Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (67) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (67) (remove)
Language
- English (26)
- Portuguese (15)
- German (12)
- Spanish (5)
- Italian (3)
- Ukrainian (2)
- French (1)
- Multiple languages (1)
- slo (1)
- Turkish (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (67)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (67)
Keywords
- Adorno (4)
- Theodor W. Adorno (3)
- inclusion (3)
- Critical Theory (2)
- Dialectic (2)
- Dialética (2)
- Recognition (2)
- Reconhecimento (2)
- Teoria Crítica (2)
- Theodor Adorno (2)
Institute
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (67) (remove)
Unter dem Schlagwort "68er-Bewegung" werden verschiedene linksgerichtete Protestbewegungen, Bürgerrechtsdemonstrationen und antiautoritäre Aktionen zusammengefasst, die ab Mitte der 1960er in Deutschland und zahlreichen anderen Ländern stattfanden und auf eine Umwälzung bestehender sozialer und politischer Strukturen zielten. ...
In den zahlreichen Beiträgen zum "Jubeljahr der 1968er-Bewegung" kommen oft ehemalige Aktive, Historikerinnen und Experten zu Wort. Doch wie blicken eigentlich Aktivistinnen und Aktivisten des 21. Jahrhunderts auf diese Zeit zurück? Dieser Frage hat sich ein zweijähriges Forschungsprojekt am Institut für Politikwissenschaft der Goethe-Universität gewidmet.
Neues Wissen erzeugt gleichzeitig auch Nichtwissen. Wie damit umzugehen ist, wirft in kaum einem Forschungsgebiet so viele Fragen auf wie in der Medizin. So kann die Pränataldiagnostik heute schon im ersten Schwangerschaftsdrittel bestimmte, früher nicht behandelbare Fehlbildungen erkennen. Dadurch entstehen komplexe Behandlungssituationen, die Eltern mit bisher nicht bekannten Unwägbarkeiten konfrontieren. Forschende aus Medizin und Soziologie untersuchen gemeinsam, wie Eltern während und nach der Schwangerschaft auf die schwierige Situation reagieren.
Este artigo se propõe estabelecer um diálogo com o ensaio Teoria da Semiformação, de Theodor Adorno, escrito em 1959, no contexto do capitalismo do bem-estar social. O objetivo é ressaltar sua atualidade na abordagem da crise da formação cultural contemporânea, em que prevalece a forma de capitalismo neoliberal e, ao mesmo tempo, detectar novas nuances constitutivas da referida teoria nesse momento histórico. Nessa trajetória, o texto percorrerá os seguintes passos: a Teoria da Semiformação como um diagnóstico da crise da formação cultural no final da década de 1950; as formas de como a ontologia da semiformação se constitui em tempos de neoliberalismo; as novas roupagens com que essa crise cultural vai se instalando progressivamente nas salas de aulas; e a necessidade de se lhe contrapor novas manifestações de resistência. O artigo buscou apoio teórico em Dardot e Laval (2016) para captar as especificidades do neoliberalismo contemporâneo.
Eu busco neste artigo mostrar alguns aspectos relativos a diferentes pesquisas e reflexões que empreendi em anos recentes sobre o conceito de indústria cultural. A questão central é o pensamento de Theodor W. Adorno com especial atenção para a atualidade de sua dialética negativa. Minha intervenção acerca da atualidade do conceito de indústria cultural possui três passos argumentativos: o entrelaçamento entre racionalidade e dominação como a base de uma teoria da sociedade em Adorno; algumas mudanças no capitalismo contemporâneo e suas implicações para um conceito de indústria cultural no século XXI e; a posição da indústria cultural no contexto da Sociologia brasileira. O objetivo central do artigo, produzido na forma de ensaio, é enfatizar a atualidade da teoria crítica da sociedade de Theodor Adorno mediante argumentos específicos ao campo da Sociologia.
Adorno pensou a filosofia moral em diversos momentos de sua carreira filosófica, notadamente em Minima Moralia (1951), Dialética Negativa (1966) e em seu curso publicado postumamente Probleme der Moralphilosophie (1996). Uma avaliação conjunta desses textos permite indicar a centralidade do que Adorno chamou de “dialética da moral” – entre impulso somático e racionalidade – na constituição da experiência do prático. Além disso, as reflexões sobre a moral são um momento privilegiado das análises metafilosóficas de Adorno, que identificam em boa parte da tradição filosófica ocidental sobre a moral a presença da dominação da natureza interna – processo que caberia à dialética materialista da moral criticar e ajudar a transformar.
The theory and practice of urban governance in recent years has undergone both a collaborative and participatory turn. The strong connection between collaboration and participation has meant that citizen participation in urban governance has been conceived in a very particular way: as varying levels of partnership between state actors and citizens. This over-focus on collaboration has led to: 1) a dearth of proposals in theory and practice for citizens to engage oppositionally with institutions; 2) the miscasting of agonistic opportunities for participation as forms of collaboration; 3) an inability to recognise the irruption of agonistic practices into participatory procedures. This article attempts to expand the conception of participatory urban governance by adapting Rosanvallon’s (2008) three democratic counter-powers—prevention, oversight and judgement—to consider options for institutionalising agonistic participatory practices. It argues that these counter-governance processes would more fully realise the inclusion agenda that underpins the participatory governance project.
