Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (16)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Preprint (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (18)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (18) (remove)
Keywords
- Oral anticoagulation (4)
- Primary care (4)
- Patients (3)
- Case management (2)
- Depression (2)
- Family practice (2)
- General practice (2)
- Multimorbidity (2)
- Quality of life (2)
- Anticoagulant therapy (1)
Institute
Background: Antithrombotic treatment is a continuous therapy that is often performed in general practice and requires careful safety management. The aim of this study is to investigate whether a best practice model that applies major elements of case management, including patient education, can improve antithrombotic management in primary health care in terms of reducing major thromboembolic and bleeding events.
Methods: This 24-month cluster-randomized trial will be performed in 690 adult patients from 46 practices. The trial intervention will be a complex intervention involving general practitioners, health care assistants and patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation. To assess adherence to medication and symptoms in patients, as well as to detect complications early, health care assistants will be trained in case management and will use the Coagulation-Monitoring-List (Co-MoL) to regularly monitor patients. Patients will receive information (leaflets and a video), treatment monitoring via the Co-MoL and be motivated to perform self-management. Patients in the control group will continue to receive treatment-as-usual from their general practitioners. The primary endpoint is the combined endpoint of all thromboembolic events requiring hospitalization, and all major bleeding complications. Secondary endpoints are mortality, hospitalization, strokes, major bleeding and thromboembolic complications, severe treatment interactions, the number of adverse events, quality of anticoagulation, health-related quality of life and costs. Further secondary objectives will be investigated to explain the mechanism by which the intervention is effective: patients' assessment of chronic illness care, self-reported adherence to medication, general practitioners' and health care assistants' knowledge, patients' knowledge and satisfaction with shared decision making. Practice recruitment is expected to take place between July and December 2012. Recruitment of eligible patients will start in July 2012. Assessment will occur at three time points: baseline (T0), follow-up after 12 (T1) and after 24 months (T2).
Discussion: The efficacy and effectiveness of individual elements of the intervention, such as antithrombotic interventions, self-management concepts in orally anticoagulated patients and the methodological tool, case-management, have already been extensively demonstrated. This project foresees the combination of several proven instruments, as a result of which we expect to profit from a reduction in the major complications associated with antithrombotic treatment.
Background: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) with coumarins and new anticoagulants are highly effective in preventing thromboembolic complications. However, some studies indicate that over- and under-treatment with anticoagulants are fairly common. The aim of this paper is to assess the appropriateness of treatment in patients with a long-term indication for OAC, and to describe the corresponding characteristics of such patients on the basis of screening results from the cluster randomized PICANT trial.
Methods: Randomly selected family practices in the federal state of Hesse, Germany, were visited by study team members. Eligible patients were screened using an anonymous patient list that was generated by the general practitioners? software according to predefined instructions. A documentation sheet was filled in for all screened patients. Eligible patients were classified into 3 categories (1: patients with a long-term indication for OAC and taking anticoagulants, 2: patients with a long-term indication for OAC but not taking anticoagulants, 3: patients without a long-term indication for OAC but taking an anticoagulant on a permanent basis). IBM SPSS Statistics 20 was used for descriptive statistical analysis.
Results: We screened 2,036 randomly selected, potentially eligible patients from 52 family practices. 275 patients could not be assigned to one of the 3 categories and were therefore not considered for analysis. The final study sample comprised 1,761 screened patients, 1,641 of whom belonged to category 1, 78 to category 2, and 42 to category 3. INR values were available for 1,504 patients of whom 1,013 presented INR values within their therapeutic ranges. The majority of screened patients had very good compliance, as assessed by the general practitioner. New antithrombotic drugs were prescribed in 6.1% of cases.
Conclusions: The screening results showed that a high proportion of patients were receiving appropriate anticoagulation therapy. The numbers of patients with a long-term indication for OAC therapy that were not receiving oral anticoagulants, and without a long-term indication that were receiving OAC, were considerably lower than expected. Most patients take coumarins, and the quality of OAC control is reasonably high.
