Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (3)
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (3) (entfernen)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- nein (3) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Gait analysis (3) (entfernen)
Institut
Background and aims: One reason for the controversial discussion of whether the dual task (DT) walking paradigm has an added value for diagnosis in clinical conditions might be the use of different gait measurement systems. Therefore, the purpose was 1) to detect DT effects of central gait parameters obtained from five different gait analysis devices in young and old adults, 2) to assess the consistency of the measurement systems, and 3) to determine if the absolut and proportional DT costs (DTC) are greater than the system-measurement error under ST. Methods: Twelve old (72.2 ± 7.9y) and 14 young adults (28.3 ± 6.2y) walked a 14.7-m distance under ST and DT at a self-selected gait velocity. Interrater reliability, precision of the measurement and sensitivity to change were calculated under ST and DT. Results: An age effect was observed in almost all gait parameters for the ST condition. For DT only differences for stride length (p < .029, ɳ2p = .239) as well as single and double limb support (p = .036, ɳ2p = .227; p = .034, ɳ2p = .218) remained. The measurement systems showed a lower absolute agreement compared to consistency across all systems. Conclusions: When reporting DT effects, the real changes in performance and random measurement errors should always be accounted for. These findings have strong implications for interpreting DT effects.
Objective: To study the effect of total hip replacement (THR) on serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein concentration (sCOMP) and its correlation with joint loading during gait in patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis.
Design: In this prospective multimodal (clinical, biomechanical, biochemical) study blood samples from 15 patients were taken before and up to three times after THR (7 days, 3 months and 1 year), each after a resting period of at least 30 min, for analysis of sCOMP. Gait analysis was performed before and 1 year after THR to determine hip and knee joint moments.
Results: Seven days after THR, sCOMP decreased significantly compared to the preoperative measurement (p < 0.001). Three months and 1 year postoperatively, sCOMP reverted to concentrations in the range of the preoperative value. One year postoperatively, a linear correlation between sCOMP and the maximum hip flexion moment was indicated in the first half of the stance phase on the unaffected side (r = −0.736, p = 0.024). No further correlations could be determined.
Conclusions: Surprisingly, the removal of a joint affected by osteoarthritis did not have a sustained effect on sCOMP. Both before and after THR there was no scientifically substantiated correlation between sCOMP and joint moments from gait analysis. Consequently, the examination of sCOMP is not useful to detect altered joint loads that may influence degenerative changes of adjacent joints after THR.
The registration number in the German Registry of Clinical Trials is DRKS00015053.
Background: Gait kinematics after total hip replacement only partly explain the differences in the joint moments in the frontal plane between hip osteoarthritis patients after hip replacement and healthy controls. The goal of this study was to determine if total hip replacement surgery affects radiological leg alignment (Hip-Knee-Shaft-Angle, femoral offset, Neck-Shaft-Angle and varus/valgus alignment) and which of these parameters can explain the joint moments, additionally to the gait kinematics.
Methods: 22 unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients who were scheduled for total hip replacement were included in the study. Preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively all patients had biplanar radiographic examinations and 3D gait analysis.
Results: The operated leg showed significantly (P < 0.05) more varus (1.1°) as well as a larger femoral offset (+ 8 mm) and a larger Hip-Knee-Shaft-Angle (+ 1.3°) after total hip replacement; however no significant differences in the joint moments in the frontal plane compared to healthy controls were found. The hip moment (first half of stance) and the knee moments (first and second half of stance) were mostly determined by the varus/valgus alignment (29% and respectively 36% and 35%). The combination with a kinematic parameter (knee range of motion, foot progression angle) increased the predictive value for the knee moments.
Conclusion: In our patient group the joint moments after total hip replacement did not differ from healthy controls, whereas radiological leg alignment parameters changed significantly after the total hip replacement. A combination of these radiological leg parameters, especially the varus alignment, and the deviating kinematics explain the joint moments in the frontal plane during gait after total hip replacement surgery. For surgeons it is important not to create too much of a structural varus alignment by implanting the new hip joint as varus alignment can increase the knee adduction moment and the risk for osteoarthritis of the medial knee compartment.
Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered with DRKS (German Clinical Trials Register) under the number DRKS00015053. Registered 1st of August 2018.