Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (21)
- Part of Periodical (2)
- Book (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (24)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (24)
Keywords
- Araneae (24) (remove)
Institute
Ökologischer Vergleich der Spinnenfauna (Arachnida: Araneae) von Energiewäldern und Ackerland
(2008)
Kurzumtriebsflächen, oder auch Energiewälder bzw. Schnellwuchsplantagen genannt, sind Flächen mit schnellwachsenden Baumarten (z. B. Hybridpappeln), die in kurzen Umtriebszeiten von 2 bis 10 Jahren bewirtschaftet werden. Nach der zyklischen Ernte treiben die Bäume wieder aus (Stockausschlag) und können nach einigen Jahren erneut genutzt werden. Das Prinzip der schnellwüchsigen Baumarten ist dem früher weit verbreiteten Niederwald ähnlich, allerdings mit dem Unterschied, dass der Energiewald in der Regel auf stillgelegten landwirtschaftlichen Flächen angebaut wird und bei der Begründung züchterisch bearbeitetes Material von Pappel, Aspe und Weide verwendet wird. Kurzumtriebsflächen dienen vorwiegend der Holzproduktion (v. a. Hackschnitzel) zur Gewinnung von (Wärme-)Energie. Spinnen (Arachnida: Araneae) kommen in allen terrestrischen Lebensräumen in großer Artenzahl vor. Allein auf dem Gebiet Deutschlands sind derzeit über 1000 verschiedene Spinnenarten bekannt (Blick & al. 2004). Spinnen ernähren sich räuberisch, wobei ihre Beutetiere meist andere Arthropoden darstellen. Aufgrund der spezifischen Ansprüche vieler Arten an bestimmte (Mikro-)Habitate und damit an spezielle Lebensraumanforderungen eignen sie sich besonders für die qualitative Charakterisierung von Groß- und Kleinlebensräumen. Auch die Veränderung von Lebensräumen durch verschiedene Einflüsse (z. B. Änderung der Nutzungsintensität, Schadstoffimmissionen, Entwässerung, Sukzession, etc.) kann durch Spinnen gut bewertet und dokumentiert werden. Sie werden deshalb häufig bei der Beurteilung der Schutzwürdigkeit von Flächen, bei Eingriffsgutachten, Erfolgskontrollen, Umweltverträglichkeitsuntersuchungen sowie zum Biotopmonitoring herangezogen und zunehmend als Indikatorgruppe für die Bewertung von Habitaten verwendet (z. B. Clausen 1986, Gack & al. 1999). Bisher gibt es nur wenige publizierte Studien zum Vorkommen und zu den Entwicklungstendenzen der epigäischen Arthropodenfauna auf Energiewaldflächen (Blick & Burger 2002, Blick & al. 2003). Mit der vorliegende Untersuchung sollen daher exemplarisch die Auswirkungen solcher Kurzumtriebs-Versuchsflächen auf die epigäische Raubarthropodenfauna beleuchtet werden. Als eine der wichtigsten Prädatorengruppen wurde die Ordnung der Spinnen (Araneae) gewählt, die aufgrund der hohen Arten- und Individuenzahl sowie oft spezifischer Biotopansprüche der einzelnen Arten besonders geeignet erscheint. Besonderes Interesse erweckt bei vorliegender Untersuchung die Fragestellung, ob sich innerhalb weniger Jahre waldtypische Spinnenarten einstellen und inwieweit sich die Spinnenfauna bezüglich des Ausgangsstadiums „Acker“ verändert (Sukzession). Darüber hinaus wurde ermittelt, welche Auswirkungen die Ernte eines aufstockenden Energiewaldes auf die Spinnenzönose haben kann.
Zur Biodiversität von Spinnen (Araneae) und Laufkäfern (Carabidae) auf sächsischen Ackerflächen
(2006)
Im Rahmen eines Forschungsprojektes der Sächsischen Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft erfolgten zönologische Studien in vier praxisrelevanten Bewirtschaftungsvarianten. Das primäre Untersuchungsziel bestand in der Einschätzung des Förderprogramms „Umweltgerechte Landwirtschaft (UL)“ hinsichtlich seiner Effekte auf die Biodiversität typischer Ackerstandorte im Freistaat Sachsen. Unter anderem wurden dazu Laufkäfer (Coleoptera: Carabidae) und Webspinnen (Araneae) als Indikatoren genutzt. Über die ökologische Bewertung der verschiedenen Bewirtschaftungsvarianten hinaus wird die Nutzung der Biodiversität von Ackerflächen und deren Indikation anhand von Raubarthropoden und anderen Organismengruppen diskutiert.