Background: It is not well established how psychosocial factors like social support and depression affect health-related quality of life in multimorbid and elderly patients. We investigated whether depressive mood mediates the influence of social support on health-related quality of life.
Methods: Cross-sectional data of 3,189 multimorbid patients from the baseline assessment of the German MultiCare cohort study were used. Mediation was tested using the approach described by Baron and Kenny based on multiple linear regression, and controlling for socioeconomic variables and burden of multimorbidity.
Results: Mediation analyses confirmed that depressive mood mediates the influence of social support on health-related quality of life (Sobel's p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression showed that the influence of depressive mood (beta = -0.341, p < 0.01) on health-related quality of life is greater than the influence of multimorbidity (beta = -0.234, p < 0.01).
Conclusion: Social support influences health-related quality of life, but this association is strongly mediated by depressive mood. Depression should be taken into consideration in research on multimorbidity, and clinicians should be aware of its importance when caring for multimorbid patients.
Objective: The objective of this study was to describe and analyze the effects of depression on health care utilization and costs in a sample of multimorbid elderly patients.
Method: This cross-sectional analysis used data of a prospective cohort study, consisting of 1,050 randomly selected multimorbid primary care patients aged 65 to 85 years. Depression was defined as a score of six points or more on the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15). Subjects passed a geriatric assessment, including a questionnaire for health care utilization. The impact of depression on health care costs was analyzed using multiple linear regression models. A societal perspective was adopted.
Results: Prevalence of depression was 10.7%. Mean total costs per six-month period were €8,144 (95% CI: €6,199-€10,090) in patients with depression as compared to €3,137 (95% CI: €2,735-€3,538; p<0.001) in patients without depression. The positive association between depression and total costs persisted after controlling for socio-economic variables, functional status and level of multimorbidity. In particular, multiple regression analyses showed a significant positive association between depression and pharmaceutical costs.
Conclusion: Among multimorbid elderly patients, depression was associated with significantly higher health care utilization and costs. The effect of depression on costs was even greater than reported by previous studies conducted in less morbid patients.
Background: In primary care, patients with multiple chronic conditions are the rule rather than the exception. The Chronic Care Model (CCM) is an evidence-based framework for improving chronic illness care, but little is known about the extent to which it has been implemented in routine primary care. The aim of this study was to describe how multimorbid older patients assess the routine chronic care they receive in primary care practices in Germany, and to explore the extent to which factors at both the practice and patient level determine their views.
Methods: This cross-sectional study used baseline data from an observational cohort study involving 158 general practitioners (GP) and 3189 multimorbid patients. Standardized questionnaires were employed to collect data, and the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire used to assess the quality of care received. Multilevel hierarchical modeling was used to identify any existing association between the dependent variable, PACIC, and independent variables at the patient level (socio-economic factors, weighted count of chronic conditions, instrumental activities of daily living, health-related quality of life, graded chronic pain, no. of contacts with GP, existence of a disease management program (DMP) disease, self-efficacy, and social support) and the practice level (age and sex of GP, years in current practice, size and type of practice).
Results: The overall mean PACIC score was 2.4 (SD 0.8), with the mean subscale scores ranging from 2.0 (SD 1.0, subscale goal setting/tailoring) to 3.5 (SD 0.7, delivery system design). At the patient level, higher PACIC scores were associated with a DMP disease, more frequent GP contacts, higher social support, and higher autonomy of past occupation. At the practice level, solo practices were associated with higher PACIC values than other types of practice.
Conclusions: This study shows that from the perspective of multimorbid patients receiving care in German primary care practices, the implementation of structured care and counseling could be improved, particularly by helping patients set specific goals, coordinating care, and arranging follow-up contacts. Studies evaluating chronic care should take into consideration that a patient’s assessment is associated not only with practice-level factors, but also with individual, patient-level factors.
