Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (17)
- Working Paper (7)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Preprint (1)
- Report (1)
Language
- German (14)
- English (11)
- Turkish (2)
- Multiple languages (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (28) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (28) (remove)
Keywords
- Evaluation (28) (remove)
Institute
- Medizin (9)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (9)
- Biochemie und Chemie (1)
- Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Geographie (1)
- Geowissenschaften (1)
- Psychologie (1)
- Psychologie und Sportwissenschaften (1)
Ölçme ve değerlendirme birçok alanda olduğu gibi yabancı dil öğretiminde de büyük bir öneme sahiptir. Ölçme işlemi, öğrenciye not vermenin yanı sıra öğretim sürecinin, programın, yöntemin etkililiği gibi birçok amaç için de yapılmaktadır. Öğretim sürecinin etkililiğini belirlemek için ise amaca hizmet eden ölçme araçlarının hazırlanması önemli bir unsurdur. Almanca dilbilgisi dersinin ölçme sürecinde genellikle boşluk doldurma, eşleştirme gibi ölçme teknikleri kullanılmaktadır. Ancak bu özellikteki ölçme araçları, dilin biçimsel yönünün ölçülmesini sağlarken; dilin kullanım yönünü ölçmede yetersiz kalmaktadır. Bu bağlamda bu çalışmanın amacı Almanca dilbilgisi derslerinde etkili bir ölçme ve değerlendirme yapabilmek için kullanılan ölçme araçlarının hangi özelliklere sahip olması gerektiği, ölçme aracı hazırlarken soruların nitelikleri, yapısı, ölçme aracının amaca hizmet etmesi için hangi özelliklere sahip olması gerektiğine ilişkin önerilerde bulunmaktır. Çalışmanın sonucunda ölçme ve değerlendirme sürecine işlevsellik kazandırmak amacıyla alternatif ölçme araçlarının kullanılması gerektiği vurgulanarak Almanca dilbilgisi dersinin ölçme ve değerlendirme aşamasında kullanılabilecek alternatif ölçme ve değerlendirme tekniklerine ilişkin önerilerde bulunulmuştur.
Background: The purpose of this pilot study was to create a valid and reliable set of assessment questions for examining Evidence-based Dentistry (EbD) knowledge. For this reason, we adapted and validated for dental students the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ), which assesses Evidence-based Medicine (EbM) abilities.
Methods: The Berlin Questionnaire was validated with medical residents. We adapted it for use in a dentistry setting. An expert panel reviewed the adapted BQ for content validity. A cross-sectional cohort representing four training levels (EbD-novice dental students, EbD-trained dental students, dentists, and EbM−/EbD-expert faculty) completed the questionnaire. A total of 140 participants comprised the validation set. Internal reliability, item difficulty and item discrimination were assessed. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the mean total scores of students to faculty and comparing proportions of students and faculty who passed each item.
Results: Among the 133 participants (52 EbD-novice dental students, 53 EbD-trained dental students, 12 dentists, and 16 EbM-/ EbD-expert faculty), a statistically significant (p < 0.001) difference was evident in the total score corresponding to the training level. The total score reliability and psychometric properties of items modified for discipline-specific content were acceptable. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.648.
Conclusion: The adapted Berlin Questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument to assess competence in Evidence-based Dentistry in dental students. Future research will focus on refining the instrument further.
Spielfilme stellen für die meisten Lernenden ein attraktives Medium dar, das ein großes Potenzial für sprachliches, interkulturelles, filmästhetisches sowie mediales Lernen besitzt. In der Fremdsprachendidaktik wurden exakte Kriterien für die Filmauswahl sowie vielfältige Methoden zum produktiven Umgang mit Film-werken entwickelt. Trotzdem werden Spielfilme im schulischen Fremdsprachenunterricht relativ selten eingesetzt und noch seltener evaluiert. Das Ziel des vor-liegenden Beitrags ist deshalb, neben einer theoretischen Auseinandersetzung mit der Filmdidaktik, Evaluationsergebnisse eines schulischen Filmprojekts anzwei PASCH-Schulen und zwei deutschen bilingualen Gymnasien in der Slowakei zu präsentieren. Mittels didaktischer Tests wurden Effekte der Filmarbeit auf die Wortschatzerweiterung, den Ausbau des kulturspezifischen Hintergrundwissens sowie den Einfluss auf die "Filmlesefähigkeit" erhoben. Überdies wurden mit je-der Schülergruppe Interviews zu subjektiven Lernerfahrungen durchgeführt. Die Testergebnisse weisen auf positive Effekte hin, die durch die qualitativen Daten noch differenzierter betrachtet werden können.
