Refine
Year of publication
- 2016 (111) (remove)
Document Type
- Report (111) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (111)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (111)
Keywords
- Deutschland (10)
- Salafismus (9)
- Terrorismus (7)
- EU (6)
- Islamischer Staat (6)
- terrorism (6)
- Islamismus (5)
- far right (5)
- islamism (5)
- China (4)
- Dschihadismus (4)
- Propaganda (4)
- Radikalisierung (4)
- Strategie (4)
- facebook (4)
- fascism (4)
- islamic state (4)
- racism (4)
- AfD (3)
- Anti-Terror (3)
- England (3)
- France (3)
- Germany (3)
- IS (3)
- Medien (3)
- Pegida (3)
- Philippinen (3)
- Prävention (3)
- Russland (3)
- Syrien (3)
- Südchinesisches Meer (3)
- UK (3)
- USA (3)
- mobilization (3)
- nationalism (3)
- social media (3)
- AKP (2)
- Abwehr (2)
- Anti-Terror-Gesetz (2)
- Antiterror (2)
- Blogfokus (2)
- Brexit (2)
- CasaPound (2)
- Demokratie (2)
- Deradikalisierung (2)
- EEZ (2)
- Erdogan (2)
- Europa (2)
- Europe (2)
- Exclusive Economic Zone (2)
- Forschung (2)
- Frankreich (2)
- Genozid (2)
- Gesellschaft (2)
- Gleichberechtigung (2)
- Golden Dawn (2)
- Großbritannien (2)
- Integration (2)
- Internationale Schiedshof (2)
- Internet (2)
- Islam (2)
- Italy (2)
- NPD (2)
- Präventionsarbeit (2)
- Russia (2)
- Saudi-Arabien (2)
- Sicherheitspolitik (2)
- Syria (2)
- Türkei (2)
- Ukraine (2)
- Völkermord (2)
- attack (2)
- democracy (2)
- documentary (2)
- far-right politics (2)
- hate crimes (2)
- hate speech (2)
- jihad (2)
- neo-fascism (2)
- nouvelle droite (2)
- radicalisation (2)
- right-wing extremism (2)
- strategy (2)
- violence (2)
- Abkommen (1)
- Alain de Benoist (1)
- Algerien (1)
- Angel Dzhambazki (1)
- Arabischer Frühling (1)
- Armenien (1)
- Armut (1)
- Art and liberty (1)
- Art and society (1)
- Aufklärung (1)
- Aufmarsch (1)
- Austria (1)
- BBP (1)
- Bedrohung (1)
- Befragung (1)
- Berichterstattung (1)
- Berlin (1)
- Beteiligung (1)
- Bevölkerung (1)
- Bibliografie (1)
- Bibliographie (1)
- Bildung (1)
- Bildungsarbeit (1)
- Blasphemy Law (1)
- Bloc Identitaire (1)
- Blocco Studentesco (1)
- Blood & Honour (1)
- Britain (1)
- British National Party (1)
- Brussels (1)
- Buch (1)
- Bulgaria (1)
- Bundestag (1)
- Burschenschaften (1)
- CCW (1)
- CPI (1)
- Catholic Church (1)
- Classical style (1)
- Clement Méric (1)
- Combat 18 (1)
- Counterterrorism (1)
- Cyber Terror (1)
- Datenbank (1)
- Den Haag (1)
- Der Dritte Weg (1)
- Deradicalisation (1)
- Desalegn (1)
- Deutsch (1)
- Digital Transformation (1)
- Dimiter Lazarov (1)
- Donald Trump (1)
- Dramatisierung (1)
- Drohnen (1)
- Dschidismus (1)
- Dschihad (1)
- E-commerce (1)
- Egypt (1)
- Entwicklung (1)
- Ethiopia (1)
- Euro (1)
- Eurokrise (1)
- Europol (1)
- Europäische Außenpolitik (1)
- Europäische Union (1)
- Euroscepticism (1)
- Extremismus (1)
- FPÖ (1)
- Facebook (1)
- Far-right politics (1)
- Faschismus (1)
- Fethullah Gülen (1)
- Finland (1)
- Finnish Defence League (1)
- Flugverbot (1)
- Flugverbotszone (1)
- Flüchtlinge (1)
- Folgen (1)
- Frauen (1)
- Freiheit (1)
- Freital (1)
- Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (1)
- Gebrauchslyrik (1)
- Gender (1)
- George Becali (1)
- Germanistische Linguistik (1)
- Goldene Morgenröte (1)
- Graue Wölfe (1)
- Great Britain (1)
- Greater Romania Party (1)
- Greece (1)
- Grey Wolves (1)
- Gülen Movement (1)
- HDP (1)