Introduction: In this article three research questions are addressed: (1) Is there an association between socioeconomic status (SES) and patient-reported outcomes in a cohort of multimorbid patients? (2) Does the association vary according to SES indicator used (income, education, occupational position)? (3) Can the association between SES and patient-reported outcomes (self-rated health, health-related quality of life and functional status) be (partly) explained by burden of disease?
Methods: Analyses are based on the MultiCare Cohort Study, a German multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study of multimorbid patients from general practice. We analysed baseline data and data from the first follow-up after 15 months (N = 2,729). To assess burden of disease we used the patients’ morbidity data from standardized general practitioner (GP) interviews based on a list of 46 groups of chronic conditions including the GP’s severity rating of each chronic condition ranging from marginal to very severe.
Results: In the cross-sectional analyses SES was significantly associated with the patient-reported outcomes at baseline. Associations with income were more consistent and stronger than with education and occupational position. Associations were partly explained (17% to 44%) by burden of disease. In the longitudinal analyses only income (but not education and occupational position) was significantly related to the patient-reported outcomes at follow-up. Associations between income and the outcomes were reduced by 18% to 27% after adjustment for burden of disease.
Conclusions: Results indicate social inequalities in self-rated health, functional status and health related quality of life among older multimorbid patients. As associations with education and occupational position were inconsistent, these inequalities were mainly due to income. Inequalities were partly explained by burden of disease. However, even among patients with a similar disease burden, those with a low income were worse off in terms of the three patient-reported outcomes under study.
Hintergrund: Die Delegation ärztlicher Leistungen an nichtärztliches medizinisches Fachpersonal wird in Deutschland vor dem Hintergrund eines absehbaren Hausärztemangels bei gleichzeitig wachsendem Bedarf an hausärztlichen Betreuungsleistungen seit einiger Zeit diskutiert. Inzwischen wurden unterschiedliche Qualifikationsmodelle für Medizinische Fachangestellte (MFA) (z.B. die Versorgungs-assistentin in der Hausarztpraxis, VERAH) konzipiert und implementiert, die für eine Delegation von Leistungen qualifizieren. VERAH sind v.a. in Baden-Württemberg in Hausarztpraxen tätig, da deren Einsatz dort im Rahmen der Hausarztzentrierten Versorgung (HzV) seit 2008 finanziell honoriert wird. Dabei ist es den Praxen freigestellt, wie sie das VERAH-Konzept und damit auch die Delegation umsetzen. Auch gesetzliche Vorgaben zur Delegation lassen erheblichen Spielraum bei der Umsetzung. Erschwerend kommt hinzu, dass weiterhin Unklarheit darüber besteht, welche Leistungsübertragung als „Delegation“ und welche eher als „Substitution“ zu verstehen ist.
Zielrichtung der Arbeit: Ziel dieser publikationsbasierten Dissertation ist eine Darstellung der Formen und Graduierungen von Delegation, d.h. der tatsächlichen Umsetzung von Leistungsübertragung in der Hausarztpraxis am Beispiel der VERAH in Baden-Württemberg. Es können Empfehlungen für das Gelingen der Delegation aus der Analyse von Ergebnissen auf Patienten-, Praxis- und Teamebene abgeleitet werden.
Resultate: Diese Dissertation basiert auf sechs Publikationen, die im Rahmen von zwei Projekten zur Evaluation des VERAH-Einsatzes in der HzV in Baden-Württemberg entstanden. Die Evaluationen basieren auf einem Mixed Methods-Design, d.h. auf der Analyse von querschnittlich erhobenen quantitativen Daten sowie qualitativen Daten zu verschiedenen Fragen des VERAH-Einsatzes.
