Refine
Document Type
- Article (5)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Working Paper (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (12)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (12)
Keywords
- Semantics (12) (remove)
Institute
This thesis investigates the acquisition of compositional and lexical semantic properties of adjectives in German-speaking children between the age of two and five years.
According to formal semantic approaches, there are intersective and non-intersective adjectives, subsective and non-subsective adjectives as well as gradable and non-gradable adjectives. These properties concern the compositional mechanisms involved in nominal modification, i.e., the combination of adjectives and nouns. In addition, adjectives differ regarding lexical semantic properties that contribute to the adjectives' meaning. Differences in the adjectives' scale structure have led to the theoretical assumption that gradable adjectives should be distinguished into relative and absolute gradable adjectives. In addition, meaning components such as multidimensionality or subjectivity have led to the distinction between dimensional and evaluative gradable adjectives. These properties have been mostly investigated independently of each other in both theory and acquisition research. I suggest a classification system for adjectives that combines different semantic properties. This system results in six adjective classes constituting a Semantic Complexity Hierarchy. Assuming that these adjective classes differ in semantic complexity, I propose an operationalization of semantic complexity that takes into account the adjectives' length of description, their type complexity, and lexical properties that contribute to the adjectives' meaning.
Regarding the question of how monolingual German-speaking children acquire the semantics of adjectives, I hypothesize that the order of acquisition of adjectives is determined by their semantic complexity. This hypothesis is tested in a spontaneous speech study and a comprehension experiment.
The spontaneous speech study is a longitudinal investigation of the production of adjectives from 2;00 to 2;11 years based on transcripts from a dense data corpus. The results provide evidence that the mean age of acquisition for the adjective classes in the Semantic Complexity Hierarchy follows the order predicted by semantic complexity. The same order was observed for the age at which the number of types for each class increased most. A preliminary analysis of the input indicates that the frequency of parental adjective use is related to the order of acquisition, but it is unlikely that frequency determines the order completely.
The comprehension experiment focuses on two specific adjective classes. I examine children's and adults' interpretation of relative (big, small) and absolute (clean, dirty) gradable dimensional adjectives with a picture-choice task. These two classes are of the same semantic complexity because they are both gradable, but they have different scale structures. As a result, they must be interpreted differently due to lexical semantic properties. I investigate whether children calculate different standards of comparison for relative and absolute gradable adjectives and whether they distinguish between relative and absolute gradable adjectives regarding the relevance of the explicit comparison class. The results indicate that as of age 3, children distinguish between relative and absolute gradable adjectives with regard to the standard of comparison. However, with respect to the relevance of the comparison class, for 3-year-old children, unlike for 4- and 5-year-olds, changes in the noun, i.e., in the explicit comparison class, led to non-adult-like responses regarding both relative and absolute gradable adjectives.
On the basis of the empirical findings, I propose an acquisition path stating that children enter the acquisition process with inherent linguistic knowledge, the Semantic Complexity Hierarchy, and cognitive abilities to categorize their environment. I suggest that initially, children apply the least complex interpretation available in the Semantic Complexity Hierarchy to all adjectives: all adjectives are interpreted as properties of individuals that are not gradable. To access other levels of the Semantic Complexity Hierarchy and to establish more complex adjective classes, positive evidence from the input and conceptual properties of adjectives, e.g., COLOR, MENTAL STATE, PHYSICAL PROPERTY etc., can operate as triggers.
Switching between reading tasks leads to phase-transitions in reading times in L1 and L2 readers
(2019)
Reading research uses different tasks to investigate different levels of the reading process, such as word recognition, syntactic parsing, or semantic integration. It seems to be tacitly assumed that the underlying cognitive process that constitute reading are stable across those tasks. However, nothing is known about what happens when readers switch from one reading task to another. The stability assumptions of the reading process suggest that the cognitive system resolves this switching between two tasks quickly. Here, we present an alternative language-game hypothesis (LGH) of reading that begins by treating reading as a softly-assembled process and that assumes, instead of stability, context-sensitive flexibility of the reading process. LGH predicts that switching between two reading tasks leads to longer lasting phase-transition like patterns in the reading process. Using the nonlinear-dynamical tool of recurrence quantification analysis, we test these predictions by examining series of individual word reading times in self-paced reading tasks where native (L1) and second language readers (L2) transition between random word and ordered text reading tasks. We find consistent evidence for phase-transitions in the reading times when readers switch from ordered text to random-word reading, but we find mixed evidence when readers transition from random-word to ordered-text reading. In the latter case, L2 readers show moderately stronger signs for phase-transitions compared to L1 readers, suggesting that familiarity with a language influences whether and how such transitions occur. The results provide evidence for LGH and suggest that the cognitive processes underlying reading are not fully stable across tasks but exhibit soft-assembly in the interaction between task and reader characteristics.
This thesis investigated the acquisition of restrictive and appositive interpretations of relative clauses in German-speaking children between the age of 3 and 6 in three experiments.
