Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (7) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (7) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (7) (remove)
Keywords
- Agamben, Giorgio (7) (remove)
Mit "Corpus Delicti" zeigt Zeh eine biopolitische Kontrollmacht auf, die in der Fluchtlinie von Michel Foucaults und Giorgio Agambens biopolitischen Theorien auf dem menschlichen Körper fußt: Während jedoch Foucault die Einwirkung der Biomacht auf der sozio-politischen Ebene lokalisiert, nähert sich Giorgio Agamben dem biopolitischen Grundgedanken aus einer juristischen Perspektive an. "Corpus Delicti" absorbiert beide biopolitischen Annäherungen und veranschaulicht sie vor dem Hintergrund einer Gesundheitsdiktatur, in der die individuelle Freiheit der Gesundheit weichen muss; lieber gesund, schmerzfrei und lang lebend als frei. Mit diesem Ziel, allen Bürgern*innen die Gesundheit zu garantieren, verwaltet Zehs fiktiver Staat, die METHODE, totalitär die Körper seiner Bürger*innen und stößt dabei auf erstaunlich geringen Widerstand, denn die Angst vor Krankheit und Tod führt zur innerlichen Akzeptanz normierten Verhaltens im Namen der zur Staatsräson erhobenen Gesundheit. Mit diesem Beitrag möchte ich versuchen, Michel Foucaults und Giorgio Agambens Theoretisierung von Biopolitik so weit zu erklären, dass die biopolitischen Anknüpfungen in "Corpus Delicti" beleuchtet und veranschaulicht werden können. Vor dem Hintergrund des Verständnisses von Foucaults und Agambens biopolitischen Theorien und einer kurzen inhaltlichen Darstellung von "Corpus Delicti" wird es möglich sein, die literarische Verarbeitung biopolitischen Regierens in "Corpus Delicti" genauer aufzuzeigen, und dies sowohl aus einem sozio-politischen als auch juristischem Blickwinkel.
This essay follows the productive discussion of Giorgio Agamben's "The Open: Man and Animal" that took place as part of the 'Openness in Medieval Culture' conference at the ICI Berlin. The essay attempts to develop a speculative notion of openness within Agamben's work, in particular by connecting the question of openness to the question of the promise: the promise of the resolution of the question of man and animal ("The Open"); the promise of the Franciscans' vow, or 'sacramentum' ("The Highest Poverty"); and the promise of language ("The Sacrament of Language").
The essay confronts the question of weathering by considering its excess to the conceptual dimension and relating it to what Jacques Derrida names (the) 'trace'. The study of the 'logic' of weathering/the trace is confronted with Giorgio Agamben's critique of Derrida's project. Their two different conceptions of language, of its presuppositional structure, and of its order of 'metaphysical presence' are considered, in particular by turning to Werner Hamacher's work on these and related matters.
Recitation : lyric time(s) I
(2019)
What is the time of the lyric? For Augustine, the recitation of a hymn illustrates the workings of time in the human mind; for Giorgio Agamben, the poem itself exemplifies the structure of what he defines as 'messianic time'. By focusing on Dante's sonnet 'Tanto gentile e tanto onesta pare' and looking at the double act of the recitation of the poem and the "re-citation" of prior gestures, the temporality of both the single poem and lyric discourse will come into focus.
Das Zentrum und den Ausgangspunkt von Katja Diefenbachs Beitrag "'Conatus' versus 'cogito'" bildet, wie der Untertitel anzeigt, "der Streit um Spinozas spekulativen Materialismus in der postmarxistischen Philosophie". Sie stellt die kritischen Positionen Badious und Žižeks vor und diskutiert die unterschiedlichen Anknüpfungen an Spinoza in der postmarxistischen Philosophie bei Negri und Agamben, macht aber zugleich deutlich, dass sich ihre eigene Auslegung der Philosophie von Spinoza und des Conatusprinzips an Deleuze orientiert. So geht sie mit Deleuze davon aus, dass Spinoza das Sein als unendliche Potentialitätsdifferenz begreift, in dem der Mensch nichts anderes ist als "Handelnd-Werden, Vermögend-Werden, Verursachend-Werden, das eine Reihe kritischer Wendepunkte umfasst." Sie betont, dass die Struktur des Conatusprinzips anarchisch und nichtvorschreibend ist und genau deswegen einen Primat der Politik begründe, in dem es nicht um den Sprung in die Freuden des Denkens gehe, sondern um die Ungarantiertheit dieses Sprungs.
By focusing on Pasolini's uncompleted film project "San Paolo", Luca Di Blasi's article 'One Divided by Another: Split and Conversion in Pasolini's "San Paolo"' analyzes the notion of split (the split in the structure of time and, above all, the split of the figure of Paul) and concentrates especially on the very moment of Paul's Damascene conversion. Di Blasi refers to the "Kippbild" as a model that can be used to understand better certain ambivalences in Pasolini's Paul. Locating Pasolini's reading of the founder of the Church in a triangulation with two major contemporary philosophers, Alain Badiou and Giorgio Agamben, Di Blasi shows that two opposing possibilities of interpreting Paul - as militant subject of a universal event and its necessary consequences (Badiou) and as representative of softness, weakness, poverty, "homo sacer" (Agamben) - fit perfectly with the two aspects of Pasolini's Paul. Pasolini's profoundly split Paul thus represents a dichotomy which disunites two major figures of contemporary leftist thought.
Manuela Marchesini brings Agamben's ideas to bear on Gadda's "Pasticciaccio" and vice versa. While preserving the specificity of their different fields of operation, this mutual exposure contributes to reframing the Culture War of yore. On the one hand, we have a novel published after World War II with a tortuous gestation and convoluted publication history and reception, written by an author who happened to outlive his creative 'canto del cigno'; on the other, a philosophical and essayistic speculation on contemporary events. The function of Dante's "Comedy" in each author spans from the textual to the allegorical, but rests upon one single crucial common denominator: both Gadda and Agamben take literature seriously. [...] The present essay, part of a larger project unfolding along the same lines, attempts a 'close reading' in the spirit that Edward Said has solicited from the humanities in his lectures at Columbia - or, to put it differently, a tentative 'exercise' of critica in the wake of modern Italian Romance philology and textual criticism from Pasquali through Contini and Debenedetti (a lineage of which Agamben's approach appears to be mindful). [...] Marchesini passes over the general Dantesque infernal allegory of "Pasticciaccio" in order to expand on its final scene. Her thesis is that "Pasticciaccio's" allegorical use of Dante's "Comedy" does not just unravel its interpretive knot. It also points to a utopian overcoming of binarism that concurs with Agamben's reflections. "Pasticciaccio's" closure is neither an epiphany (in the sense of a final celebration of the missing piece that completes the puzzle of the novel), nor does it signal a collapse into ambiguity or irrationality (in the sense that everything is left undecided, wavering between one possibility and its opposite). Gadda maintains his interpellation of wholeness unequivocally throughout the novel.