- HEROES (1)
- HSFK (1)
- Hauptmann, Gerhart (1)
- Heinz-Christian Strache (1)
- Hintertüren (1)
- Hungary (1)
- IMRO (1)
- IMRO-BNM (1)
- IRA (1)
- ISA (1)
- Identitaires (1)
- Indonesien (1)
- Information (1)
- Innere Sicherheit (1)
- Interview (1)
- Iran (1)
- Iraq (1)
- Isis (1)
- Islam al-Buhairi (1)
- Islamfeindlichkeit (1)
- Islamic reformation (1)
- Islamischer Staat, Islamismus (1)
- Islamisten (1)
- Jihad (1)
- Jihadism (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Jugendarbeit (1)
- Jugendbuchautorin (1)
- Justnationalgirls (1)
- Jörg Haider (1)
- Kinderbuchautorin (1)
- Klassischer Stil (1)
- Kommunen (1)
- Kriminalität (1)
- Krypto (1)
- Kunst (1)
- Kunst und Freiheit (1)
- Kunst und Gesellschaft (1)
- Kurden (1)
- Latvia (1)
- Legitimität (1)
- Leipzig (1)
- Libyen (1)
- Link (1)
- Lisa (1)
- Lügenpresse (1)
- MHP (1)
- Maidan (1)
- Mautner, Isidor (1)
- Mautner, Jenny (1)
- Messerer, Th. (1)
- Messerer, Therese (1)
- Monopoly (1)
- Muslims (1)
- ND (1)
- National Front (1)
- National Movement (1)
- Nationale Präventionsstrategie (1)
- Nationalismus (1)
- Neonazismus (1)
- Nepal (1)
- New Right (1)
- Nikolai Yovev (1)
- Nine-Dash-Line (1)
- No-fly zone (1)
- Northern League (1)
- Nuklearwaffen (1)
- Nuklearwaffenverbot (1)
- Osmanen-Herde (1)
- PKK (1)
- PRM (1)
- PRR (1)
- Pan-Turkism (1)
- Patriotic Front (1)
- Perussuomalaiset (1)
- Platform design (1)
- Podcast (1)
- Poland (1)
- Politische Bildung (1)
- Pop (1)
- Populismus (1)
- Presse (1)
- Price competition (1)
- Privacy concerns (1)
- Rajat kiinni (1)
- Rechtsextremismus (1)
- Rechtsradikalismus (1)
- Rechtsruck (1)
- Reflexionsphase (1)
- Registration cost (1)
- Roma (1)
- Romania (1)
- SNPU (1)
- Salafiyya (1)
- Saudi Arabia (1)
- Scarborough Shoal (1)
- Scharia-Polizei (1)
- Schiedsgericht (1)
- Schule (1)
- Schweiz (1)
- Security concerns (1)
- Sicherheitsdiskurs (1)
- Soldiers of Odin Finland (1)
- Somalia (1)
- Souveränität (1)
- Soziale Medien (1)
- Speicherung (1)
- Spratley (1)
- Strategien (1)
- Suomen Sisu (1)
- Swiss (1)
- Switzerland (1)
- Swoboda (1)
- Telegram (1)
- Territorialkonflikt (1)
- Terrorbekämpfung (1)
- Third Position (1)
- Tjahnybok (1)
- Tongji-Daxue <Schanghai> (1)
- Tunesien (1)
- Turkey (1)
- Turmoil in the Middle East (1)
- Twitter (1)
- UN (1)
- Uiguren (1)
- Vadim Tudor (1)
- Vereinte Nationen (1)
- Vergewaltigung (1)
- Verschlüsselung (1)
- Videos (1)
- Vigilantes FTL/360 (1)
- Vigilantes Munich (1)
- Vladimir Putin (1)
- Vorratsdaten (1)
- Völkerrecht (1)
- Waffenexport (1)
- Waffenhandel (1)
- Waffenkontrolle (1)
- Waffenruhe (1)
- Wahl (1)
- Wasserkraft (1)
- Weiblichkeitsbilder (1)
- Werchowna Rada (1)
- WhatsApp (1)
- Winkler, Therese (1)
- Wissenstransfer (1)
- Women for the Nation (1)
- Zentropa (1)
- Zusammenarbeit (1)
- abortion (1)
- al-Qaida (1)
- al-shabaab (1)
- amhara (1)
- anti-abortion (1)
- anti-immigration (1)
- anti-terrorism (1)
- antifeminist (1)
- bombing (1)
- cartoon (1)
- citizens initiatives (1)
- civil society (1)
- counterterrorism (1)
- crisis (1)
- cyber cyber (1)
- cyber krieg (1)
- cyber überall (1)
- daesh (1)
- education (1)
- election (1)
- extremism (1)
- fake media (1)
- foreign fighters (1)
- frame analysis (1)
- framing (1)
- gewaltbereiter Extremismus (1)
- identitarians (1)
- identity crisis (1)
- ideology (1)
- integration (1)
