenokortikotropes Hormon (1)
- Akute Verletzungen (1)
- Alkaline phosphatase (1)
- Alkalische Phosphatase (1)
- Anatomy (1)
- Arms (1)
- Arteriosclerosis (1)
- Arteriosklerose (1)
- Axiography (1)
- BG-index (1)
- BMI (1)
- BSP (1)
- Back scan (1)
- Berufliche Gesundheit (1)
- Berufszufriedenheit (1)
- Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung (1)
- Betriebliches Wiedereingliederungsmanagement (1)
- Bewegungsanalyse mit Inertialsensoren (1)
- Biomarker (1)
- Biomarker Lipoprotein(a) (1)
- Biophysics (1)
- Blocked occlusion (1)
- Blood parameters (1)
- Blutparameter (1)
- Body sway (1)
- Bone metastases (1)
- Bühnentanz (1)
- Büroarbeit (1)
- CTX and NTX (1)
- CTX und NTX (1)
- CUELA system (1)
- Cardiavascular function (1)
- Cerebrospinal fluid diagnostics (1)
- Chronic diseases (1)
- Chronische Fehl- und Überlastungsschäden (1)
- Citation (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constrained posture (1)
- Corticotropic axis (1)
- Cushing-Syndrom (1)
- Cushing’s syndrome (1)
- Custom-made mouthguard (1)
- Dance (1)
- Dehntraining (1)
- Density equalizing mapping (1)
- Dental casts (1)
- Dentists (1)
- Distribution (1)
- Economic benchmarks (1)
- Epidemiology (1)
- Ergometrie (1)
- Ergometry (1)
- Ergonomic analysis (1)
- Ergonomics (1)
- Ergonomie am Arbeitsplatz (1)
- Ergonomische Analyse (1)
- Factor analysis (1)
- Female subjects (1)
- Five-Konzept (1)
- Gender (1)
- Health care (1)
- Healthy men (1)
- Herz-Kreislauffunktion (1)
- Hip (1)
- Hyperlipidemia (1)
- Hyperlipidämie (1)
- Immune system (1)
- Immunsystem (1)
- Inertial motion capture (1)
- Jaw (1)
- Job satisfaction (1)
- Jumping (1)
- Kinematic posture analysis (1)
- Kinematics (1)
- Knochenmetastasen (1)
- Kortikotrope Achse (1)
- Körperliche Aktivität (1)
- Lebensqualität (1)
- Legs (1)
- Liquordiagnostik (1)
- Lungenerkrankungen (1)
- Magnetic resonance imaging (1)
- Magnetresonanztomographie (1)
- Medical staff (1)
- Meersseman test (1)
- Morbus Cushing Syndrom (1)
- Multiple Sklerose (1)
- Multiple sclerosis (1)
- Mundhöhlenkarzinome (1)
- Musculoskeletal problems (1)
- Music chair concepts (1)
- Musician (1)
- Musician-specific seating position (1)
- Muskuloskeletale Erkrankungen (1)
- Muskuloskelettale Erkrankungen (1)
- Myalgia (1)
- Neurofilament light chains (1)
- Neurofilament-Leichtketten (1)
- Neurology (1)
- Nordic questionnaire (1)
- Normal distribution (1)
- Occupational reintegration management (1)
- Office work (1)
- Oral cancer (1)
- Orthodontist (1)
- Orthopaedics (1)
- Osteoporose (1)
- Osteoporosis (1)
- Pedagogue (1)
- Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (1)
- Periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit (1)
- Physical activity (1)
- Physiology (1)
- Posture (1)
- Pressure distribution (1)
- Pressure measuring plate (1)
- Preventive medicine (1)
- Primary care (1)
- Professional dance (1)
- Präanalytik (1)
- Publication (1)
- Pädagoge/in (1)
- Quality of life (1)
- RULA (1)
- Ready-made mouthguard (1)
- Rehabilitation (1)
- Research architecture (1)
- Respiratory Syncytial Virus (1)
- Restricted posture (1)
- SF-36 (1)
- Scientometry (1)
- Sialic acid (1)
- Sialinsäure (1)
- Socioeconomic status (1)
- Sport (1)
- Standard reference values (1)
- Stretch training (1)
- Stringed bow player (1)
- Störfaktoren (1)
- Subjective health status (1)
- Subjektiver Gesundheitszustand (1)
- Symmetrical blocked occlusion (1)
- Tabakkonsum (1)
- Taekwondoka (1)
- Tanz (1)
- Therapie (1)
- Therapy (1)
- Three-dimensional back scan (1)
- Torque (1)
- Translational research (1)
- Tubers (1)
- Urban (1)
- Video rasterstereography (1)
- Videorasterstereography (1)
- Vitamin D (1)
- Weight distribution (1)
- Women (1)
- Work health promotion (1)
- Workplace (1)
- Workplace ergonomics (1)
- academic medicine (1)
- analgesics (1)
- back scan (1)
- bibliometrics (1)
- body posture (1)
- career promotion (1)
- cleaning (1)