Die Spinnenzönose der Stieleiche wurde in zwei anthropogen unterschiedlich beeinflussten Waldstandorten des Staatswaldes Kottenforst bei Bonn auf ihr ökologisches Spektrum hin untersucht und an Hand des Bewertungssystems nach PLATEN ausgewertet. Als Datengrundlage dienten 4103 Spinnenindividuen aus 89 Arten, die mit Ast- und Stammeklektoren im Kronen- und Stammbereich von insgesamt acht Eichen erfasst wurden. In den untersuchten Straten beider Standorte dominieren die baumlebenden und rindenbesiedelnden Spinnen. Den dritthäufigsten Ökotyp stellen die für den untersuchten Maiglöckchen-Eichen-Hainbuchenwald nicht erwarteten Vertreter bodensaurer Mischwälder dar. Die Auswertung liefert stratenspezifische Unterschiede innerhalb der Standorte, gibt jedoch nur wenig Hinweise für deutliche Unterschiede zwischen den beiden Untersuchungsflächen.
Spiders leave draglines, faeces and other secretions behind when traveling through their microhabitat. The presence of these secretions may unintentionally inform other animals, prey as well as predators, about a recent and possible current predation risk or food availability. For a wolf spider, other spiders including smaller conspecifics, form a substantial part of their prey, and larger wolf spiders, again including conspecifics, are potential predators. We tested two hypotheses: that large wolf spiders may locate patches of potential spider prey through the presence of silk threads and/or other secretions; and that prey spiders may use secretions from large wolf spiders to avoid patches with high predation risk. We used large (subadult or adult) Pardosa saltans to provide predator cues and mixed dwarf spiders or small (juvenile) P. saltans to provide prey cues. Subadult wolf spiders were significantly attracted to litter contaminated by dwarf spiders or small conspecifics after 6 hours but no longer after 24 hours. In contrast, neither dwarf spiders nor small P. saltans showed significant avoidance of substrate contaminated by adult P. saltans. However, small P. saltans showed different activity patterns on the two substrates. The results indicate that wolf spiders are able to increase the efficiency of foraging by searching preferentially in patches with the presence of intraguild prey. The lack of a clear patch selection response of the prey in spite of a modified activity pattern may possibly be associated with the vertical stratification of the beech litter habitat: the reduced volume of spaces in the deeper layers could make downward rather than horizontal movement a fast and safe tactic against a large predator that cannot enter these spaces.
Saba Island (Caribbean Netherlands) is one of the northernmost islands of the Lesser Antilles. It is only 13 square kilometers but contains a wide variety of potential spider habitats including dry, moist, and elfin forests. As part of a collaborative effort between Conservation International and Saba Conservation Foundation, during a several week period in March and May 2008 we briefly surveyed the island for spiders and other arthropods. This survey, the first for spiders of Saba, resulted in the identification of 18 families and 76 spider species, including six new species that will be described elsewhere and may be endemic to Saba. The species richness of Saba’s spider fauna is considerably higher than that reported from other small Caribbean islands. We conclude this is probably a combined result of undersampling and lower habitat diversity on these other islands.
The present study summarises spider records from East Macedonia and Thrace (NE Greece). Spiders were mainly collected by hand sampling and to a smaller extent by pitfall trapping during field trips in 2002, 2004, 2007, 2008 and 2009. 171 species from 23 families were sampled. Pelecopsis pavida (O. P.-Cambridge, 1872) (Linyphiidae) and Xysticus kaznakovi Utochkin, 1968 (Thomisidae) were new to the European spider fauna and ten further species, Diaea livens Simon, 1876, Heriaeus graminicola (Doleschall, 1852), Meioneta ressli Wunderlich, 1973, Oedothorax retusus (Westring, 1851), Philodromus albidus Kulczynski, 1911, Pocadicnemis pumila Keyserling, 1880, Sitticus saltator (O. P.-Cambridge, 1868), Stemonyphantes lineatus (Linnaeus, 1758), Synageles scutiger Prószynski, 1979 and Thanatus coloradensis Keyserling, 1880, could be added to the Greek fauna for the first time. 21 and 38 species were new to East Macedonia and Thrace, respectively. Based on previous work, plus the present study, the Greek spider fauna now includes 1,108 species.