Neste artigo, que é originalmente um discurso de posse no Instituto Otto Suhr na Universidade Livre de Berlin, Axel Honneth esboça o programa de uma teoria intersubjetiva do reconhecimento, utilizando esta última categoria como o núcleo conceitual de uma Teoria Crítica da sociedade na qual a experiência pré-cientifica de desrespeito às expectativas sociais se conecta à formação de demandas emancipatórias.
"Post-truth" is a failed concept, both epistemically and politically because its simplification of the relationship between truth and politics cripples our understanding and encourages authoritarianism. This makes the diagnosis of our "post-truth era" as dangerous to democratic politics as relativism with its premature disregard for truth. In order to take the step beyond relativ- ism and "post-truth", we must conceptualise the relationship between truth and politics differently by starting from a "non-sovereign" understanding of truth.
Una historia filosófica de la identidad estadounidense: Balance de propuestas y su crisis actual
(2018)
Este trabajo de síntesis crítica, realiza un balance de los principales aportes de pensamiento que han favorecido la configuración de la identidad estadounidense y su reformulación periódica. Se sistematizan las escuelas, según su transición de teólogos-políticos (como los puritanos, carismáticos y trascendentalistas, con aportes tipo pactismo bíblico, libre albedrío, caridad pietista, destino manifiesto, etc.), pasando por filósofos pragmáticos (como los constituyentes, democratizadores y reconstructores, con recursos como libre-pensamiento -free masonry & whigs-, federalismo, pragmatismo, etc.), hasta académicos socio culturales (sobre todo, de Estudios culturales, vía nociones de consenso, v.g. fronterismo, excepcionalismo y crisol cultural; así como artificios de hecho diferencial –a raíz de la fuga de cerebros de la Escuela de Frankfurt, Normale Annales, Birmingham, etc.-, con categorías de clase, status y conflicto social, metámeros etnoculturales, constructos de género, etc.). El estudio llega hasta la crisis actual, sin soluciones generalmente aceptadas y bajo la amenaza transoccidental.
Recently, many democracies have developed towards more citizens’ involvement in direct democracy or public deliberation. Are these developments linked to different types of democracy? Can public deliberation be mainly found in consensus democracies, whereas direct democracy prevails in majoritarian democracies? By analysing OECD countries around the year 2012, we examine these assumptions. The answer is surprisingly clear. The choice of a democracy to opt for direct democratic instruments or for public deliberation is neither dichotomous nor is it related to the respective pattern type of democracy. Based on these findings, a new typology with four participatory models of democracy is suggested.
Privilegierte männliche, hochmobile Finanzmanager sind nicht nur Teil abstrakter ortsübergreifender Netzwerke, sondern sie arbeiten an konkreten Arbeitsorten. Am Beispiel deutscher Finanzmanager in London und Singapur arbeite ich die Relevanz des lokalen Arbeitsortes für die Identitätsaufführungen der globalen Elite mit einer intersektionalen Perspektive heraus. Da die Performanz dieser Identitätsdimension als dynamischer Prozess verstanden wird – also als eine Dynamik, in der diese im Handeln alltäglich erzeugt und aufgeführt wird – werden die alltäglichen Aufführungen der Globalen Elite in ihrer Beziehung zu dem Arbeitsort, an dem die Aufführungen stattfinden, analysiert. Es wird deutlich, dass mit dem Ansatz der Intersektionalität auch privilegierte Identitätsdimensionen in den Blick genommen werden können. In Abhängigkeit vom Ort der Performanz differenziert sich die Identitätsdimension globale Elite und überschneidet sich in spezifischer Weise mit der Identitätsdimension des Weißseins.
The purpose of the text is to present an interpretation of Theodor Adorno’s critical reading of authors considered revisionists of Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory, particularly Karen Horney. We discuss critically Adorno’s favorable positioning to the Freudian conception of the individual psychic nucleus in contrast to the hasty sociologization of psychoanalysis practiced by the revisionism of Karen Horney. In the final part we try to show how the Adornian perspective ends up by making, in his own way, the same mistake of a hasty sociologization of psychoanalysis he imputed to the revisionists and advocates an theoretical emphasis on the sociological realm that seems also problematic.
Este trabalho tenciona fazer uma análise a respeito das contribuições de Axel Honneth no que concerne às suas contribuições para o debate sobre teorias da justiça no contexto atual. Neste sentido, pode ser elencada como principal a tentativa de alcançar princípios normativos pautados na horizontalidade, ou seja, na própria realidade social. Para alcançar êxito nesta empreitada reflexivo-filosófica, parte-se de suas obras A textura da justiça: sobre os limites do procedimentalismo contemporâneo e O direito da Liberdade, nos quais se tem a questão relacionada à liberdade, sendo esta tomada como o princípio de maior valor na contemporaneidade. Daí, a liberdade direcionada ao aspecto social ser especificamente expressa nas instituições, bem como seu vínculo estar intrinsecamente ligado às relações sociais, de mercado e também ao universo político. Ao se pressupor a existência de um vazio entre os princípios normativos pertencentes à justiça e a realidade social, conforme considera o autor, fomenta-se, a partir deste estudo, notar as potencialidades, bem como os limites desta reconstrução normativa, conforme proposição teórica de Honneth.