In der vorliegenden Evaluationsstudie wurde die Wirkung der Lehre des universitären Lehrprojektes ‚Expertise und Kooperation für eine Basisqualifikation Inklusion‘ (EKBI) auf inklusionsbezogene Einstellungen, Haltungen und Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen untersucht. Diese Lehre schloss jeweils Lehrtandems aus mindestens zwei Dozierenden sowie interdisziplinäre Kooperationen ein. Die Teilnehmenden der Kurse (Experimentalgruppe, n = 101) sowie Studierende, die nicht daran teilgenommen hatten (Kontrollgruppe, n = 54), wurden vor und nach dem Semester, in dem die Lehre stattfand, mittels Fragebogen untersucht. Bei der Entwicklung allgemeinerer Einstellungen, Haltungen und Bedenken konnte kein signifikanter Effekt der Zeit in Abhängigkeit von der Gruppe verzeichnet werden. Es zeigte sich aber, dass sowohl die spezifischen unterrichtsbezogenen Einstellungen als auch die subjektiv eingeschätzte Lehrer*innenwirksamkeit in Bezug auf Inklusion in der Experimentalgruppe stärker anstiegen als in der Kontrollgruppe. Es ist zu schlussfolgern, dass die Tandemlehre mindestens kurzfristig wirksam in Bezug auf eine proinklusive Entwicklung ist. Zukünftige Studien könnten die Nachhaltigkeit der Effekte sowie ihren Praxistransfer untersuchen.
Hintergrund: Bislang fehlen umfassende Daten zu Evaluationspraktiken und Leistungsorientierter Mittelvergabe (LOM) in der Lehre für die deutschen medizinischen Fakultäten. Vor diesem Hintergrund haben sich die Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e.V. (AWMF) und der Medizinische Fakultätentag (MFT) das gemeinsame Ziel gesetzt, die Praxis der Evaluationen und LOM in der Lehre (LOM-Lehre) an den medizinischen Fakultäten in Deutschland zu analysieren.
Methoden: Die Datenerhebung erfolgte mittels Fragebogen, der an alle medizinischen Fakultäten in Deutschland gesandt wurde.
Ergebnisse: An der Befragung nahmen 30 Fakultäten mit insgesamt 33 Studiengängen teil (Rücklauf: 83%). Die an den Fakultäten eingesetzten Erhebungsinstrumente erfassen vorrangig strukturelle und prozedurale Aspekte sowie einen Gesamteindruck der Lehre. Zwischen den Fakultäten herrscht bezüglich der verwendeten Instrumente eine recht hohe Heterogenität. Teilweise bleibt unklar, inwiefern die Erhebungsinstrumente internationalen Qualitätsstandards genügen. Die finanzielle Honorierung der Lehre erfolgt überwiegend im Rahmen der Grundausstattung bzw. nach Kriterien der Lehr-Quantität. Qualitätsbasierte Mittelzuweisung spielt eine eher untergeordnete Rolle.
Schlussfolgerung: Eine möglichst bundesweite Konsentierung eines Leitbilds guter Lehre sowie die Identifikation bzw. Entwicklung valider und reliabler Erhebungsinstrumente in deutschlandweiter Zusammenarbeit scheint erstrebenswert und würde eine Weiterentwicklung der gültigen LOM-Lehre darstellen.
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the acceptance and assessment of work shadowing carried out by students and dentists in dental practices. Furthermore, the extent to which students perceive an improvement in their specialised, communication and social competencies, was to be examined.
