Refine
Document Type
- Article (15)
- Part of Periodical (8)
- Working Paper (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (26)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (26)
Keywords
- Coronavirus (26) (remove)
Institute
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (15)
- Rechtswissenschaft (12)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (10)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (3)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (2)
- House of Finance (HoF) (2)
- Medizin (2)
- Philosophie (2)
- Zentrum für Nordamerika-Forschung (ZENAF) (1)
Seit Wochen nun beobachten wir, wie Menschen auf sehr unterschiedliche Weise auf die COVID-19-Pandemie reagieren. Die unmittelbare Gefahrenursache ist zwar für das bloße Auge nicht sichtbar. Sichtbar hingegen sind die von der Weltgesundheitsorganisation, der Johns Hopkins Universität oder dem Robert-Koch-Institut veröffentlichten Daten. Täglich steigende Zahlen von Infizierten, täglich steigende Zahlen von Toten. Vielleicht ist es nachvollziehbar, dass "in diesen Zeiten" Regelungsmaßnahmen "mit heißer Nadel gestrickt" (noch so eine Phrase) sind. Selbst wenn in der Theorie Krisenszenarien vielleicht irgendwann einmal durchgespielt worden sind (siehe BT Drs. 17/12051, S. 57 ff.), lässt sich nicht jede Variante einer Krise antizipieren – genauso wenig wie der tatsächliche Stressmodus, in dem andere und man selbst sich befinden werden. In diesem Modus sind nun Entscheidungen getroffen worden. Entscheidungen, deren Konsequenzen ohne jegliche Übertreibung als der "massivste kollektive Grundrechtseingriff in der Geschichte der Bundesrepublik" bezeichnet werden können. ...
A new virus, SARS-CoV-2, emerged in the Chinese city of Wuhan at the end of 2019. Infected persons developed an atypical form of pneumonia, later known as COVID-19. The pathogen created a pandemic, with fatalities throughout the world, and also led to the adoption of restrictive measures which were, until recently, unthinkable, as well as fostering new political conflicts. Even the path of the multilateral order in its current form is at stake. For a take on these issues under international law, the legal regime of the World Health Organization (WHO) and its response to the pandemic provides an insightful access. ...
Governments, economists and intellectuals have called for common European bonds or increased own EU funds to address the recession induced by Covid19. Unfortunately, the German government, joined by the other members of the “Frugal Four” (Austria, Finland, the Netherlands), has categorically rejected to look into any such measures and favours using the ESM. This reaction created a déjà vu experience for citizens and governments of the heavily affected southern Member States of the EU. The proposal to use the ESM raises fears of another wave of austerity amounting to yet another lost decade for economic, social, and ecological development in Europe.
Angesichts der in Deutschland und anderswo präzedenzlosen Eingrenzung des rechtlich Erlaubten stehen die begrenzenden Rechtsverordnungen, Allgemeinverfügungen und vollziehenden Maßnahmen des Staates im Zentrum grundrechtlicher Aufmerksamkeit. Freiheitsschonendere Alternativen werden in erster Linie durch das Prisma der Erforderlichkeit in den Blick genommen. Sich in einer Pandemielage gegen Beschränkungen zu entscheiden, erscheint grundrechtlich unverdächtig. Doch wäre es das tatsächlich? Im Folgenden werden zwei unterschiedliche Szenarien einer solchen Entscheidung vorgestellt und es wird ein näherer Blick auf die Folgen für den individuellen Grundrechtsgebrauch geworfen. Es zeigen sich Grundrechtsfragen, die im Ergebnis auch für die Beurteilung des beschränkenden Staates aufgeworfen sind.
Many countries have restricted public life during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic. As related measures limited the access to sports facilities, this dissertation aimed (1) to examine changes in physical activity (PA) and well-being in affected countries, and (2) to determine the effectiveness of a digital home exercise program in this context.
Part 1 (PA/well-being) of the dissertation was a digital survey administered in 14 countries. Participants reported a 41 - 42% reduction of PA (NPAQ-SF) during restrictions (n=13,503 valid responses). Compliance with international PA guidelines decreased by nearly 19%. Mental well-being declined substantially (n=14,975 responses; 68.1 to 51.9 points on the WHO5 index) and the proportion of individuals at risk of depression tripled (14.2% to 45.2%). Physical well-being (SF-36 Pain) decreased slightly (85.8% to 81.3%). About two thirds (68.1%) of the respondents reported being interested in digital home exercise.
For Part 2 (digital home exercise) of the dissertation, an international multicenter randomized, controlled trial was performed allocating healthy adults (n=763; 33±12 years) to an intervention (IG) or control (CG) group. In contrast to the CG, the IG was offered live-streamed home exercise for four weeks. Subsequently, both groups had access to pre-recorded workouts for another four weeks. Outcomes were measured weekly using validated questionnaires. Mixed-models data analyses revealed an up to 1.65-fold (95% CI: 1.4-1.94; week 1) increase of PA relative to the CG. Moreover, small improvements in exercise motivation (SKK scale), psychological well-being (WHO-5 index), sleep quality (MOS Sleep Scale), and anxiety symptoms (GAD-7 Scale) were observed for IG.
The results of this dissertation suggest that public life restrictions associated with the pandemic had significant adverse effects on movement behavior and well-being. Digital home exercise can help to maintain and/or increase health- beneficial PA and well-being and may hence represent a supportive element of viral containment efforts.