Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (188) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (108)
- Article (42)
- Part of Periodical (34)
- Review (2)
- Bachelor Thesis (1)
- Report (1)
Language
- English (188) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (188)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (188)
Keywords
- COVID-19 (8)
- Covid-19 (6)
- ESG (6)
- monetary policy (6)
- Artificial intelligence (3)
- Green Finance (3)
- Machine learning (3)
- Sustainability (3)
- climate change (3)
- corporate governance (3)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (188) (remove)
Over the course of the last financial crises, retail investors have been identified to bear a major share of the invoked financial losses. As a consequence, financial market regulators put major effort on retail investor protection, especially following the Great Financial Crisis of 2007-2009. The major legislative initiatives, such as in the Dodd-Frank Act in the United States, seemingly manifest retail investors’ overly fragile role among the variety of professional investors in the financial market by establishing additional protection requirements for retail investors. A vast majority of related international academic literature is supporting those steps. However, considering the most recent developments that occurred in the US financial markets, the dogma of the lamb-like retail investor seems to be crumbling: In 2021, under the synonym “WallStreetBets” retail investors systematically colluded in investment bets which eventually disrupted not only financial markets by distorting stock price formation of single firms but also systematically squeezed sizeable positions of institutional investors. The key question arises, how retail investors have changed, such that they not only became a source of price distortions and market turmoil but also endanger professional institutional investors. In this thesis, I study this changing role and investment behavior of retail investors, taking into account the retail investor’s wellestablished and researched behavioral characteristics to the changing environmental aspects such as regulation and the adaption and usage of technology for information gathering and collaboration. Based on the combination of those different research streams, I am able to deduct the sequential consequences of these developments for financial markets.
The aim of this study was to identify and evaluate different de-identification techniques that may be used in several mobility-related use cases. To do so, four use cases have been defined in accordance with a project partner that focused on the legal aspects of this project, as well as with the VDA/FAT working group. Each use case aims to create different legal and technical issues with regards to the data and information that are to be gathered, used and transferred in the specific scenario. Use cases should therefore differ in the type and frequency of data that is gathered as well as the level of privacy and the speed of computation that is needed for the data. Upon identifying use cases, a systematic literature review has been performed to identify suitable de-identification techniques to provide data privacy. Additionally, external databases have been considered as data that is expected to be anonymous might be reidentified through the combination of existing data with such external data.
For each case, requirements and possible attack scenarios were created to illustrate where exactly privacy-related issues could occur and how exactly such issues could impact data subjects, data processors or data controllers. Suitable de-identification techniques should be able to withstand these attack scenarios. Based on a series of additional criteria, de-identification techniques are then analyzed for each use case. Possible solutions are then discussed individually in chapters 6.1 - 6.2. It is evident that no one-size-fits-all approach to protect privacy in the mobility domain exists. While all techniques that are analyzed in detail in this report, e.g., homomorphic encryption, differential privacy, secure multiparty computation and federated learning, are able to successfully protect user privacy in certain instances, their overall effectiveness differs depending on the specifics of each use case.
We raise some critical points against a naïve interpretation of “green finance” products and strategies. These critical insights are the background against which we take a closer look at instruments and policies that might allow green finance to become more impactful. In particular, we focus on the role of a taxonomy and investor activism. We also describe the interaction of government policies with green finance practice – an aspect, which has been mostly neglected in policy debates but needs to be taken into account. Finally, the special case of green government bonds is discussed.
Analysing causality among oil prices and, in general, among financial and economic variables is of central relevance in applied economics studies. The recent contribution of Lu et al. (2014) proposes a novel test for causality— the DCC-MGARCH Hong test. We show that the critical values of the test statistic must be evaluated through simulations, thereby challenging the evidence in papers adopting the DCC-MGARCH Hong test. We also note that rolling Hong tests represent a more viable solution in the presence of short-lived causality periods.
This paper examines how the transmission of government portfolio risk arising from maturity operations depends on the stance of monetary/fiscal policy. Accounting for risk premia in the fiscal theory allows the government portfolio to affect the expected inflation, even in a frictionless economy. The effects of maturity rebalancing on expected inflation in the fiscal theory directly depend on the conditional nominal term premium, giving rise to an optimal debt maturity policy that is state dependent. In a calibrated macro-finance model, we demonstrate that maturity operations have sizable effects on expected inflation and output through our novel risk transmission mechanism.
We analyze the extent to which individual audit partners influence the audited narrative disclosures in their clients’ financial reports. Using a sample of 3,281,423 private and public client firm-pairs, we find that the similarity among audited narrative disclosures is higher when two client firms share the same audit partner. Specifically, we find that the wording similarity of management reports (notes) increases by 30 (48) percent, the content similarity by 29 (49) percent, and the structure similarity by 48 (121) percent. Moreover, we find that audit partners in particular are relevant for their clients’ narrative disclosures because the increase in narrative disclosure similarity when sharing the same audit partner is nine (four) times greater than when sharing the same audit firm (audit office). We show that this influence of audit partners goes beyond adding boilerplate statements and, using novel field evidence, we shed light on the underlying mechanisms. Our findings are economically relevant because a stronger involvement of audit partners with their clients’ narratives is associated with a higher quality of narrative disclosures, which helps users better predict the future profitability of client firms.
Recent advances in natural language processing have contributed to the development of market sentiment measures through text content analysis in news providers and social media. The effectiveness of these sentiment variables depends on the imple- mented techniques and the type of source on which they are based. In this paper, we investigate the impact of the release of public financial news on the S&P 500. Using automatic labeling techniques based on either stock index returns or dictionaries, we apply a classification problem based on long short-term memory neural networks to extract alternative proxies of investor sentiment. Our findings provide evidence that there exists an impact of those sentiments in the market on a 20-minute time frame. We find that dictionary-based sentiment provides meaningful results with respect to those based on stock index returns, which partly fails in the mapping process between news and financial returns.