Refine
Document Type
- Working Paper (17)
- Article (1)
- Part of a Book (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (19)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (19)
Keywords
- Deutschland (6)
- Armut (3)
- Einkommensverteilung (3)
- Arbeitsloser (2)
- Arbeitslosigkeit (2)
- Dänemark (2)
- Familienlastenausgleich (2)
- Frankreich (2)
- Großbritannien (2)
- Irland (2)
Institute
This paper fits within a broader research programme concerned with the processes that link labour market precarity and social exclusion. Labour market insecurity manifests itself most directly in the form of unemployment, and other elements in the programme seek to measure the impact of precarity, and unemployment in particular, on poverty and social exclusion in the eight countries covered. One of the principal concerns of the programme is however the extent to which institutional differences across countries with respect to the labour market and social protection are a significant factor mediating the relationship between labour market precarity and social exclusion. This paper focuses on the effectiveness of cash transfers, the central element of social protection systems, in alleviating the effects of unemployment on income poverty. The structures of social protection systems vary greatly across European Union member states, and in many cases have altered significantly in recent years in response to high unemployment (see Hauser et al, 1998). Using data from the mid-1980s and the mid-1990s for six member countries, the paper compares the effectiveness of different systems in lifting or keeping the unemployed out of poverty, and how this has been affected by the way systems have responded to the challenges produced by developments in the labour market in the past decade. The specific role of social insurance-based unemployment-linked transfers versus other cash transfers is also considered, to assess the extent to which social insurance has been able to cope with changes in the labour market over the period. The data come from a variety of national large-scale household surveys. The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 discusses the data and methods to be employed in measuring the impact of cash transfers on poverty risks for the unemployed. Section 3 looks at the overall risks of poverty for the unemployed before and after cash transfers, and how these changed between the mid-1980s and mid-1990s. Section 4 looks at the role of social insurance-based unemployment payments versus other cash transfers. Section 5 examines the extent to which the impact of transfers varies by gender and by duration of unemployment. Section 6 highlights the key patterns identified and what these tell us about the relationship between the type of welfare regime a country operates and effectiveness in alleviating poverty among the unemployed.
Die Struktur der Gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung (GRV) in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland ist grundsätzlich geändert worden. Die Bundesregierung hat die Einführung einer zusätzlichen privaten Alterssicherung auf freiwilliger Basis beschlossen. Hierdurch soll ein Kapitalstock gebildet werden, der die Leistungen der GRV ergänzt. Zur Förderung dieser Systemänderung der Alterssicherung werden umfangreiche fiskalische Unterstützungsmaßnahmen eingeführt. Im Rahmen des hier vorliegenden Beitrags wird auf die besondere Situation der Familien mit Kindern eingegangen. Im zweiten Abschnitt wird untersucht, inwieweit Familien mit Kindern in den letzten zehn Jahren in Deutschland in der Lage waren, privates Vermögen aufzubauen. Im dritten Abschnitt werden die beabsichtigten Änderungen des Systems der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung in den Grundzügen dargestellt, und es wird ein Überblick über die geplanten fiskalischen Fördermaßnahmen gegeben. Im abschließenden vierten Abschnitt wird eine Bewertung der Änderungen vor allem in Bezug auf die Situation von Familien versucht.
The structure of the compulsory pension system (CPS) in the Federal Republic of Germany has been changed fundamentally. The federal government has decided to introduce a private pension system on a voluntary basis. The payments to this voluntary system are to constitute a capital stock to supplement the payments of the compulsory pension system. Comprehensive fiscal subsidies will be introduced to support this change to the pension system. This paper discusses the special situation of families with children. The second section investigates the extent to which families with children were able to accumulate private wealth in the last ten years in Germany. In the third section the main features of the intended changes to the compulsory pension system are described, and an overview of the planned fiscal subsidies is provided. In the fourth and final section we attempt to evaluate the changes with particular attention to the situation of families.
All-over in Europe, unemployment became a growing problem from the mid 1980s to the mid 1990s. Nevertheless, the effects on the economical situation of the unemployed and the whole population are quite different in European countries. In this paper we first give a brief overview over the development of unemployment rates in eight member states of the European Union and over the different reactions to provide the social protection of the unemployed. Therefore we look at the social security expenditures, the level of income replacement for the unemployed and recent social policy reforms concerning them. In the second section of the paper, we examine the development of income distribution and poverty taking different poverty lines into consideration. There is no general pattern neither for the relationship of inequality among the unemployed to the whole economically active population nor for the development from the 80s to the 90s. But one can say that in countries with increasing income inequality also poverty is rising (especially in the UK) and that where inequality among the unemployed is less pronounced the proportions of the poor went down from the mid 80s to the mid 90s (France and Ireland). In nearly all countries the risk of being poor is ernormously high for the unemployed, Denmark is the only exception.