Participatory policy making is a contested concept that can be understood in multiple ways. So how do those involved with participatory initiatives make sense of contrasting ideas of participation? What purposes and values do they associate with participatory governance? This paper reflects on a Q‐method study with a range of actors, from citizen activists to senior civil servants, involved with participatory initiatives in U.K. social policy. Using principal components analysis, supplemented with data from qualitative interviews, it identifies three shared participation preferences: participation as collective decision making, participation as knowledge transfer, and participation as agonism. These preferences demonstrate significant disagreements between the key informants, particularly concerning the objectives of participation, how much power should be afforded to the public, and what motivates people to participate. Their contrasting normative orientations are used to highlight how participatory governance theory and practice frequently fails to take seriously legitimate diversity in procedural preferences. Moreover, it is argued that, despite the diversity of preferences, there is a lack of imagination about how participation can function when social relations are conflictual.
While global justice theorists heatedly discuss the responsibilities of the affluent and powerful, those states which can legitimately be seen as victims of global injustice have seldom, if ever, been considered as duty bearers to whom responsibilities can be attached. However, recognising agents whose options are constrained not only as victims, but also as duty bearers is necessary as a proof of respect for their agency and indispensable to mobilise the type of action required to alter global injustices. In this article, I explore what responsibilities state officials of dominated states have. I argue that they have the responsibility to resist domination in the name of the dominated states members. While under particular circumstances this responsibility gives rise to a duty to engage in acts of state civil disobedience, under other circumstances state officials of dominated states ought to resist domination in an internal, attitudinal way by recognising themselves as outcome responsible agents.
Fair Trade is under fire. Some critics argue, for instance, that there is no obligation to purchase Fair Trade certified products and that doing so may even be counter-productive. Others worry that well-justified conceptions of what makes trade fair can conflict. Yet others suggest that the common arguments for Fair Trade cannot justify purchasing Fair Trade certified goods, in particular. This paper starts by sketching one common argument for Fair Trade and defends it against this last line of criticism. In particular, it argues that we should purchase Fair Trade certified goods because doing so benefits the poor even though there are other ways to alleviate poverty. It then considers how other common arguments for Fair Trade fare in light of similar criticism and concludes that they may well succeed.
There are longstanding calls for international organizations (IOs) to be more inclusive of the voices and interests of people whose lives they affect. There is nevertheless widespread disagreement among practitioners and political theorists over who ought to be included in IO decision-making and by what means. This paper focuses on the inclusion of IOs’ ‘intended beneficiaries,’ both in principle and practice. It argues that IOs’ intended beneficiaries have particularly strong normative claims for inclusion because IOs can affect their vital interests and their political agency. It then examines how these claims to inclusion might be feasibly addressed. The paper proposes a model of inclusion via representation and communication, or ‘mediated inclusion.’ An examination of existing practices in global governance reveals significant opportunities for the mediated inclusion of IOs’ intended beneficiaries, as well as pervasive obstacles. The paper concludes that the inclusion of intended beneficiaries by IOs is both appropriate and feasible.
The democratic boundary problem raises the question of who has democratic participation rights in a given polity and why. One possible solution to this problem is the all-affected principle (AAP), according to which a polity ought to enfranchise all persons whose interests are affected by the polity’s decisions in a morally significant way. While AAP offers a plausible principle of democratic enfranchisement, its supporters have so far not paid sufficient attention to economic participation rights. I argue that if one commits oneself to AAP, one must also commit oneself to the view that political participation rights are not necessarily the only, and not necessarily the best, way to protect morally weighty interests. I also argue that economic participation rights raise important worries about democratic accountability, which is why their exercise must be constrained by a number of moral duties.
Political realists claim that international relations are in a state of anarchy, and therefore every state is allowed to disregard its moral duties towards other states and their inhabitants. Realists argue that complying with moral duties is simply too risky for a state’s national security. Political moralists convincingly show that realists exaggerate both the extent of international anarchy and the risks it poses to states who act morally. Yet moralists do not go far enough, since they do not question realism’s normative core: the claim that when national security is really at risk, states are allowed to disregard their moral duties. I contend that there is at least one moral duty that states should not disregard even if their inhabitants are at risk of death by military aggression: the duty to reduce extreme global poverty. The reason is that even granting that national security is about securing individuals’ right to life, global poverty relief is about that as well.
This article outlines a new approach to answering the foundational question in democratic theory of how the boundaries of democratic political units should be delineated. Whereas democratic theorists have mostly focused on identifying the appropriate population-group – or demos – for democratic decisionmaking, it is argued here that we should also take account of considerations relating to the appropriate scope of a democratic unit’s institutionalized governance capabilities – or public power. These matter because democratically legitimate governance is produced not only through the decision-making agency of a demos, but also through the institutionally distinct sources of political agency that shape the governance capabilities of public power. To develop this argument, the article traces a new theoretical account of the normative and institutional sources of collective agency, political legitimacy, and democratic boundaries, and illustrates it through a democratic reconstruction of the classical body politic metaphor. It further shows how this theoretical account lends strong prescriptive support to pluralist institutional boundaries within democratic global governance.