- isa2016 (1)
- islam (1)
- it-sicherheit (1)
- jihadism (1)
- kurds (1)
- media (1)
- migration (1)
- muslims (1)
- national strategy terrorism (1)
- nativism (1)
- nicht-linearer Krieg (1)
- non-linear war (1)
- nsu (1)
- oromiya (1)
- paramilitary (1)
- political science (1)
- pop culture (1)
- protests (1)
- radicalization (1)
- refugee crisis (1)
- relative termination (1)
- rewriting systems (1)
- salafism (1)
- sectarian divide (1)
- shia (1)
- soziale Projekte (1)
- string rewriting (1)
- student fraternities (1)
- subculture (1)
- sunni (1)
- tensions in the Middle East (1)
- termination (1)
- terror (1)
- terrorisms (1)
- transnational (1)
- twitter (1)
- unrests (1)
- vigilantism (1)
- war of words (1)
- xenophobia (1)
- youth (1)
- youtube (1)
- Ägypten (1)
- Überwachung (1)
Social movements and institutions are central actors in national and transnational politics as well as core categories of social inquiry. Despite their importance, both terms are still haunted by a lack of thorough definitions. We introduce a blog series with ten weekly contributions on their interrelation, outlining several innovative approaches and suggesting some vantage points for rethinking ‘Movements’ and ‘Institutions’ in a productive manner.
Obgleich die Disziplin der internationalen Beziehungen global sein will, bleibt sie allzu häufig von westlichen Wissenschaftlern dominiert. Doch wie kann internationale Politik anders gedacht werden? Welche Perspektiven ergeben sich auch für westliche WissenschaftlerInnen aus einem Perspektivwechsel? Und welche Herausforderungen bringt dies mit sich?
This is the seventh post in the blog series „Movements and Institutions“.
Social movements challenge systems of rule and thus institutions. They are expressions of the non-identical, the gaps and fissures in today’s world. That’s what makes social movements interesting and relevant for a critical research agenda. Thus, more than applying ready-made concepts to cases, scholars should inquire into the interactions between social movements and institutions as relationships between rule and resistance. This article proposes one way to go about such a critical research agenda.
This is the third article in our series Trouble on the Far-Right.
I am the author of two books about the French nouvelle droite (ND – New Right): Where Have All The Fascists Gone? and Rethinking the French New Right: Alternatives to modernity. In 2014, I published a piece entitled „The French New Right Neither Right, nor Left?“. Surprisingly, the French ND leader Alain de Benoist responded with a polemical and largely ad hominem article in the same journal.1 I must stress that I neither identify with a political party, nor a political movement. I do not support any ideological current. De Benoist does. He is self-described as a man of the right. Hence, he cannot even claim intellectual objectivity.
In this piece, I want to offer some comments on my debate with de Benoist. I argue that while we should strive towards intellectual objectivity, we cannot be silent in the face of falsehoods. In this respect, the ND plays a dishonest game. Its leader and other ND intellectuals feign intellectual objectivity and the platitudes of transcending right and left, but they want cultural hegemony and the triumph of their decidedly radical right-wing ideals...