Das Niedrigeinkommenssegment steht im Zentrum der Kontroversen um eine Reform des Sozialstaats. Die Kenntnis seiner soziodemographischen Zusammensetzung ist daher unabdingbar, um in der betreffenden Diskussion gehaltvoll Position beziehen zu können. Besonders interessieren in diesem Zusammenhang Zeitvergleiche. In diesem Sinne wird in der vorliegenden Studie die Veränderung der Struktur des Niedrigeinkommensbereiches in der Bundesrepublik anhand einer Abfolge mehrerer Querschnitte, welche die Jahre 1962/63 bis 1988 umfaßt, analysiert. Dem Niedrigeinkommensbereich werden - in Anlehnung an neuere Ergebnisse in der Literatur über „prekären Wohlstand“ und über Abstiegsrisiken - diejenigen Personen zugerechnet, die nicht mehr als 80 v. H. des durchschnittlichen Nettoäquivalenzeinkommens zur Verfügung haben. Zur vertieften Analyse wird der Niedrigeinkommensbereich nochmals in vier Teilsegmente unterteilt. Entsprechend den relativen Besetzungshäufigkeiten zeigt sich beim Vergleich mit dem oberen Einkommensbereich für spezifische Personengruppen eine Überrepräsentation im Niedrigeinkommensbereich bzw. in seinen vier Teilsegmenten. Hierbei ergeben sich im Zeitablauf einige aufschlußreiche Trends. So erhöhte sich von 1962 bis 1988 beispielsweise für Alleinstehende, für Personen in Alleinerziehenden-, in Nichterwerbstätigenhaushalten sowie für Personen in Haushalten mit einer weiblichen Bezugsperson der Grad der Überrepräsentation im Niedrigeinkommensbereich. Gleiches gilt für Personen in Haushalten mit einem hohen Mietanteil am Haushaltsnettoeinkommen bzw. generell für Personen in Nichteigentümerhaushalten. Demgegenüber verringerte sich insbesondere für Personen im Haushaltstyp einer vollständigen Familie mit vier Kindern oder für Personen in Landwirte- und Arbeiterhaushalten von 1962 bis 1988 das Ausmaß der Überrepräsentation im Niedrigeinkommenssegment.
Die langfristige Entwicklung der personellen Einkommensverteilung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland
(1998)
To sum up our findings we come to the following statements. - During the period from 1973 to 1993 inequality of the personal distribution of equivalent pre-government income increased to some extent, as was to be expected given the enormous rise in unemployment. - Inequality of post-government income also increased slightly, but was much lower than inequality of pre-government income due to the equalizing effect of the German tax and transfer system. - In 1993 inequality of pre-government income was higher, and inequality of post-government income was considerably lower in East Germany than in West Germany; the West German tax and transfer system that was transferred to East Germany after reunification - with some additional but temporary minimum regulations - seems to have had a stronger equalizing effect in the East than in the West. - A decomposition into three age groups, the young and the middle-aged group sub-divided further according to whether household members were affected by unemployment, showed that within-groups inequality explained by far more of overall inequality than between-groups inequality. - The relative positions of the two young groups as well as of the middle-aged group with unemployed members deteriorated with respect to their equivalent pre-government and post-government incomes. - During the first period with rising unemployment (1973 to 1978), the development of within-groups inequality and of between-groups inequality contributed to about the same extent to the increase of overall inequality of pre-government income. But this was fully compensated by the tax and transfer system as there were only a negligible change in inequality of equivalent net income and very slight effects of the (four) components of change which nearly compensated each other. - During the last period from 1988 to 1993 the equalizing effect of the German tax and transfer system seems to have weakened, at least in the western part of Germany. The increase in inequality of equivalent net income is mainly due to developments of within group inequalities.
Revised version of a paper presented at the Conference "The Distribution of Economic Well-Being in the 1980s - an International Perspective", June 21 - 23, 1993, in Fiskebäckskil, Sweden. This paper sketches changes in the distribution of well-being during the period from 1972 to 1991 against the background of West Germany's economic and demographic development, and compares the distribution of well-being in East Germany before and after reunification. We rely on equivalent income of persons as the main indicator to measure well-being, but we also look at the distribution of gross wage income of workers and employees. Estimates of the Federal Statistical Office referring to the mesolevel of average equivalent income of socio-economic groups as well as various distributional measures computed by us at the micro-level are used to gauge changes of the distribution. The computations are based on two sets of micro-data available to us, the official Income and Consumption Surveys (1973, 1978 and 1983), and the German Socio-economic Panel (1983 to 1990 for West Germany, 1990, 1991 for East Germany). At the meso-level we find substantial changes in the relative welfare positions of the ten socio-economic groups distinguished, but a nearly constant ranking of the groups during the whole period under review. At the micro-level our computations indicate slight increases in the inequality of gross earnings during both decades. The distribution of well-being as measured by equivalent income of persons seems also to have become slightly more unequal during the whole period but the changes are very small, and partly reversed during subperiods. A decomposition of overall inequality by occupational status of the heads of household using the Theil measure shows that more than 80 percent of overall inequality is due to within-group inequality with rising tendency. This result is mitigated a little when dis aggregating the heterogeneous group of not gainfully employed with regard to the main income source of the household.