Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (57)
- Article (34)
- Working Paper (16)
- Preprint (7)
- Review (7)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Book (1)
- Lecture (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Language
- English (73)
- German (52)
- Portuguese (4)
- Croatian (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (131)
Keywords
- Semantik (131) (remove)
Institute
Der Titel dieses Beitrags variiert den berühmten Titel eines der Hauptwerke Nietzsches "Also sprach Zarathrustra". In seiner englischen Übersetzung lautet der Titel meist wie folgt: "Thus spoke (spake) Zarathrustra". Thus kennzeichnet Konklusivität, eine Schlussfolgerung aus einem zuvor genannten Umstand oder Sachverhalt. Das englische also, in seiner Schreibung dem deutschen also identisch, beinhaltet semantisch keine Konklusivität, sondern drückt Additivität aus. Der formgleiche Konnektor ist also (!) semantisch unterschiedlich im Deutschen und Englischen. Um diesen Unterschied und seine Bedeutung für türkische DaF-Lerner soll es im folgenden Artikel gehen.
"Je suis Charlie" was used over 619.000 times in the two days that have followed the attack of the editorial team of Charlie Hebdo (Le Progrès, The Huffington Post) and has regularly been taken up in both written and spoken form since. In this paper, we argue that the structure of this sentence actually clashes with its meaning. More specifically, whereas its word order and default rightmost sentence stress are compatible either with an all-focus reading or a narrow focusing of Charlie, the context of use of this sentence as well as the solidarity/empathy message it intends to communicate suggest that its subject is narrowly focused. We will propose that two strategies have emerged to solve this conflict: (i) various alternative forms have appeared that allow proper subject focusing and (ii) speakers have reinterpreted the structure so as to pragmatically retrieve the (additive) focused nature of the subject.
Rezension zu Thomas Klinkert: Literarische Selbstreflexion im Medium der Liebe. Untersuchungen zur Liebessemantik bei Rousseau und in der europäischen Romantik (Hölderlin, Foscolo, Madame de Staël und Leopardi). Freiburg im Breisgau (Rombach) 2002 (= Reihe Litterae; Bd. 92). 283 Seiten.
Thomas Klinkert hat es sich in seiner Regensburger Habilitationsschrift (2001) zur Aufgabe gemacht, das Konzept einer europäischen Romantik in der historischen Erfahrung eines fundamentalen gesellschaftlichen Umbruchs zu begründen, der sich an der Ausprägung "gemeinsame[r] Tendenzen der französischen, der deutschen und der italienischen Literatur um 1800" ablesen lässt. Der wesentliche literarische Kristallisationspunkt dieser in ganz Europa geteilten Umbrucherfahrung ist die Rede über die Liebe. In der Thematisierung der Liebe artikuliert sich nicht nur in besonders prägnanter Form das veränderte Verhältnis zwischen Individuum und Gesellschaft, die Liebe avanciert in der Romantik auch zu einem bevorzugten Medium der literarischen Selbstreflexion, die ihrerseits wiederum durch den historischen Funktionswandel der Literatur motiviert ist.
The aim of this paper is to analyze the concept of body developed by Luhmann's systems theory. Privileged places where one can look for the body will be the interpenetration between human beings and the concept of socialization. Another fundamental problem is the relationship between semantics and body, although the most explicit presence of the body in this theory comes with the concept of symbiotic mechanisms or symbols. The last place where this enquiry will look for a bodily reference are emotions, which were highly ignored by Luhmann. Alternative approaches explored in the paper are treating the body as a structure, as a medium or as an internal environment.
This paper provides an overview of current research on a hybrid and robust parsing architecture for the morphological, syntactic and semantic annotation of German text corpora. The novel contribution of this research lies not in the individual parsing modules, each of which relies on state-of-the-art algorithms and techniques. Rather what is new about the present approach is the combination of these modules into a single architecture. This combination provides a means to significantly optimize the performance of each component, resulting in an increased accuracy of annotation.
This paper presents results of research into syntactic negation in both German and Brazilian Portuguese dialogues. After some considerations on the nature of negation, its occurrence in a corpus is investigated based on semantic negation categories established from works by Polenz and Engel. Based on Ilari's works, possible syntactic negation forms are presented as formulae that express the relationships between their components. Use frequency of syntactic negation in the semantic categories in each language is presented, as well as possible sources of interference in the use of such elements by foreign speakers, along with considerations about negation, culture and language.
German particles usually bring great difficulties to German students. One of these particles, doch, is very often used, especially in conversation. In this paper its various uses are discussed, as well as eases where it can be replaced by other particles, adverbs or conjunctions, without changing the illocution (that is, the intention of the speaker). This study is based on the work of HELBIG, who differentiates eight varieties of doch. Each of them is discussed here according to syntactic, semantic and pragmatic criteria and made explicit through examples.