Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (20) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (20) (remove)
Language
- English (20)
Has Fulltext
- yes (20)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (20)
Institute
- Medizin (20) (remove)
Background: Following elective craniotomy patients routinely receive monitoring on ICU. However, the benefit of ICU monitoring in these patients is discussed controversially. Due to the current COVID-19 pandemic, there are further limitations of ICU capacities. This study aimed to compare this strategy with a standardized management of post-craniotomy patients on ICU.
Methods: Two postoperative strategies were compared in a matched-pair analysis: The first cohort included patients treated between May-August 2021 according to the “No ICU – unless” concept (NIU group), where patients were managed on the normal ward postoperatively. The second cohort contained patients routinely admitted to the ICU between February-April 2021 (control group). Outcome parameters contained complications, length of stay, duration to first postoperative mobilization, number of unplanned imaging, number/type of ICU interventions and pre- and postoperative mRS. Patient characteristics were analyzed using electronic medical records.
Results: The NIU group consisted of 96 patients, the control group of 75 patients. Complication rates were comparable in both cohorts (16% in NIU vs. 17% in control; p=0.123). Groups did not differ significantly in the number of imaging (10% in NIU vs. 13% in control; p=0.67), in the type of interventions on ICU (antihypertensive therapy 5% (NIU) vs. 6% (control); p=0.825) or in the time to first postoperative mobilization (average 1.1± 1.6 days vs. 0.9± 1.2 days; p=0.402). Length of hospital stay was shorter in the NIU group without reaching statistical significance (average 5.8 vs. 6.8 days; p=0.481). There was no significant change in the distribution of preoperative (p=0.960) and postoperative (p=0.425) mRS scores.
Conclusion: Postoperative ICU management does not reduce postoperative complications and has no effect on the surgical outcome of elective craniotomies. The majority of postoperative complications are detected after a 24-hour observation period. This approach may represent a potential strategy to prevent overutilization of ICU capacities while maintaining sufficient postoperative care for neurosurgical patients.
Propranolol as a potentially novel treatment of arteriovenous malformations: from bench to bedside
(2022)
Background: Propranolol is a non-selective blocker of the β-adrenergic receptor and has been used for treatment of proliferative infantile hemangiomas. The vasoconstrictive and antiangiogenic effects of propranolol led us to explore its potential application for the treatment of AVMs.
Methods: AVM tissue was cultured after surgical resection in the presence of 100μM propranolol or solvent DMSO. After incubation for 72 hours, tissue was harvested for testing. The expression levels of SDF1α, CXCR4, VEGF and HIF-1 was measured by rt-PCR. Furthermore, data of patients in 2 vascular centres harboring AVM was retrospectively interrogated for a time period of 20 years. The database included information about hemorrhage, AVM size and antihypertensive medication. Descriptive analyses were performed, focusing on the risk of hemorrhage, size of the lesion at presentation and clinical follow-up in patients on β-blocker medication versus those who were not.
Results: Among 483 patients, 73 (15%) were under β-blocker-treatment. 48% AVMs presented with hemorrhage at diagnosis. Patients under β-blocker-treatment had a lower risk of hemorrhage at the time of diagnosis in a univariate analysis (p<0,0001;OR13). Patients under β-blocker-treatment showed a significant higher chance for a lower Spetzler-Martin-grade ≤III (p<0,0001;OR6,5) and a lower risk for the presence of an associated aneurysm (p<0,0001;OR3,6).
Multivariate analysis including Spetzler-Martin-Grading, young age ≤50, presence of associated aneurysm and β-blocker-treatment showed reduced risk for hemorrhage under β-blocker-treatment (p<0,01,OR0,2).
The expression of CXCR4 was suppressed by propranolol most likely through the HIF-1-pathways. The gene-expression of vasculogenesis factors was decreased in with propranolol incubated AVMs.
Conclusion: β-Blocker medication seems to be associated with a decreased risk of AVM-related hemorrhage and AVM-size at presentation or during follow-up. Propranolol inhibits SDF1α-induced vasculogenesis by suppressing the expression of CXCR4 most likely through the HIF-1-pathways. Therefore, SDF1α/CXCR4 axis plays an important role in the vasculogenesis and migration of inflammatory cells in AVM lesions.
Background: A growing interest exists in using polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) especially functionalized with surface-active substances as carriers across the blood brain barrier (BBB) for potentially effective drugs in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the organ distribution of intravenous administrated biodegradable and non-biodegradable NPs coated with different surfactants, how much of the administrated dose reach the brain parenchyma in areas with intact and opened BBB after trauma, as well as whether they elicit an inflammatory response is still to be clarified.
Methods: The organ distribution, brain penetration and eventual inflammatory activation of polysorbate-80 (Tw80) and sodium-lauryl-sulfate (SDS) coated poly l-lactide (PLLA) and perfluorodecyl acrylate (PFDL) nanoparticles were evaluated after intravenous administration in rats prior and after undergoing controlled cortical impact (CCI).
Results: A significant highest NP uptake at 4 and 24 hs was observed in the liver and spleen, followed by the brain and kidney, with minimal concentrations in the lungs and heart for all NPs. After CCI, a significant increase of NP uptake at 4 hs and 24 hs was observed within the traumatized hemisphere, especially in the perilesional area, although NPs were still found in areas away from CCI and the contralateral hemisphere in similar concentrations as in non-CCI subject. NPs were localized in neurons, glial and endovascular cells. Immunohistochemical staining against GFAP, Iba1, TNFα and IL1β demonstrated no glial activation or neuroinflamatory changes.
Conclusions: Tw80 and SDS coated biodegradable (PLLA) and non-biodegradrable (PFDL) NPs reach the brain parenchyma in both areas of traumatized and undamaged brain with disrupted and intact BBB, even though a high amount of them are retained in the liver and the spleen. No inflammatory reaction is elicited by these NPs within 24 hs after application. These preliminary promising results postulate the effectiveness and safety of these NPs as drug-carriers for the treatment of TBI.