The theoretical background shows that restrictive relative clauses are semantically less complex than appositive ones. This assumption is supported by observations from a typological overview on the semantic functions attested across languages. It is shown that the existence of appositive relative clauses implies the availability of restrictive readings in a given language. Furthermore, restrictive readings may be favored due to the functioning of general processing principles. Previous research on the acquisition of relative clauses demonstrates that the acquisition of the semantic functions of relative clauses is an understudied area. In contrast, the acquisition of syntactic aspects of relative clauses is well documented. Relative clauses start to be produced in the third year of life and can be interpreted target-like between the age of 4 and 8 depending on their structure. Which semantic interpretation children assign to relative clauses at this age, however, is still an open question.
Based on the formal background and insights from previous studies, three experiments were designed: two picture selection tasks and one acceptability task. The crucial aspect of the experimental design constitutes the interaction of an ordinal number word and the interpretation of the relative clause in sentences like “Take the third car(,) that/which is red”. The scope of the ordinal number reveals whether the relative clause had been attached restrictively at the NP-level or whether it had been attached higher up at the DP shell resulting in an appositive interpretation.
The results of the experiments demonstrate that 4- to 6-year-old German-speaking children and adults prefer restrictive readings over appositive ones. This preference is found within the group data and is mirrored by the results of an individual analysis. In addition, while the majority of children has acquired restrictive readings at the age of 4, appositive interpretations are mastered only by about half of the children between age 4 and 6. Interestingly, 3-year-old children show a different pattern than their older peers. Appositive but not restrictive interpretations seem to be available to these children. Although the results may be taken as evidence that appositivity is acquired before restrictivity in relative clauses by German-speaking children, I propose the contrary. Based on assumptions about the complexity of restrictive and appositive derivations, I argue that the appositive interpretations observed at the age of 3 do not result from a target-like syntactic and semantic representation. I propose that 3-year-old children do not yet identify relative clauses as nominal modifiers. Instead, they are derived from an incorrect attachment of the relative clause higher up in the syntactic tree.
The results of the three experiments are the first to show that neither a prototypical unintegrated prosodic contour nor the presence of a lexical marker, the discourse particle “ja”, or a visual context biasing for appositivity led to an increase of appositive interpretations in the children’s groups. Adults, in contrast, were sensitive to the presence of the discourse particle and the cues from the visual context. As for children, the prosodic format of the relative clauses did not systematically change the interpretation preferences of adults.
The proposed acquisition path may not be specific to German. Instead, it is predicted to hold cross-linguistically and may also be transferred to the interpretation of adjectives. Moreover, the assumptions on how children integrate relative clauses during comprehension may be generalized to other types of subordinate clauses.
The correspondence between the terminology used for querying and the one used in content objects to be retrieved, is a crucial prerequisite for effective retrieval technology. However, as terminology is evolving over time, a growing gap opens up between older documents in (long-term) archives and the active language used for querying such archives. Thus, technologies for detecting and systematically handling terminology evolution are required to ensure "semantic" accessibility of (Web) archive content on the long run. As a starting point for dealing with terminology evolution this paper formalizes the problem and discusses issues, first ideas and relevant technologies.
A logical framework consisting of a polymorphic call-by-value functional language and a first-order logic on the values is presented, which is a reconstruction of the logic of the verification system VeriFun. The reconstruction uses contextual semantics to define the logical value of equations. It equates undefinedness and non-termination, which is a standard semantical approach. The main results of this paper are: Meta-theorems about the globality of several classes of theorems in the logic, and proofs of global correctness of transformations and deduction rules. The deduction rules of VeriFun are globally correct if rules depending on termination are appropriately formulated. The reconstruction also gives hints on generalizations of the VeriFun framework: reasoning on nonterminating expressions and functions, mutual recursive functions and abstractions in the data values, and formulas with arbitrary quantifier prefix could be allowed.
Der Aufsatz beschäftigt sich mit der Frage, ob im gegenwärtigen deutschen Sprachgebrauch ein übermäßiger Gebrauch von Anglizismen zu beobachten ist. Als entscheidender linguistischer Grund für die häufige Verwendung von Anglizismen wird ihre Eurysemie (semantische Vagheit) angesehen. Der digitale Wandel der Medienbranche wird als außerlinguistischer Faktor betrachtet. Diese Fragen werden im Rahmen einer Studie zur Semantik der in elektronischen und in Print-Medien am häufigsten verwendeten Anglizismen behandelt.
Beauty is the single most frequently and most broadly used aesthetic virtue term. The present study aimed at providing higher conceptual resolution to the broader notion of beauty by comparing it with three closely related aesthetically evaluative concepts which are likewise lexicalized across many languages: elegance, grace(fulness), and sexiness. We administered a variety of questionnaires that targeted perceptual qualia, cognitive and affective evaluations, as well as specific object properties that are associated with beauty, elegance, grace, and sexiness in personal looks, movements, objects of design, and other domains. This allowed us to reveal distinct and highly nuanced profiles of how a beautiful, elegant, graceful, and sexy appearance is subjectively perceived. As aesthetics is all about nuances, the fine-grained conceptual analysis of the four target concepts of our study provides crucial distinctions for future research.
