Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (99)
- Part of Periodical (62)
- Part of a Book (54)
- Review (16)
- Book (6)
- Conference Proceeding (6)
- Working Paper (6)
- Doctoral Thesis (4)
- Report (4)
- Other (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (260)
Keywords
- Film (260) (remove)
Institute
Figura lacrima
(2012)
Hervé Joubert-Laurencin’s article 'Figura Lacrima', which explores Pasolini's figure of Christ, consists of two interconnected parts. The part called 'Lacrima' argues that Pasolini's Christ sheds a small tear which is analogous to the salvific tear of Dante's Bonconte da Montefeltro. This heretical tear is not explicitly referred to or shown but can only be perceived through the coherent text represented by the ensemble of Pasolini's films. The part called 'Figura' argues that Pasolini invents the new concept of 'figural integration', which extends beyond Erich Auerbach's analysis of medieval figural and typological interpretation and allows him to conceptualize a kind of non-dichotomous tension between the poles structuring his thought and art. Joubert-Laurencin argues thereby that Pasolini's scandal of Christ's small tear is not the simple provocation of a sinful Christ, but the utopian image of a West that frees itself from its own closure through the promise of another world, coming not from somewhere else but from the powers of an outside that it possesses within itself.
Pasolini's literature, film, theatre, and essays engaged with Classical tragedy from the mid-1960s onwards. As Bernhard Groß shows in his paper 'Reconciliation and Stark Incompatibility: Pasolini's "Africa" and Greek Tragedy', this engagement forms a modality in Pasolini's politics of aesthetics that seeks to grasp the fundamental transformation from a rural-proletarian to a petit-bourgeois Italy. Since the mid-'60s, Pasolini was concerned with the bourgeoisie and its utopian potentials, which he sought to make productive by reading Classical tragedy as a possibility to make contradictions visible. Pasolini realized his reading of the Classical tragedy by having 'Africa' and 'Europe' - as he understood them - confront one another without mediation. By means of film analyses and film theory, Groß argues that this confrontation, especially in the films on the ancient world, generates an aesthetic place where the incompatible can unfold in the spectators' experience.
The body of the actor : notes on the relationship between the body and acting in Pasolini's cinema
(2012)
Agnese Grieco's paper 'The Body of the Actor: Notes on the Relationship Between the Body and Acting in Pasolini's Cinema' deals with the specific physiognomy of the actor within Pasolini's 'cinema of poetry'. It argues that Pasolini's films allow the spectator to experience directly a complex and polyvalent reality beyond the traditional idea of 'representation'. As a fragment of that reality, actors quote and present themselves beyond and through their interpretations of a role. Instead of conceiving of the actor as a 'professional of fiction', Pasolini employs a variety of actors who are able fully to convey their own anthropological history. It is particularly the body of the actor, Grieco concludes, that becomes a door opening towards a deeper reality. For instance, the figure of Ninetto Davoli can push us back towards Greek antiquity, and the codified art of the comedian Totò or the iconic fixity of Maria Callas can interact with the African faces of the possible interpreters of an African Oresteia.
Astrid Deuber-Mankowsky's paper 'Cinematographic Aesthetics as Subversion of Moral Reason in Pasolini's Medea' explores the 1969 film "Medea". Pasolini's Medea, masterfully played by Maria Callas, betrays her homeland and her origin, stabs both her children, sets her house on fire, and dispossesses Jason of his sons' corpses. But Deuber-Mankowsky argues that it is ultimately not these acts that render the film particularly disturbing and disconcerting, but, rather, the fact that the spectator is left behind in suspension precisely because Medea cannot be easily condemned for her acts. Pasolini's film and its cinematographic aesthetics thereby not only subvert the projection of Medea into the prehistorical world of madness and perversion, but also undermine belief in the validity of the kind of moral rationality developed and constituted in an exemplary way by Immanuel Kant in his "Critique of Practical Reason". In particular, Pasolini seems to relate conceptually to Nietzsche's artistic-philosophical transfiguration of Dionysus and to accuse belief in a world of reasons of failing to grasp the groundlessness, irrationality, or even a-rationality of reason itself.
Albert Ostermaiers Werk nimmt eine Sonderstellung ein in der deutschsprachigen Gegenwartsliteratur: zum einen weil sich der Autor mit großer Selbstverständlichkeit in allen Gattungen bewegt und zum anderen, weil er intertextuelle und intermediale Bezüge ungewohnt offen verarbeitet und damit offensiv ausstellt, dass die schriftliche Literatur (zumal im 21. Jahrhundert) immer auch von anderen Künsten profitiert und aus diesen 'gemacht' ist. Vergleichbare Bezüge sind schon einigen Werktiteln zu entnehmen wenn Dramen 'Tatar Titus', 'The Making Of B.-Movie' bzw. 'Radio Noir' und Gedichtbände 'Autokino' und 'Wer sehen will' heißen. Bezüge zu Shakespeare klingen damit ebenso an wie zur amerikanischen Tradition der billigeren kleineren Filmproduktion, zum Hörmedium des Radios wie auch zu der einer bestimmten Form der Filmrezeption; und nicht zuletzt zur Photokunst, wenn sich in 'Wer sehen will' alle Gedichte auf die abgebildeten Photos Donzellis beziehen. Diese Mischung aus so genannter hohen und populärer Kultur ist kennzeichnend für Ostermaiers unbefangenen Umgang mit kulturellen und ästhetischen Traditionen. Das zeigt auch der kleine Band mit dem Titel 'Der Torwart' ist immer dort, wo es weh tut. Die Populärkultur des Sports wird in diesem Band gattungsübergreifend verhandelt: Die Sammlung beginnt mit drei lyrischen 'ode[n] an kahn'; findet später ihre Fortsetzung in einer dramatisch-dialogischen Szene 'Eins mit der eins' während im Rest des Bandes so genannte epische Texte dominieren und essayistisch-philosophische Gedanken versammeln, die um den Fußballsport kreisen. Dabei schreibt sich Ostermaier mit der Ode in eine lyrische Tradition ein, die schon in der Antike begonnen hat, während er in den epischen Texten über aktuelle und alltägliche Fußballangelegenheiten nachdenkt, über einen Sport also dem massenhafte Aufmerksamkeit zuteil wird und der globale schichten- und klassenübergreifende Beachtung findet.
