Refine
Year of publication
- 2017 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- information processing (1)
- information theory (1)
- information transfer (1)
- neural computation (1)
- neural development (1)
- neuroscience (1)
- partial information decomposition (1)
- self-organisation (1)
- transfer entropy (1)
Institute
- Medizin (2)
- Informatik und Mathematik (1)
- MPI für Hirnforschung (1)
Information processing performed by any system can be conceptually decomposed into the transfer, storage and modification of information—an idea dating all the way back to the work of Alan Turing. However, formal information theoretic definitions until very recently were only available for information transfer and storage, not for modification. This has changed with the extension of Shannon information theory via the decomposition of the mutual information between inputs to and the output of a process into unique, shared and synergistic contributions from the inputs, called a partial information decomposition (PID). The synergistic contribution in particular has been identified as the basis for a definition of information modification. We here review the requirements for a functional definition of information modification in neuroscience, and apply a recently proposed measure of information modification to investigate the developmental trajectory of information modification in a culture of neurons vitro, using partial information decomposition. We found that modification rose with maturation, but ultimately collapsed when redundant information among neurons took over. This indicates that this particular developing neural system initially developed intricate processing capabilities, but ultimately displayed information processing that was highly similar across neurons, possibly due to a lack of external inputs. We close by pointing out the enormous promise PID and the analysis of information modification hold for the understanding of neural systems
Measuring information processing in neural data: The application of transfer entropy in neuroscience
(2017)
It is a common notion in neuroscience research that the brain and neural systems in general "perform computations" to generate their complex, everyday behavior (Schnitzer, 2002). Understanding these computations is thus an important step in understanding neural systems as a whole (Carandini, 2012;Clark, 2013; Schnitzer, 2002; de-Wit, 2016). It has been proposed that one way to analyze these computations is by quantifying basic information processing operations necessary for computation, namely the transfer, storage, and modification of information (Langton, 1990; Mitchell, 2011; Mitchell, 1993;Wibral, 2015). A framework for the analysis of these operations has been emerging (Lizier2010thesis), using measures from information theory (Shannon, 1948) to analyze computation in arbitrary information processing systems (e.g., Lizier, 2012b). Of these measures transfer entropy (TE) (Schreiber2000), a measure of information transfer, is the most widely used in neuroscience today (e.g., Vicente, 2011; Wibral, 2011; Gourevitch, 2007; Vakorin, 2010; Besserve, 2010; Lizier, 2011; Richter, 2016; Huang, 2015; Rivolta, 2015; Roux, 2013). Yet, despite this popularity, open theoretical and practical problems in the application of TE remain (e.g., Vicente, 2011; Wibral, 2014a). The present work addresses some of the most prominent of these methodological problems in three studies.
The first study presents an efficient implementation for the estimation of TE from non-stationary data. The statistical properties of non-stationary data are not invariant over time such that TE can not be easily estimated from these observations. Instead, necessary observations can be collected over an ensemble of data, i.e., observations of physical or temporal replications of the same process (Gomez-Herrero, 2010). The latter approach is computationally more demanding than the estimation from observations over time. The present study demonstrates how to handles this increased computational demand by presenting a highly-parallel implementation of the estimator using graphics processing units.
The second study addresses the problem of estimating bivariate TE from multivariate data. Neuroscience research often investigates interactions between more than two (sub-)systems. It is common to analyze these interactions by iteratively estimating TE between pairs of variables, because a fully multivariate approach to TE-estimation is computationally intractable (Lizier, 2012a; Das, 2008; Welch, 1982). Yet, the estimation of bivariate TE from multivariate data may yield spurious, false-positive results (Lizier, 2012a;Kaminski, 2001; Blinowska, 2004). The present study proposes that such spurious links can be identified by characteristic coupling-motifs and the timings of their information transfer delays in networks of bivariate TE-estimates. The study presents a graph-algorithm that detects these coupling motifs and marks potentially spurious links. The algorithm thus partially corrects for spurious results due to multivariate effects and yields a more conservative approximation of the true network of multivariate information transfer.
The third study investigates the TE between pre-frontal and primary visual cortical areas of two ferrets under different levels of anesthesia. Additionally, the study investigates local information processing in source and target of the TE by estimating information storage (Lizier, 2012) and signal entropy. Results of this study indicate an alternative explanation for the commonly observed reduction in TE under anesthesia (Imas, 2005; Ku, 2011; Lee, 2013; Jordan, 2013; Untergehrer, 2014), which is often explained by changes in the underlying coupling between areas. Instead, the present study proposes that reduced TE may be due to a reduction in information generation measured by signal entropy in the source of TE. The study thus demonstrates how interpreting changes in TE as evidence for changes in causal coupling may lead to erroneous conclusions. The study further discusses current bast-practice in the estimation of TE, namely the use of state-of-the-art estimators over approximative methods and the use of optimization procedures for estimation parameters over the use of ad-hoc choices. It is demonstrated how not following this best-practice may lead to over- or under-estimation of TE or failure to detect TE altogether.
In summary, the present work proposes an implementation for the efficient estimation of TE from non-stationary data, it presents a correction for spurious effects in bivariate TE-estimation from multivariate data, and it presents current best-practice in the estimation and interpretation of TE. Taken together, the work presents solutions to some of the most pressing problems of the estimation of TE in neuroscience, improving the robust estimation of TE as a measure of information transfer in neural systems.
The disruption of coupling between brain areas has been suggested as the mechanism underlying loss of consciousness in anesthesia. This hypothesis has been tested previously by measuring the information transfer between brain areas, and by taking reduced information transfer as a proxy for decoupling. Yet, information transfer is a function of the amount of information available in the information source—such that transfer decreases even for unchanged coupling when less source information is available. Therefore, we reconsidered past interpretations of reduced information transfer as a sign of decoupling, and asked whether impaired local information processing leads to a loss of information transfer. An important prediction of this alternative hypothesis is that changes in locally available information (signal entropy) should be at least as pronounced as changes in information transfer. We tested this prediction by recording local field potentials in two ferrets after administration of isoflurane in concentrations of 0.0%, 0.5%, and 1.0%. We found strong decreases in the source entropy under isoflurane in area V1 and the prefrontal cortex (PFC)—as predicted by our alternative hypothesis. The decrease in source entropy was stronger in PFC compared to V1. Information transfer between V1 and PFC was reduced bidirectionally, but with a stronger decrease from PFC to V1. This links the stronger decrease in information transfer to the stronger decrease in source entropy—suggesting reduced source entropy reduces information transfer. This conclusion fits the observation that the synaptic targets of isoflurane are located in local cortical circuits rather than on the synapses formed by interareal axonal projections. Thus, changes in information transfer under isoflurane seem to be a consequence of changes in local processing more than of decoupling between brain areas. We suggest that source entropy changes must be considered whenever interpreting changes in information transfer as decoupling.