Methods: 61 dental students in their clinical semesters at a German university participated in work shadowing placements at 27 different general dental practices. Before beginning, they received checklists of various competencies that they self-assessed using school grades (from 1 = "very good", to 6 = "failed"), which they also repeated after completion. The dentists supplemented this with their external assessments. In addition, the students were requested to fill out a 54-item questionnaire and compose a freely-structured report after the work shadowing; the dentists filled out a questionnaire containing 16 items. The statistical analysis was carried out by means of the Friedman Test, including a post-hoc test (Bonferroni-Holm correction).
Results: The analysis showed a significant overall improvement in the students’ self-assessed competencies by 0.71* ± 0.43 grades. With an average of 0.33* ± 0.36, the dentists’ external assessment proved significantly higher than the self-assessment. The greatest improvements were perceived by the students in the areas of accounting (1.17* ± 0.77), practice organisation (1.05* ± 0.61) and dentist’s discussions (0.94* ±0.80) [*p < 0.05]. The students confirmed experiencing an expansion of knowledge, an improvement in their communication skills and indicated a high degree of satisfaction in regard to the dentists (school grade 1.58 ± 0.93). A maximum amount of satisfaction towards the work shadow students was demonstrated by the dentists, and this form of teaching was assessed with a school grade of 1.69 ± 0.89.
Conclusion: Both students and dental practitioners demonstrated a high level of satisfaction in regard to the work shadowing. The students felt their knowledge had increased, viewed the dentists as motivating role models and acknowledged a significant improvement in their specialised, communication and social competencies. Work shadowing in dental teaching practices presents a sensible addition to academic teaching at a university.
Background: In Germany, patients suffering from life-limiting conditions are eligible for specialized outpatient palliative care (SOPC). Evaluation of the quality of this service lacks currently integration of patient-relevant outcomes. There is also no scientific consensus how to prove quality of care in the special context of SOPC adequately. Existing quality reports are primarily based on descriptive structural data which do not allow for estimation of process quality or result quality. The ELSAH study ("Evaluation of Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care in the German state of Hesse") aims to choose - or, if necessary, to adopt - to evaluate and to implement a suit of measures to assess, evaluate and monitor the quality of specialized, home-based palliative care.
Methods: All 22 SOPC teams providing their services in the state of Hesse, Germany, participate in the ELSAH study. The study is divided in two phases: a preparation phase and a main study phase. Based on the findings of the preparation phase we have chosen a preliminary set of instruments including the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale, Views on Care, Zarit Burden Interview, Phase of Illness, Goal Attainment Scaling, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, Consumer Quality Indices Palliative Care and Sense of Security in Care. During the main study phase, we will use a mixed-methods approach to evaluate the instruments’ psychometric properties (reliability, validity, feasibility and practicability), to identify barriers, facilitators and limitations of their routine use and to explore how their use affects the care within the SOPC setting.
Discussion: At the end of this study, an outcome- and patient-centered, validated measurement approach should be provided, adapted for standardized evaluations in SOPC across patient groups, palliative care services and regions nationwide. The standardized application of instruments should allow for making valid statements and comparisons of health care quality in SOPC based on process- and outcome-evaluation rather than relying on structural data only. Moreover, the instruments might directly influence the care of patients in palliative situations.
Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00012421).
Kinder aus zugewanderten Familien und aus den unteren Sozialschichten haben es an deutschen Schulen schwer. Zu ihrer Unterstützung werden vielfältige Fördermaßnahmen angeboten. Welche Art der Förderung insbesondere Familien mit Migrationshintergrund benötigen, wird in der vorliegenden Schrift besprochen.
Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage wurde ein Familien-Bildungsprogramm - mittels qualitativer und quantitativer Erhebungsmethoden - evaluiert. In dem Programm werden Familien über die Dauer von zwei Jahren (im Übergang von der 4. in die 5. Klasse) eng begleitet. Das vielfältige Unterstützungsangebot ist dahingehend ausgerichtet, die teilnehmenden Kinder auf ihrem schulischen Weg zu unterstützen. Ebenso möchte das Programm zur Erhöhung der gesellschaftlichen Teilhabe der Familien beitragen.