The issue of statelessness poses problems for the statist (or nationalist) approach to the philosophy of immigration. Despite the fact that the statist approach claims to constrain the state’s right to exclude with human rights considerations, the arguments statists offer for the right of states to determine their own immigration policies would also justify citizenship rules that would render some children stateless. Insofar as rendering a child stateless is best characterized as a violation of human rights and insofar as some states have direct responsibility for causing such harm, the problem of non-refugee stateless children points to greater constraints than most statists accept on states’ right to determine their own rules for membership. While statists can ultimately account for the right not to be rendered stateless, recognizing these additional human rights constraints ultimately weakens the core of the statist position.
Traditionally, in deciding whether some strategy or action in war is proportionate and necessary and thus permissible both international law and just war theory focus exclusively on civilian deaths and the destruction of civilian infrastructure. I argue in this paper that any argument that can explain why we should care about collateral killing and damage to infrastructure can also explain why collateral displacement matters. I argue that displacement is a foreseeable near-proximate cause of lethal harm to civilians and is relevant for proportionality and necessity calculi. Accepting my argument has significant consequences for what we are permitted to do in war and for what obligations we have towards refugees that result from our actions in war.
Moral refugee markets
(2018)
States are increasingly paying other states to host refugees. For example, in 2010 the EU paid Libya €50 million to continue hosting the refugees within its borders, and five years later Australia offered Cambodia $31.16 million to accept asylum seekers living in Naru. These exchanges, which I call ‘refugees markets,’ have faced criticism by philosophers. Some philosophers claim the markets fail to ensure true protection, and are demeaning, expressing just how much refugees are unwanted. In response, some have defended refugee markets, claiming they can ensure refugees have protection and are not demeaned. I argue that many markets do demean refugees, and therefore have moral costs, but can still be all-things-considered preferable to alternative schemes if they protect refugees more than these alternative schemes.
In diesem Beitrag befasse ich mich mit ethischen Herausforderungen der Biografieforschung am Beispiel eigener Erfahrungen im Rahmen einer Studie im Feld der politischen Partizipation. Im ersten Teil diskutiere ich grundsätzliche ethische Fragen der Biografieforschung, die mit der Erhebung und Auswertung von biografisch-narrativen Interviews einhergehen. Im zweiten Teil des Beitrages werden exemplarisch forschungsethische Aspekte und Probleme skizziert, die im Verlauf der Feldforschung aufgetreten sind und die Prämissen einer rekonstruktiv vorgehenden Biografieforschung herausfordern. Dazu gehören die informierte Einwilligung als dialogischer Prozess sowie die Anonymisierung und Rückmeldung von biografischen Daten in einem hochsensiblen Feld. Abschließend gehe ich der Frage nach, welche Möglichkeiten und Grenzen das Format der Forschungswerkstatt für die Reflexion von ethischen Fragen in der Biografieforschung bietet.
Este artigo procurou refletir sobre alguns aspectos teóricos acerca da Teoria do Reconhecimento desenvolvida por Axel Honneth. Herdeiro da tradição teórica do pensamento crítico frankfurtiano – do qual se destacam pensadores como Adorno, Horkheimer, Marcuse e Habermas –, Honneth propõe uma inovadora teoria normativa dos conflitos sociais. Como fio condutor de sua análise, emerge o argumento de que a evolução social está estruturada pelos conflitos morais dos sujeitos sociais, em busca do reconhecimento recíproco de suas identidades. Assim, ao desenvolver sua teoria, Honneth articula elementos da Teoria Crítica, da filosofia do jovem Hegel e da psicologia social de Mead. Este artigo tem justamente o ensejo de refletir sobre a teia conceitual sobre a qual Honneth fundamenta sua proposta teórica.
Rezension zu: Marcuse, Herbert: Příslib štěstí. Edícia a preklad Martin Profant. Praha: Nakladatelství Epocha 2017, 372 s.
Em diálogo com Axel Honneth, analiso os desafios do reconhecimento nas relações íntimas à luz de pesquisas qualitativas realizadas com homens e mulheres heterossexuais de classes média e média alta sobre o amor romântico nos dias de hoje. As pesquisas revelaram as ambiguidades da concepção de amor que resultou do crescente processo de individualização e democratização das relações de gênero na intimidade. Ainda que o reconhecimento no amor seja importante para homens e mulheres, estas explicitaram, de forma mais enfática, o déficit de reconhecimento nas relações íntimas – não reconhecimento, reconhecimento limitado ou falso. Destaco as formas de sofrimento emocional feminino criadas com a institucionalização do campo sexual, que separou sexo de envolvimento afetivo, apontando os dilemas e contradições da liberdade sexual para as mulheres. Se, por um lado, a reconstrução normativa das relações íntimas de Honneth consegue elucidar as regras morais tacitamente postas nas interações amorosas e a importância do amor para uma teoria moral da “boa vida”, por outro, superestima as potencialidades do reconhecimento na esfera íntima. Além disso, pretendo mostrar as ambivalências do “novo feminismo” e as limitações dos estudos de gênero e sexualidade contemporâneos, com ênfase nas sexualidades “não normativas” e na desconstrução dos binarismos de gênero que, contraditoriamente, contribuem para eclipsar diferenças de gênero em torno do amor e da sexualidade e, com isso, acabam colaborando para tornar imperceptíveis sofrimentos femininos.
