Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (5)
- Part of a Book (4)
- Review (3)
- Book (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- German (7)
- English (5)
- French (1)
- Portuguese (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (14)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (14)
Keywords
- Joyce, James (14) (remove)
Institute
„Great writers,“ those who constitute our canon (at any given moment, one should add warily, since aesthetic canons fluctuate considerably over time), have invariably been the focus of reception studies, partly because they provide the most fertile ground for research, but partly also because literary scholars (and in particular the aspiring doctoral candidate: I myself graduated with an influence /reception study of this kind) need some justification for their endeavors, and what better ticket into the ivory rower - or onto the book market - than the study of the most seminal and widely accepted authors? James Joyce is just such a „great author.“ And „James Joyce and German Literature,“ the subject of this essay, must inevitably result in some form of reception study. But just what form should it take? Within the limited space of one article, it would be impossible to survey in toto Joyce's influence on German literature; that is, the multiple receptions of Joyce by some four or five generations of authors writing in German.
Böll on Joyce, Joyce on Böll : a gnomonical reading of Heinrich Böll's "Die schönsten Füße der Welt"
(1998)
It is my contention - but not my whole argument, as we shall soon see - that this shift or new departure can be attributed in part to Böll's introduction to the work of James Joyce, an event that took place at or around the time when Böll began travelling to Ireland in 1954. Indeed, as if in corroboration of this assumption, the earliest mentionings of Joyce that I have found occur in the second and third episodes of Böll's popular travelogue „Irisches Tagebuch“, published in 1957. It is worth noting, however, that neither of these two comments is formulated in a way that would presuppose more than a superficial knowledge of Joyce's works. And later, too, we find only the occasional allusion to or mention of the lrish writer in Böll's literary work. Nor does Joyce or his œuvre figure prominently in Böll's countless essays and interviews on writers and writing. Even in the short article „Über den Roman“ of 1960, which is devoted to the modern novel and would provide the natural occasion for an acknowledgement of this kind, Böll refers neither to „A Portrait of the Artist as a young Man“ nor to „Ulysses“, not to mention „Finnegans Wake“.
The essay provides a contrapuntal "parallactic" reading of Johann Wolfgang Goethe's "Bildungsroman" Wilhelm Meisters Lehrjahre - with its extensions Wilhelm Meisters theatralische Sendung and Wilhelm Meisters Wanderjahre - and James Joyce's high modernist A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man (1916) and Ulysses (1922). Derived from astronomy, the term parallax designates, transferred to literary history, a narrative stratagem, a metapoetical rationale, and an interpretive method. Joyce employs it as a key concept and narrative tool in Ulysses to denote a stereoscopic perspective applied to the protagonists’ actions and the world they live in. Leopold Bloom thus refl ects on it and the technique of Ulysses is determined by it. On a higher plane, literary critics, too, engage in literary historical parallax whenever they read texts intertextually — as exemplified in this essay. A parallactic reading of the novels’ protagonists Wilhelm Meister and Stephen Dedalus, as regards not just their identification with Shakespeare’s Hamlet but also the symbolic connotations embedded in their names and mythological pretexts, allows us to shed new light on the roles and significance of narrative irony, chance, and paternity in these novels.
[...] die Erkenntnis, daß "Ulysses", dieser Roman der Romane des 20. Jahrhunderts aus dem Jahre 1922, [...] auch ein jüdischer Roman ist, hat sich so noch nicht durchgesetzt. Wohl spielen Gedanken zum jüdischen Thema eine Rolle in der reichen, ja überreichen Sekundarliteratur, meist gar nicht, wenn ja, weniger als mehr. Das Thema bleibt am Rande, die Frage ward so nicht gestellt. Und doch ist er auch ein jüdischer Roman, und nicht nur von der Hauptfigur, von Leopold Bloom her.
Rezension zu Gerald Gillespie: Proust, Mann, Joyce in the Modernist Context, Washington/D.C. (The Catholic University of America Press) 2003. 235 Seiten.
Gillespies Studien zur literarischen Moderne greifen teilweise auf frühere und an anderen Stellen publizierte Forschungsergebnisse und Thesen zurück. Sie gliedern sich in zwei Teile: Die Kapitel des ersten Teils erörtern schwerpunktmäßig modernespezifische Formen der Welterfahrung und -darstellung sowie zentrale Themen und charakteristische Strukturen moderner Literatur. Teil II ist vor allem den Oeuvres von Proust, Mann und Joyce gewidmet. Durch eine Fülle von Querbezügen zwischen den im einzelnen verfolgten Fragestellungen ergibt sich ein dichtes Gewebe von präzisen Beobachtungen, Beschreibungen, Argumenten und Thesen zur literarischen Moderne.
This chapter proposes the scar as a productive image to conceptualize the relation of speakers to the particular language otherwise called mother tongue, native or first language. Thinking of this relation in terms of a scar avoids the biopolitical implications of concepts derived from the context of family and birth that have, throughout the nineteenth and twentieth century, come to present language as basis of a nation state. The image of the scar also avoids the biographical normalization and linguistic hierarchization implied in the term first language, as both are equally important biopolitical strategies of forming individuals and communities. Thinking of the mother tongue in terms of a scar emphasizes the intensity of lasting formation and identification entailed by acquiring this particular language, and it highlights the violence inherent to these processes that tends to be covered up by the naturalizing and family-related imagery of native or mother tongue as well as by the favour implied in the term first language.
Rezension zu Finn Fordham: I Do I Undo I Redo. The textual Genesis of Modernist Selves in Hopkins, Yeats, Conrad, Forster, Joyce, and Woolf. Oxford (Oxford University Press) 2010. 281 S.
"Why are not excrements, children and lice works of art?" fragt sich James Joyce 1903 in seinem Pariser Notizbuch. Im elf Jahre später fertig gestellten 'Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man' schreibt er die Frage Stephen Dedalus als Eintrag in dessen Notizbuch zu. Finn Fordhams Band 'I Do I Undo I Redo' verspricht, den Prozess der Verfertigung von Kunstwerken zu analysieren, der bei Joyce in Frage stehen bleibt.
A encenação autoral de Christian Kracht: o caso d' "Os Mortos" de Kracht, de Joyce e de Huston
(2019)
Partimos do pressuposto que os escritores, ao longo da história, sempre se utilizaram de estratégias encenatórias tanto em relação às suas obras como às suas figuras públicas, e de que o fazem não só para se estabelecer no campo literário, mas para o fazê-lo de um modo específico (JÜRGENSEN; KAYSER, 2011; BOURDIEU, 2000). Tendo em vista o último romance de Christian Kracht, "Die Toten" (2016), cujo título pode ser livremente traduzido como "Os Mortos", e as relações intertextuais que podem ser estabelecidas com o conto homônimo de James Joyce (1914) e sua adaptação para o cinema dirigida por John Huston (1987), temos por objetivo investigar de que modo essas relações contribuem para a encenação de Christian Kracht e para seu posicionamento no campo literário.