Refine
Document Type
- Working Paper (2)
- Article (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- School of Salamanca (3) (remove)
Institute
- Philosophie (3) (remove)
La Escuela de Salamanca ha sido considerada desde hace tiempo como un fenómeno español, ibérico o europeo. Se subraya también siempre que su influencia se extendió desde Salamanca al resto del mundo, llegando hasta América y Asia ¿Es, sin embargo, esta perspectiva realmente adecuada para analizar la indiscutible importancia de la Escuela en la construcción de un lenguaje jurídico-político? ¿No se trataría, más bien, de un caso de producción global de conocimiento a abordar más desde las metodologías de la historia del conocimiento que desde las propias de la historia de la ciencia? Si tenemos en cuenta, además, que la Escuela de Salamanca no fue, meramente, una comunidad de discurso erudita, sino también una comunidad de producción de normas pragmáticas, estos interrogantes se vuelven aún más acuciantes. En este working paper se recogen algunas reflexiones sobre los interrogantes mencionados, pretendiendo que sirvan de base para las discusiones que tendrán lugar en las jornadas La Escuela de Salamanca, ¿un ejemplo de producción global de conocimiento?, a celebrar en octubre de 2018. El presente working paper es, además, un trabajo preparativo para la contribución a un volumen colectivo dedicado a este mismo tema.
Matías De Paz and the introduction of thomism in the Asuntos De Indias: a conceptual revolution
(2018)
Most of the writings dedicated to assessing the contribution of the Spanish Second Scholasticism to the controversial issue of infidels’ dominion began their analyses with the well-known Francisco de Vitoria’s Relectiones (1532). This article offers a reconstruction of the history of the theological and juridical debates on this key issue on the Iberian Peninsula since the late 13th century. Special attention is paid to friar Matías de Paz, who was asked to offer his advice on the early patterns of rule and domination imposed on the Native Americans at the Junta de Burgos (1512), introduced to the discussions about asuntos de Indias the Thomist conceptual framework later employed by Vitoria, Soto, Suárez and many other prominent members of the so-called School of Salamanca. The article shows that it was, in fact, De Paz who first considered the Amerindians infidels affected by an "invincible ignorance", and he tried to curb some of the many abuses committed against them by applying the distinctions between different types of dominium and principatus.
Historical scholarship on the sixteenth-century neo-scholastic debate about American Indians generally centers on the thought of Francisco de Vitoria. Focusing on Alfonso de Castro’s short treatise Utrum indigenae (1543), this paper challenges both an exclusive concentration on Vitoria as well as the received contention that the thought of the School of Salamanca rendered a single, unified view of Amerindians. In Utrum indigenae, Castro argued that American Indians should be instructed in liberal arts and theology thus constructing a strikingly different image of the peoples of the New World as compared to accounts by Vitoria or Francisco Suárez. While the historian Martin Nesvig has recently proposed an Erasmian humanist contextualization of Castro’s treatise, I argue that the image of American Indians presented in Utrum indigenae testifies to an alternative, novel way of writing about American Indians from within the framework of the School of Salamanca which has so far remained unnoticed.