O objetivo deste artigo é discutir como os projetos intelectuais de Fraser e Honneth seguiram vias diversas após o debate que ambos publicaram em 2003 e como estas vias podem ser apropriadas pela teoria social feita no Brasil. Se no momento da discussão, tanto Fraser quanto Honneth pro- curaram demonstrar a maior adequação de suas respectivas teorias para a análise das lutas sociais e a possibilidade de uma apropriação deu seus modelos pelos movimentos sociais, de modo que o caráter político do debate fosse expresso na forma como movimentos sociais, remeteriam aos termos redistribuição e/ou reconhecimento (I); e, ao longo dos últimos, ambos mudaram o foco de suas análises para um entendimento do próprio sistema capitalista, chegando a concepções alteradas da dinâmica de conflitos sociais (II). Na medida em que este potencial analítico mediou sua recepção no Brasil, isso implica, afinal, novas formas de apropriação e diálogo com as ideias de Fraser e Honneth (III).
The article analyses the 'post-secular turn' in critical theory by comparing Jürgen Habermas' late philosophy with the philosophy of his predecessor Theodor W. Adorno. It poses the question to what extent can Habermas be seen as a post-secular theorist when setting his work against that of Adorno? Following Birgitte Schepelern Johansen, the author develop a concept of post-secularism as a move beyond the strict division between religion and non-religion, and apply the concept to the work of the two critical theorists in question. Finally, Adorno’s work is identified as a 'religious secularism’ and Habermas’ work as a 'post-secular secularism’. Thus, the author points out the ambivalence, which the alleged 'post-secular turn’ breeds, and suggest a reconsideration of the religious motives discovered in Adorno’s work.
De acordo com parte da literatura, a teoria crítica de Adorno é um lamento sobre o fracasso da civilização moderna que é incapaz de dar conta de suas próprias condições de possibilidade. No presente artigo, questiono tal veredito, por meio da análise da questão de como a crítica pode ser feita e de quem seria o destinatário dela, em uma situação de quase completa dominação.
El presente artículo aborda el análisis de los teóricos de Frankfurtrt, especialmente Adorno, Marcuse, Walter Benjamin y Horkheimer, y su actualidad en relación a la educación. La motivación ante un mundo en que ascienden valores de extrema derecha y fundamentalismos religiosos, este escenario motiva a cuestionar cuál es el papel que la educación realiza para combatir extremismos e intolerancias. Ámbito de pertinencia. Este artículo está directamente relacionado con la filosofía de la educación. Justificación y relevancia. Se justifica este tema por tratar de aspectos teleológicos de la función de la educación. En el sentido de problematizar el carácter teleológico de la educación a partir de conceptos filosóficos que buscan la autonomía del sujeto en lugar de sólo adecuarlo a lo que está puesto. Como metodología recurre a los estudios bibliográficos y reflexiones críticas sobre la educación y su carácter político en la construcción de una conciencia social emancipada de valores que legitiman opresión. Resultado y discusión. Se realizó un estudio sobre teoría crítica de Adorno, Horkheimer, Benjamin, Habermas y Marcuse como aportes para la construcción de una educación que además de buscar la inclusión, busque también ser un instrumento político de combate a los valores de prejuicios, que hoy son reavivados con el ascenso de fundamentalismos religiosos, xenofobia y ascensión de la extrema derecha. Conclusión. Se concluye que la escuela tiene una finalidad política de educar para un mundo de solidaridad y respeto por las diferencias.
This article deals with the analysis of Frankfurtrt's theorists, especially Adorno, Marcuse, Walter Benjamin and Horkheimer, and their relevance in relation to education. Motivation, faced with a world in which extreme-right values and religious fundamentalisms are promoted, such a scenario motivates us to question the role that education plays in combating extremism and intolerance. Scope of relevance. This article is directly related to the philosophy of education. Justification and relevance. This topic is justified because it deals with teleological aspects of the function of education. In the sense of questioning the teleological character of education based on philosophical concepts that seek the autonomy of the subject instead of just the human being to what is settled. As a methodology, it resorts to bibliographical studies and critical reflections on education and its political character in the construction of an emancipated social conscience of values that legitimize oppression. Results and discussion. A study on Critical Theory of Adorno, Horkheimer, Benjamin, Habermas and Marcuse was conducted as contributions to the construction of an education that, in addition to seeking inclusion, also seeks to be a political instrument to combat prejudice, which is nowadays alive again with the rise of religious fundamentalisms, xenophobia and the rise of extreme-right political ideas. Conclusion. It is concluded that the school has the political purpose to educate for a world of solidarity and respect for differences.