Abstract: The human visual cortex enables visual perception through a cascade of hierarchical computations in cortical regions with distinct functionalities. Here, we introduce an AI-driven approach to discover the functional mapping of the visual cortex. We related human brain responses to scene images measured with functional MRI (fMRI) systematically to a diverse set of deep neural networks (DNNs) optimized to perform different scene perception tasks. We found a structured mapping between DNN tasks and brain regions along the ventral and dorsal visual streams. Low-level visual tasks mapped onto early brain regions, 3-dimensional scene perception tasks mapped onto the dorsal stream, and semantic tasks mapped onto the ventral stream. This mapping was of high fidelity, with more than 60% of the explainable variance in nine key regions being explained. Together, our results provide a novel functional mapping of the human visual cortex and demonstrate the power of the computational approach.
Author Summary: Human visual perception is a complex cognitive feat known to be mediated by distinct cortical regions of the brain. However, the exact function of these regions remains unknown, and thus it remains unclear how those regions together orchestrate visual perception. Here, we apply an AI-driven brain mapping approach to reveal visual brain function. This approach integrates multiple artificial deep neural networks trained on a diverse set of functions with functional recordings of the whole human brain. Our results reveal a systematic tiling of visual cortex by mapping regions to particular functions of the deep networks. Together this constitutes a comprehensive account of the functions of the distinct cortical regions of the brain that mediate human visual perception.
Die Dissertation geht der Frage: Was ist Bildung? aus kulturtheoretischer Perspektive nach und diskutiert kritisch die vorherrschenden universalistischen Annahmen. Ausgangspunkt dieser auch empirisch angelegten Untersuchung waren zunächst unsystematische Beobachtungen über die Bedeutung von Bildung in Indien. Ein erster Fokus ist auf die Frage gerichtet, welche Sinnzuschreibungen mit dem Begriff Bildung korrespondieren und wie das konstitutiv reflexive Verhältnis von Sinn und Kontext bzw. Kultur zu fassen ist. Theoretisch wird von einem sinntheoretischen Modell ausgegangen - vor allem in den systemtheoretischen Neufassungen von Niklas Luhmann. Auch die Ausführungen über kompatible Kulturkonzepte orientieren sich an dem systemtheoretischen Paradigma. Das von Luhmann entwickelte Konzept der Semantik wird als Erklärungsansatz aufgenommen und im Anschluss daran die Frage spezifiziert, welche Verknüpfungen und funktionalen Zusammenhänge zwischen der mit dem Begriff education verbundenen „gepflegten Semantik“ und dem mit ihr strukturell gekoppelten Sozialsystem identifiziert und rekonstruiert werden können. Indien bietet sich wegen der traditionell exponierten gesellschaftlichen Rolle von Bildung für eine Analyse des engen Zusammenhangs von Semantik und Sozialstruktur in besonderer Weise an. Erinnert sei hier nur an die historisch signifikante Bedeutung der Brahmanenkaste. Die semantischen Konstrukte über Bildung, die sich in einem urbanen, indischen Mittelschichtkontext zeigen, so ein Ergebnis, weisen auf ein zunehmendes Misstrauen gegenüber den etablierten und traditionellen Erziehungs- und Sozialisationsformen hin, mit Folgen für die Selbst- und Fremdkonstruktion sowie auch für generelle Biographisierungsprozesse. In die Semantik sind Formen eingelagert, die die sozialen Inklusions- und Exklusionsprozesse entscheidend beeinflussen. Die Dignität dieser Semantik wird in Anlehnung an Jürgen Schriewer et. al. und allgemein an das Konzept der Externalisierung als ‚indischer Weg’ der Entwicklung interpretiert. Das Misstrauen gegenüber den traditionellen Erziehungs- und Bildungsmustern lässt sich strukturell abstrakter als Transformationsprozess von der Sanskritization zu einer Educationization beschreiben. Unter Sanskritization wird dabei in Anlehnung an Srinivas eine traditionelle Mobilitätsform von Gruppen im hierarchischen Kastensystem verstanden. Die Educationization impliziert ähnlich wie Sanskitization eine starke Differenzformel mit Orientierungswert unter anderem für soziale wie personale Beobachtungen, Wahrnehmungen und Beurteilungen. Sie ist jedoch ein Instrument, das besser an die Anforderungen einer modernen Gesellschaft angepasst zu sein scheint und gegenüber traditionelleren Formen wie Sanskritization neue und angemessenere Anschlussmöglichkeiten bietet. Die damit verbundenen Veränderungen der indischen Gesellschaft, die von den einen als Modernisierung gefeiert und von anderen als Erosion der bestehenden Kultur scharf kritisiert werden, hinterlassen aber Spuren, die in unterschiedliche Richtungen weisen.