Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Language
- English (2)
- Portuguese (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Aristotle (3) (remove)
Institute
The main sources for the discussion of the category “relation” were Aristotle’s Categories and Metaphysics. Before their translation into Arabic in the 8th and 9th centuries, Christian theologians and in their footsteps Syriac scholars considered Aristotle’s works to be a useful tool in Christological discussions. This article analyzes the category of relation and its development in Arabic-Islamic philosophy in authors such as Kindī and his student Aḥmad Ibn aṭ-Ṭayyib as-Saraḫsī, Fārābī, Ibn Sīnā, Ghazālī, Ibn Rušd, the Sufi Ibn ʿArabī and others.
O presente artigo trata da consciência filosófica expressa nas formulações de T. W. Adorno quanto ao desvanecimento da ética como possibilidade inerente ao ato educativo. Tendo em vista compreender o significado do termo "doutrina da vida reta" que, nas palavras de Adorno, teria caído em esquecimento na atualidade, o presente texto revisita o pensamento ético de Aristóteles, procurando elucidar o seu sentido imanente à educação. Por fim, extrairemos desse percurso algumas preocupações referentes ao problema da educação contemporânea sob a ótica das formulações de Adorno.
In his works, Hans Kelsen elaborates several objections to the so-called “doctrine of natural law”, especially in his essay The Natural-Law Doctrine Before the Tribunal of Science. Kelsen argues that natural law theorists, searching for an absolute criterion for justice, try to deduce from nature the rules of human behavior. Robert P. George, in the essay Kelsen and Aquinas on the ‘Natural Law Doctrine’ examines his criticism and concludes that what Kelsen understands as the Natural-law doctrine does not include the natural law theory elaborated by Thomas Aquinas. In this paper, we will try to corroborate George’s theses and try to show how Aquinas’ natural law theory can be vindicated against Kelsens criticisms.