Refine
Document Type
- Article (4)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (6) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (6)
Keywords
- Konversion <Linguistik> (6) (remove)
Institute
- Extern (1)
In this paper, I discuss verb to noun conversion in French. The properties of the input verb and the output noun are presented and a formal representation is proposed using the SBCG framework. The use of such a formalism based on constraints and multiple inheritance highlights the difficulties in defining what exactly is a conversion rule. I propose that the different properties of the input verb and the output noun can be thought of as different dimensions of classification, which characterize the verb to noun conversion rule.
Nominalization in French can be done by means of conversion, which is characterized by the identity between the base and the derived lexeme. Since both noun→verb and verb→noun conversions exist, this property raises directionality issues, and sometimes leads to contradictory analyses of the same examples. The paper presents two approaches of conversion: derivational and non-derivational ones. Then it discusses various criteria used in derivational approaches to determine the direction of conversion: diachronic ones, such as dates of first attestation or etymology; and synchronic ones, such as semantic relations, noun gender or verb inflection. All criteria are evaluated on a corpus of 3,241 French noun~verb pairs. It is shown that none of them enables to identify the direction of conversion in French. Finally, the consequences for the theory of morphology are discussed.
This article addresses the controversial question how non-derived denominal verbs (e.g. wingsuit, kennel, trombone) build their argument structures. Based on selected subsets of conceptually related verbs it will be shown that the argument structures of these verbs are flexible though not arbitrary. Without context, these verbs evoke frame-like default situations which are determined by speakers' shared encyclopaedic knowledge and sensorimotor experience and which are mapped onto a small set of abstract event schemata that 'predesign' thematic configurations. The discourse context, which also provides the syntactic context, either meets or models our expectations as to the context-free readings. In the latter case, new (metaphorical) readings are contextually created. These configurations are not arbitrary either because the meanings of verbalized nouns should always be (a) in a relation of contiguity to the base-noun concepts and (b) compatible with the semantics of the syntactic constructions.
Der Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit den paradigmatischen Bedeutungsrelationen im Rahmen der Phraseologie, dazu gehören: phraseologische Reihen, Synonymie, Antonymie, Konversion I, Konversion II, Polysemie und Homonymie. Einzelne Relationen werden mit Beispielen der somatischen Phraseologie illustriert. Am Anfang werden die Platzierung der paradigmatischen Relationen im Rahmen der Lexikologie und eine kurze terminologische Erklärung angeführt. Weiter werden unterschiedliche Felder mit der phraseologischen Komponente HAND vorgestellt: a) Geben, Nehmen/Klauen und Behalten; b) Macht und Gewalt; c) Mord und Selbstmord; d) Freiheit; e) Machen, Vollenden, Schaffen. Zum Schluss wird die Bedeutung der paradigmatischen Beziehungen erläutert.
Primjeri preobrazbe u "Ričoslovniku iliričkoga, italijanskoga i nimačkoga jezika" Josipa Voltića
(2011)
U članku se obrađuju tvorenice iz Voltićeva rječnika nastale preobrazbom. Primjeri se određuju prema prvoj potvrdi, i to u odnosu na potvrde u "Rječniku hrvatskoga ili srpskoga jezika" JAZU. Analizi prethodi teorijsko polazište koje uzima u obzir recentne radove iz područja preobrazbe i tvorbe riječi općenito.
U radu se raspravlja o leksikografskom postupku koji se primjenjuje u izradbi Rječnika hrvatskoga kajkavskoga književnog jezika pri uspostavljanju nadnatuknice i kanonskih likova za dvadesetak potvrđenih leksičkih varijanata za ‘rajnski forint’, novčanu jedinicu koja označuje kovani novac u uporabi u Hrvatskoj od 16. do 19. stoljeća. Nakon navođenja svih kontekstualnih potvrda, utvrđuje se vrijednost novčane jedinice i podrijetlo naziva, provodi se morfološka analiza leksema, određuju se kanonski likovi i njihove gramatičke odrednice te se lik rajniški uspostavlja kao najreprezentativniji gdje se donose etimologija i definicija. Dvadesetak leksičkih varijanata za naziv ‘rajnski forint’ posljedica su različitih jezičnih procesa u prihvaćanju, upotrebi i adaptaciji toga naziva u kajkavskom književnom jeziku.