The main sources for the discussion of the category “relation” were Aristotle’s Categories and Metaphysics. Before their translation into Arabic in the 8th and 9th centuries, Christian theologians and in their footsteps Syriac scholars considered Aristotle’s works to be a useful tool in Christological discussions. This article analyzes the category of relation and its development in Arabic-Islamic philosophy in authors such as Kindī and his student Aḥmad Ibn aṭ-Ṭayyib as-Saraḫsī, Fārābī, Ibn Sīnā, Ghazālī, Ibn Rušd, the Sufi Ibn ʿArabī and others.
O presente escrito teve como objetivo analisar a necessidade da educação escolar para o desenvolvimento do ora vigente modo de produção capitalista industrial. Esta análise se baseia na investigação e exposição de Marx dos momentos constitutivos do capital por meio do modo de produção industrial de mercadorias. Em suma, procuramos demonstrar a partir dos escritos, principalmente, de Marx, Adorno e Marcuse que a demanda do modo de produção capitalista por uma massa de indivíduos oriundos da educação escolar não existe, pois a maioria de suas demandas radica nele mesmo, modo de produção, e é solucionada por ele mesmo em seu processo de constituição, não em um elemento externo e ideal, como é o caso da educação escolar.
A atualidade da crítica de Adorno para as pesquisas qualitativas com bases empíricas em educação
(2018)
Neste artigo, serão apresentados dados e argumentos sobre a atualidade da crítica de Theodor W. Adorno para as pesquisas qualitativas com bases empíricas em educação, com especial ênfase à hermenêutica objetiva, desenvolvida por Ulrich Oevermann e aplicada por Andreas Gruschka às pesquisas em educação. O tema será abordado da seguinte maneira: (a) serão apontados elementos históricos e teóricos do desenvolvimento de um método de pesquisa próprio pela Teoria Crítica; (b) serão apresentados elementos caracterizadores da hermenêutica objetiva; (c) para, por fim, apresentar algumas das contribuições de Gruschka na aplicabilidade do referido método às pesquisas educacionais na Alemanha, além de algumas experiências no Brasil a partir da referida abordagem de pesquisa.
The article presents an analysis of the development of labour market risks in Germany in light of changing working poverty risks. Low hourly wages and part-time employment are identified as the main demand-side-related mechanisms for household poverty. Their measurement and development are discussed as well as their contribution to trends in working poverty risks. A rise in low wages, especially among part-time employed households, was decisive for the increase in working poverty risks in Germany by 45% between the end of the 1990s and the end of the 2000s. We therefore study these trends more closely in the multivariate analysis. The results show that while low wages are unequally distributed across occupations and industries, shifts in employment between sectors explain only a minor part of the change in low wages. However, they reveal a polarization of low-wage risks by skill-level and sector of employment, on the one hand, and full-time and part-time employees, on the other hand.
Este artigo elucida, em primeiro lugar, os vários significados da noção francesa de dispositif e contrasta-a com os usos de "aparelho" ("appareil"), por um lado, e "reunião" ("agencement"), por outro. A segunda parte apresenta o uso distintivo de Foucault do conceito de dispositivo. O argumento baseia-se na tese de que a noção de dispositivo de Foucault está firmemente ancorada em uma analítica do governo, na medida em que se concentra na direção e regulação de forças agenciais e processos vitais. Na última parte, proponho combinar uma analítica do governo, seguindo Foucault, com insights dos Estudos de Ciência e Tecnologia (STS). Argumento que essa síntese teórica entre STS e uma analítica do governo ajuda a corrigir os problemas de muitas análises da sociologia política e da teoria social e política ao enfrentar as transformações e mudanças nas sociedades contemporâneas.
This essay develops, within the terms of the recent New York Declaration, an account of the shared responsibility of states to refugees and of how the character of that responsibility effects the ways in which it can be fairly shared. However, it also moves beyond the question of the general obligations that states owe to refugees to consider ways in which refugee choices and refugee voice can be given appropriate standing with the global governance of refuge. It offers an argument for the normative significance of refugee’s reasons for choosing states of asylum and linked this to consideration of a refugee matching system and to refugee quota trading conceived as responsibility-trading, before turning to the issue of the inclusion of refugee voice in relation to the justification of the norms of refugee governance and in relation to the institutions and practices of refugee governance through which those norms are given practical expression.
La experiencia del arte en todas sus variedades tiene siempre una dimensión cognitiva. También las experiencias estéticas negativas la tienen, muy especialmente en el arte contemporáneo. Éstas pueden estar determinadas por el contenido y o los medios de la obra o por los efectos de la misma. Lo que da lugar a una variada tipología de experiencias del arte con uno o más aspectos negativos. La teoría estética de T.W. Adorno nos proporciona diversas herramientas para repensar esta variedad de la cognición artística. En la medida que se trata de una estética negativa, categorías de la misma como las de carácter enigmático, autonomía, resistencia o comunicación de lo incomunicable, nos ofrecen vías para entender el lugar de las experiencias negativas en el arte contemporáneo y su función cognitiva.