- dental health professional (1)
- dental treatment concept (1)
- dentist’s chair design (1)
- female subjects (1)
- gender (1)
- gender difference (1)
- human factors (1)
- inertial motion units (1)
- inertial sensors (1)
- kinematics (1)
- medication (1)
- movement pattern (1)
- movement profile (1)
- musculoskeletal pain (1)
- occupational factors (1)
- occupational health (1)
- oral health (1)
- oral health burden (1)
- orthodontist (1)
- pain medication (1)
- physical activity (1)
- promotion index (1)
- publication output (1)
- quality of life (1)
- risk assessment (1)
- running (1)
- socio-economic influences (1)
- sonoSens (1)
- standard value (1)
- statistical parametric mapping (1)
- stretching (1)
- therapy (1)
- triathlon (1)
- vacuuming (1)
- wearable sensors (1)
- work place evaluation (1)
- workplace health promotion (1)
Institute
- Medizin (59)
- Sportwissenschaften (10)
- Biochemie und Chemie (2)
- Psychologie (1)
- Psychologie und Sportwissenschaften (1)
Standard values of the upper body posture in healthy adults with special regard to age, sex and BMI
(2023)
In order to classify and analyze the parameters of upper body posture in clinical or physiotherapeutic settings, a baseline in the form of standard values with special regard to age, sex and BMI is required. Thus, subjectively healthy men and women aged 21–60 years were measured in this project. The postural parameters of 800 symptom-free male (n = 397) and female (n = 407) volunteers aged 21–60 years (Ø♀: 39.7 ± 11.6, Ø ♂: 40.7 ± 11.5 y) were studied. The mean height of the men was 1.8 ± 0.07 m, with a mean body weight of 84.8 ± 13.1 kg and an average BMI of 26.0 ± 3.534 kg/m2. In contrast, the mean height of the women was 1.67 ± 0.06 m, with a mean body weight of 66.5 ± 12.7 kg and an average BMI of 23.9 ± 4.6 kg/m2. By means of video rasterstereography, a 3-dimensional scan of the upper back surface was measured when in a habitual standing position. The means or medians, confidence intervals, tolerance ranges, the minimum, 2.5, 25, 50, 75, 97.5 percentiles and the maximum, plus the kurtosis and skewness of the distribution, were calculated for all parameters. Additionally, ANOVA and a factor analyses (sex, BMI, age) were conducted. In both sexes across all age groups, balanced, symmetrical upper body statics were evident. Most strikingly, the females showed greater thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis angles (kyphosis: Ø ♀ 56°, Ø♂ 51°; lordosis: Ø ♀ 49°, Ø♂ 32°) and lumbar bending angles (Ø ♀ 14°, Ø♂ 11°) than the males. The distance between the scapulae was more pronounced in men. These parameters also show an increase with age and BMI, respectively. Pelvic parameters were independent of age and sex. The upper body postures of women and men between the ages of 21 and 60 years were found to be almost symmetrical and axis-conforming with a positive correlation for BMI or age. Consequently, the present body posture parameters allow for comparisons with other studies, as well as for the evaluation of clinical (interim) diagnostics and applications.
Background: In order to classify and analyze the parameters of upper body posture, a baseline in the form of standard values is demanded. To this date, standard values have only been published for healthy men aged 18–35 and 41–50 years. Data for male adults aged between 31 and 40 years are lacking.
Methods: The postural parameters of 101 symptom-free male volunteers aged 31–40 (35.58 ± 2.88) years were studied. The mean height of the men was 179.89 ± 7.38 cm, with a mean body weight of 86.36 ± 11.58 kg and an average BMI of 26.70 ± 3.35 kg/m2. By means of video rasterstereography, a 3-dimensional scan of the upper back surface was measured in a habitual standing position. The means or medians, confidence interval, tolerance range, and group comparisons and correlations of BMI and physical activity were calculated for all parameters.