Es existiert ein breites Spektrum an Formen und Graduierungen der Delegation in Hausarztpraxen, die am HzV-Modell teilnehmen. VERAH übernehmen einerseits supplementäre (zusätzliche) ärztliche Tätigkeiten, wie z.B. Geriatrisches Assessment oder Impfberatungen, aber auch komplementäre (ergänzende) Tätigkeiten wie z.B. die Beratung der Angehörigen zu Hilfeleistungen im Gesundheitssystem. Vor allem im Rahmen von Hausbesuchen üben VERAH auch substituierende (ersetzende) Funktionen
aus. Auf Patientenseite sind gerade ältere, multimorbide und pflegebedürftige Patienten Empfänger delegierter Leistungen. Sie erhalten eine umfassende Betreuung und werden beim Erhalt ihrer häuslichen Selbständigkeit unterstützt. Die Patienten sehen in der VERAH eine zusätzliche Vertrauensperson in der Praxis und akzeptieren sie als kompetente Ansprechpartnerin. Die Hausärzte profitieren durch die Delegation von Tätigkeiten an VERAH, indem sie entlastet werden und Zeit für wichtige medizinische Aufgaben gewinnen. Für VERAH stellt die Delegation eine Erweiterung ihrer Tätigkeits- und Kompetenzbereiche dar und kann insofern als ein Schritt zur Professionalisierung des nichtärztlichen Personals einer Hausarztpraxis gelten.
Viele Faktoren, die zum Gelingen einer Umsetzung der Delegation beitragen, können vom hausärztlichen Team selbst beeinflusst werden. Darunter fallen das Engagement der MFA, die Qualifikation, zeitliche Flexibilität, ausreichend Gestaltungsspielraum, Grad der Autonomie, Abgrenzung des Verantwortungsbereiches und auch adäquates Equipment. Entsprechend richten sich die hier formulierten Empfehlungen meist an die Praxis, aber auch an den Gesetzgeber.
Bedeutung für die übergeordnete Fragestellung: Die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit zeigen, dass mit dem VERAH-Konzept erste Ansätze einer teambasierten Versorgung vorhanden sind, und dass sich die Analyse dieses Konzeptes eignet, um Desiderata für die Zukunft von Delegation (haus-)ärztlicher Leistungen an nichtärztliches Personal formulieren zu können. Teambasierte Ansätze bedürfen, wie auch internationale Beispiele verdeutlichen, einer Weiterentwicklung der bestehenden Delegationskonzepte in deutschen Hausarztpraxen. Idealerweise mündet eine mit Delegation einhergehende Aufgaben- und Rollenneuverteilung in einer Betreuungsform, in der alle Teammitglieder entsprechend ihrer Qualifikation an der Versorgung der Patienten in der Hausarztpraxis beteiligt sind. Daher kommt die Einbindung von Pflegekräften in die hausärztliche Versorgung genauso in Frage, wie auch speziell ausgebildete VERAH/MFA. In jedem Fall sollte über Schritte der Professionalisierung nichtärztlicher Berufsgruppen nachgedacht werden. Ob sich in Deutschland, wie in den USA und in Kanada, aus diesen Delegationskonzepten im Laufe der Zeit Substitution (im Sinne der Verantwortungsübertragung an nichtärztliche Berufsgruppen) entwickelt, bleibt abzuwarten. Die Ergebnisse der Dissertation zeigen, dass es mit der gegenwärtigen Umsetzung der Delegation an VERAH zu einer Erweiterung des Leistungsspektrums in den Hausarztpraxen kommen kann; eine Ausweitung der Delegation sollte jedoch zeitnah vorangetrieben werden.
Background: Expected growth in the demand for health services has generated interest in the more effective deployment of health care assistants. Programs encouraging German general practitioners (GPs) to share responsibility for care with specially qualified health care assistants in the family practice (VERAHs) have existed for several years. But no studies have been conducted on the tasks German GPs are willing to rely on specially qualified personnel to perform, what they are prepared to delegate to all non-physician practice staff and what they prefer to do themselves.
Methods: As part of an evaluation study on the deployment of VERAHs in GP-centered health care, we used a questionnaire to ask about task delegation within the practice team. From a list of tasks that VERAHs are specifically trained to carry out, GPs were asked to indicate which they actually delegate. We also asked GPs why they had employed a VERAH in their practice and for their opinions on the benefits and limitations of assigning tasks to VERAHs. The aim of the study was to find out which tasks GPs delegate to their specially qualified personnel, which they permit all HCAs to carry out, and which tasks they do not delegate at all.