Yaratıcı endüstri kavramı, aşırı-teknik-kapitalist toplumların bir zorunluluğu olarak 1990’lı yıllarda gerek gündelik yaşama gerekse bilimsel yazına yerleşmeye başlamıştır. Habermas’ın çift değerlilik yaklaşımı doğrultusunda düşünüldüğünde, yaratıcı endüstrilerin, yaratıcılık ve kültürü kullanarak ürettikleri ürünlerin olumlu yanları kadar olumsuz yanlarının da olacağı açıktır. Bu çalışma yaratıcı endüstrilerin, toplumsal alanda anlaşma yönelimli iletişimsel eylemi koordine eden kültürel-normatif yapılar üzerindeki olası bozucu etkilerine dikkat çekmeye çalışmıştır. Çalışma, bu düşünceyi temellendirmek için, Husserl tarafından geliştirilen “yaşam dünyası” ve Habermas tarafından kuramsallaştırılan “yaşam dünyasının sömürgeleştirilmesi” kavramları doğrultusunda ilerlemiştir. Çalışmamızda kısmen Frankfurt Okulu’nun düşüncelerine başvurulmuştur. Çalışmamız özetle, yaratıcı endüstrilerin, yaşam dünyasının temel bileşenlerinden kültürel yeniden üretim, toplumsal bütünleşme ve toplumsallaşma süreçlerini nasıl etkileyeceğine, iletişimsel eylemi ne şekilde koordine edeceğine ve yaşam dünyasını potansiyel olarak nasıl sömürgeleştireceğine odaklanmıştır.
Partiendo de la recurrencia del motivo de la pobreza de la experiencia en el marco de la Teoría crítica y su entorno más afín, nos proponemos tematizar la equivocidad que presenta el mismo mediante la delimitación de sus diferentes sentidos en Adorno, Horkheimer y Benjamin. Ello nos permitirá dejar esbozadas las líneas generales de una problemática que, a nuestro entender, es producto de cierta complementariedad pero a la vez tensión entre dichos sentidos.
En este trabajo me propongo realizar una lectura en paralelo de las críticas al concepto de sujeto llevadas a cabo por Theodor Adorno y Louis Althusser, ambos autores pertenecientes a dos tradiciones teóricas muy distintas. Esto con el fin de mostrar que: 1) que ambos parten del desmoronamiento del marxismo hegeliano y su idea de un sujeto de la historia, 2) que ambos intentan develar la naturaleza ideológica de la categoría de sujeto y 3) que para tal fin utilizan herramientas psicoanalíticas. Este recorrido me permitirá resaltar los puntos de encuentro y las enormes divergencias entre ambos autores.
"Die Goethe-Universität ist eine weltoffene Werkstatt der Zukunft mitten in Europa. 1914 von BürgerInnen für BürgerInnen gegründet, hat sie seit 2008 als autonome Stiftungsuniversität an diese Tradition wieder angeknüpft. Ihrer wechselvollen Geschichte kritisch verpflichtet, ist sie geleitet von den Ideen der Europäischen Aufklärung, der Demokratie und der Rechtsstaatlichkeit und wendet sich gegen Rassismus, Nationalismus und Antisemitismus. Die Goethe-Universität ist ein Ort argumentativer Auseinandersetzung; Forschung und Lehre stehen in gesellschaftlicher Verantwortung."
Dieses Leitbild strahlt an einem Freitagabend im Januar 2018 zwei Stunden lang über einem voll besetzten, unruhigen Hörsaal. Der groß an die Wand projizierte Text richtet sich an das Publikum einer Veranstaltung der "Frankfurter Bürgeruniversität" mit dem Titel "Diskurskultur im Zwielicht – Wie viel Meinungsfreiheit verträgt die Uni?" Die Atmosphäre ist für eine öffentliche Abendveranstaltung ungewöhnlich angespannt: Menschen mit unterschiedlichen politischen Einstellungen sitzen dicht beieinander, ein paar Burschenschaftler mit Schärpe nehmen die Mitte des Saales ein, es gibt Gerüchte, die AfD habe zu der Veranstaltung mobilisiert. ...
Rule is commonly conceptualized with reference to the compliance it invokes. In this article, we propose a conception of rule via the practice of resistance instead. In contrast to liberal approaches, we stress the possibility of illegitimate rule, and, as opposed to critical approaches, the possibility of legitimate authority. In the international realm, forms of rule and the changes they undergo can thus be reconstructed in terms of the resistance they provoke. To this end, we distinguish between two types of resistance—opposition and dissidence—in order to demonstrate how resistance and rule imply each other. We draw on two case studies of resistance in and to international institutions to illustrate the relationship between rule and resistance and close with a discussion of the normative implications of such a conceptualization.
Weg mit den Talaren! Hoch die Doktorhüte! : vom Wandel der Zeremonialität an deutschen Universitäten
(2018)
"Unter den Talaren – Muff von 1000 Jahren": Dieser Slogan steht wie kaum ein anderer für die Aufbruchstimmung der 68er-Generation. Damit zielten die Hamburger Studenten auf das Verschweigen der NS-Vergangenheit ab, anschließend ging es aber auch den Talaren selbst an den Kragen. Seit einigen Jahren wird im zeremoniellen Raum der Universitäten vielfach experimentiert: Die Fächer bilden eine jeweils eigene Feierkultur aus – auf der Suche nach einem Übergang von der Universität in das berufliche Leben.
