Refine
Document Type
- Report (4)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
- Global South (4) (remove)
Institute
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (4) (remove)
Bridge International is a for-profit chain of private (pre-)primary schools employing technology to allegedly provide “high-quality, affordable education” in the Global South. Like many other actors, Bridge (cl)aims to bridge the global digital divide and to use information and communication technologies to realize development (“ICT4D”), in particular in sub-Saharan Africa. But are such projects really allowing the region to “catch up” with the rest of the world and strengthen its weak global standing? Not necessarily. Many projects’ implementation mirrors existing global power inequalities and may even reinforce them.1 Moreover, the technologies employed themselves augment these imbalances. The present contribution illustrates this, using Bridge as a case study.
Im Zuge der (wieder) zunehmenden Aufmerksamkeit verschiedenster IB-Theorien für postkoloniale Problemlagen hat unter ‚nördlichen‘ IB-Forschern das Interesse an Dialog und Auseinandersetzung mit den IB-Communities des ‚globalen Südens‘ zugenommen. Dieser Beitrag will Möglichkeiten und Hindernisse dieses Dialogs für den Fall der südamerikanischen IB-Communities aufzeigen. Es soll gewissermaßen eine ‚Bedienungsanleitung‘ erstellt werden, um dem interessierten Außenseiter das Verständnis der Interessenlagen, theoretischen Präferenzen und der konkreten Arbeitssituationen südamerikanischer IB-Forscher zu erleichtern. Dies geschieht selbstredend unter Betonung der Unvollständigkeit der Beschreibung sowie der Perspektivenabhängigkeit des Beobachters.
Out of area or out of business?: the bourgeois parochialism of international studies conferences
(2014)
Most face-to-face interaction with other IR types happens at conferences, and it’s easy to break conferences down by profile and inclusiveness. The ISA annual conference is supposed to rate pretty highly on both, and almost everyone has been a few times by the end of their post-grad careers. Then there are the conferences that are high profile but less inclusive. APSA, BISA, the ISA regional conferences, and the newly constituted EISA are fairly high profile in that most IR professionals have heard of them, but they’re less inclusive in that few of us would cross broad bodies of water and long customs lines to participate...
In the Global South, private corporations and development aid programs are widely implementing information and communication technology (ICT). Stakeholders export infrastructure (including satellites, drones, and white spaces technology) as well as mobile and internet services (mobile money services, zero-rating), following the proclaimed goal to close the global digital divide. They particularly target under-connected regions in Africa, as Africa shows the lowest levels of internet connectivity (cf. International Telecommunications Union 2017). According to companies and development aid programs, these digitalization efforts in the Global South are key to development and security. However, an ethical perspective points to concerns about the practice of digitalization in the Global South. One central concern is that certain values are inscribed in ICT, and that they may be indirectly implemented through technology in the importing countries. Thus, the export of ICT by Western companies and development aid programs to the Global South may have a "neo-colonial" character. This raises ethical questions about global justice...