Results: The habitual standing position was found to be almost symmetrical and the axis aligned in the spine, pelvis, and shoulder region, while the spine position was marginally inclined ventrally. The kyphosis angle of the thoracic spine was greater than the lordosis angle of the lumbar spine. All deviations fell under the measurement error margin of 1 mm/1°. The greater the BMI, the greater was the pelvic and scapular distance. The lower the BMI, the further caudally positioned was the right shoulder. The pelvic and scapular distances were also lower with the increasing athleticism of the participants.
Conclusion: The upper body posture of men between the ages of 31 and 40 years was found to be almost symmetrical and axis-conforming, with the kyphosis angle, pelvic distance, and shoulder distance enlarging with increasing BMI. Consequently, postural parameters presented in this survey allow for comparisons with other studies, as well as the evaluation of clinical diagnostics and applications.
The aim of this study was to investigate gender-specific influences of different symmetric and asymmetric occlusion conditions on postural control during standing and walking. The study involved 59 healthy adult volunteers (41 f/19 m) aged between 22 and 53 years (30.2 ± 6.3 years). Postural control measurements were carried out using a pressure plate by measuring plantar pressure distribution during standing and walking test conditions. Seven different occlusion conditions were tested. Prior to a MANOVA model analysis, the relationship between the two test conditions were checked using a factor analysis with a varying number of factors (between 2 and 10). The plantar pressure distributions during walking and standing are independent test conditions. The coefficient of variance across all variables between the conditions and genders was not significant: t(46) = 1.51 (p = 0.13). No statement can be made whether, or not, the influence of gender is greater than the influence of the conditions. Healthy male and female test subjects did not show any difference between seven occlusion conditions on the plantar pressure distribution while standing or walking. No differences between the genders were found for any of the investigated variables. In contrast to custom-made occlusion splints, simple cotton rolls appear not to influence the neuromuscular system in a systematic manner.
Background: The aim of this study was to collect standard reference values of the weight and the maximum pressure distribution in healthy adults aged 18–65 years and to investigate the influence of constitutional parameters on it.
Methods: A total of 416 healthy subjects (208 male / 208 female) aged between 18 and 65 years (Ø 38.3 ± 14.1 years) participated in this study, conducted 2015–2019 in Heidelberg. The age-specific evaluation is based on 4 age groups (G1, 18–30 years; G2, 31–40 years; G3, 41–50 years; G4, 51–65 years). A pressure measuring plate FDM-S (Zebris/Isny/Germany) was used to collect body weight distribution and maximum pressure distribution of the right and left foot and left and right forefoot/rearfoot, respectively.
Results: Body weight distribution of the left (50.07%) and right (50.12%) foot was balanced. There was higher load on the rearfoot (left 54.14%; right 55.09%) than on the forefoot (left 45.49%; right 44.26%). The pressure in the rearfoot was higher than in the forefoot (rearfoot left 9.60 N/cm2, rearfoot right 9.51 N/cm2/forefoot left 8.23 N/cm2, forefoot right 8.59 N/cm2). With increasing age, the load in the left foot shifted from the rearfoot to the forefoot as well as the maximum pressure (p ≤ 0.02 and 0.03; poor effect size). With increasing BMI, the body weight shifted to the left and right rearfoot (p ≤ 0.001, poor effect size). As BMI increased, so did the maximum pressure in all areas (p ≤ 0.001 and 0.03, weak to moderate effect size). There were significant differences in weight and maximum pressure distribution in the forefoot and rearfoot in the different age groups, especially between younger (18–40 years) and older (41–65 years) subjects.
Discussion: Healthy individuals aged from 18 to 65 years were found to have a balanced weight distribution in an aspect ratio, with a 20% greater load of the rearfoot. Age and BMI were found to be influencing factors of the weight and maximum pressure distribution, especially between younger and elder subjects. The collected standard reference values allow comparisons with other studies and can serve as a guideline in clinical practice and scientific studies.
Background: To detect deviations from a normal postural control, standard values can be helpful for comparison purposes. Since the postural control is influenced by gender and age, the aim of the present study was the collection of standard values for women between 31 and 40 years of age.
Methods: For the study, 106 female, subjectively healthy, German subjects aged between 31 and 40 years (35 ± 2.98 years) were measured using a pressure measuring platform.
