Refine
Year of publication
- 2016 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3) (remove)
Keywords
- Ecological speciation (2)
- Animal personality (1)
- Assortative mating (1)
- Gambusia (1)
- Hydrogen sulfide (1)
- Life-history evolution (1)
- Local adaptation (1)
- Mate choice (1)
- Morphometrics (1)
- Poecilia (1)
Institute
- Institut für Ökologie, Evolution und Diversität (3) (remove)
Invasive non-native species are key components of human-induced global environmen-tal change and lead to a loss of biodiversity, alterations of species interactions and changes of ecosystem services. Freshwater ecosystems in particular are strongly affect-ed by biological invasions, since they are spatially restricted environments and often already heavily impacted by anthropogenic activities. Recent human-induced species invasions are often characterized by long-distance dispersal, with many species having extended their native distribution range within a very short time frame. However, a long term view into the past shows that biological invasions are common phenomena in nature—representing the arrival of a species into a location in which it did not originally evolve—as a result of climatic changes, geotectonic activity or other natural events. Once a species arrives in a new habitat, it may experience an array of novel selection pressures resulting from abiotic and biotic environmental factors and simultaneously act as a novel selective agent on the native fauna. Consequences of species invasions are manifold. My thesis, which combines seven studies on different aspects of biological invasions, aims to explore the influence of abiotic stressors and biotic interactions during species introductions and range expansions, as well as the consequences of biological invasions on evolutionary and ecosystem processes.
The first part of my thesis examines human-induced biological invasions, dealing with basic ecological characteristics of invaded ecosystems, novel predator-prey interactions, functional consequences of species invasions and certain behavioral traits that may contribute to the invasiveness of some species. The second part of my thesis examined distribution patterns and phenotypic trait divergence in species that historically invaded new geographical areas. I investigated variation of abiotic and biotic selection factors along a stream gradient as well as ecological and evolutionary consequences of species invasions to extreme habitats. The results highlight the importance of simultaneously considering processes involved in natural invasions and during human-induced invasions to understand the success of invading species.
We often lack detailed information on the impacts of historical biological inva-sions. Also, we are currently lacking crucial knowledge about the time scales during which different mechanisms (behavioral flexibility, plastic phenotypic changes, and ge-netic adaptation) play a role during biological invasions and affect species exchange and establishment. Comparative analyses of historical, natural invasion and recent (man-made) invasions can provide insights into the relative importance of the processes governing adaptation to abiotic stressors and selection resulting from biotic interactions. Beyond their negative effects, the establishment of invasive species and the subsequent range expansion represent “natural experiments” to investigate fundamental questions in ecology and evolution. My comparison of natural and human-induced biological invasions revealed that in many cases preadaptation to altered abiotic conditions plays a key role during early stages of invasions and range expansions. Considering the evolutionary history of invasive species and the evolutionary history of the recipient native fauna might therefore help predict the consequences of biological invasions for the ecosystem under consideration and the future success of the invading species. This knowledge can also be implemented when formulating conservation strategies, including methods to mitigate and manage human-induced biological invasions.
Background: Replicate population pairs that diverge in response to similar selective regimes allow for an investigation of (a) whether phenotypic traits diverge in a similar and predictable fashion, (b) whether there is gradual variation in phenotypic divergence reflecting variation in the strength of natural selection among populations, (c) whether the extent of this divergence is correlated between multiple character suites (i.e., concerted evolution), and (d) whether gradual variation in phenotypic divergence predicts the degree of reproductive isolation, pointing towards a role for adaptation as a driver of (ecological) speciation. Here, we use poeciliid fishes of the genera Gambusia and Poecilia that have repeatedly evolved extremophile lineages able to tolerate high and sustained levels of toxic hydrogen sulfide (H2S) to answer these questions.
Results: We investigated evolutionary divergence in response to H2S in Gambusia spp. (and to a lesser extent Poecilia spp.) using a multivariate approach considering the interplay of life history, body shape, and population genetics (nuclear miscrosatellites to infer population genetic differentiation as a proxy for reproductive isolation). We uncovered both shared and unique patterns of evolution: most extremophile Gambusia predictably evolved larger heads and offspring size, matching a priori predictions for adaptation to sulfidic waters, while variation in adult life histories was idiosyncratic. When investigating patterns for both genera (Gambusia and Poecilia), we found that divergence in offspring-related life histories and body shape were positively correlated across populations, but evidence for individual-level associations between the two character suites was limited, suggesting that genetic linkage, developmental interdependencies, or pleiotropic effects do not explain patterns of concerted evolution. We further found that phenotypic divergence was positively correlated with both environmental H2S-concentration and neutral genetic differentiation (a proxy for gene flow).
Conclusions: Our results suggest that higher toxicity exerts stronger selection, and that divergent selection appears to constrain gene flow, supporting a scenario of ecological speciation. Nonetheless, progress toward ecological speciation was variable, partially reflecting variation in the strength of divergent selection, highlighting the complexity of selective regimes even in natural systems that are seemingly governed by a single, strong selective agent.
Background: One aspect of premating isolation between diverging, locally-adapted population pairs is female mate choice for resident over alien male phenotypes. Mating preferences often show considerable individual variation, and whether or not certain individuals are more likely to contribute to population interbreeding remains to be studied. In the Poecilia mexicana-species complex different ecotypes have adapted to hydrogen sulfide (H2S)-toxic springs, and females from adjacent non-sulfidic habitats prefer resident over sulfide-adapted males. We asked if consistent individual differences in behavioral tendencies (animal personality) predict the strength and direction of the mate choice component of premating isolation in this system.
Results: We characterized focal females for their personality and found behavioral measures of ‘novel object exploration’, ‘boldness’ and ‘activity in an unknown area’ to be highly repeatable. Furthermore, the interaction term between our measures of exploration and boldness affected focal females’ strength of preference (SOP) for the resident male phenotype in dichotomous association preference tests. High exploration tendencies were coupled with stronger SOPs for resident over alien mating partners in bold, but not shy, females. Shy and/or little explorative females had an increased likelihood of preferring the non-resident phenotype and thus, are more likely to contribute to rare population hybridization. When we offered large vs. small conspecific stimulus males instead, less explorative females showed stronger preferences for large male body size. However, this effect disappeared when the size difference between the stimulus males was small.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that personality affects female mate choice in a very nuanced fashion. Hence, population differences in the distribution of personality types could be facilitating or impeding reproductive isolation between diverging populations depending on the study system and the male trait(s) upon which females base their mating decisions, respectively.