Refine
Document Type
- Working Paper (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Financial Advice (3) (remove)
We merge administrative information from a large German discount brokerage firm with regional data to examine if financial advisors improve portfolio performance. Our data track accounts of 32,751 randomly selected individual customers over 66 months and allow direct comparison of performance across self-managed accounts and accounts run by, or in consultation with, independent financial advisors. In contrast to the picture painted by simple descriptive statistics, econometric analysis that corrects for the endogeneity of the choice of having a financial advisor suggests that advisors are associated with lower total and excess account returns, higher portfolio risk and probabilities of losses, and higher trading frequency and portfolio turnover relative to what account owners of given characteristics tend to achieve on their own. Regression analysis of who uses an IFA suggests that IFAs are matched with richer, older investors rather than with poorer, younger ones.
In total, this dissertation comprises three research papers. Objective of all of these papers are to detect mistakes of private investors when conducting mutual funds investments and to analyze the implications. Moreover, the question is addressed whether financial advisors help private investors to avoid these investment mistakes. All three research papers use the same data base which has been provided by a German online brokerage house. The detailed data set allows contributing to existing literature on mutual fund investments, smart decision making, household finance as well as financial advice on an investor- and transaction-specific level. The first paper addresses the question which particular decision criteria private investors use when purchasing mutual funds. It can be shown that funds volume is the dominating decision criterion, whereas historical performance is only of minor importance. As performance persistence exists in the underlying data set, it can be concluded that the majority of investors make investment mistakes. In the second paper it is shown that smart investors, i.e. investors who purchase mutual funds by chasing historical performance, are older, wealthier, more experienced and less likely to be overconfident. In addition, it can be verified that there exists a positive impact of the ability to select mutual funds by chasing historical performance on the overall investment success. Hence, the quality of mutual fund selection ability is an ex-ante measure for investment success. Finally, the third paper analyzes the influence of financial advice on mutual fund decision making of private investments. Evidence can be provided that financial advisors do not help their customers to purchase mutual funds by chasing historical performance. In fact, advisors recommend high-volume mutual funds from well-known fund families. Apparently, financial advisors are much more salesmen than real advisors. These results hold when controlling for potential endogeneity issues.
We conduct a field experiment with clients of a German universal bank to explore the impact of peer information on sustainable retail investments. Our results show that infor-mation about peers’ inclination towards sustainable investing raises the amount allocated to stock funds labeled sustainable, when communicated during a buying decision. This effect is primarily driven by participants initially underestimating peers’ propensity to invest sustainably. Further, treated individuals indicate an increased interest in addi-tional information on sustainable investments, primarily on risk and return expectations. However, when analyzing account-level portfolio holding data over time, we detect no spillover effects of peer information on later sustainable investment decisions.