Spider fauna of semi-dry grasslands on a military training base in Northwest Germany (Münster)
(2008)
The spider fauna of semi-dry grasslands on the military training area of Dorbaum near Münster (North Rhine-Westphalia) was investigated. From 2002 to 2003 a total of 11,194 mature spiders from 141 species and 20 families was caught by pitfall trapping and hand sampling. Among them are 18 species listed in the Red Data Book of North Rhine-Westphalia, four species are rare or previously rarely recorded. Most of the spiders are habitat generalists that extend their occurrence into all types of habitats, while the number of species which are stenotopic to sand habitats is noticeably low (n = 13). The spider data were analysed with Principal Component Analysis (PCA). It is possible to distinguish spider communities of neighbouring forested habitats from species groups of open habitats, but there is no uniform spider community which is characteristic for semi-dry grassland.
Spatial and temporal structure of the spider community in the clay semi-desert of western Kazakhstan
(2011)
The spatial and temporal structure of spider communities was studied in the clay semi-desert of the north-western Caspian Lowland, western Kazakhstan (49°23' N, 46°47' E). The soils and vegetation are complex, being composed of a mosaic of desert and steppe plant communities. Besides the native associations, there are plantations of different tree species. The ground-dwelling spider assemblages in the native habitats are the most diverse. The number of species inhabiting forest plantations is three times as small. Gnaphosidae is the leading family in the ground layer. They show high abundance and diversity levels during the whole season. Thomisidae, Lycosidae, Philodromidae, and Salticidae are abundant as well. The species diversity of herbage-dwelling spiders in different open native habitats is very similar. The spectrum of dominant families (Thomisidae, Oxyopidae, Araneidae, and Salticidae) and the seasonal dynamics of their ratio in desert and steppe associations have much in common. Spider assemblages of native and artificial habitats are characterised by change from multispecies polydominant spring-summer communities to impoverished imbalanced autumn ones. Seasonal changes in the species structure of mature spider groupings in native habitats are well pronounced, while the impact of seasonal conditions is even stronger than between-habitat differences. Complexes of typical species with different levels of habitat preference are revealed.
Agricultural intensification is a major threat to biological diversity worldwide. Land management activities enhancing landscape diversity are therefore regarded as a key strategy to halt species loss in cultural landscapes. Diverse and abundant communities of predatory arthropods, e.g. spiders (Araneae), have a high potential to suppress pest populations (Symondson et al. 2002) and could therefore contribute to allow reductions of pesticide use. Crop fields alone are usually not able to sustain diverse and individual-rich populations of predatory arthropods, because agricultural management results in disturbances and habitat deteriorations (harvest, soil cultivation, pesticide application) that kill or drive away large parts of the populations. Therefore semi-natural and perennial habitats in agricultural landscapes are considered to be of great importance for beneficial arthropods. On the one hand they offer refuge habitats in times when arable fields are hostile, e.g. fields with bare grounds during winter (Schmidt & Tscharntke 2005). On the other hand, viable populations of predatory arthropods in semi-natural habitats can serve as sources for (re-) colonisation of arable fields (Schmidt & Tscharntke 2005). Because of these exchanges between crop and non-crop areas it is important to include the surrounding landscape when investigating field-scale processes. We investigated the relations between spider assemblages in arable fields and the surrounding landscape in 29 fields of winter oilseed rape (OSR) in an agricultural landscape in eastern Austria. The objectives of this study were to estimate (1) how much spider assemblages in oilseed rape fields are influenced by the surrounding landscape, (2) the relative influence of landscape variables compared to field-scale variables and (3) at which spatial scales landscape variables are effective.
The data presented by HÄNGGI et al. (1995) and BOLAÑOS (2003) on the habitats of a large number of European spiders are examined, most of which appear to show non-specific preferences. The abundance and frequency peaks of the 384 species graphs (HÄNGGI et al. 1995) can be explained by assuming that habitat tolerance varies with geographical location. This can be demonstrated on a local level within a particular country or throughout the European range of a species. Examples are described. Many published ecological studies of spider faunas seem to have assumed that the habitat preferences of a species is a fixed characteristic wherever they occur but evidence is presented to show that this may apply to only a few species. A number of examples are described showing how preferences change with latitude and longitude within Europe. It is proposed that most species can be categorised as stenotopic, mesotopic or eurytopic, although there is a gradual change from one group to another, with no clear boundaries. Supporting evidence for regional variation in habitat tolerance is scarce. More studies are required of individual species throughout their European distribution and detailed descriptions of their habitats in different parts of their range. Definitions of micro-, macro- and minor habitats are presented as useful tools for field studies of spider faunas. It is also recommended that future faunal surveys should use the same system of habitat classification so that the results are comparable with other studies. The most appropriate method is described by BUCHAR & RŮŽIČKA (2002) but could be made more precise by the use of scientific measuring equipment for light/shade, dryness/humidity and temperature. Finally the importance of checking the validity of some published records is stressed because misidentifications are sometimes frequent.