Refine
Year of publication
- 2012 (1)
Document Type
Language
- English (1) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (1) (remove)
Keywords
- Law epistemology (1) (remove)
Institute
- Rechtswissenschaft (1) (remove)
The process of finding evidence of what truthfully happened in a conflictive situation interests jurists and journalists but in different ways. When the work of journalists and judges are concerned the paradox is at stake. Both categories must tell a story about a conflict must listen to all involved, must inform what happened to the general public. Although both categories must use the freedom must use the freedom of speech their point of view about something with objectivity, their timing is different as well as the process and the effect of fulfilling their task. That question that should be made is what happen to law when it becomes the subject matter to the news in the world of full information? In what measurement journalists also pass judgements and how this affects the formal processes of law? The effort to answer these questions and the ones related to them is important to understand some of the problems that must be approached in order to establish the ways of law and of the mass media technological society.