Results: The survey was filled in and returned by 245 GPs (83%). Some tasks were exclusively delegated to VERAHs (e.g. home visits), while others were delegated to all HCAs (e.g. vaccinations). About half the GPs rated the assessment of mental health, as part of the comprehensive assessment of a patient’s condition, as the sole responsibility of a GP.
The possibility to delegate more complex tasks was the main reason given for employing a VERAH. Doctors said the delegation of home visits provided them with the greatest relief.
Conclusions: In Germany, where GPs are solely accountable for the health care provided in their practices, experience with the transfer of responsibility to other non-physician health care personnel is still very limited. When HCAs have undergone special training, GPs seem to be prepared to delegate tasks that demand a substantial degree of know-how, such as home visits and case management. This “new” role allocation within the practice may signal a shift in the provision of health care by family practice teams in Germany.
Background: Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) is a challenge in general practice, especially for high-risk groups such as the elderly. Insufficient patient knowledge about safety-relevant aspects of OAT is considered to be one of the main reasons for complications. The research question addressed in this manuscript is whether a complex intervention that includes practice-based case management, self-management of OAT and additional patient and practice team education improves patient knowledge about anticoagulation therapy compared to a control group of patients receiving usual care (as a secondary objective of the Primary Care Management for Optimised Antithrombotic Treatment (PICANT) trial).
Methods: The cluster-randomised controlled PICANT trial was conducted in 52 general practices in Germany, between 2012 and 2015. Trial participants were patients with a long-term indication for oral anticoagulation. A questionnaire was used to assess knowledge at baseline, after 12, and after 24 months. The questionnaire consists of 13 items (with a range of 0 to 13 sum-score points) covering topics related to intervention. Differences in the development of patient knowledge between intervention and control groups compared to baseline were assessed for each follow-up by means of linear mixed-effects models.
Results: Seven hundred thirty-six patients were included at baseline, of whom 95.4% continued to participate after 12 months, and 89.3% after 24 months. The average age of patients was 73.5 years (SD 9.4), and they mainly suffered from atrial fibrillation (81.1%). Patients in the intervention and control groups had similar knowledge about oral anticoagulation at baseline (5.6 (SD 2.3) in both groups). After 12 months, the improvement in the level of knowledge (compared to baseline) was significantly larger in the intervention group than in the control group (0.78 (SD 2.5) vs. 0.04 (SD 2.3); p = 0.0009). After 24 months, the difference between both groups was still statistically significant (0.6 (SD 2.6) vs. -0.3 (SD 2.3); p = 0.0001).
Conclusion: Since this intervention was effective, it should be established in general practice as a means of improving patient knowledge about oral anticoagulation.
Trial registration: Current controlled trials ISRCTN41847489; Date of registration: 13/04/2012
Purpose: Collaborative care is effective in improving symptoms of patients with depression. The aims of this study were to characterize symptom trajectories in patients with major depression during one year of collaborative care and to explore associations between baseline characteristics and symptom trajectories.
Methods: We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial in primary care. The collaborative care intervention comprised case management and behavioral activation. We used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to assess symptom severity as the primary outcome. Statistical analyses comprised latent growth mixture modeling and a hierarchical binary logistic regression model.
Results: We included 74 practices and 626 patients (310 intervention and 316 control recipients) at baseline. Based on a minimum of 12 measurement points for each intervention recipient, we identified two latent trajectories, which we labeled "fast improvers" (60.5%) and "slow improvers" (39.5%). At all measurements after baseline, "fast improvers" presented higher PHQ mean values than "slow improvers". At baseline, "fast improvers" presented fewer physical conditions, higher health-related quality of life, and had made fewer suicide attempts in their history.
Conclusions: A notable proportion of 39.5% of patients improved only "slowly" and probably needed more intense treatment. The third follow-up in month two could well be a sensible time to adjust treatment to support "slow improvers".