Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (3230) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (1487)
- Part of Periodical (421)
- Book (274)
- Part of a Book (208)
- Doctoral Thesis (204)
- Contribution to a Periodical (195)
- Review (146)
- Working Paper (132)
- Preprint (75)
- Conference Proceeding (49)
Language
- English (1776)
- German (1342)
- Portuguese (35)
- Spanish (18)
- French (17)
- Multiple languages (17)
- Turkish (13)
- Italian (6)
- Ukrainian (2)
- Hebrew (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3230) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3230) (remove)
Keywords
- taxonomy (61)
- Geschichte (52)
- Begriff (51)
- Deutsch (48)
- new species (38)
- Literatur (34)
- Übersetzung (20)
- Financial Institutions (17)
- Fremdsprachenunterricht (17)
- Vormärz (16)
Institute
- Medizin (520)
- Präsidium (304)
- Physik (224)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (179)
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (129)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (117)
- Biowissenschaften (106)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (102)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS) (97)
- Neuere Philologien (89)
Der vorliegende Band befasst sich mit Formen und Techniken der erzählerischen Vermittlung von Räumlichkeit. Ein Fokus der hier versammelten Aufsätze liegt auf der Darstellung des Raumtyps Innenraum, der - wie die unterschiedlichen Lektüren aus verschiedenen Philologien vorführen - ein weitreichendes narratives Experimentierfeld darstellt. Im Zentrum der Auseinandersetzung steht zum einen die Frage, wie literarische Räume und Raumvorstellungen konstituiert und in eine narrative Progression übersetzt werden, zum anderen die Frage nach den unterschiedlichen - symbolischen, allegorischen, soziologischen oder poetologischen - Funktionszusammenhängen, in die das literarische Interieur eingebunden ist. Dieser Band will insbesondere an neuere Forschungsbeiträge anknüpfen, die die innenraumkonstituierenden und -gliedernden Medien wie Möbel oder Stoffe, Wände, Bilder oder Fenster in ihrer spezifischen Materialität und Medialität in den Blick nehmen und so die Exteriorität von Raumzeichen betonen.
Das Akademiejahr 2018 hatte neben den beiden Schülerakademien für die Mittelstufe und die Oberstufe noch einen weiteren Höhepunkt: das Symposium "Kulturelle Bildung auf dem Weg" (vom 2. bis 4. März 2018, ausgerichtet von Burg Fürsteneck gemeinsam mit dem Schulentwicklungsprogramm KulturSchule des Hessischen Kultusministeriums und dem Weiterbildungsmaster Kulturelle Bildung an Schulen der Uni Marburg). Es wurde von unserem Schirmherrn, Kultusminister Prof. Dr. R. Alexander Lorz, eröffnet und hatte unter anderem das Ziel, in der Begegnung von Bildungsexpert*innen und -praktiker*innen eine Fachdebatte über "Qualitätsbedingungen in der Kulturellen Bildung am Beispiel der Schülerakademien und der Kulturschulen in Hessen" anzustoßen.
An invariant differential cross section measurement of inclusive π0 and η meson production at mid-rapidity in pp collisions at s√=8 TeV was carried out by the ALICE experiment at the LHC. The spectra of π0 and η mesons were measured in transverse momentum ranges of 0.3<p T <35 GeV/c and 0.5<p T <35 GeV/c , respectively. Next-to-leading order perturbative QCD calculations using fragmentation functions DSS14 for the π0 and AESSS for the η overestimate the cross sections of both neutral mesons, although such calculations agree with the measured η/π0 ratio within uncertainties. The results were also compared with PYTHIA 8.2 predictions for which the Monash 2013 tune yields the best agreement with the measured neutral meson spectra. The measurements confirm a universal behavior of the η/π0 ratio seen for NA27, PHENIX and ALICE data for pp collisions from s√=27.5 GeV to s√=8 TeV within experimental uncertainties. A relation between the π0 and η production cross sections for pp collisions at s√=8 TeV is given by m T scaling for p T >3.5 GeV/c . However, a deviation from this empirical scaling rule is observed for transverse momenta below p T <3.5 GeV/c in the η/π0 ratio with a significance of 6.2σ.
In recent years, the interest in theory which has once been a moving force of academic research in the field of literary studies appears to have decreased. The status of theory, its relevance and appropriateness for the understanding of literature have been put into doubt. Faced with this observation, some critics have even suggested that we have now entered into a new era of research which can retrospectively be identified as the era "after theory". Against the background of such pronouncements and to a certain extent in opposition to them, the investigations proposed here wish to uphold the idea of the utility and indeed the need for theoretical approaches to literature. To appreciate the status of theory and its possible contribution to a deepened understanding of literature, it is useful not to focus exclusively on the distinction or supposed divide between literature and theory. Instead we should pay attention to what links and unites them. This common ground or common denominator of literature and theory consists in the dimension of language. Furnishing the intellectual material from which both domains of articulation are formed, language constitutes at once the key element of literature and a principal concern of theory. [...] The present volume collects the papers presented in the context of the panel "Languages of Theory" at the conference of the "International Association of Comparative Literature" (ICLA) at Vienna in July 2016. As stated above, our aim is to examine the philological or linguistic preoccupations of current approaches in literary and cultural theory, to look into the (pre-)history of theory's engagement with linguistic concerns and to unfold its conceptual and semantic implications. Taking our cue from the title of the ICLA conference, "The Many Languages of Comparative Literature", we have found it to be a rewarding task to raise the issue of the "languages of theory" and to promote its further exploration and analysis. It is our contention that theoretical approaches and reflections do not only rightfully hold their place in comparative literature studies but that it is also worthwhile to interrogate their conceptual genealogies and terminological choices, their styles of thought and argument as well as their various linguistic engagements. The articles united in this volume have taken up this challenge and attempt to elucidate the intricate relationship of language and theory in exemplary case studies.