In the latest contribution to the Democracy Papers, Thomas Zittel explores when and how polarization becomes a cause for democratic anxiety. He argues that polarization over traditional policy issues is not in itself harmful, and can even be beneficial for democracies. However, he warns that polarization in which parties become divided over the acceptable rules of the game is a problem for democracies. Unfortunately, this latter type of division is increasingly common on both sides of the Atlantic today.
The authors argue, in line with recent research, that operationalizing gender ideology as a unidimensional construct ranging from traditional to egalitarian is problematic and propose an alternative framework that takes the multidimensionality of gender ideologies into account. Using latent class analysis, they operationalize their gender ideology framework based on data from the 2008 European Values Study, of which eight European countries reflecting the spectrum of current work–family policies were selected. The authors examine the form in which gender ideologies cluster in the various countries. Five ideology profiles were identified: egalitarian, egalitarian essentialism, intensive parenting, moderate traditional, and traditional. The five ideology profiles were found in all countries, but with pronounced variation in size. Ideologies mixing gender essentialist and egalitarian views appear to have replaced traditional ideologies, even in countries offering some institutional support for gendered separate spheres.
Роботу «Філософія і вчитель» Теодор Адорно вперше прочитав як доповідь у Будинку студентів міста Франкфурта-на-Майні в листопаді 1961 року. У цій доповіді Адорно продовжив тему критики тих чинників тодішньої освіти Західної Німеччини, які унеможливлюють особисту боротьбу інтелектуала з культурними залишками тоталітарного суспільства. Адорно зауважив такий важливий елемент освітнього процесу, яким є іспит із філософії. Цей іспит мають складати майбутні вчителі, кандидати на посаду викладача ґімназії. Також Адорно звернув свою увагу на тенденцію формалістичного дотримання Правил складання іспитів деякими майбутніми вчителями, які не здатні зрозуміти гуманістичну, емансипаційно-духовну суть філософії, а отже й не розуміють мету проведення названого іспиту. Ушанувавши давню традицію академічної свободи німецького Університету, Адорно зауважив постать німецького філософа, охарактеризувавши його тією людиною, інтелектуальна діяльність якої вплинула на гуманізацію освіти в німецькому Університеті, що безпосередньо далося взнаки відповідним социокультурним перетворенням. Однак, на думку Адорно, в повоєнних університетах ФРН переважає тенденція дотримання засад саме наукового пізнання. Ця тенденція поєднана зі ставленням деяких майбутніх учителів до знання як до привласненого у споживацький спосіб, що зумовлено браком особистої любові до власного фаху й до своїх студентів. Адорно був переконаний у тому, що такі вчителі байдужі до свого фаху й не мають до нього покликання. Ознакою відсутності покликання в цих людях Адорно назвав інтелектуальну недбалість, провінційність мовлення і провінційну нездатність зрозуміти свободу людини як духовну цінність. Подібні вчителі неспроможні пропонувати нове знання своїм студентам як за допомогою добірного усного мовлення, так і за допомогою досконалого письмового викладу. Цілком іншою Адорно запропонував убачати людину, яка здатна засвоювати знання, що потрібні для розуміння свого професійного обов’язку. Використовуючи саморозуміння та саморефлексію, вона зможе самостійно збагнути сенс своєї педагогічної роботи. Ця людина сумлінно і терпляче виконуватиме свою роботу задля практичного впровадження в суспільство гуманістичних ідеалів попереднього філософського знання.
Що означає «опрацювання минулого» : (переклад з німецької, анотація і післямова Віталія Брижніка)
(2018)
Роботу «Що означає «опрацювання Минулого» Адорно вперше прочитав як доповідь 6 листопада 1959 року перед Координаційною радою з питань християнсько-єврейської співпраці. У цій доповіді Адорно розглянув суть соціальної ідеології, панівної в повоєнній Німеччині, яка зумовлювала стратегії суспільного примирення з політичними злочинами колишньої націонал-соціалістичної влади. На думку філософа, соціальна ідеологія суспільства споживання використовує чималу кількість відповідних засобів, аби стабілізувати свій панівний статус у суспільстві. Й передусім вона намагається ліквідувати колективну історичну пам’ять людей про жахи воєнного періоду, прагнучи витиснути їх із колективної свідомості, зокрема й завдяки спогадам людей про «кращі часи» життя під «опікою» попередньої, тоталітарної влади. Філософ назвав суроґатною ідентичність цих людей, соціально інтеґрованих лише завдяки авторитету владної особистості. Вони не ототожнюють себе з жертвами тоталітарного режиму через уплив на їхню свідомість культурних елементів цієї соціальної ідеології. Іншим наслідком даного впливу також стає відчуження цих людей від ідеї демократії як чинника належних соціокультурних перетворень. Дієвим засобом подолання цього впливу Адорно визначив нову, «демократичну педагогіку» і просвіту як «другу освіту», що практично здійснюють у суспільстві освічені люди, які володіють знанням про минулі злочини тоталітарного режиму. Тим самим вони зумовлюють у межах освітнього процесу дієве «опрацювання Минулого» через формування особистого розуміння окремої людини соціальних причин і жахливих наслідків панування тоталітарного режиму. Це ліквідує її «політичне неповноліття» й тим самим унеможливлює історичне повторення в Європі злочинів авторитарної влади.