Results: Their average BMI was 21.60 ± 4.65 kg/m2. The load distribution between left and right foot was almost evenly balanced with a median 51.46% load on the left [tolerance interval (TR) 37.02%/65.90%; confidence interval (CI) 50.06/52.85%] and 48.54% [TR 43.10/62.97%; CI 47.14/49.93%] on the right foot. The median forefoot load was 33.84% [TR 20.68/54.73%; CI 31.67/37.33%] and the rearfoot load was measured at 66.16% [TR 45.27/79.33%; CI 62.67/68.33%]. The median/mean body sway in the sagittal plane was measured 12 mm [TR 5.45/23.44 mm; CI 11.00/14.00 mm] and 8.17 mm in the frontal plane [TR 3.33/19.08 mm; CI 7.67/9.33 mm]. The median of the ellipse area is 0.72 cm2 [TR 0.15/3.69 cm2; CI 0.54/0.89°]. The ellipse width has a median of 0.66 cm [TR 0.30/1.77 cm; CI 0.61/0.78 cm] and the height of 0.33 cm [TR 0.13/0.71 cm; CI 0.30/0.37 cm]. The ellipse angle (sway, left forefoot to right rearfoot) has a mean of − 19.34° [TR − 59.21/− 0.44°; CI − 22.52/− 16.16°] and the ellipse angle sway from right forefoot to left rearfoot has a mean of 12.75° [TR 0.09/59.09°; CI 9.00/16.33°].
Conclusion: The right-to-left ratio is balanced. The forefoot-to-rearfoot ratio is approximately 1:2. Also, the body sway can be classified with 12 and 8 mm as normal. The direction of fluctuation is either approx. 19° from the left forefoot to the right rearfoot or approx. 13° the opposite. Body weight, height, and BMI were comparable to the German average of women in a similar age group, so that the measured standard values are representative and might serve as baseline for the normal function of the balance system in order to support the diagnosis of possible dysfunctions in postural control.
Background: In general, the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) in dentistry is high, and dental assistants (DA) are even more affected than dentists (D). Furthermore, differentiations between the fields of dental specialization (e.g., general dentistry, endodontology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, or orthodontics) are rare. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the ergonomic risk of the aforementioned four fields of dental specialization for D and DA on the one hand, and to compare the ergonomic risk of D and DA within each individual field of dental specialization. Methods: In total, 60 dentists (33 male/27 female) and 60 dental assistants (11 male/49 female) volunteered in this study. The sample was composed of 15 dentists and 15 dental assistants from each of the dental field, in order to represent the fields of dental specialization. In a laboratory setting, all tasks were recorded using an inertial motion capture system. The kinematic data were applied to an automated version of the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Results: The results revealed significantly reduced ergonomic risks in endodontology and orthodontics compared to oral and maxillofacial surgery and general dentistry in DAs, while orthodontics showed a significantly reduced ergonomic risk compared to general dentistry in Ds. Further differences between the fields of dental specialization were found in the right wrist, right lower arm, and left lower arm in DAs and in the neck, right wrist, right lower arm, and left wrist in Ds. The differences between Ds and DAs within a specialist discipline were rather small. Discussion: Independent of whether one works as a D or DA, the percentage of time spent working in higher risk scores is reduced in endodontologists, and especially in orthodontics, compared to general dentists or oral and maxillofacial surgeons. In order to counteract the development of WMSD, early intervention should be made. Consequently, ergonomic training or strength training is recommended.
In the application of range of motion (ROM) tests there is little agreement on the number of repetitions to be measured and the number of preceding warm-up protocols. In stretch training a plateau in ROM gains can be seen after four to five repetitions. With increasing number of repetitions, the gain in ROM is reduced. This study examines the question of whether such an effect occurs in common ROM tests. Twenty-two healthy sport students (10 m/12 f.) with an average age of 25.3 ± 1.94 years (average height 174.1 ± 9.8 cm; weight 66.6 ± 11.3 kg and BMI 21.9 ± 2.0 kg/cm2) volunteered in this study. Each subject performed five ROM tests in a randomized order—measured either via a tape measure or a digital inclinometer: Tape measure was used to evaluate the Fingertip-to-Floor test (FtF) and the Lateral Inclination test (LI). Retroflexion of the trunk modified after Janda (RF), Thomas test (TT) and a Shoulder test modified after Janda (ST) were evaluated with a digital inclinometer. In order to show general acute effects within 20 repetitions we performed ANOVA/Friedman-test with multiple comparisons. A non-linear regression was then performed to identify a plateau formation. Significance level was set at 5%. In seven out of eight ROM tests (five tests in total with three tests measured both left and right sides) significant flexibility gains were observed (FtF: p < 0.001; LI-left/right: p < 0.001/0.001; RF: p = 0.009; ST-left/right: p < 0.001/p = 0.003; TT-left: p < 0.001). A non-linear regression with random effects was successfully applied on FtF, RF, LI-left/right, ST-left and TT-left and thus, indicate a gradual decline in the amount of gained ROM. An acute effect was observed in most ROM tests, which is characterized by a gradual decline of ROM gain. For those tests, we can state that the acute effect described in the stretching literature also applies to the performance of typical ROM tests. Since a non-linear behavior was shown, it is the decision of the practitioner to weigh up between measurement accuracy and expenditure. Researchers and practitioners should consider this when applying ROM assessments to healthy young adults.