On October the 2nd the Colombian people rejected the peace agreement between the government and the FARC in a referendum with a very thin majority of 0.4%. With this unexpected rejection, the referendum was in some ways similar to the Brexit referendum, for the results of which David Cameron was as little prepared as Juan Manuel Santos for his rejection; there was obviously no Plan B. In the last weeks, the government undertook ten changes to the agreement, but it will not go through a referendum again. Santos, as he said, has learned his lesson from the rejection and will seek to have the amended peace agreement approved in Congress. This will likely lead to the implementation of the peace agreement and the furtherance of its goals, such as a DDR process, land reforms, a transitional justice process and reparations for victims, just to mention a few. But this progress in peace will be seen as being at odds with popular opinion. Many of the “no” voters are still not satisfied with the adjustments made by the government and the FARC, and neither are the sectors of the opposition mainly responsible for the rejection. Nevertheless, the government and the FARC are progressing with the implementation, and peace talks with the second-largest – and now the last standing – guerrilla group, the ELN, are scheduled to start in 2017. The prospects for 2018 and onwards, when the presidency election will be held, are more questionable.
The dualism of movements and institutions. A structurational approach towards the two concepts
(2016)
In studies of social mobilization, the distinction between institutions and organizations is often as blurry as the instant of time from which on we can actually speak of a proper movement. Using the idea of a `duality of structure’ as a starting point, this article suggests a way of fixing the boundaries: a brief analysis of the South African Landless People’s Movement demonstrates the merit of conceiving of movements as aggregate actors with shared common objectives and common norms, which institutionalize particular modes of cooperation by purposefully drawing on existing institutions in order to shape functioning internal structures.
Dies ist der 22. Artikel unseres Blogfokus „Salafismus in Deutschland“. Die Beiträge der Blogserie „Salafismus in Deutschland – Herausforderungen für Politik und Gesellschaft“ beschäftigten sich pointiert mit den gesellschaftlich, politisch, wissenschaftlich und medial wichtigsten Aspekten der salafistischen Glaubenslehre, Ideologie und Bewegung. Sie betonten die vielen Schattierungen dieser sich beständig im Wandel befindlichen Phänomene, wagten den Blick über den deutschen Tellerrand hinaus und formulierten Handlungsempfehlungen für Politik, Medien, Wissenschaft und Zivilgesellschaft. Obwohl es einige blinde Flecken vor allem in der empirischen Forschung zu Salafismus und Dschihadismus gibt (siehe unter anderem den Beitrag von Riem Spielhaus), ist es offensichtlich, dass nicht nur ein Erkenntnisproblem, sondern ein Umsetzungsproblem besteht: es gibt sehr viel grundlegendes Wissen, welches aber nicht in konkrete Handlungen übersetzt wird und oft in „Inseln des Wissens“ verharrt. Dies bezieht sich auf zweierlei: erstens auf die Gestaltung eines nur in seiner Gegenseitigkeit produktiven Wissenstransfers zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis und zweitens auf eine sinnvolle Priorisierung politischer Steuerungsmaßnahmen....
French far right activism experienced tremendous changes in recent years. Besides traditional far right party politics, new patterns of street-based mobilization attract especially action-oriented youths. This trend is epitomized by the growing popularity of the Bloc Identitaire (official name; shortened to “Identitaires”). Its ideology rests on the idea that there exists a struggle between different political families in order to become the legitimate representative of the people, and that the extreme right is winning this struggle. Behind the scenes, the recurring idea of the Bloc Identitaires is to occupy a cultural and “meta-political” territory that was once the monopoly of the left. Their aim is that they are gradually associated with the only possible alternative to change the world. They try to frame a maximum of popular needs and present themselves as substitutes for when the economy and the state will be bankrupt. So you can eat the food of the Identitaires, drink their beer (the “Desouchière”), buy their clothes, listen to their music or read their books and thus participate in financing the movement...
An analysis of the UK's counter-terrorism strategy, CONTEST, and the challenges in its evaluation
(2016)
The UK’s Counter-Terrorism strategy, known as CONTEST, is recognized as one of the most successful soft-focus strategies in the world, with an intended emphasis on community support and what have become known as ‘Prevent’ (or counter-extremism) measures. In all, there are four limbs to CONTEST: PREVENT, PROTECT, PURSUE and PREPARE. While there is much crossover between these areas, for example policing activities take place in all four limbs, each one has a specific focus with its own intrinsic goals. This article intends to provide an overview of CONTEST, and to explore the challenges of evaluating counter-terrorism strategies in general. In doing so, I intend to show that while robust and independent evaluation of CONTEST has not been undertaken from a quantitative approach, some level of evaluation has taken place and can be taken into consideration when moving forward with future analysis of the strategy...