Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (64)
- Part of a Book (48)
- Review (18)
- Conference Proceeding (7)
- Book (6)
- Preprint (4)
- Working Paper (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Language
- English (120)
- German (21)
- Portuguese (4)
- Polish (3)
- Croatian (1)
- mis (1)
- Multiple languages (1)
- Turkish (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (152)
Keywords
- Englisch (152) (remove)
Institute
In many languages, a passive-like meaning may be obtained through a noncanonical passive construction. The get passive (1b) in English, the se faire passive (2b) in French and the kriegen passive (3b) in German represent typical manifestations. This squib focuses on the behavior of the get-passive in English and discusses a number of restrictions associated with it as well as the status of get.
The causative/anticausative alternation has been the topic of much typological and theoretical discussion in the linguistic literature. This alternation is characterized by verbs with transitive and intransitive uses, such that the transitive use of a verb V means roughly "cause to Vintransitive" (see Levin 1993). The discussion revolves around two issues: the first one concerns the similarities and differences between the anticausative and the passive, and the second one concerns the derivational relationship, if any, between the transitive and intransitive variant. With respect to the second issue, a number of approaches have been developed. Judging the approach conceptually unsatisfactory, according to which each variant is assigned an independent lexical entry, it was concluded that the two variants have to be derivationally related. The question then is which one of the two is basic and where this derivation takes place in the grammar. Our contribution to this discussion is to argue against derivational approaches to the causative / anticausative alternation. We focus on the distribution of PPs related to external arguments (agent, causer, instrument, causing event) in passives and anticausatives of English, German and Greek and the set of verbs undergoing the causative/anticausative alternation in these languages. We argue that the crosslinguistic differences in these two domains provide evidence against both causativization and detransitivization analyses of the causative / anticausative alternation. We offer an approach to this alternation which builds on a syntactic decomposition of change of state verbs into a Voice and a CAUS component. Crosslinguistic variation in passives and anticausatives depends on properties of Voice and its combinations with CAUS and various types of roots.
It has often been noticed that one syntactic argument position can be realized by elements which seem to realize different thematic roles. This is notably the case with the external argument position of verbs of change of state which licenses volitional agents, instruments or natural forces/causers, showing the generality and abstractness of the external argument relation. (1) a. John broke the window (Agent) b. The hammer broke the window (Instrument) c. The storm broke the window (Causer) In order to capture this generality, Van Valin & Wilkins (1996) and Ramchand (2003) among others have proposed that the thematic role of the external argument position is in fact underspecified. The relevant notion is that of an effector (in Van Valin & Wilkins) or of an abstract causer/initiator (in Ramchand). In this paper we argue against a total underspecification of the external argument relation. While we agree that (1b) does not instantiate an instrument theta role in subject position, we argue that a complete underspecification of the external theta-position is not feasible, but that two types of external theta roles have to be distinguished, Agents and Causers. Our arguments are based on languages where Agents and Causers show morpho-syntactic independence (section 2.1) and the behavior of instrument subjects in English, Dutch, German and Greek (section 2.2 and 3). We show that instrument subjects are either Agent or Causer like. In section (4) we give an analysis how arguments realizing these thematic notions are introduced into syntax.
Die folgende Arbeit beschäftigt sich mit dem Thema des Wortschatzerwerbs im Bereich Englisch als Fremdsprache. Die Relevanz und Notwendigkeit des Erlernens von Vokabular ist für den erfolgreichen Fremdsprachenerwerb unumstritten. Sprachen bauen auf Wörtern, sprich Bedeutungsträgern, auf, die es erst zulassen in einer Sprache miteinander kommunizieren zu können. Die Kommunikation kann mit mangelndem und unausreichendem Wortschatz nur begrenzt stattfinden und Missverständnisse können hervortreten. Daher wird in dieser Arbeit in der Einleitung betont, wie wichtig es ist, den Wortschatz von Studierenden zu fördern und je nach Niveau und Altersstufe die richtigen Methoden zur Vermittlung auszuwählen. Die Arbeit liefert dabei explizit ein Beispiel der Umsetzung. Diese findet im universitären Kontext in einer Vorbereitungsklasse einer privaten Universität (Nişantaşı Universität) in Istanbul statt. Die Student*innen der Vorbereitungsklasse befinden sich auf dem Niveau B1 und erwerben Englisch als Fremdsprache. Ein Teil dieser Arbeit zeigt, wie der Wortschatz zu einem bestimmten Thema, hier Beschreibung von Persönlichkeit/ Aussehen, vermittelt werden kann und geht dabei auf Materialien und Arbeitsvorgänge im Unterricht ein. Es werden ein Vortest und ein Nachtest zum Thema durchgeführt, die die Erfolgsquote vor und nach der Vermittlung messen sollen. Ein zweiter Teil der Arbeit beschäftigt sich mit dem Vergleich des im Englischen zusammengestellten Wortschatzes mit dem entsprechenden Wortschatz im Deutschen, um festzustellen, welche Gemeinsamkeiten und Diskrepanzen zwischen den beiden Sprachen existieren. Die Arbeit resultiert in einem Fazit, welches ein weiteres Mal die Relevanz von dem Wortschatzerwerb im Fremdsprachenunterricht betont.
Not your day to die
(1995)
This article will attempt to suggest translation procedures necessary to translate culturally bound items in the referential level of a literary work illustrated with examples from two novels: “The Bluest Eye” by Toni Morrison and “Vineland” by Thomas Pynchon. First, the article will include a general description of the referential level in literary works offering possible avenues of 285 its rendition, then and finally suggest a translation methodology and techniques together with practical examples of the theory at work.
Gegenstand dieser Arbeit sind die englischen Lehnwörter des Samoanischen, einer westpolynesischen Sprache. Als Basis der Untersuchung und Quelle des bearbeiteten Lehnwortschatzes dient das "Lexicon of foreign loan-words in the Samoan language" von Cain (1986)1. Hierbei handelt es sich um eine Auflistung der lexikalischen Entlehnungen im Samoanischen mit kurzen enzyklopädischen Erläuterungen. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit soll sein, die Integration der englischen Lehnwörter in die samoanische Sprache darzustellen und gegebenenfalls Regularitäten bezüglich der Assimilation an das samoanische Phoneminventar aufzuzeigen.
Dog after dog revisited
(2006)
This paper presents a compositional semantic analysis of pluractional adverbial modifiers like 'dog after dog' and 'one dog after the other'. We propose a division of labour according to which much of the semantics is carried by a family of plural operators. The adverbial itself contributes a semantics that we call pseudoreciprocal.
The syntactic structure of predicatives : clues from the omission of the copula in child english
(2001)
This paper explores the syntax of main clause predicatives from the perspective of trying to account for an asymmetry in copular constructions in certain languages. One of the languages in which we find such an asymmetry is child English (around age 2). Specifically, new results show that children acquiring English tend to use an overt (and inflected) copula in individual-level predicatives, but they tend to omit the copula in stage-level predicatives. The analysis adopted to account for this pattern draws on evidence from adult English, Russian, Spanish and Portuguese that stage-level predicates are Aspectual (they contain AspP) while individual-level predicates are not (they involve only a lexical Small Clause predicate). Children's omission of the copula in structures with AspP is linked to the fact that at this stage of development, children fail to require finiteness in main clauses. In particular, Asp0 is temporally anchored in child English, thereby obviating the need for a finite (temporally anchored) Infl, i.e. an inflected copula.