Erhebliche Leistungsfortschritte erreichen fast alle Kinder im Kompetenzbereich Lesen. Besonders die leistungsschwächeren Kinder haben von der Förderung profitiert. Auch die Rechtschreibkompetenzen haben sich im Schnitt verbessert. Das schulbezogene Fähigkeitsselbstkonzept der Kinder sowie ihre Lern- und Leistungsmotivation bleibt von der Förderung relativ unbeeinflusst. Die Eltern profitieren insbesondere von dem Zugewinn einer konstanten Ansprechperson. Es gelingt den Mitarbeiterinnen ein Stützungs-Setting aufzubauen, welches den Eltern Sicherheit vermittelt und sie zuversichtlicher werden lässt. Daneben wurde eine Reihe differentieller Wirksamkeiten ermittelt (wie Entlastung, Aktivierung, Qualifizierung). Das Ausmaß der Wirksamkeit wird durch spezielle Bedingungen - auf Seite der Teilnehmer und auf Seite der Ausführenden - moderiert.
Die vorliegenden Ergebnisse werden mit Bezug auf Implikationen für die Praxis (in Schulen und Bildungsprogrammen) diskutiert.
Background: There is general consensus that the organizational and administrative aspects of academic study programs exert an important influence on teaching and learning. Despite this, no comprehensive framework currently exists to describe the conditions that affect the quality of teaching and learning in medical education. The aim of this paper is to systematically and comprehensively identify these factors to offer academic administrators and decision makers interested in improving teaching a theory-based and, to an extent, empirically founded framework on the basis of which improvements in teaching quality can be identified and implemented.
Method: Primarily, the issue was addressed by combining a theory-driven deductive approach with an experience based, “best evidence” one during the course of two workshops held by the GMA Committee on Personnel and Organizational Development in Academic Teaching (POiL) in Munich (2013) and Frankfurt (2014). Two models describing the conditions relevant to teaching and learning (Euler/Hahn and Rindermann) were critically appraised and synthesized into a new third model. Practical examples of teaching strategies that promote or hinder learning were compiled and added to the categories of this model and, to the extent possible, supported with empirical evidence.
Based on this, a checklist with recommendations for optimizing general academic conditions was formulated.
Results: The Frankfurt Model of conditions to ensure Quality in Teaching and Learning covers six categories: organizational structure/medical school culture, regulatory frameworks, curricular requirements, time constraints, material and personnel resources, and qualification of teaching staff. These categories have been supplemented by the interests, motives and abilities of the actual teachers and students in this particular setting. The categories of this model provide the structure for a checklist in which recommendations for optimizing teaching are given.
Conclusions: The checklist derived from the Frankfurt Model for ensuring quality in teaching and learning can be used for quality assurance and to improve the conditions under which teaching and learning take place in medical schools.
Mistral and tramontane wind speed and wind direction patterns in regional climate simulations
(2016)
The Mistral and Tramontane are important wind phenomena that occur over southern France and the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Both winds travel through constricting valleys before flowing out towards the Mediterranean Sea. The Mistral and Tramontane are thus interesting phenomena, and represent an opportunity to study channeling effects, as well as the interactions between the atmosphere and land/ocean surfaces. This study investigates Mistral and Tramontane simulations using five regional climate models with grid spacing of about 50 km and smaller. All simulations are driven by ERA-Interim reanalysis data. Spatial patterns of surface wind, as well as wind development and error propagation along the wind tracks from inland France to offshore during Mistral and Tramontane events, are presented and discussed. To disentangle the results from large-scale error sources in Mistral and Tramontane simulations, only days with well simulated large-scale sea level pressure field patterns are evaluated. Comparisons with the observations show that the large-scale pressure patterns are well simulated by the considered models, but the orographic modifications to the wind systems are not well simulated by the coarse-grid simulations (with a grid spacing of about 50 km), and are reproduced slightly better by the higher resolution simulations. On days with Mistral and/or Tramontane events, most simulations underestimate (by 13 % on average) the wind speed over the Mediterranean Sea. This effect is strongest at the lateral borders of the main flow—the flow width is underestimated. All simulations of this study show a clockwise wind direction bias over the sea during Mistral and Tramontane events. Simulations with smaller grid spacing show smaller biases than their coarse-grid counterparts.