Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (180) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (101)
- Part of Periodical (59)
- Article (8)
- Contribution to a Periodical (4)
- Book (3)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Bachelor Thesis (1)
- Periodical (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (180) (remove)
Keywords
- Financial Institutions (17)
- Macro Finance (12)
- Financial Markets (10)
- Systemic Risk (9)
- Banking Union (8)
- Demography (8)
- Household Finance (8)
- Social System (8)
- ECB (7)
- Financial Stability (7)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (180) (remove)
"A groundbreaking decision"
(2018)
We assess the relationship between finance and growth over the period 1980-2014. We estimate a cross-country growth regression for 48 countries during 20 periods of 15 years starting in 1980 (to 1995) and ending in 1999 (to 2014). We use OLS and IV estimations and we find that: 1) overall financial development had a positive effect on economic growth during all periods of our sample, i.e., we confirm that from 1980 to 2014 financial services provided by the various financial systems were significant (to various degrees) for firm creation, industrial expansion and economic growth; but that, 2) the structure of financial markets was particularly relevant for economic growth until the financial crisis; while 3) the structure of the banking sector played a major role since; and finally that, 4) the legal system is the primary determinant of the effectiveness of the overall financial system in facilitating innovation and growth in (almost) all of our sample period. Hence, overall our results suggest that the relationship between finance and growth matters but also that it varies over time in strength and in sector origination.
JEL Classification: O16, G16, G20.
I present a new business cycle model in which decision making follows a simple mental process motivated by neuroeconomics. Decision makers first compute the value of two different options and then choose the option that offers the highest value, but with errors. The resulting model is highly tractable and intuitive. A demand function in level replaces the traditional Euler equation. As a result, even liquid consumers can have a large marginal propensity to consume. The interest rate affects consumption through the cost of borrowing and not through intertemporal substitution. I discuss the implications for stimulus policies.