Background: Temporary occlusal changes and their influence on the upper body statics are still controversially discussed. Furthermore, concrete statements on whether age- or gender-specific differences in neurophysiological reactions exist are missing. Therefore, it is the aim of this study to evaluate the immediate effects of a symmetrical occlusion blocking on the upper body posture. These effects shall be investigated for both genders and for a larger age range.
Methods: In this study, 800 (407f/393 m) subjects volunteered aged from 21 to 60 years. Both genders were divided into four age groups according to decades. The three-dimensional upper body posture was measured by using the rasterstereography (ABW-Bodymapper). The habitual static posture was measured in two dental occlusion conditions (a) in rest position and (b) symmetrical blocking in the bicuspid region by cotton rolls.
Results: A significant reduction of the trunk length (0.72 mm; p < 0.001), an increase of the lumbar (0.30°; p < 0.001) and the thoracic bending angle (0.14°; p = 0.001), a reduction of the spinal forward decline (0.16°; p < 0.001) and a reduction of the scapular distance (0.36 mm; p = 0.001) was found. Gender-specific reactions can only be recorded in scapular distance, in that regard men reduce this distance while over all age groups women did not show a significant change.
Discussion: Slight gender- and age-independent reactions due to a symmetric occlusion blockade are shown: A gender independent reaction of the spinal related variables in the sagittal plane (thoracic and lumbar flexion angle, trunk length, spinal forward decline). In addition, a gender specific change of the shoulder blade distance could be observed, where men reduced the distance while female did not show a change. However, since these reactions are of a minimum amount, it can be concluded that neurophysiological compensation mechanisms work equally well regardless of age and sex, and the upper body posture of healthy people changes only very slightly due to a temporarily symmetrical altered bite position.
Die vorliegende Übersicht zum Biomarker „Lipoprotein(a) – Lp(a)“ wird im Rahmen der Serie Diagnostika des Zentralblatts für Arbeitsmedizin, Arbeitsschutz und Ergonomie publiziert, die sich mit dem immer häufigeren Gebrauch der Bestimmung von spezifischen Markern bei sog. Manager-Vorsorgen und Check-up-Untersuchungen beschäftigt. Lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), eignet sich grundsätzlich nicht für solche Vorsorgen, sondern ist ein Marker zur Risikoabschätzung der peripheren arteriellen Verschlusskrankheit. Hier zeigt dieser eine hohe Sensitivität und Spezifität, wobei der Marker aber auf keinen Fall als Screeningparameter zur Frühdiagnostik eingesetzt werden sollte.
Standard reference values of the upper body posture in healthy middle-aged female adults in Germany
(2021)
In order to classify and analyze the parameters of upper body posture, a baseline in form of standard values is demanded. To this date, standard values have only been published for healthy young women. Data for female adults between 51 and 60 years are lacking. 101 symptom-free female volunteers aged 51–60 (55.16 ± 2.89) years. The mean height of the volunteers was 1.66 ± 0.62 m, with a mean body weight of 69.3 ± 11.88 kg and an average BMI of 25.02 ± 4.55 kg/m2. By means of video raster stereography, a 3D-scan of the upper back surface was measured in a habitual standing position. The confidence interval, tolerance range and ICCs were calculated for all parameters. The habitual standing position is almost symmetrical in the frontal plane the most prominent deviation being a slightly more ventral position of the left shoulder blade in comparison to the right. The upper body (spine position) is inclined ventrally with a minor tilt to the left. In the sagittal plane, the kyphosis angle of the thoracic spine is greater than the lordosis angle of the lumbar spine. The pelvis is virtually evenly balanced with deviations from an ideal position falling under the measurement error margin of 1 mm/1°. There were also BMI influenced postural variations in the sagittal plane and shoulder distance. The ICCs are calculated from three repeated measurements and all parameters can be classified as "almost perfect". Deflections from an ideally symmetric spinal alignment in women aged 51–60 years are small-scaled, with a minimal frontal-left inclination and accentuated sigmoidal shape of the spine. Postural parameters presented in this survey allow for comparisons with other studies as well as the evaluation of clinical diagnostics and applications.