1913 kamen zwei 'Lichtspiele', die häufig als die ersten deutschen 'Kunstfilme' bezeichnet werden, in die Kinos. Beide Filme, Max Macks 'Der Andere' und Stellan Ryes 'Der Student von Prag', handelten von gespaltener Persönlichkeit und dämonischen Doppelgängern. Ihre Geschichten können auch als metafilmischer Kommentar zum prekären Status der 'lebenden Bilder' des Kinematographen gelesen werden. Macks 'Der Andere', dessen Premiere am 21. Januar in den "Berliner Lichtspielen" stattfand, beruhte auf einem Theaterstück des Autors Paul Lindau und erzeugte großes Aufsehen, da die Hauptrolle von einem berühmten Theaterschauspieler gespielt wurde. Albert Bassermann arbeitete mit Max Reinhardt am Deutschen Theater und hatte zwei Jahre zuvor den 'Iffland-Ring' erhalten, der ihn als bedeutendsten deutschsprachigen Schauspieler auszeichnete. Nahezu kein Theaterkritiker ließ sich die Gelegenheit entgehen, den renommierten Bühnendarsteller auf einer Kinoleinwand zu sehen, so daß in den Tagen nach der Premiere Filmbesprechungen erstmals in den Feuilletons angesehener Zeitungen erschienen - ein enormer Gewinn an kulturellem Prestige für das neue Medium, auch wenn viele Rezensenten Bassermanns "Seitensprung in den Kintop" verurteilten, oder sich genötigt sahen zu versichern, daß Bassermanns Spiel Kunst sei, obwohl es sich um einen Film handele.
Die Geringschätzung, mit der das Kino zu diesem Zeitpunkt betrachtet wurde, wird auch in einem Aufsatz des konservativen Kulturkritikers Hermann Duenschmann deutlich, der 1912 - gerade einmal ein Jahr zuvor - verlangt hatte: "Wer für den [sic] Kino gearbeitet hat, muß aus dem Schauspielerstande ausgeschlossen werden."
'Perhaps the sodomites should be written out of Dante's "Inferno"', Jarman wrote in his journal on 1 August 1990: 'I'll offer myself as the ghostwriter.' What does he mean by 'ghostwriter' here? How queer is this odd speech-act? What is he offering to do to the homophobic landscape of the "Inferno", that forbiddingly sealed textual prison, with his Hollywood pitchman's casual bid to 'write out' the sodomites as if they were a slight embarrassment to the divine justice system? Is he speaking in jest as a writer of gay satires and sacrilegious memoirs, or in deadly earnest as an activist who had renounced the middle-class pretensions and frivolities of the pre-AIDS gay world? [...] Jarman counters the trope of homosexual theft visually with the triumphant figure of Man with Snake. The Dantesque merging of snake and thief is replaced by an erotic dance in which the gilded youth raises his phallic partner above his head and seductively kisses it on the mouth. Whereas Dante would have us notice the grotesque parody of the Trinity played out in the seventh bolgia - with the unchanging Puccio as God the Father, the two-natured Agnello-Cianfa as Christ, and the fume-veiled Buoso receiving his forked tongue from the serpent Francesco in a demonic replay of the gift of tongues from the Spirit - Jarman clears away all overdetermined theological meanings to revel in the purely aesthetic impact of the phallic dancer. All the ghosts from Dante's snakepit are conjured away in the film and replaced with the solid presence of a single gorgeously spotlit male body. Ghostwriting Dante, for Jarman, meant more than a mere appropriation of homoerotic scenes from the "Inferno" into his screenplay. It meant a complete reimagining of their aesthetic significance within the filmscape of his Dantean transformations.
The 1935 Fox Films "Dante's Inferno" (directed by Harry Lachman) traces the rise and fall of an entrepreneur. Its protagonist, Jim Carter (played by Spencer Tracy), begins the story as a stoker on a cruise liner. The narrative opens with a burst of flames from the ship's boiler, and the ensuing scene goes on to show the protagonist competing at shovelling coal for a bet in the sweltering engine-room. Interspersed are shots of the superstructure directly above with a number of elegant and vapid passengers following the game below. This initial sequence thus concisely conveys the main features of the film's social agenda through imagery that anticipates that of two of its later 'infernal' sequences. [...] Spectacular admonition and concern about the ruthless pursuit of wealth are the main features which link this "Inferno" of the thirties to the one that had appeared some six hundred years earlier. Wealth and avarice were, of course, demonstrably serious concerns for Dante: as Peter Armour, for example, has shown, there is a recurrent and pervasive concern with money, its meaning, and its misuse throughout the "Commedia". So it is not surprising that the "Inferno" should also have been appropriated by social critics some hundred years before the 1935 Hollywood fable. [...] Some of the narrative and visual patterns in "Dante's Inferno" imply an uneasy underlying vision of the movie industry and its practices. Other productions, publicity, and journalism of the time reinforce suggestions of such a metafictional approach to movies, morality, and the market in the 1935 "Dante's Inferno".